OCRIS: Online Catalogue and Repository Interoperability Study: Final Report

Birrell, Duncan and Dunsire, Gordon and Menzies, Kathleen OCRIS: Online Catalogue and Repository Interoperability Study: Final Report., 2009 [Report]


Download (766Kb) | Preview

English abstract

The aims and objectives of OCRIS were to: • Survey the extent to which repository content is in scope for institutional library OPACs, and the extent to which it is already recorded there; • Examine the interoperability of OPAC and repository software for the exchange of metadata and other information; • List the various services to institutional managers, researchers, teachers and learners offered respectively by OPACs and repositories; • Identify the potential for improvements in the links (e.g. using link resolver technology) from repositories and/or OPACs to other institutional services, such as finance or research administration; • Make recommendations for the development of possible further links between library OPACs and institutional repositories, identifying the benefits to relevant stakeholder groups. Key Findings Interoperability and services 1. Interoperability between IRs and LMSs in UK HEIs is currently rare - only 2 percent of questionnaire respondents state that their systems definitely interoperate, with a further 14 percent stating that interoperability is pending. 2. Interoperability of either of these system types with some type of other institutional system is moderately high, and is slightly higher for LMSs than IRs. 3. Interoperability between LMSs or IRs and a range of other institutional systems is limited. It cannot be said that interoperability is substantial or that a wide variety of administrative systems interoperate with any individual library system. 4. The REF has clearly been a factor in the establishment or consideration of interoperability between Institutional Repositories and other administrative systems. 5. Services stemming from library systems are limited and narrow, excepting the generation of usage statistics and metadata enhancement services. 6. The generation of reports for specific administrative departments is not a common service offered by either IRs or LMSs. 7. The most popular service offered by IRs remains "advice on Open Access" suggesting perhaps that they are still in their infancy, still require explanation thus have yet to spread their wings in terms of widening their range of services. 8. The use of metasearch/linking tools as well as web services and APIs is moderately popular within LMSs and IRs; the data gathered is not sufficient to discern why or what these tools and services are being used for.

Item type: Report
Keywords: catalogues, library management systems, metadata;, OPACs, repositories
Subjects: H. Information sources, supports, channels. > HS. Repositories.
H. Information sources, supports, channels. > HM. OPACs.
Depositing user: Elinor Toland
Date deposited: 15 Jan 2010
Last modified: 14 Dec 2012 21:39
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/13187


"SEEK" links will first look for possible matches inside E-LIS and query Google Scholar if no results are found.

Ashworth, S. (2004). Glasgow University institutional repositories: a case study. Presentation available online at: www.lmba.lt/ppt/SusanAshworth.ppt [Accessed 06 August 2009].

Baars, C., Dijk, E., Hogenaar, A. and van Meel, M. (2006). Creating an Academic Information Domain: a Dutch Example. In Bosnjak, A., and Stempfhuber, M. (Eds.). In Proceedings: Get the Good CRIS Going: Ensuring Quality of Services for the User in the ERA. 9th International Conference on Current Research Information Systems. 5-7 June 2008, Maribor, Slovenia, pp.75-85.

http://www.onderzoekinformatie.nl/nl/oi/papers/crisaid/%5C%5Camsterdam.knaw.net%5Cbureau%2 4%5Chome%5Cchrisb%5CMaribor%5CPaper+EUROCRIS+2008.pdf [Accessed 4th September, 2009].

Chaudhri, T. (2009). Assessing FRBR in Dublin Core Application Profiles. In Ariadne. Issue 58. January 2009. Online at: http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue58/chaudhri/ [Accessed 11th September, 2009].

Freire, N., Borbinha, J. and Martins, B. (2008). Consolidation of References to Persons in Bibliographic Databases. In Proceedings of the 2008 International Conference on Asia-Pacific Digital Libraries, 2-5 December, 2008, Bali, Indonesia. Online at:

http://www.springerlink.com/content/m8114g7583367087/fulltext.pdf [Accessed 19th September, 2009].

Green (2007). RepoMMan Final Project Report: September 2007. Online at: http://ierepository.jisc.ac.uk/125/ [Accessed 30th August 2009].

Higher Education Funding Council for England. (2009). Bibliometrics. See:

http://www.hefce.ac.uk/research/ref/Biblio/ [Accessed 2nd September, 2009].

House of Commons Science and Technology Committee. (2004). Scientific Publications: Free for All? In 10th Report of Session 2003-04, vol. 1: Report, HC 399-1, London: The Stationary Office, July 20, 2004). Available online at:

http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200304/cmselect/cmsctech/399/39902.htm [Accessed 17th August 2009].

IFLA. (1998). Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records, Final Report by the IFLA Study Group on the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records. München : K.G. Saur.

IFLA. (2007). International standard bibliographic description (ISBD). Recommended by the ISBD Review Group; approved by the Standing Committee of the IFLA Cataloguing Section. Preliminary consolidated edition. München : K.G. Saur.

JISC and SCONUL. (2008). 'Appendix II – Vendor Profiles'. In JISC & SCONUL Library Management Systems Study. An Evaluation and horizon scan of the current library management systems and related systems landscape for UK higher education. Compiled by Sero Consulting Ltd., Glenaffric Ltd., and Ken Chad Consulting Ltd. pp.120-156. Online at:

www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/programmes/resourcediscovery/lmsstudy.pdf [Accessed 06 August 2009].

JISC. (2009a). Metadata Enrichment for Repositories in a London Institutional Network. Online at:

http://www.ucl.ac.uk/ls/merlin/about.shtml [Accessed 2nd September, 2009].

JISC (2009b). Enlighten and Research Integration. Online at:

http://www.jisc.ac.uk/whatwedo/programmes/inf11/enrich.aspx [Accessed 2nd September, 2009].

JISC. (2009c). Institutional Scholarly comms with integrated publication sharing. Online at:

http://www.jisc.ac.uk/whatwedo/programmes/vre/insscol.aspx [Accessed 26th August, 2009].

Joint Steering Committee for Development of RDA. (2009). Full Draft of Resource Description and Access. Online at: http://www.rda-jsc.org/rdafulldraft.html [Accessed 9th September, 2009].

LibX. (2009). LibX - a Browser Plug-In for Libraries. [Accessed 3rd October, 2009].

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item