Transferring evidence into practice: what evidence summaries of library and information studies research tell practitioners

Kloda, Lorie A. and Koufogiannakis, Denise and Mallan, Katrine Transferring evidence into practice: what evidence summaries of library and information studies research tell practitioners. Information Research, 2011, vol. 6, n. 1. [Journal article (On-line/Unpaginated)]

[img] HTML
paper465.html

Download (59Kb)

English abstract

Introduction. Critical appraisal is a crucial aspect of evidence-based practice. In order to determine whether research is valid, reliable and applicable, the evidence-based practice process advocates that published research be critically appraised. Between 2006 and 2008, the journal Evidence Based Library and Information Practice published 101 evidence summaries, critically appraising research in library and information studies. These evidence summaries can be examined in order to determine common strengths and weaknesses of research relevant to library and information studies and identify commonalities in existing evidence summary commentaries. Method. We undertook a directed qualitative content analysis of the commentary portion of all 101 evidence summaries published in the journal, Evidence Based Library and Information Practice from 2006-2008. Findings. Evidence summaries reveal more weaknesses than strengths in the library and information studies research. In general, evidence summary writers tend to remark on weaknesses relating to validity and reliability, yet paradoxically point out strengths with respect to research's applicability to practice. Conclusions.Further research is required to understand why evidence summary writers note more weaknesses than strengths in library and information studies research and whether this reflects the actual quality of the research in general.

Item type: Journal article (On-line/Unpaginated)
Keywords: evidence based librarianship; evidence based practice; knowledge transfer
Subjects: B. Information use and sociology of information. > BA. Use and impact of information.
Depositing user: Lorie A. Kloda
Date deposited: 20 Mar 2011
Last modified: 02 Oct 2014 12:18
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/15442

References

"SEEK" links will first look for possible matches inside E-LIS and query Google Scholar if no results are found.

* Booth, A. (2000). Librarian heal thyself: evidence-based librarianship, useful, practicable, desirable? Paper presented at the 8th International Congress on Medical Librarianship, 2nd-5th July 2000, London, UK.

* Booth, A. & Brice, A. (2003). Clear-cut? Facilitating health librarians to use information research in practice. Health Libraries Review, 20(1), 45-52.

* Booth, A. & Brice, A. (2004). Appraising the evidence. In A. Booth & A. Brice, (Eds.), Evidence-based practice for information professionals: a handbook (pp. 104-118). London: Facet Publishing.

* Dawes, M., Summerskill, W., Glasziou, P., Cartabellotta, A., Martin, J., Hopayian, K. et al. (2005). Sicily statement on evidence-based practice. BMC Medical Education, 5(1). Retrieved 17 February, 2011 from http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6920/5/1 (Archived by WebCite® at http://www.webcitation.org/5wZY38E9r)

* Glynn, L. (2006). A critical appraisal tool for library and information research. Library Hi Tech, 24(3), 387-399.

* Grad, R.M., Pluye, P., Mercer, J., Marlow, B., Beauchamp, M.E., Shulha, M. et al. (2008). Impact of research-based synopses delivered as daily e-mail: a prospective observational study. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 15(2), 240-245.

* Koufogiannakis, D., Booth, A. & Brettle, A. (2006). ReLIANT: Reader’s guide to the Literature on Interventions Addressing the Need for education and Training. Retrieved 22 February, 2010 from http://eprints.rclis.org/7163/ content (Archived by WebCite® at http://www.webcitation.org/5wZYHZWsM)

* Koufogiannakis, D., Slater, L. & Crumley, E. (2004). A content analysis of librarianship research. Journal of Information Science, 30(3), 227-239.

* Reynolds, S. (2000). The anatomy of evidence-based practice: principles and methods. In E. Trinder & S. Reynolds, (Eds.), Evidence-based practice: a critical appraisal (pp. 17-34). Oxford: Blackwell Science.

* Zhang, Y. & Wildemuth, B.M. (2009). Qualitative analysis of content. In B.M. Wildemuth, (Ed.), Applications of social research methods to questions in information and library science, (pp. 308-319). Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited.


Actions (login required)

View Item View Item