Open Access Dissemination Challenges: A Case Study

Young, Philip Open Access Dissemination Challenges: A Case Study. OCLC Systems & Services, 2009, vol. 25, n. 2. [Journal article (Unpaginated)]


Download (50kB) | Preview

English abstract

This paper explores dissemination, broadly considered, of an open access (OA) database as part of a librarian-faculty collaboration currently in progress. Metadata optimization for cataloging, repository submission, and search engines is examined, as are user notification methods. Libraries should consider their role in scholarly publishing, develop workflows to enable it, and extend their efforts to the web.

Item type: Journal article (Unpaginated)
Keywords: open access, metadata optimization, dissemination, search engine indexing
Subjects: I. Information treatment for information services > IA. Cataloging, bibliographic control.
B. Information use and sociology of information > BG. Information dissemination and diffusion.
H. Information sources, supports, channels. > HL. Databases and database Networking.
Depositing user: Philip Young
Date deposited: 10 Jun 2009
Last modified: 02 Oct 2014 12:14


ACRL (2007), “Establishing a research agenda for scholarly communication: a call for community engagement”, available at:

Beall, J. (2006), “The death of metadata”, The Serials Librarian, Vol. 51, No. 2.

Bosworth, A. (2007), “Google is destroying the web and you don’t even know it”, available at:

Brooks, T.A. (2004), “The nature of meaning in the age of Google”, Information Research, Vol. 9 No. 3, paper 180, available at:

Brown, L., Griffiths, R., and Rascoff, M. (2007), “University publishing in a digital age”, Ithaka Report, available at:

Davis, P.M. and Connolly, M.J.L. (2007) “Institutional repositories: evaluating the reasons for non-use of Cornell University’s installation of DSpace”, D-Lib Magazine, Vol. 13 No. 3/4, available at:

Dawson, A. (2004), “Creating metadata that works for digital libraries and Google”, Library Review, Vol. 53, No. 27, pp. 347-350, available at:

Dawson, A. (2005), “Optimising publications for Google users”, pp. 177-194, in Miller, W. and Pellen, R.M. (eds.), Libraries and Google, Haworth Press, Binghamton, N.Y.

Dawson, A. and Hamilton, V. (2006), “Optimising metadata to make high-value content more accessible to Google users”, Journal of Documentation, Vol. 62 No. 3, pp. 307-327

De Rosa, C. et al., (2006), College Students’ Perceptions of Libraries and Information Resources, OCLC, Dublin, Ohio.

Dornfest, R., Bausch, P. and Calishain, T. (2006), Google Hacks (3rd ed.), O’Reilly, Sebastopol, Calif.

Google (2007), “Webmaster guidelines”, available at:

Grafton, A. (2007), “Future reading: digitization and its discontents”, The New Yorker, available at:

Harris, J. (2007), “Messing around with metadata”, Open, [New York Times blog], available at:

Hood, A.K. (2007), “Open Access Resources: Executive Summary”, SPEC Kit 300, pp. 11-14, Association of Research Libraries, Washington, D.C., available at:

Hunter, P. and Guy, M. (2004), “Metadata for harvesting: the Open Archives Initiative, and how to find things on the Web”, Electronic Library, Vol. 22 No. 2, pp. 168-174, available at:

Inger, S. (2004), "Google vs traditional information services: a comparison of search results", National Federation of Abstracting and Indexing Services (NFAIS), 22 February, available at:

Jorgensen, P. (2005), “Citations in hypermedia: implementation issues”, Information Technology and Libraries, Vol. 24 No. 4, available at:

Kahn, D. and Drey, J. (2002), "Finding Chemical Information on the Web - the User's Viewpoint", Free Pint, Issue 109, available at:

Lally, A.M. and Dunford, C.E. (2007), “Using Wikipedia to extend digital collections”, D-Lib Magazine, Vol. 13 No. 5/6, available at:

Library of Congress (2005), “Web Cataloging Assistant”, Bibliographic Enrichment Advisory Team, available at:

Manuel, S. and Oppenheim, C. (2007), “Googlepository and the university library”, Ariadne, Issue 53, available at

Mattison, D. (2006), “The digital humanities revolution”, Searcher, Vol. 14, No. 5, pp. 25-34.

Moffat, M. (2006), “Marketing with metadata—how metadata can increase exposure and visibility of online content”, New Review of Information Networking, Vol. 12, Nos. 1-2, pp. 23-40.

Morgan, E.L. (2004), “Open access publishing”, available at

Morville, P. (2005), Ambient findability, O’Reilly, Sebastapol, Calif.

OAI (2007), “Open Archives Initiative announces public meeting on March 3, 2008 to release Object Reuse and Exchange specifications”, press release available at:

OAIster (2007), “How to become a data contributor”, available at:

OCLC (2004), The 2003 OCLC Environmental Scan: Pattern recognition, OCLC, Dublin, Ohio.

OCLC (2007), “Cataloging: Create Bibliographic Records”, OCLC Connexion Client Guides, pp. 15-23, available at

OCLC (2007a), E-mail from OCLC Connexion-Support, August 20, 2007.

OCLC (2007b), “Attach digital content to WorldCat records”, available at:

Rieh, S.Y., Markey, K., St. Jean, B., Yakel, E., and Kim, J. (2007), “Census of institutional repositories in the U.S.: a comparison across institutions at different stages of IR development”, D-Lib Magazine, Vol. 13 No. 11/12, available at:

Rusch-Feja, D. (2002), “The Open Archives Initiative and the OAI Protocol for Metadata Harvesting: rapidly forming a new tier in the scholarly communication infrastructure”, Learned Publishing, Vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 179-186.

SHERPA (2006), “Fifteen common concerns- and clarifications”, available at:

Smith, M., Barton, M., Bass, M., Branschofsky, M., McClellan, G., Stuve, D., Tansley, R., and Walker, J.H. (2003), “DSpace: an open source dynamic digital repository”, D-Lib Magazine, Vol. 9 No. 1, available at:

Smith-Yoshimura, K. (2007), “RLG Programs Descriptive Metadata Practices Survey Results”, OCLC Programs and Research, available at:

Sowards, S.W. (1999), “Practical lessons for small-scale web publishers”, Journal of Electronic Publishing, Vol. 5, Issue 2, available at:

Su, S.T., Long, Y. and Cromwell, D.E., (2002), “Metadata by crawling E-publications”, Information Technology and Libraries, Vol. 21 No. 4, available at:

Suber, P. (2004), “Open access in the humanities”, SPARC Open Access Newsletter, Issue 70, available at

Suber, P. (2004a), “The case for OAI in the age of Google”, SPARC Open Access Newsletter, Issue 73, available at

Suber, P. (2007), “Open Access overview”, available at:

Sullivan, D. (2002), “Death of a meta tag”, available at

Tenopir, C. (2004), “Is Google the competition?”, Library Journal, Issue 6, available at:

Ward, J. (2004), “Unqualified Dublin Core usage in OAI-PMH data providers”, OCLC Systems & Services, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 40-47.

Weibel, S.L. (2005), “Border crossings: reflections on a decade of metadata consensus building”, D-Lib Magazine, Vol. 11 No. 7/8, available at:

Weideman, M. and Schwenke, F. (2006), “The influence that JavaScript has on the visibility of a website to search engines- a pilot study”, Information Research, Vol. 11 No. 4, available at


Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item