Open Their Eyes: How the Open Access Movement has Changed the Scholarly Publishing World for Academics

Driscoll, Margaret A. Open Their Eyes: How the Open Access Movement has Changed the Scholarly Publishing World for Academics., 2009 [Preprint]


Download (239kB) | Preview

English abstract

The scholarly publishing world is somewhat secretive and mysterious, at least to those who exist outside of it. Even newly tenured college faculty members have been confused by the process and impact of publishing. For many years there have been specific procedures for conducting research in the sciences and humanities, and even more specific policies for writing, submitting, and having one’s end product accepted. Scholars must also consider the role of publishing in their career advancement, from meeting tenure requirements to being considered for merit promotion. The value of various publishing venues is discipline-specific, which can be confusing in an ever-growing interdisciplinary world. Additionally, academic scholars have had to rely on traditional impact factors (citation counts) of various journals as indicators of how likely their research would be taken forward and cited in subsequent research. The world of scholarly publishing is currently experiencing a significant upheaval. The Open Access (OA) movement specifically has been made possible by developing technologies that allow for digital delivery of documents. While providing free access to scholarship, some aspects of publishing in OA journals have proven challenging to scholars, while other aspects of OA journals provide compelling incentives as publishing venues. Librarians act on behalf of scholars; but in addition to assisting with resources, librarians can also provide information and eye-opening insights regarding the changing landscape of scholarly publishing.

Item type: Preprint
Keywords: open access, scholarly publishing, peer review
Subjects: B. Information use and sociology of information > BG. Information dissemination and diffusion.
E. Publishing and legal issues. > EB. Printing, electronic publishing, broadcasting.
E. Publishing and legal issues. > ED. Intellectual property: author's rights, ownership, copyright, copyleft, open access.
B. Information use and sociology of information > BA. Use and impact of information.
Depositing user: Margaret A. Driscoll
Date deposited: 06 Nov 2009
Last modified: 02 Oct 2014 12:15


Armbruster, C. (2009). Whose Metrics? On Building Citation, Usage and Access Metrics as Information Service for Scholars. SSRN eLibrary. Retrieved October 16, 2009, from

Banks, M. A., & Dellavalle, R. (2008). Emerging Alternatives to the Impact Factor. OCLC Systems & Services, 24(3), 167-173.

Bergman, B. (2009, October 2). A ‘Public Option’ for Scholarship. UC Berkeley News. Newsletter, . Retrieved October 16, 2009, from

Bhat, M. H. (2009). Effect of Peer Review on Citations in the Open Access Environment. Library Philosophy & Practice, 11(1), 1-6.

Carr-Chellman, A. A. (2006). Where Do Educational Technologists Really Publish? An Examination of Successful Emerging Scholars Publication Outlets. British Journal of Educational Technology, 37(1), 5-15.

Cassella, M., & Calvi, L. (2009, August). New Journal Models and Publishing Perspectives in the Evolving Digital Environment. Presented at the IFLA General Conference, Conference Presentation, Milan, Italy.

Compact for OA Publishing Equity - The Compact. (n.d.). . Retrieved October 16, 2009, from

Cornwell, R., & Suber, P. (2008). Perspective on Open-Access Publishing: An Interview with Peter Suber. Innovate: Journal of Online Education, 4(4). Retrieved October 9, 2009, from

Declaring Independence (SPARC). (2001). SPARC (the Scholarly Publishing & Academic Resources Coalition). Retrieved October 26, 2009, from

Directory of Open Access Journals Reaches a Milestone. (2006). Information Today, 23(3), 3.

DOAJ Titles — Pass 2,000. (2006). Information Outlook, 10(5), 9.

Harnad, S. (2003). The Research‐Impact Cycle. Information Services & Use, 23(2/3), 139.

Harnad, S., & Brody, T. (2004). Comparing the Impact of Open Access (OA) vs. Non-OA Articles in the Same Journals. D-Lib Magazine, 10(6), online.

Hemmings, B. C., Rushbrook, P., & Smith, E. (2007). Academics' Views on Publishing Refereed Works: A Content Analysis. Higher Education: The International Journal of Higher Education and Educational Planning, 54(2), 307-332.

Hynes, G. E., & Stretcher, R. H. (2005). Business Schools' Policies Regarding Publications in Electronic Journals. Journal of Education for Business, 81, 73.

de Kemp, A., Pöschl, U., & Koop, T. (2008). Interactive Open Access Publishing and Collaborative Peer Review for Improved Scientific Communication and Quality Assurance. Information Services & Use, 28(2), 105-107.

Kiernan, V. (2000). Rewards Remain Dim for Professors Who Pursue Digital Scholarship. Chronicle of Higher Education, 46(34), A45-46.

Lamphere, P., Reinke, K., & Papanek, M. (1999). Electronic Journals, Scholarship, and Tenure: Paving the Way for New Policies in Higher Education. Retrieved October 9, 2009, from

Lyman, P. (1997). Digital Documents and the Future of the Academic Community. Retrieved October 9, 2009, from

Magnan, S. S. (2007). Commentary: The Promise of Digital Scholarship in SLA Research and Language Pedagogy. Language Learning & Technology, 11(3), 152-155.

Maron, N. L., Smith, K. K., & Association of Research Libraries. (2008). Current Models of Digital Scholarly Communication: Results of an Investigation Conducted by Ithaka for the Association of Research Libraries. Association of Research Libraries. Retrieved October 9, 2009, from

Mercieca, P., & Macauley, P. (2008). A New Era of Open Access? Australian Academic & Research Libraries, 39(4), 243-252.

Mulligan, A., Akerman, R., Granier, B., Tamber, P. S., & Pöschl, U. (2008). Quality, Certification and Peer Review. Information Services & Use, 28(3/4), 197-214.

Newmark, P. (2003). Peer Review and the Rewards of Open Access. Nature, 422(6933), 661.

Olson, G. A. (2008). Certifying Online Research. Chronicle of Higher Education, 54(39), C2.

Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey - Office of the President. (n.d.). Academic Reappointments/Promotions. Retrieved October 13, 2009, from

Ryder, M. (1997). Print vs. Online Scholarly Publishing: Notes and Reflections on the Peer Review Process. Retrieved October 9, 2009, from

Saxby, C., Creaser, C., Nicholas, D., Huntington, P., & Jamali, H. R. (2006). Assessing the Impact of Open Access: Preliminary Findings from Oxford Journals. Oxford Journals. Retrieved October 16, 2009, from

Speier, C., Palmer, J., Wren, D., & Hahn, S. (1999). Faculty Perceptions of Electronic Journals as Scholarly Communication: A Question of Prestige and Legitimacy. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(6), 537-43.

Suber, P. (2008, April 30). Lists Related to the Open Access Movement. Lists Related to The Open Access Movement. Retrieved October 26, 2009, from

Suber, P. (2009, February 9). Timeline of the Open Access Movement. Timeline of the Open Access Movement. Retrieved October 13, 2009, from

Sweeney, A. E. (2001). E-Scholarship and Electronic Publishing in the Twenty-First Century: Implications for the Academic Community. Educational Media International, 38(1), 25-38.

The Effect of Open Access and Downloads ('Hits') on Citation Impact: A Bibliography of Studies. (n.d.). OpCit: The Open Citation Project: Reference linking and citation analysis for Open Archives. Retrieved October 16, 2009, from

Thomas, J. (2009, September 23). Universities Work Toward Open Access to Research. Retrieved October 16, 2009, from

Webber, C. F. (2005). A Revolution in Academic Publication. Education Libraries, 28(2), 5-10.

Weller, A. C. (2000). Editorial Peer Review for Electronic Journals: Current Issues and Emerging Models. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(14), 1328-1333.

Wood, D. J. (1998). Peer Review and the Web: The Implications of Electronic Peer Review for Biomedical Authors, Referees and Learned Society Publishers. Journal of Documentation, 54(2), 173-97.

Yiotis, K. (2005). The Open Access Initiative: A New Paradigm for Scholarly Communications. Information Technology & Libraries, 24(4), 157-162.


Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item