The social class struggles concept with an interdisciplinary approach: a paramount concept for research in library and information science (LIS)

Muela-Meza, Zapopan Martín The social class struggles concept with an interdisciplinary approach: a paramount concept for research in library and information science (LIS). Crítica Bibliotecológica: Revista de las Ciencias de la Información Documental (Library and Information Science Critique: Journal of the Sciences of Information Recorded in Documents), 2010, vol. 3, n. 1, pp. 8-36. [Journal article (Paginated)]

[thumbnail of Muela_LIS_Critique_Vol_3_No_1_social_class_struggles_LIS.pdf] Text
Muela_LIS_Critique_Vol_3_No_1_social_class_struggles_LIS.pdf
Download (400kB)

English abstract

This paper analyses the social class struggles concept with an interdisciplinary approach to be used by theorists and practitioners of library and information science (LIS). This concept emerged as part of the theoretical framework employed by the author in his doctoral thesis (Muela-Meza, 2010): An Application of Community Profiling to Analyse Community Information Needs, and Providers: Perceptions from the People of the Broomhall Neighbourhood of Sheffield, UK. This concept is complemented from philosophy (Marx and Engels, [1848] 1976a), and the natural sciences (Hauser, 2006; Sagan and Druyan, 1992), and it served the author to understand better the bigger dimensions of the underlying issues behind social classes and human conflicts. It also served to understand better the contradictions between people (e.g. LIS users with contradictory and mutually exclusive information needs to be provided by libraries and other institutions of information recorded in documents), and how these intensify when these are interrelated with the social class they belong to (Muela-Meza, 2007). This paper also criticises some competing views whose proponents by pretending fallaciously and deceitfully to deny the presence of social class divides in society, such as those rhetorical ploys of post-modernism that propose capitalist-class-driven ideologues of “community cohesion” based on “social capital” (Putnam, 1999). It shows evidence of how those followers (e.g. Pateman, 2006; Contreras Contreras, 2004; Bryson, Usherwood and Proctor, 2003) of capitalist-class ideologues, by doing so they aligned their discourse to that of dominance hierarchies and hegemony against working class people, in LIS and other sciences, and the humanities. It also criticises the postmodern pseudoscience because it pretends to undermine the logical rationality fundamental in LIS and all other sciences. It recommends that LIS theorists and practitioners employ the social class struggles concept as configured here in order to understand better contradictions, conflicts, and struggles within LIS theory and practice, and also to search for broader epistemological aims such as justice and wisdom (Fleissner and Hofkirchner, 1998), concealed by the capitalist or bourgeois and middle classes for their benefit against working class.

Spanish abstract

Este trabajo analiza el concepto lucha de clases sociales con un acercamiento interdisciplinario para ser empleado por teóricos y practicantes de la bibliotecología y ciencia de la información. Este concepto surgió como parte del marco teórico utilizado por el autor en su tesis doctoral (Muela-Meza, 2010): Una aplicación del perfilado de la comunidad para analizar las necesidades y proveedores comunitarios de información: percepciones de la gente del Barrio Broomhall de Sheffield, Reino Unido. Este concepto es complementado de la filosofía (Marx and Engels, [1848] 1976a), y de las ciencias naturales (Hauser, 2006; Sagan and Druyan, 1992), y le sirvió al autor a entender mejor las dimensiones más amplias de las cuestiones controvertidas subyacentes detrás de las clases sociales y conflictos humanos. También le sirvió para entender mejor las contradicciones entre la gente (e.g. usuarios de bibliotecas con necesidades de información contradictorias y mutuamente excluyentes para ser satisfechas por bibliotecas y otras instituciones de información documental), y cómo éstas se intensifican cuando son interrelacionadas con la clase social a la que pertenecen (Muela-Meza, 2007). Este artículo también critica algunas opiniones contrastantes cuyos partidarios al pretender falaz y engañosamente negar la presencia de divisiones de la sociedad en clases sociales, tales como esas estratagemas retóricas del postmodernismo que proponen los ideólogos de la clase capitalista o burguesa como la “cohesión de la comunidad” basada en el “capital social” (Putnam, 1999). Muestra evidencia de cómo esos seguidores (e.g. Pateman, 2006; Contreras Contreras, 2004; Bryson, Usherwood and Proctor, 2003) de la clase capitalista o burguesa, al hacer eso alinearon su discurso al de las jerarquías de dominación y hegemonía contra la gente de la clase trabajadora, en bibliotecología y otras ciencias sociales, y en las humanidades. También critica la pseudociencia del postmodernismo porque pretende socavar la lógica racional fundamental en la bibliotecología y todas las demás ciencias. Recomienda que los teóricos y practicantes de la bibliotecología empleen el concepto de la lucha de clases sociales como fue configurado aquí para entender mejor las contradicciones, conflictos, y luchas dentro de la teoría y práctica de la bibliotecología, y también para buscar objetivos epistemológicos más amplios tales como la justicia y la sabiduría (Fleissner and Hofkirchner, 1998), ocultado por las clases capitalista o burguesa y media para su beneficio contra la clase trabajadora.

Item type: Journal article (Paginated)
Keywords: [Keywords] Sciences of Information Recorded in Documents; Library and Information Science (LIS) -- Epistemology; LIS -- Methodology; social class; social class struggles; dominance hierarchies; submission hierarchies; hegemony; critical and sceptical thinking; logical fallacies; rhetorical ploys. [Palabras clave] Ciencias de la información documental; Bibliotecología y ciencias de la información – Epistemology; Bibliotecología y ciencias de la información documental – metodología; clase social; lucha de clases sociales; jerarquías de dominación; jerarquías de sumisión; hegemonía; pensamiento crítico y escéptico; falacias lógicas; estratagemas retóricas.
Subjects: A. Theoretical and general aspects of libraries and information. > AC. Relationship of LIS with other fields .
A. Theoretical and general aspects of libraries and information. > AA. Library and information science as a field.
B. Information use and sociology of information > BC. Information in society.
A. Theoretical and general aspects of libraries and information.
A. Theoretical and general aspects of libraries and information. > AB. Information theory and library theory.
Depositing user: Zapopan Martín Muela-Meza
Date deposited: 17 Nov 2010
Last modified: 27 Feb 2015 08:40
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/15091

References

Agada, J. (1999). “Inner-city gatekeepers: an exploratory survey of the information use environment.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50 (1), 74-85.

Bowell, T. y Kemp, G. (2005). Critical thinking: A concise guide. 2da. ed. Londres; Nueva York:

Routledge.

Bryson, J, Usherwood, B & Proctor, R. (2003). Libraries must also be buildings? New Library Impact Study. Sheffield: University of Sheffield. [Online] http://www.conteque.com/content/1/c6/07/01/24/CPLIS%20-%20New%20Library%20Impact%20Study.pdf . [Accessed 20 September 2010].

Caidi, N. & Allard, D. (2005). “Social inclusion of newcomers to Canada: An information problem?” Library and Information Science Research, 27 (3), 302-324.

Contreras Contreras, F. (2004). “Bibliotecas públicas : espacios de inclusión social (Public libraries: spaces of social inclusión).” Bibliodocencia : Revista de Profesores de Bibliotecología (LISprofessorship: Journal of Professors of LIS) (Peru). 1 (2). [En línea] http://eprints.rclis.org/archive/00005309 . [Accesed 20 September 2010].

Cromar, P. (2003). Broomhall Cosmopolitan Centre. A Sustainable Regeneration Opportunity. Feasibility Study. Sheffield, UK: Cromar & Hackett Ltd.

Dawkins, R. (2008). El Capellán del Diablo: Reflexiones sobre Esperanza, la Mentira, la Ciencia y el Amor, 2nd Ed. Barcelona: Gedisa (Series: Freedom and Change) (Original in English: Dawkins, R. (2003). The Devil’s Chaplain, Houghton Mifflin Company).

de la Garza Toledo, E. (1999). "Epistemología de las teorías sobre modelos de producción.” (“Epistemology of the theories about the models of production).” In: De la Garza Toledo, E. (Comp.). Los Retos Teóricos de los Estudios del Trabajo hacia el Siglo XXI (The Theoretical Challanges of the Labour Studies towards the 21st Century). Buenos Aires: CLACSO (Consejo Latinoamericano de las Ciencias Sociales) (Latin American Council of the Social Sciences). [Online]. http://docencia.izt.uam.mx/egt/publicaciones/capituloslibros/index.htm. [Accessed 28 May 2006].

de la Garza Toledo, E. (2000). "El papel del concepto de trabajo en la teoría social del siglo XX." (“The role of the labour concept in the social theory of the XX century.” In: de la Garza Toledo, E. (coord.). El Tratado Latinoamericano de Sociología del Trabajo (Latin American Treatise of the Sociology of Labour). Mexico: COLMEX; FLACSO; UAM; FCE.

de la Garza Toledo, E. (2001). “La epistemología crítica y el concepto de configuración: Alternativas a la estructura y función estándar de la teoría.” (“The critical epistemology and the concept of configuration: alternatives to the structure and standard function of theory).” Revista Mexicana de Sociología (Mexican Journal of Sociology), (1) [Online]. http://docencia.izt.uam.mx/egt/publicaciones/articulos/index.htm . [Accessed 28 May 2006].

de la Garza Toledo, E. (2002). "La configuración como alternativa del concepto estándar de la teoría.“ (“The configuration as an alternative to the standard concept of theory”). In: Valencia García, G., de la Garza Toledo, E. & Zemelman Merino, H. (2002). Epistemología y Sujetos: Algunas Contribuciones al Debate (Epistemology and Subjects: Some Contributions to the Debate). México: UNAM; Plaza y Valdés. [Online]. http://docencia.izt.uam.mx/egt/publicaciones/capituloslibros/index.htm . [Accessed 28 May 2006].

de la Garza Toledo, E. (2008). “Seis tesis acerca de la economía de la información (Six theses about the economy of information).” Crítica Bibliotecológica: Revista de las Ciencias de la Información Documental (Library & Information Science Critique: Journal of the Sciences of Information Recorded in Documents), 1 (1), 8-13. [Online] http://critica.bibliotecologica.googlepages.com. [Accessed 20 September 2010].

Delanty, G. (2003). Community. London; New York: Routledge.

Delanty, G. (2005). Social Science: Philosophical and Methodological Foundations. Second Edition. Berkshire, UK; NY: Open University Press; McGraw Hill Education, (Collection: Concepts in the Social Sciences).

Demirovic, A. (2004). “Hegemony and the paradox of public and private.” Transversal: EIPCP Multilingual Webjournal. June number. [Online] http://eipcp.net/transversal/0605/demirovic/en. [Accessed 20 September 2010].

Durrani, S. (2000) “Returning a stare: people’s struggles for political and social inclusion.” In: Muddiman, D. et. al. (2000b). Open to All?: the Public Library and Social Exclusion. Vol.3: Working Papers. London: Resource, The Council for Museums, Archives and Libraries. [Online] http://eprints.rclis.org/3777/1/vol3wp6.pdf. [Accessed 20 August 2003].

Edgell, S. (1993). Class. London; New York: Routledge.

Einstein, A. (2005). Ideas and Opinions. London: A Condor Book; Souvenir Press.

Fleissner, P. & Hofkirchner, W. (1998). “The making of the information society: driving forces, ‘Leitbilder’ and the imperative for survival. BioSystems. (46), pp. 201-207.

Galicia Sánchez, S. (1985). Introducción al estudio del conocimiento científico. (Introduction to the Study of Scientific Knowledge). México: Universidad Autónoma de Sinaloa.)

Giddens, A. (1999). La Tercera Vía: La Renovación de la Socialdemocracia. (The Third Way). Madrid: Taurus.

Gimeno Perelló, J. (2007a). “El conocimiento no es una mercancía (Knowledge is not a commodity).” In: Gimeno Perelló, J., López López, P. & Morillo Calero, M.J. (Coords). De Volcanes Llena: Biblioteca y Compromiso Social (Full of Volcanoes: Library and Social Commitment). Gijón, Asturias, Spain: Trea, pp.129-157.

Gimeno Perelló, J. (2007b). “En las bibliotecas de la Unión Europea hay que pagar por leer.” (In the libraries of the European Union it is mandatory to pay to read). Librinsula. Weekly Bulletin of the National Library of Cuba “Jose Marti”, 4 (175), 11 May.

Gimeno Perelló, J., López López, P. & Morillo Calero, M.J. (Coords). (2007). De Volcanes Llena: Biblioteca y Compromiso Social (Full of Volcanoes: Library and Social Compromise). Gijón, Asturias, Spain: Editorial Trea.

Gorman, G.E. & Clayton, P. (2005). Qualitative Research for the Information Professional: A Practical Handbook. 2nd ed. London: Facet.

Green, R. (2000a). “Applying a community needs profiling approach to tackling service user poverty.” British Association of Social Workers, 30 (287-303).

Green, R. (2000b). Marginalised Groups and Community Development: Inclusion through Community Needs Profiling. Hertfordshire, UK: University of Hertfordshire. [Ph.D. Thesis in Social Work].

Hauser, M. D. (2006). Moral Minds: How Nature Designed our Universal Sense of Right And Wrong. New York: Ecco; Harper Collins.

Heller, A. (1996). Una Revisión de la Teoría de las Necesidades (A Revision of the Theory of Needs), 1st ed. Barcelona: Editorial Paidos Iberica (Series: Contemporary Thinking No. 47).

Hull, B. (2003). “Information and Ccommunication Technology and social exclusion: the roles of libraries.” Telematics and Informatics, 20, 131-142.

Jones, S.J. (1998). “Subjectivity and class consciousness: the development of class identity.” Journal of Adult Development, 5 (3), 145-162.

LDA Design (2005). The Vision: Broomhall Community Centre, Ltd. London: LDA Design, Ltd.; Broomhall Community Centre, Ltd.

Louie, R.L. (1976). A Community Profile Approach Toward Expanding Public Library Services: Communication Survey Procedures Reaching Chinese Americans in the Los Angeles Chinatown Community and Obtaining their Information-Seeking Patterns. California: University of Southern California. [PhD thesis in library science].

Marcella, R. & Baxter, G. (2000). “The impact of social class and status on citizenship information need: the results of two national surveys in the UK.” Journal of Information Science, 26, (4), 239-254.

Marx, K. & Engels, F. ([1845-1846] 1976a). The German Ideology. Critique of Modern German Philosophy According to its Representatives Feuerbach, B. Bauer and Stirner, and of German Socialism According to its Various Prophets. In: Marx, K. & Engels, F. (1976a). Karl Marx and Frederick Engels Collected Works. Vol. 5. London: Lawrence & Wishart; Moscow: Progress Publishers; Institute of Marxism-Leninism Moscow. (Marx and Engels: 1845-47).

Marx, K. ([1867], 1974). Capital: A Critical Analysis Of Capitalist Production. Volume 1. London: Lawrence & Wishart; Moscow: Foreign Languages Publishing House.

Marx, K. & Engels, F. (1976a). Karl Marx and Frederick Engels Collected Works. Vol. 5. London: Lawrence & Wishart; Moscow: Progress Publishers; Institute of Marxism-Leninism Moscow. (Marx and Engels: 1845-47).

Marx, K. y Engels, F. (1976b). Karl Marx and Frederick Engels Collected Works. Vol. 6. London: Lawrence & Wishart; Moscow: Progress Publishers; Institute of Marxism-Leninism Moscow. (Marx and Engels: 1845-48).

Mason, J. (2002). Qualitative Researching. 2nd edition. London: Sage Publications.

Moran, R.A. & Butler, D.S. (2001). “Whose health profile?” Critical Public Health, 11, (1), 59-74.

Muddiman, D. (2000a). “Images of exclusion: user and community perceptions of the public library.” In: Muddiman, D. (et. al). (2000b). Open To All? : The Public Library And Social Exclusion. Vol.3. Working Papers. London: Resource (Library and Information Commission Research Report No. 86). [Online] http://eprints.rclis.org/5473/ . [Accessed 20 September 2010].

Muddiman, D. et. al. (2000b). Open to All?: the Public Library and Social Exclusion. Vol.3: Working Papers. London: Resource, The Council for Museums, Archives and Libraries. (Library and Information Commission Research Report No. 86). [Online] http://eprints.rclis.org/3775. [Accessed 20 September 2010].

Muela-Meza, Zapopan Martín. (2010). An Application of Community Profiling to Analyse Community Information Needs, and Providers: Perceptions from the People of the Broomhall Neighbourhood of Sheffield, UK. Sheffield, UK: University of Sheffield, Department of Information Studies. [PhD Thesis]. [Online] http://eprints.rclis.org/18649/. [Accessed 20 September 2010].

Muela-Meza, Z.M. (2007). “Contradicciones eticas de las responsabilidades sociales de la bibliotecologia. (Ethical contradictions of the social responsibilities of Library and Information Science).” In: Gimeno Perelló, J., López López, P. & Morillo Calero, M.J. (Coords). De Volcanes Llena: Biblioteca y Compromiso Social (Full of Volcanoes: Library and Social Compromise). Gijón, Asturias, Spain: Trea, pp. 417-444. [Online] http://eprints.rclis.org/archive/00007942/ . [Accessed 20 September 2010].

Muela-Meza, Z.M. (2005) “Information needed to cope with crisis in the lives of individuals and communities: an assessment of the roles public libraries and voluntary sector agencies play in the provision of such information.” Information for Social Change. (21), 13-26. [Online] http://eprints.rclis.org/archive/00003616. [Accessed 20 September 2010].

Muela-Meza, Z.M. (2008). “Introducción al pensamiento crítico y escéptico en las ciencias de la información documental” (An Introduction to the critical and sceptical thinking in the sciences of information recorded in documents).” Crítica Bibliotecológica: Revista de las Ciencias de la Información Documental (Library & Information Science Critique: Journal of the Sciences of Information Recorded in Documents), 1 (1), 14-41. [Online] http://critica.bibliotecologica.googlepages.com. [Accessed 20 September 2010].

Muela-Meza, Z.M. (2004a). "Liberación de la información como condición de la liberación del acceso a la información. (Information liberation as a condition for the liberation of the access to information)." In Proceedings of the First Social Forum of Information, Documentation, and Libraries." Programs of Alternative Action from Latin America towards the Society of Knowledge." Buenos Aires, Argentina, August 2004. [Online] http://eprints.rclis.org/archive/00003623. [Accessed 20 September 2010].

Muela-Meza, Z.M. (2009). “Por una crítica al sistema del copyright y al rol de policies del copyright de los bibliotecarios (For a critique of the copyright system and of the role of librarians as copyright police).” Crítica Bibliotecológica: Revista de las Ciencias de la Información Documental (Library and Information Science Critique: Journal of the Sciences of Information Recorded in Documents, 2 (1). [Online] http://eprints.rclis.org/17293/1/CB.v2.n1.Articulo2.zmmm.pdf. [Accessed 20 September 2010].

Muela-Meza, Z.M. (2006). “The age of the corporate State versus the informational and cognitive public domain.” Information for Social Change.(UK). (23). [Online] http://eprints.rclis.org/archive/00007319/. [Accessed 20 September 2010].

Muela-Meza, Z.M. (2003). “Un acercamiento a las barreras políticas en las bibliotecas públicas mexicanas. (An approximation to the political barriers in the Mexican public libraries).” In Proceedings Third Mexican National Congress of Public Libraries: “Celebrating the 20 Years of the Mexican National Network of Public Libraries.” Durango, Durango, México. [Online] http://eprints.rclis.org/view/people/Muela-Meza,_Zapopan_Mart=n.html. [Accessed 20 September 2010].

Muela-Meza, Z.M. (2004b). “Una introducción a la crítica de los desafíos teóricos y prácticos que enfrentan los integrantes de los repositorios públicos de conocimiento en el fenómeno de la Sociedad de la Información ( An Introduction to the critique of the theoretical and practical challenges faced by the stakeholders of the repositories of public knowledge in the phenomenon of the Information Society)." Pez de Plata, Bibliotecas Públicas a la Vanguardia. Revista de Opinión para el Desarrollo de las Bibliotecas Públicas. (Pez de Plata –Silver Fish-- Chilean Peer Reviewed Journal for the Development of Public Libraries), 1 (2), 1-45. [Online] http://eprints.rclis.org/archive/00003577. [Accessed 20 September 2010].

Oliver, P. (2004). Writing your Thesis. London; Thousand Oaks, Calif.; New Delhi: Sage Publication.

Pateman, J. (2000). “Public libraries and social class.” In: Muddiman, D. (et. al). (2000b). Open To All? : The Public Library And Social Exclusion. Vol.3. Working Papers. London: Resource (Library and Information Commission research report 86). [Online] http://eprints.rclis.org/3776/ . [Accessed 20 September 2010]

Pateman, J. (2006). “Social exclusion to community cohesion.” Library and Information Update, 5 (3), 41-43.

Putnam, R. (1999). Bowling Alone. New York: Simon & Shuster.

Reale, G & Antiseri, D. (2004). Historia del Pensamiento Filosófico y Científico. Tomo Primero. Antiguedad y Edad Media (History of the Philosophical and Scientific Thought. Ancient times and Middle Ages. Vol. I). 3rd ed. Barcelona: Herder.

Rendón Rojas, M.A. (2005). Bases Teóricas y Filosóficas de la Bibliotecología. 2a ed. (Theoretical and Philosophical Foundations in Library and Information Science, 2nd ed.). Mexico: UNAM, Centro Universitario de Investigaciones Bibliotecológicas (Sistemas Bibliotecarios de Información y Sociedad) (Mexico National Autonomous University, University Library and Information Science Research Centre (Series: Library and Information Science Systems and Society).

Rikowski, R. (2007). “Globalización, bibliotecas, información y compromiso social (Globalization, libraries, information, and social commitment).” In: Gimeno Perelló, J., López López, P. & Morillo Calero, M.J. (Coords). (2007). De Volcanes Llena: Biblioteca y Compromiso Social (Full of Volcanoes: Library and Social Compromise). Gijón, Asturias, Spain: Trea, pp. 159-212.

Rikowski, G. (2002). “Marxist educational theory after postmodernism.” In: Hill, D. (et. al). Marxism against Postmodernism in Education Theory. Lanham, MD, USA: Lexignton Books, pp. 16-32.

Roddy, K. (2005). “Community profiling.” Library and Information Update, 4 (5), 40-41.

Sagan, C. (1998). Billions & Billions: Thoughts on Life and Death at the Brink of the Millenium. New York: Ballantine Books.

Sagan, C. & A. Druyan. (1992). Shadows Of Forgotten Ancestors: A Search For Who We Are. London: BCA.

Sagan, C. (2001). Cosmos. Barcelona: Planeta

Sagan, C. (1980). Broca’s Brain: Reflections on the Romance of Science. New York: Ballantine Books.

Sagan, C. (1997). El Mundo y sus Demonios: La Ciencia como una Luz en la Oscuridad : (The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark). Mexico; Barcelona: Editorial Planeta.

Sagan, C. (1978). The Dragons of Eden: Speculations on the Evolution of Human Intelligence. Nueva York: Ballantine Books.

Schiller, H.I. (1996). Information Inequality: The Deepening Social Crisis in America. New York; London: Routledge.

Sokal, A. & Bricmont, J. (1999). Imposturas Intelectuales. Barcelona: Ediciones Paidós Ibérica. (English original: Sokal, A. & Bricmont, J. (1998). Fashionable Nonsense: Postmodern Intellectuals’ Abuse of Science. New York: Picador).

Sokal, A. (2009). Más Allá de las Imposturas Intelectuales: Ciencia, Filosofía y Cultura. Barcelona: Paidós (Col. Transiciones No. 78). (Orig. English: Sokal, A. (2008). Beyond the Hoax: Science, Philosophy, and Culture. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.)

Usherwood, B. (1989). The Public Library as Public Knowledge. London: Library Association.

Usherwood, B. (1992). “Community information.” In: Kinnell, M. (Ed.) (1992). Informing Communities: The Role of Libraries and Information Services. Newcastle, UK: CSG Publishing, pp. 17-40.

Usherwood, B., Wilson, K. & Bryson, J. (2005). “Relevant repositories of public knowledge? Libraries, museums and archives in the 'information age'.” Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 37 (2), 89-98.


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
Contact us
Send email Sponsors
Sponsor: AIMS Sponsor: D&P Sponsor: UniNa CAB Get connected
Facebook Facebook Twitter Twitter Linkedin LinkedIn RSS RSS