Enfoques en torno al modelo cognitivo para la recuperación de información: análisis crítico

Vargas-Quesada, Benjamín, De-Moya-Anegón, Félix and Olvera-Lobo, María-Dolores Enfoques en torno al modelo cognitivo para la recuperación de información: análisis crítico. Ciência da Informação, 2002, vol. 31, n. 2, pp. 107-119. [Journal article (Paginated)]

[thumbnail of 2002-Ciencia_da_Informaçao-Brasilia.pdf] PDF
2002-Ciencia_da_Informaçao-Brasilia.pdf
Download (697kB)

English abstract

[Perspectives around the cognitive model for the information retrieval: a critical analysis] The traditional or algorithmic model of information retrieval has evolved into the cognitive model. From the latter, different proposals for practical implementation have arisen being the most remarkable ones those labelled by their own authors as Global Model of Polirepresentation, Episodic Model, Stratified Model and Model of Interactive Feedback. These are critically described and analysed in this paper.

Spanish abstract

El modelo de recuperación de información tradicional o algorítmico ha ido evolucionando hasta dar lugar al modelo cognitivo. A partir de éste último han surgido distintas propuestas de implementación práctica siendo las más destacables las denominadas por sus autores Modelo Global de Polirepresentación, Modelo Episódico, Modelo Estratificado y Modelo de Retroalimentación Interactiva, las cuales en este trabajo se consideran sistemas y se describen y analizan desde un punto de vista crítico.

Item type: Journal article (Paginated)
Keywords: Recuperación de información; Modelo cognitivo.
Subjects: L. Information technology and library technology
Depositing user: Maria Dolores/ M.D. Olvera Lobo
Date deposited: 25 Nov 2010
Last modified: 02 Oct 2014 12:17
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/15124

References

1. CLEVERDON, C. The Cranfield tests on index languages devices. In: SPARCK, Jones K.; WILLET, P. (Ed.). Readings in information retrieval. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann, 1997.

2. SARACEVIC, T. Modeling interaction in information retrieval (IR): a review and proposal. In: ANNUAL MEETING OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, 1996. Proceedings... [S. l.], ASIS, 1996. p. 3-9.

3. SPINK, A.; SARACEVIC, T. Interaction in information retrieval: selection and effectiveness of search terms. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, v. 48, n. 8, p. 741-761, 1997.

4. MOYA ANEGÓN, F. Los sistemas integrados de gestión bibliotecaria. Madrid: Anabad, 1995.

5. SPINK, A. Study of interactive feedback during mediated information retrieval. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, v. 48, n. 5, p. 382-394, 1997.

6. SALTON, G.; McGILL, M. J. The smart and sire experimental retrieval systems . In: _______;_______. Introduction to modern information retrieval. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1983. p. 118-151.

7. _______; _______. Introduction to modern information retrieval. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1983.

8. HARMAN, D. Relevance feedback revisited. In: ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN INFORMATIO RETRIEVAL, 15., 1992, Copenhaguen. Proceedings... Copenhaguen : ACM, 1992. p. 1-10.

9. SARACEVIC, T. Relevance: a review of and a framework for the thinking on the notion in information science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, v. 26, n. 11-12, p. 321-343, 1975.

10. MIZZARO, S. Relevance: the whole history. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, v. 48, n. 9, p. 810-832, 1997.

11. BELKIN, N. J. The cognitive viewpoint in information science. Journal of Information Science, n. 16, p. 11-15, 1990.

12. _______; ODDY, R. N.; BROOKS, H. M. Ask for information retrieval: Part I: Background and theory. Journal of Documentation, v. 38, n. 2, p. 61-71, 1982.

13. _______;_______;_______. Ask for information retrieval: Part II. Results of a design study. Journal of Documentation, v. 38, n. 3, p. 145-164, 1982.

14. BATES, M J. The design of browsing and berrypicking techniques for the online search interface. Online Review, v. 13, n. 5, p. 407- 424, 1989.

15. ELLIS, D. A behavioural approach to information system design. Journal of Documentation, v. 45, n. 3, p. 171-212, 1989.

16. EFTHIMIADIS, E. N. Interactive query expansion: a user-bases evaluation in a relevance feedback environment. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, v. 51, n. 11, p. 989-1003, 2000.

17. ROBERTSON, S. E.; WALKER, S. ; HANCOCK-BEAULIEU,M. M. Large test collection experiments on an operational, interactive system: Okapi and Trec. Information Processing and Management, v. 31, p. 345-360, 1995.

18. BELKIN, N. J. et al. Iterative exploration, design and evaluation of support for query reformulation interactive information retrieval. Information Processing and Management, v. 37, p. 403-434, 2001.

19. INGWERSEN, P. Information retrieval interaction. London : Taylor Graham, 1992.

20. KUHLTHAU, C. C. A principle of uncertainty for information seeking. Journal of Documentation, v. 49, n. 4, p. 339-355, 1993.

21. INGWERSEN, P. Polyrepresentation of information needs and semantic entities: elements of a cognitive theory for information retrieval interaction. In: ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN INFORMATION RETRIEVAL, 17., 1994, Berlim. Proceedings... Berlin : Springer Verlag, 1994, p. 101-110.

22. TANG, R.; SOLOMON, P. Toward an understanding of the dynamics of relevance judgment: an analysis of one person’s search behavior. Information Processing and Management, v. 34, n. 2/3, p. 237-256, 1998.

23. INGWERSEN, P. Cognitive perspectives of information retrieval interaction: elements of a cognitive IR theory. Journal of Documentation, v. 52, n. 1, p. 3-50, 1996.

24. SUTCLIFFE, A. E. M. Towards a cognitive theory of information retrieval. Interacting with Computers, v. 10, p. 321-351, 1998.

25. SPINK, A.; LOSEE, R. M. Feedback in information retrieval. Annual Review of Information Systems and Technology, n. 31, p. 33-77, 1996.

26. SALTON, G.; BUCLLEY, C. Improving retrieval perfomance by relevance feedback. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, v. 41, n. 4, p. 288-297, 1990.

27. INGWERSEN, P.; WILLET, P. An introduction to algorithmic and cognitive approaches for information retrieval. Libri, n. 45, p. 160-177, 1995.

28. ROBERTSON, S. E. The probability ranking principle in IR. Journal of Documentation, v. 33, n. 4, p. 294-304, 1977.

29. BELKIN, N. J. et al. The effect of multiple query representations on information retrieval system perfomance. In: ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN INFORMATION RETRIEVAL, 16., 1993, New York. Proceedings... New York : ACM, 1993. p. 339-346.

30. HAINES, D.; CROFT, W. B. Relevance feedback and inference networks. In: ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN INFORMATION RETRIEVAL, 16., 1993. Proceedings... New York : ACM, 1993. p. 2-11.

31. LEE, J. H. Combining multiple evidence from different relevance feedback methods. Information Processing and Management, v. 34, n. 6, p. 681-691, 1998.

32. RUTHVEN, I. Incorporating aspects of information use into relevance feedback. 1999. Disponível em: < http://ir.dcs.gla.ac.uk/ papers/Pdf/ruthven2000a.pdf>. Acesso em: 1 jul. 2001.

33. _______; LAMAS, M.; RIJSBERGEN, C. J. Van. Retrieval through explanation: an abductive inference approach to relevance feedback. 1999. Disponível em: <http://ir.dcs.gla.ac.uk/papers/pdf/ruthven99a.pdf> Acesso em: 1 jul. 2001.

34. BELKIN, N. J. et al. Cases, scripts, and information-seeking strategies: on the design of interactive information retrieval systems. Expert Systems with Applications, n. 9, p. 379-395, 1995.

35. _______; CROFT, W. B. Information filtering and information retrieval: two side of the same coin? Communications of the ACM, v. 35, n. 12, p. 29-38, 1992.

36. ROBINS, D. Interactive information retrieval: contexts and basic notion. Informing Science, v. 3, n. 2, p. 57-62, 2000.

37. STORRS, G. A conceptualization of multiparty interaction. Interacting with Computers, v. 6, n. 2, p. 173-189, 1994.

38. SPINK, A.; GREISDORF, H.; BATEMAN, J. From highly relevant to not relevant: examining different regions of relevance. Information Processing and Management, v. 34, n. 5, p. 599-621, 1998.

39. _______; Saracevic, T. Human-computer interaction in information retrieval: nature and manifestations of feedback. Interacting with computers, v. 10, p. 249-267, 1998.

40. OLVERA, M. D. Evaluación de sistemas de recuperación de información: aproximaciones y nuevas tendencias. El Profesional de la Información, v. 8, n. 11, p. 4-14, 1999.

41. KUHN, T. S. La estructura de las revoluciones científicas. México D.F.: Fondo de la Cultura Económica, 1990.

42. WHITE, H. D.; McCAIN, K. W. Visualization of literatures. Annual Review of Information Systems and Technology, v. 32, p. 99- 168, 1997.

43. SMALL, H. Visualizing science by citation mapping. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, v. 50, n. 9, p. 799-813, 1999.

44. WHITE, H. D.; McCAIN, K. W. Visualizing a discipline: an author co-citation analysis of information science, 1972-1995. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, v. 49, n. 4, p.327-355, 1998.

45. DING, Y.; CHOWDHURY, G. G.; FOO, S. Bibliometric cartography of information retrieval research by using co-word analysis. Information Processing & Management, v. 37, p. 801-817, 2001.

46. HJORLAND, B. Birger; ALBRECHTSEN, Hanne. Toward a new horizon in information science: domain analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, v. 46, n. 6, p. 400-425, 1995.


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
Contact us
Send email Sponsors
Sponsor: AIMS Sponsor: D&P Sponsor: UniNa CAB Get connected
Facebook Facebook Twitter Twitter Linkedin LinkedIn RSS RSS