Rendimiento de los sistemas de recuperación de información en la world wide web: revisión metodológica

Olvera-Lobo, María-Dolores Rendimiento de los sistemas de recuperación de información en la world wide web: revisión metodológica. Revista Española de Documentación Científica, 2000, vol. 23, n. 1, pp. 63-77. [Journal article (Paginated)]

[img]
Preview
 PDF
2000-REDOC-1.pdf
Download (10MB) | Preview

English abstract

This study is an attempt to establish a methodology for the evaluation of information retrieval with search engines in the World Wide Web. The method, which is explained in detail, adapts traditional techniques for evaluating web peculiarities and makes use of precision and recall scores, based on the relevance of the first 20 results retrieved. This method has been successfully applied to the evaluation of ten different search engines.

Spanish abstract

Este estudio pretende contribuir a establecer una metodología para la evaluación de la recuperación de información de las herramientas de búsqueda en el entorno de la World Wide Web. Se detalla el método diseñado(y aplicado con éxito), para evaluar los resultados de las búsquedas, adaptando las técnicas tradicionales de evaluación a las particularidades de la Web y empleando las medidas de la precisión y exhaustividad, basadas en la relevancia, para los 20 primeros resultados recuperados.

Item type: Journal article (Paginated)
Keywords: information retrieval evaluation; World Wide Web; web search engines, Internet, recuperación de la información, buscadores
Subjects: L. Information technology and library technology
Depositing user: Maria Dolores/ M.D. Olvera Lobo
Date deposited: 29 Nov 2010
Last modified: 02 Oct 2014 12:17
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/14709

References

1. ELLIS, D.; FORD, N. In search of the unknown user: indexing, hypertext and the world wide web. Journal of Documentation, 54(1), 28-47, 1998.

2. HARTER, S.P.; HERT, C. A. Evaluation of information retrieval systems. En: Wi11ian, M.E. (ed.), Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 32, 3-94, 1997.

3. LEBEDEV, A. Best search engines for finding scientific information on the Web. Sept. 29, 1996. Disponible en: http://www.chem.msu.su/eng/comparison.html(consultado 12 dic. 97).

4. LEONARD, A. Search engine: where to find anything on the neto Disponible en:

http://www.cnet.com/ContentIReviews/Compare/Search. 1996 (consultado 1 abril 97).

5. LINDOP, L. et al. Catching sites. PC Magazine, 6(2), 108-153, 1997.

6. WINSHIP, 1. R. World Wide Web searching tools: an evaluation. Vine 99, 49-54, 1995. Disponible en:http://www.bubl.bath.ac.uk/BUBLlIWinship.html(Consultado 16 enero 96).

7. ZORN, P. et al. Advanced Web searching: tricks of the trade, Online. 20(3), 15-28, 1996.

8. COURTOIS, M. P. Cool tools for web searching: an update, Online, 20(3), 29-36, 1996.

9. SCOVILLE, R. Special Report: Find it on the Net!, PC World, 125, 14(1), 1996.

lO. CHU, H.; ROSENTHAL, M. Search enginesfor the World Wide Web: A comparative study and evaluation methodology. oct. 1996. Disponible en: http://www.asis.org/annual-96/ElectronicProceedings/chu.html (consultado 5 febr. 97).

11. DING, W.; MARCHIONINI, G. A comparative study of web search service performance, Proceedings of the ASIS Annual Conference, 33. 136-142, 1996.

12. LEIGHTüN, V. H.; SRIVASTAVA, J. Precision among World Wide Weh Search Services (Search Engines): Altavista, Excite. Hotbot, Infoseek. Lycos. act. JO jul. 97. Disponible en: http://www.winona.msus.edulisfnibrary/webind2lwebind2.htm (consultado 12 jul.

97).

13. LEIGHTON, V.H.; SRIVASTAVA, J. First 20 Precision among World Wide Web Search Services (Search Engines), Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(lO), 87()'881, 1999.

14. TOMAIUOW, N. G.; PACKER, J. G. An analysis of Internet search engines: assessment of over 200 search queries, Computers in Libraries. 16(6), 58-62, 1996.

15. MARCHIONINI, G.; BARLOW, D.; HILL, L. Comparlng WAIS and boolean capabilities. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45(8),561-564, 1994.

16. COURTOIS, M. P.; BAER, W. M.; STARK, M. Cool tools for searching the Web: a performance evaluation, Online, 19(6), 14-32, 1995.

17. LEIGIITON, V. H. Peifonnance of Four World Wide Web (WWW) /ndex Services: Infoseek,Lycos, Webcrawler and WWWWonn. /995. Disponible en: http://www.winona.msus.edulisfllibrary-f/webind.htm (consultado 2 enero 97).

18. RANDALL, N. Hide and go seek: rating Internet search engines, PC Computing Online. Ziff-Davis Publishing Company. 1995. Disponible en: htp://www4/zdnet.comlpccomp/featureslinternetlsubl.html (consultado 3 mar. 97).

19. VENDITTO, G. Search engine showdown, Internet World. 7(5), 79-86, 1996.

20. TOMAIUOLO, N.G.; PACKER, J.G. Results of 200 subject searches in Altavista, Infoseek, Lycos. Magellan and Point, peiformed Oct. to Dec. 1995. 20 may 1996. Disponible en: http://neal.ctstateu.edu:200llhtdocs/websearch.html(consultado 13 oct. 97).

21. DONG, X.; SU, L.T. Search engines on the World Wide Web and information retrieval from the Internet: a review and evaluation, Online & CD-ROM Revíew, 21(2),67-82, 1997.

22. MEGHABGHAB, D.B.; MEGHABGHAB, G.V. Information retrieval in cyberspace. En:

Whitney, G. (ed.), The digital revolution: proceedings of the American Society for lnformation Science (AS/S). Mid-year meeting 1996 may 18-22. San Diego: Information Today, 1996, p. 224-237, ISBN 1573870285.

23. DESAI, B.C. Supporting discovery in virtual librarles, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48(3), 190-204, 1997.

24. CLARKE, S.; WILLET, P. Estimating the recall performance of web search engines, Aslib Proceedings, 49(7), 184-189, 1997.

25. GORDON, M.; PATHAK, P. Finding information on the World Wide Web: the retrieval effectiveness of search engines, Information Processing and Management. 35, 141-180, 1999.

26. DIEZ FERRElRA, M. Buscadores temáticos, lWorld. 2(1),54-60, 1998.

27. Guía completa para encontrar los recursos de la Web, PC Magazine, edición española, 11(11), 147-172, 1998.

28. HARMAN, D. K. Overview of the Second Text REtrieval Conference (TREC-2), Information Processing and Management, 31(3), 271-289, 1995.

29. HARMAN, D. K. The TREC Conferences. En: Sparck Jones, K.; Willett, P. (ed.), Readings in information retrieval, San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann, 1997. p. 247-256, ISBN 1558604545.

30. TAGUE-SUTCLIFFE, 1. The pragmatics of information retrieval experimentation revisited, Information Processing and Management, 28(4), 467-490, 1992.

31. WESTERA, G. Robot-drive search engine evaluatíon: overview, 4 july 1997. Disponible en: http://www.curtin.edu.au/curtinllibrary/staffpages/gwpersonal/senginestudy/ (consultado 13 oct. 97)

32. SPINK, A.; SARACEVIC, T. Interaction in information retrieval: selection and effectiveness of search terms, Joumal of the American Society for Information Science, 48(8), 741-761, 1997.

33. HARMAN, D. K. A special conference report: the First Text REtrieval Conference (TREC1), Rockville, Md, USA, 4-6 november, 1992, Information Processing and Management. 29(4),411-414, 1993.

34. HARMAN, D. K. Text Retrieval Conferences (TRECs): providing a test-bed for information retrieval systems, Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science. 11-13, abril/mayo 1998.

35. MUNRO. J.; LIDSKY, D. Web search sites, PC Magazine. 15(21),232, 1996. Disponible en: http://www8.zdnet.com/pcmag/iu/srchsite/test.htm (consultado 4 febr. 97).

36. GAUCH, S.; WANG, G. Information Fusion with ProFusion. Webnet 96 Conference, San Francisco, CA, October 15-19, 1996. Disponible en: http://www.csbs.utsa.edu:80/info/webnet96lhtml/155.htm (consultado 22 febr. 97).

37. SALTON, G. The state of retrieval system evaluation, Information Processing and Management, 28(4),441-449, 1992.

38. BLAIR, D. c.; MARON, M. E. An evaluation of retrieval effectiveness for a full-text document retrieval system, Communications of the ACM, 28(3), 281-299, 1985.

39. SALTON, G.; McGILL, J. Introduction to modern information retrieval. Nueva York: McGraw-Hill, 1983. ISBN 0070544840.

40. OLVERA, M.D. Evaluación de la recuperación de información en Internet: un modelo experimental. Universidad de Granada (tesis doctoral defendida el 2 de marzo de 1999).


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
Contact us
Send email Sponsors
Sponsor: AIMS Sponsor: D&P Sponsor: UniNa CAB Get connected
Facebook Facebook Twitter Twitter Linkedin LinkedIn RSS RSS