Being a Critical Professional: The Importance of Post‐Publication Peer Review in Evidence Based Library and Information Practice

Kloda, Lorie A. Being a Critical Professional: The Importance of Post‐Publication Peer Review in Evidence Based Library and Information Practice. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 2009, vol. 4, n. 3, pp. 72-74. [Journal article (Paginated)]

[img]
Preview
 PDF
Kloda.pdf
Download (195kB) | Preview

English abstract

n/a

Item type: Journal article (Paginated)
Keywords: evidence based librarianship, evidence based practice, critical appraisal, peer review
Subjects: A. Theoretical and general aspects of libraries and information. > AA. Library and information science as a field.
B. Information use and sociology of information > BG. Information dissemination and diffusion.
Depositing user: Lorie A. Kloda
Date deposited: 22 Sep 2009
Last modified: 02 Oct 2014 12:15
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/13587

References

Brower, Stewart. “Why Peer Review?” Communications in Information Literacy 2.2 (Fall 2008): 62‐3.

Gilbert, Natasha. “Editor Will Quit Over Hoax Paper.” Nature News (June 19 2009). <http://www.nature.com/news/2009/090615/full/news.2009.571.html>

Singer, Natasha. “Medical Papers by Ghostwriters Pushed Therapy.” New York Times (August 4, 2009). <http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/05/health/research/05ghost.html>

Weller, Ann C. Editorial Peer Review: Its Strengths and Weaknesses. Medford, NJ: Information Today, 2001.

Zuckerman, Harriet and Robert K. Merton. “Patterns of Evaluation in Science: Institutionalisation, Structure and Functions of the Referee System.” Minerva 9.1 (1971): 66‐100.


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
Contact us
Send email Sponsors
Sponsor: AIMS Sponsor: D&P Sponsor: UniNa CAB Get connected
Facebook Facebook Twitter Twitter Linkedin LinkedIn RSS RSS