h-index: A Review Focused in its Variants, Computation and Standardization for Different Scientific Fields

Alonso, Sergio and Cabrerizo, Francisco Javier and Herrera Viedma, Enrique and Herrera , Francisco h-index: A Review Focused in its Variants, Computation and Standardization for Different Scientific Fields. Journal of Informetrics, 2009, n. doi:10. (In Press) [Journal article (Paginated)]

[img]
Preview
PDF
hIndexReviewAlonsoCabrerizoHerrera-Viedma.pdf

Download (361kB) | Preview

English abstract

The h-index and some related bibliometric indices have received a lot of attention from the scientific community in the last few years due to some of their good properties (easiness of computation, balance between quantity of publications and their impact and so on). Many different indicators have been developed in order to extend and overcome the drawbacks of the original Hirsch proposal. In this contribution we present a comprehensive review on the h-index and related indicators field. From the initial h-index proposal we study their main advantages, drawbacks and the main applications that we can find in the literature. A description of many of the h-related indices that have been developed along with their main characteristics and some of the works that analyze and compare them are presented. We also review the most up to date standardization studies that allow a fair comparison by means of the h-index among scientists from different research areas and finally, some works that analyze the computation of the h-index and related indices by using different citation databases (ISI Citation Indexes, Google Scholar and Scopus) are introduced.

Item type: Journal article (Paginated)
Keywords: h-Index, Bibliometric indicators
Subjects: B. Information use and sociology of information > BB. Bibliometric methods
Depositing user: Enrique Herrera-Viedma
Date deposited: 02 Jul 2009
Last modified: 02 Oct 2014 12:14
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/13282

References

Alcaide, G., Gomez, M., Zurian, J., & Benavent, R. (2008). Scientific literature by spanish authors on the analysis of citations and impact factor in biomedicine 1981–2005. Revista Española de Documentation Cientifica, 31(3), 344–365.

Alonso, S., Cabrerizo, F., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (in press). hg-index: A new index to characterize the scientific output of researchers based on the h-and g- indices. Scientometrics.

Anderson, T., Hankin, K., & Killworth, P. (2008). Beyond the durfee square: Enhancing the h-index to score total publication output. Scientometrics, 76(3), 577–588.

Arencibia-Jorge, R., Barrios-Almaguer, I., Fernandez-Hernandez, S., & Carvajal-Espino, R. (2008). Applying successive h indices in the institutional evaluation: A case study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(1), 155–157.

Ball, P. (2005). Index aims for fair ranking of scientists. Nature, 436, 900.

Banks, M. (2006). An extension of the Hirsch index: Indexing scientific topics and compounds. Scientometrics, 69(1), 161–168.

Bar-Ilan, J. (2008a). The h-index of h-index and of other informetric topics. Scientometrics, 75(3), 591–605.

Bar-Ilan, J. (2008b). Which h-index?—A comparison ofWoS, Scopus and Google Scholar. Scientometrics, 74(2), 257–271.

Batista, P., Campiteli, M., Kinouchi, O., & Martinez, A. (2006). Is it possible to compare researchers with different scientific interests? Scientometrics, 68 (1),179–189.

Bornmann, L., & Daniel, H. (2005). Does the h-index for ranking of scientists really work? Scientometrics, 65(3), 391–392.

Bornmann, L., & Daniel, H. (2007a). Convergent validation of peer review decisions using the h index: extent of and reasons for type i and type ii errors. Journal of Informetrics, 1(3), 204–213.

Bornmann, L., & Daniel, H. (2007b). What do we know about the h-index? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(9), 1381–1385.

Bornmann, L., & Daniel, H. (2009). The state of h index research is the h index the ideal way to measure research performance? EMBO Reports, 10(1), 2–6.

Bornmann, L., Marx,W., & Schier, H. (2009). Hirsch-type index values for organic chemistry journals: A comparison of newmetrics with the journal impact factor. European Journal of Organic Chemistry, 10, 1471–1476.

Bornmann, L., Mutz, R., & Daniel, H. (2008). Are there better indices for evaluation purposes than the h-index? A comparison of nine different variants of the h-index using data from biomedicine. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(5), 830–837.

Bornmann, L., Wallon, G., & Ledin, A. (2008). Is the h-index related to (standard) measures and to the assessments by peers? An investigation of the h-index by using molecular life sciences data. Research Evaluation, 17(2), 149–156.

Braun, T., Glanzel,W., & Schubert, A. (2006). A Hirsch-type index for journals. Scientometrics, 69(1), 169–173.

Burrell, Q. (2007). On the h-index, the size of the Hirsch core and Jin’s A-index. Journal of Informetrics, 1(2), 170–177.

Costas, R., & Bordons, M. (2007). Advantages, limitations and its relation with other bibliometric indicators at the micro level. Journal of Informetrics, 1(3), 193–203.

Costas, R., & Bordons, M. (2008). Is g-index better than h-index? An exploratory study at the individual level. Scientometrics, 77(2), 267–288.

Cronin, B.,& Meho, L. (2006). Using the h-index to rank influential information scientists. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(9), 1275–1278.

Csajbok, E., Berhidi, A., Vasas, L., & Schubert, A. (2007). Hirsch-index for countries based on Essential Science Indicators data. Scientometrics, 73(1), 91–117.

Eck, N. V., & Waltman, L. (2008). Generalizing the h- and g-indices. Journal of Informetrics, 2(4), 263–271.

Egghe, L. (2006). Theory and practice of the g-index. Scientometrics, 69(1), 131–152.

Egghe, L. (2008a). Examples of simple transformations of the h-index: Qualitative and quantitative conclusions and consequences for other indices. Journal of Informetrics, 2(2), 136–148.

Egghe, L. (2008b). The influence of merging on h-type indices. Journal of Informetrics, 2(3), 252–262.

Egghe, L. (2008c). The influence of transformations on the h-index and the g-index. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(8), 1304–1312.

Egghe, L. (2008d). Mathematical theory of the h- and g-index in case of fractional counting of authorship. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(10), 1608–1616.

Egghe, L. (2008e). Modelling successive h-indices. Scientometrics, 77(3), 377–387.

Egghe, L. (2009). Mathematical study of h-index sequences. Information Processing & Management, 45(2), 288–297.

Egghe, L., & Rao, I. (2008). Study of different h-indices for groups of authors. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(8), 1276–1281.

Egghe, L., & Rousseau, R. (2006). An informetric model for the Hirsch-index. Scientometrics, 69(1), 121–129.

Egghe, L., & Rousseau, R. (2008). An h-index weighted by citation impact. Information Processing & Management, 44(2), 770–780.

Engqvist, L. J. F. (2008). The h-index and self-citations. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 23(5), 250–252.

Glanzel,W. (2008a). h-Index concatenation. Scientometrics, 77(2), 369–372.

Glanzel,W. (2008b). On some new bibliometric applications of statistics related to the h-index. Scientometrics, 77(1), 187–196.

Glanzel,W., & Moed, H. (2002). Journal impact measures in bibliometric research. Scientometrics, 53(2), 171–193.

Google Scholar (online resource). http://scholar.google.com/

Guan, J., & Gao, X. (2008). Comparison and evaluation of Chinese research performance in the field of bioinformatics. Scientometrics, 75(2), 357–379.

Guns, R., & Rousseau, R. (2009a). Simulating growth of the h-index. Journal of Informetrics, 3, 64–71.

Guns, R., & Rousseau, R. (2009b). Simulating growth of the h-index. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(2), 410–417.

Hirsch, J. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research out-put. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102, 16569–16572.

Hirsch, J. (2007). Does the h-index have predictive power? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 19193–19198.

Iglesias, J., & Pecharroman, C. (2007). Scaling the h-index for different scientific ISI fields. Scientometrics, 73(3), 303–320.

Imperial, J., & Rodriguez-Navarro, A. (2007). Usefulness of hirsch’s h-index to evaluate scientific research in Spain. Scientometrics, 71(2), 271–282.

ISIWeb of Science (online resource). http://isiwebofknowledge.com/products tools/multidisciplinary/webofscience/

Jacsó, P. (2008a). The plausibility of computing the h-index of scholarly productivity and impact using reference-enhanced databases. Online Information Review, 32(2), 266–283.

Jacsó, P. (2008b). The pros and cons of computing the h-index using Google Scholar. Online Information Review, 32(3), 437–452.

Jacsó, P. (2008c). Testing the calculation of a realistic h-index in Google Scholar, Scopus, andWeb of Science for F.W. Lancaster. Library Trends, 56(4), 784–815.

Jin, B. (2006). h-Index: An evaluation indicator proposed by scientist. Science Focus, 1(1), 8–9.

Jin, B. (2007). The AR-index: complementing the h-index. ISSI Newsletter, 3(1), 6.

Kelly, C., & Jennions, M. (2006). The h-index and career assessment by numbers. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 21(4), 167–170.

Kosmulski, M. (2006). A new Hirsch-type index saves time and works equally well as the original h-index. ISSI Newsletter, 2(3), 4–6.

Leeuwen, T. V., Visser,M., Moed, H., Nederhof, T., & Raan, A. V. (2003). The holy grail of science policy: Exploring and combining bibliometric tools in search of scientific excellence. Scientometrics, 57(2), 257–280.

Lehmann, S., Jackson, A., & Lautrup, B. (2008). A quantitative analysis of indicators of scientific performance. Scientometrics, 76(2), 369–390.

Leydesdorff, L. (2008). Caveats for the use of citation indicators in research and journal evaluations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(2), 278–287.

Liang, B. J. L., Rousseau, R., & Egghe, L. (2007). The R- and AR-indices: Complementing the h-index. Chinese Science Bulletin, 52(6), 855–863.

Liang, L. (1996). h-Index sequence and h-index matrix: Constructions and applications. Scientometrics, 69(1), 153–159.

Liu, Y., & Rousseau, R. (2008). Definitions of time series in citation analysis with special attention to the h-index. Journal of Informetrics, 2(3), 202–210.

Martin, B. (1996). The use of multiple indicators in the assessment of basic research. Scientometrics, 36(3), 343–362.

Meho, L., & Rogers, Y. (2008). Citation counting, citation ranking, and h-index of human–computer interaction researchers: A comparison of Scopus and Web of Science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(11), 1711–1726.

Meho, L., & Yang, K. (2007). Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty:Web of Science versus Scopus and Google Scholar. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(13), 2105–2125.

Molinari, A., & Molinari, J. (2008). Mathematical aspects of a new criterion for ranking scientific institutions based on the h-index. Scientometrics, 75(2), 339–356.

Molinari, J., & Molinari, A. (2008). A new methodology for ranking scientific institutions. Scientometrics, 75(1), 163–174.

Mugnaini, R., Packer, A., & Meneghini, R. (2008). Comparison of scientists of the Brazilian Academy of Sciences and of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA on the basis of the h-index. Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research, 41(4), 258–262.

Neuhaus, C., & Daniel, H. (2008). Data sources for performing citation analysis—An overview. Journal of Documentation, 64(2), 193–210.

Oppenheim, C. (2007). Using the h-index to rank influential British researchers in information science and librarianship. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(2), 297–301.

Pinski, G., & Narin, F. (1976). Citation influence for journal aggregates of scientific publications: Theory, with application to the literature of physics. Information Processing and Management, 12(5), 297–312.

Plomp, R. (1994). The highly cited papers of professors as an indicator of a research group’s scientific performance. Scientometrics, 29(3), 377–393.

Podlubny, I. (2005). Comparison of scientific impact expressed by the number of citations in different fields of science. Scientometrics, 64(1), 95–99.

Podlubny, I., & Kassayova, K. (2006). Law of the constant ratio. towards a better list of citation superstars: compiling a multidisciplinary list of highly cited researchers. Research Evaluation, 15(3), 154–162.

Purvis, A. (2006). The h index: playing the numbers game. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 21(8), 422.

Raan, A. V. (2006). Comparison of the Hirsch-index with standard bibliometric indicators and with peer judgment for 147 chemistry research groups. Scientometrics, 67(3), 491–502.

Radicchi, F., Fortunato, S., & Castellano, C. (2008). Universality of citation distributions: toward an objective measure of scientific impact. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(45), 17268–17272.

Rousseau, R. (1992). Why am I not cited or why are multi-authored papers more cited then others? Journal of Documentation, 48, 79–80.

Rousseau, R. (2006). New developments related to the Hirsch index, Industrial Sciences and Technology, Belgium. Available at http://eprints.rclis.org/6376/

Rousseau, R. (2007). The influence of missing publications on the Hirsch index. Journal of Informetrics, 1(1), 2–7.

Rousseau, R. (2008).Woeginger’s axiomatisation of the h-index and its relation to the g-index, the h(2)-index and the r2-index. Journal of Informetrics, 2(4), 263–372.

Rousseau, R., & Ye, F. (2008). A proposal for a dynamic h-type index. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(11), 1853–1855.

Ruane, F., & Tol, R. (2008). Rational (successive) h-indices: An application to economics in the Republic of Ireland. Scientometrics, 75(2), 395–405.

Salgado, J., & Paez, D. (2007). Scientific productivity and Hirsch’s h-index of Spanish social psychology: Convergence between productivity indexes and comparison with other areas. Psicothema, 19(2), 179–189.

Schreiber, M. (2007a). A case study of the Hirsch index for 26 non-prominent physicists. Annalen der Physik, 16(9), 640–652.

Schreiber, M. (2007b). Self-citation corrections for the Hirsch index. EPL (Euro-physics Letters), 78(3), 30002.

Schreiber, M. (2008a). An empirical investigation of the g-index for 26 physicists in comparison with the h-index, the a-index, and the r-index. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(9), 1513–1522.

Schreiber, M. (2008b). The influence of self-citation corrections on Egghe’s g-index. Scientometrics, 76(1), 187–200.

Schreiber, M. (2008c). A modification of the h-index: The h(m)-index accounts for multi-authored manuscripts. Journal of Informetrics, 2(3), 211–216.

Schreiber, M. (2008d). To share the fame in a fair way, hm for multi-authored manuscripts. New Journal of Physics, 10(040201), 1–9.

Schubert, A. (2007). Successive h-indices. Scientometrics, 70(1), 201–205.

Schubert, A., & Glanzel,W. (1983). Statistical reliability of comparisons based on the citation impact of scientific publications. Scientometrics, 5, 59–74.

Schubert, A., & Glanzel,W. (2007). A systematic analysis of Hirsch-type indices for journals. Journal of Informetrics, 1(3), 179–256.

Scopus (online resource). http://www.scopus.com/

Sidiropoulos, A., Katsaros, D., & Manolopoulos, Y. (2007). Generalized hirsch h-index for disclosing latent facts in citation networks. Scientometrics, 72(2), 253–280.

Torra, V., & Narukawa, Y. (2008). The h-index and the number of citations: Two fuzzy integrals. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 16(3), 795–797.

Van Leeuwen, T. (2008). Testing the validity of the hirsch-index for research assessment purposes. Research Evaluation, 17(2), 157–160.

Vanclay, J. (2007). On the robustness of the h-index. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(10), 1547–1550.

Vanclay, J. (2008). Ranking forestry journals using the h-index. Journal of Informetrics, 2(4), 326–334.

Vinkler, P. (1996). Some practical aspects of the standarization of scientometric indicators. Scientometrics, 35(2), 237–245.

Vinkler, P. (2004). Characterization of the impact of sets of scientific papers: The garfield (impact) factor. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(5), 431–435.

Vinkler, P. (2007). Eminence of scientists in the light of the h-index and other scientometric indicators. Journal of Information Science, 33(4), 481–491.

Wendl, M. (2007). h-index: However ranked, citations need context. Nature, 449(7161), 403–1403.

Woeginger, G. (2008a). An axiomatic analysis of Egghe’s g-index. Journal of Informetrics, 2(4), 364–368.

Woeginger, G. (2008b). An axiomatic characterization of the Hirsch-index. Mathematical Social Sciences, 56(2), 224–232.

Woeginger, G. (2008c). A symmetry axiom for scientific impact indices. Journal of Informetrics, 2(4), 298–303.

Ye, F., & Rousseau, R. (2008). The power law model and total career h-index sequences. Journal of Informetrics, 2(4), 288–297.

Zhivotovsky, L., & Krutovsky, K. (2008). Self-citation can inflate h-index. Sciento-metrics, 77(2), 373–375.


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item