¿Quién debe responder a la pregunta “qué es un obra”? Who should answer the question "what is a work?

Manzanos, Norberto ¿Quién debe responder a la pregunta “qué es un obra”? Who should answer the question "what is a work? Revista Documentación, 2010, vol. 63-72, n. 20. [Journal article (Paginated)]

[thumbnail of Quiendeberesponder....pdf]
Preview
 PDF
Quiendeberesponder....pdf
Download (270kB) | Preview
[thumbnail of WhoshouldanswerthequestionWhatisawork.pdf]
Preview
 PDF
WhoshouldanswerthequestionWhatisawork.pdf
Download (252kB) | Preview

English abstract

This article covers some of the answers that has received the question: What is a work?, from the Information Science, and from other disciplines. While it is an issue that has always been present in all these areas, it is since the arrival of IFLA FRBR model that the need for a clear answer has been pressing both to resolve practical problems -the cataloging of works- as theoretical also, i.e., the definition of work. We start with the definitions given by IFLA and other authors who have analyzed the FRBR model to demonstrate certain theoretical limitations in light of some texts produced from other knowledges such as sociology of art, semiotics, aesthetics of receptions and culture history. The article concludes that it is necessary to address a multidisciplinary study of the problem, in order to avoid errors in both theory and practice resulting from the application of the new model.

Spanish abstract

El presente artículo recorre algunas de las respuestas que ha tenido la pregunta ¿Qué es una obra?, tanto desde las Ciencias de la Documentación, como desde otras disciplinas. Si bien es una cuestión que ha estado siempre presente en todos esos ámbitos, es a partir del modelo FRBR de IFLA que la necesidad de responderla con claridad se ha hecho acuciante, tanto para resolver problemas de orden práctico -la catalogación de obras- como de orden teórico -la definición de obra. Se parte de las definiciones dadas por IFLA y por otros autores que han analizado el modelo FRBR para evidenciar ciertas limitaciones teóricas a la luz de algunos textos producidos desde otros saberes como la sociología del arte, la semiótica, la estética de la recepción y la historia de la cultura. El artículo concluye que es necesario encarar un estudio multidisciplinario del problema, a riegos de cometer errores tanto en la teoría como en la práctica que derive de la aplicacion del nuevo modelo.

Item type: Journal article (Paginated)
Keywords: FRBR Work, Cataloging, Catalogación, Knowledge representation, Representación del conocimiento
Subjects: I. Information treatment for information services > IA. Cataloging, bibliographic control.
I. Information treatment for information services > ID. Knowledge representation.
A. Theoretical and general aspects of libraries and information. > AB. Information theory and library theory.
Depositing user: Norberto Manzanos
Date deposited: 02 Nov 2010
Last modified: 02 Oct 2014 12:17
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/15057

References

Abrams, Stephen. A reference model for digital library objects [on line]. [Cambridge, MA]: [Harvard University Library]

Antelman, Kristin. Identifying a Serial Work As a Bibliographic Entity - LRTS 48(4), 2004

Chartier, Roger. Inscribir y borrar. Cultura escrita y literatura (Siglos XI-XVIII). Buenos Aires, Katz, 2006.

Chartier, Roger. Trabajar con Foucault: Esbozo de una genealogía de la "función-autor", Signos Históricos, 11 (México, junio 1999)

Foucault, Michel [1969]. ¿Qué es un autor?. Córdoba, Ediciones literales, 2010.

Gadamer, Hans-Georg. La actualidad de lo bello. El arte como juego, símbolo y fiesta. (Biblioteca de Filosofía). Madrid, Editora Nacional, 2002.

Grupo de estudio de la IFLA sobre los Requisitos Funcionales de los Registros Bibliográficos. [1998]Requisitos Funcionales de los Registros Bibliográficos: Informe Final. Madrid: Ministerio de Cultura 2004

IFLA Study Group on the functional requirements for bibliographic records.(1998). Functional requirements for bibliographic records: final report.- Munich: K. G. Saur, 1998

IFLA UBCIM Working Group on Functional Requierements and Numbering of Authority Records (FRANAR).(2007). Functional Requirements for Authority Records: A Conceptual Model. Recuperado en Noviembre 3, 2007 de http://www.ifla.org/VII/d4/FRANAR-ConceptualModel-2ndReview.pdf

Howell, R. (2002). Ontology and the nature of the literary work. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 60: 67-79.

International Working Group on FRBR and CIDOC CRM Harmonization. (2007). FRBR object-oriented definition (version 0.8.1) . Recuperado en Noviembre 3, 2007 en http://www.ifla.org/VII/s13/wgfrbr/FRBR_oo_V.0.8.1c.pdf

IFLA. Second Meeting on FRBR/CRM Harmonization. Heraklion (Crete), 22-25 March 2004. Main topic: Expressing FRBR as an object-oriented model

Le Boeuf, Patrick. The book, the bug and the bangle: a parallel and a paradox. En: Sharing the knowledge: international CIDOC CRM Symposium

Levinson, Jerrold. What a Musical Work is. The Journal of Phylosophy. Volume LXXVII n 1. January 1980.

Lubetzky, Seymour. Writings on the Classical Art of Cataloguing (Englewood, Colo.: Librarys Unlimited 2001).

Margolis, Joseph. (1977). The Ontological Peculiarity of Works of Art. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 36 (1):45-50.

Rufer, Josef. [1956] Músicos sobre música. Eudeba, Buenos Aires, 1964

Smiraglia, Richard (2001). The nature of “a work”: implications for the organization of knowledge.

Lanham, Md.: Scarecrow Press,. ISBN: 0-8108-4037-5.

Smiraglia, Richard. (2002). Further Reflections on the Nature of A Work: An Introduction. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, Volume 33 Issue 3 & 4 2002

Stevenson, Charles L. (1957). On 'What is a Poem'. Phillosophical Review 66(1957):329-362.

Svenonius, Elaine. (2001). The Intellectual Foundation of Information Organization. The MIT Press, Cambridge.

Vellucci Sherry L. Bibliographic relationships. In: International Conference on the Principles and Future Development of AACR, Toronto, Canada, October 23-25, 1997 [on line]. [S. l.]: [s. n.], 1997 [cited 6 April 2000]

Wolterstorff Toward an Ontology of Arts. Noûs. Vol 9, No 2 (Mayo 1975) [115-142]

Yee, Martha M. Lubetzky's work principle. En: The future of cataloging: insights from the Lubetzky Symposium, Tschera Harkness Connell & Robert L. Maxwell, ed. [printed monograph]. [S. l.] : cop. The American Library Association, 2000.

Yee, Martha M. What is a work? En: International Conference on the Principles and Future Development of AACR, Toronto, Canada, October 23-25, 1997


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
Contact us
Send email Sponsors
Sponsor: AIMS Sponsor: D&P Sponsor: UniNa CAB Get connected
Facebook Facebook Twitter Twitter Linkedin LinkedIn RSS RSS