Information and Communication Technologies and Informal Scholarly Communication: A Review of the Social Oriented Research

Crane, D. (1972)。無形學院 (The invisible college) (劉珺珺、顧昕、王德祿譯)。北京：華

夏出版社，1988。

蔡明月 (民86)。學術傳播與書目計量學。教育資料與圖書館學，35(1)，38-57

傅雅秀 (民88)。從圖書資訊學的觀點探討科學傳播。台北市：漢美。

宋麗萍、徐引篪 (民96)。基於SNA的電子無形學院結構分析。情報學報，26 (6)，902-908。

Agarwal, D.A., Sachs, S.R., & Johnston, W.E.(1998). The reality of collaboratories. Computer

Physics Communications, 110, 134-141.

Association of College & Research Libraries. (2007). Research agendas for scholarly

communication: A call for community engagement. Retrieved September 24, 2008,

from http://www.acrl.ala.org/scresearchagenda/index.php?title=Main_Page

Barjak, F. (2006). The role of the Internet in informal scholarly communication.

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(10) , 1350-1367.

Burns, S L(1997).Virtual Collaboratory, Frac City, facilitates geoscientific collaboration and

technology transfer. In Connie J. Manson., (Ed.), Costs and values of geoscience information. Proceedings of the 3Second Meeting of the Geoscience Information Society, 28, 111-115. Alexandria, Virginia: Geoscience Information Society.

Bridges, Anne E., & Clement, Russell T. (1997).Crossing the threshold of rocket mail: E-mail

use by U.S. humanities faculty. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 23, 109-117.

Brown, C. D. (2001), The role of computer-mediated communication in the research

process of music scholars: An exploratory investigation. [Electronic version] Information Research, 6(2).

Crawford, Susan.(1971). Informal communication among scientists in sleep

research . Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 22 (5), 301-310.

Callon, M.& Law, J. (1989). On the construction of sociotechnical networks: Content and

context revisited. Knowledge and Society, 8, 57-83.

Cohen J.(1996). Computer mediated communication and publication productivity among

faculty. Internet Research, 6(2-3), 41-63.

Case, D. O. (2002). Looking for Information: A Survey of Research on Information Seeking,

Needs, and Behavior. Amsterdam: Academic Press.

Cleal, B., Hans K.H., A.,. & Albrechtsen, H. (2004). Collaboration,

Communication and Categorical Complexity: A Case Study in Collaboratory Evaluation. In H. Albrechtsen, (Eds.), International Journal of Digital Information Management (JDIM), special issue on “Web-based collaboratories – from centres without walls to collaboratories in use”, 2(1), 13-20.

Dubrovsky, V. J., Kiesler, S., & Sethna, B. N. (1991). The equalization phenomenon: Status

effects in computer-mediated and face-to-face decision-making groups. Human-Computer Interaction, 6, 119–146.

Doolin, B. & Lowe, A. (2002). To reveal is to critique: Actor-network theory and critical

information systems research. Journal of Information Technology, 17, 69-78.

Finholt, T. A., & Olson, G. M. (1997). From laboratories to collaboratories: A new

organizational form for scientific collaboration. Psychological Science , 8, 28-36.

Finholt, T.A. (2002). Collaboratories. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology ,

36, 74-107.

Finholt, T.A. (2003). Collaboratories as a new form of scientific organization. Economics of

Innovation and New Technologies, 12, 5-25.

Fry & Taija(2007). The intellectual and social organization of academic fields and the

shaping of digital resources. Journal of Information Science, 33(2), 115-133.

Garvey, W. D., & Griffith, B.C. (1972). Communication and information processing within

scientific disciplines: Empirical findings for psychology. Information Storage and

Retrieval, 8, 123-136.

Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society : Outline of the theory of structuration.

Cambridge: Polity Press.

Genoni, P., Merrick, H., & Wilson, M.A. (2006). Scholarly communities, e-research literacy

and the academic librarian. The Electronic Library, 24(6), 734-746.

Hesse, B. W., Sproull, L. S., Kiesler, S. B., & Walsh, J.P. (1993). Returns to science: Computer networks in oceanography. Communications of the ACM, 36(8), 90-101.

Harzbecker, J. J., & Schilling-Eccles, K.(1998). The use of electronic mail at reference desk:

Impact of a computer-mediated communication technology on librarian-client interactions. Medical Reference Services Quarterly, 17(4), 17-27.

Hurd, J. M. (2000). The transformation of scientific communication: A model for 2020.

Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(14), 1279-1283.

Herring, S. C. (2002). Computer-mediated communication on the internet. Annual Review of

Information Science and Technology, 36, 109-168.

Hartley, James (2004). On requesting conference papers electronically. Journal of Information

Science, 30 (5), 475-479.

Kirkelas, J. (1983). Information-seeking behavior: Patterns and concepts. Drexel Library

Quarterly, 9(2). 5-20.

Kling, R. (1995). Controversies about Electronic Journals and Scholarly Communication: An

Introduction. The Information Society, 11, 243–246.

Kling, R. (1996). Social relationships in electronic forums: Hangouts, salons, workplaces, and

communities. In R. Kling, (Ed.), Computerization and Controversy (pp. 426-454). San Diego, CA : Academic Press.

Kling, R. (1999) What is social informatics and why does it matter? D-Lib Magazine, 5(1), Retrieved 2008/10/17 from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/january99/kling/01kling.html

Kling, R. (2000) Learning about information technologies and social change: the contribution of social informatics. The Information Society, 16, 217-232.

Kling, R. (2001). Social Informatics, Encyclopedia of LIS, Retrieved October 17, from

http://rkcsi.indiana.edu/archive/SI/si2001.html

Kling, R., McKim, G.., Fortuna, J., & King, A. (2000). Scientific collaboratories as socio-technical interaction networks: A theoretical approach. In Proceedings of the AMCIS, Long Beach, CA.

Kling, R., Mckim, G. & King, A. (2003). A bit more to it: Scholarly communication forums as socio-technical interaction networks. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 54(1), 47-67.

Lamb, R., & Davidson, E. (2005). Information and communication technology challenges to

scientific professional identity.[Electronic version]. Information Society, 21(1), 1-24.

Matzat, U. (2004). Academic communication and internet discussion groups: Transfer of

information or creation of social contacts? Social Networks, 26, 221-255.

Nardi, B., & O’Day, B. (1999). Information Ecologies: Using Technology with Heart. MIT

Press.

Orlikowski, W. J. (1992). The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in

organizations. Organization Science, 3(3), 398-427.

Orlikowski, W. J. (1993). CASE Tools as organizational change: Investigating incremental

and radical changes in systems development. MIS Quarterly, 17, 309–340.

Orlikowski, W. J. (2000). Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for

studying technology in organizations. Organization Science, 11(4), 404-428.

Olson, G. M., Teasley , S., Bietz ,M. J., & Cogburn, D. L.(2002). Collaboratories to support

distributed science: The example of international HIV/AIDS research, In Proceedings of the 2002 annual research conference of the South African institute of computer scientists and information technologists on Enablement through technology, September 16-18, Port Elizabeth, South Africa.

Rice, R.E. (1980). The impacts of computer-mediated organizational and interpersonal

communication. Annual Review of Information Science and technology, 15, 221-250.

Rice, R. (1994). Relating electronic mail use and network structure to RandD work networks

and performance. Journal of Management Information Systems, 1994, 11(1), 9–29.

Rojo, A., & Ragsdale, R.G.(1997). A process perspective on participation in scholarly

electronic forums. Science Communication, 18(4), 320-341.

Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. (1986). Reducing social context cues: Electronic mail in

organizational communication. Management Science, 32, 1492-1512.

Sawyer, S., & Eschenfelder, K. R. (2002). “Social informatics: Perspectives, examples, and

trends.” In B. Cronin & D. Shaw (Eds.), Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 36, 392-425.

Søndergaard, F., Andersen, J., & Hjørland, B. (2003). Documents and the

communication of scientific and scholarly information: Revising and updating the UNISIST model. Journal of Documentation , 59, 278-320.

Sonnenwald D. H., & Li B. (2003). Scientific collaboratories in higher education: Exploring

learning style preferences and perceptions of technology. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34(4), 419-431.

Schleyer, T. K L., Teasley, S. D., & Bhatnagar, R.(2005). Comparative case study of two

biomedical research collaboratories. J Med Internet Research, 7(5):e53. Retrieved October 17, doi: 10.2196/jmir.7.5.e53. from

http://www.jmir.org/2005/5/e53/.v7i5e53 [PubMed]

Walsh, J.P. (1991). The social context of technological change: The case of the retail food

industry. The Sociological Quarterly, 32 (3), 447–468.

Weedman, Judith. (1993). On the isolation of humanist scholars: A report of an

invisible college. communication. Research, 20, 749-776.

Walsh, J. P. & Bayma, T. (1996). The virtual college: Computer-mediated communication and

scientific work. The Information Society, 12, 343-363.

Walsham, G. (1997). Actor-network theory and IS research current and future prospects. In

A.S. Lee & J.I. DeGross (Eds.), Information Systems and Qualitative Research(pp.466-480), London: Chapman and Hall.

Wilson, T. D. (1999). Models in information behavior research. Journal of Documentation,

55(3). 249-270.

Walsh, J. P., Kucker, S. Maloney, N., & Gabbay, S. (2000). Connecting minds:

Computer-mediated communication and scientific work. Journal of the American Society

for Information Science, 51(14), 1295-1305.

Zaltman, Gerald. (1974). A note on an international invisible college for information

exchange. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 25, (2), 113-117.