Collaboration patterns in patent networks and their relationship with the transfer of technology: the case study of the CSIC patents

Ortega, José Luis Collaboration patterns in patent networks and their relationship with the transfer of technology: the case study of the CSIC patents., 2011 [Preprint]

[thumbnail of patent2010.pdf]
Preview
 PDF
patent2010.pdf
Download (127kB) | Preview

English abstract

The aim of this paper is to observe differences between research areas when it comes to establish collaboration ties with local, national or international partners. It also intends to determine in what extent the collaboration can influence the patent transfer. A collaboration network between CSIC researchers and their external collaborators was built. Several statistical tests were used to find significant differences between research areas. A multiple regression model was also utilized in order to know what type of collaboration is more successful to transfer a patent. The results show that there are two well-defined groups. A “Bio” group with a high international collaboration pattern but less national participation; and a “Physicist” group supported by a high proportion of national partners but with few international connections. The regression analysis found that the national collaboration is the variable that most increase the patent transfer.

Item type: Preprint
Keywords: Scientometrics, Multiple Regression Model, Patent licensing, Collaboration pattern, Research areas
Subjects: B. Information use and sociology of information > BB. Bibliometric methods
Depositing user: José Luis Ortega Priego
Date deposited: 28 Apr 2011
Last modified: 02 Oct 2014 12:18
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/15568

References

Agrawal, A. (2000). Importing scientific inventions: direct interaction, geography and economic performance. Mimeo: Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Balconi, M., Breschi, S., & Lissoni, F. (2004). Networks of inventors and the role of academia: an exploration of Italian patent data, Research Policy, 33: 127–145

Boccardelli, P., Leone, M. I., Magnusson, M., & Reichstein, T. (2010). Fuel on the Invention Funnel: Technology Licensing-in, Antecedents and Invention. [Working Paper]. DRUID, Aalborg. pp. 35. http://www3.druid.dk/wp/20100013.pdf

Bordons, M., & Gomez, I. (2000). Collaboration networks in science In: B. Cronin & H. B. Atkins (eds.). The web of knowledge: a festschrift in honor of Eugene Garfield. New Jersey: Information Today

Boyack, K. W., Klavans, R., & Börner, K. (2005). Mapping the backbone of science. Scientometrics, 64(3), 351-374.

CSIC (2006). Plan de Actuación 2006-2009. Madrid: CSIC

Price, D. J. de S. (1986). Little Science, Big Science ... and Beyond. New York: Columbia University Press.

Dunn, O. J. (1961). Multiple comparisons among means, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 56: 54-64

Frame, J. D., & Carpenter, M. P. (1979). International Research Collaboration. Social Studies of Science, 9(4): 481-497

Godoe, H. (2000). Innovation regimes, R&D and Radical innovations in telecommunications. Research Policy, 29: 1033-46

Goktepe, D. (2006). Identification of University Inventors and University Patenting Patterns at Lund University: Conceptual- Methodological & Empirical Findings. DRUID Winter Conference, Copenhagen, Denmark

http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/1628/1/MPRA_paper_1628.pdf

Hagstrom, W. O. (1965). The Scientific Community. New York: Basic Books, Inc.

Hansen, M. T. (1999). The Search-Transfer problem: the role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44: 82-111

Katz, J. S., & Martin, B. R. (1997). What is research collaboration? Research Policy, 26(1): 1-18

Kruskall, W.H., & Wallis, W. A. (1952). Use of ranks in one-criterion variance analysis, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 47(260): 583-621.

Lee, Y. G. (2009) What affects a patent’s value? An analysis of variables that affect technological, direct economic and indirect economic value: An exploratory conceptual approach. Scientometrics, 79(3): 623-633

Lissoni, F., & Montobbio, F. (2008) Guest authors or ghost inventors? Inventorship attribution in academic patents. The 25th DRUID Celebration Conference 2008 on Entrepreneurship and Innovation, Copenhagen, Denmark http://www.econ.kuleuven.be/msi/_docs/workshops/2008-04-24.pdf

Lissoni, F., Llerena, P., McKelvey, M., & Sanditov, B. (2008). Academic patenting in Europe: new evidence from the KEINS database. Research Evaluation, 17(2): 87–102.

Lowe, R. A. (2002). Entrepreneurship and information asymmetry: Theory and evidence from the University of California. Working Paper 11/25/02, http://littlehurt.tepper.cmu.edu/gsiadoc/wp/2003-09.pdf

McCarthy, J. T., Schecter, R. E., & Franklyn, D. J. (2004). McCarthy's desk encyclopedia of intellectual property, (3ª ed.), Washington: The Bureau of National Affairs

Meyer, M., & Bhattacharya, S. (2004). Commonalities and differences between scholarly and technical collaboration: An exploration of co-invention and co-authorship analyses. Scientometrics, 61(3):443-456

Mowery, D. C., & Ziedonis, A. A. (2001). The Geographic Reach of Market and Non-Market Channels of Technology Transfer: Comparing Citations and Licenses of University Patents. NBER Working Paper Series, w8568 http://dimetic.dime-eu.org/dimetic_files/MoweryZiedonis2004%20University%20Licenses%201.pdf

Ortega, J. L., & Aguillo, I. F. (2010), La participación española en los programas europeos: análisis estructural del área de salud del 6º Programa Marco, Revista Española de Documentación Científica, 33(2):287-297

Powell, W. W., & Grodal, S. (2004). Networks of innovations. In: J. Fagerberg, D. Mowery & R. R. Nelson (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, Oxford: University Press.

Sapsalis, E. (2007). From Science to License: An exploratory analysis of the value of academic patents, Working Papers CEB 07-018.RS, Universite Libre de Bruxelles. https://dipot.ulb.ac.be:8443/dspace/bitstream/2013/53932/1/RePEc_sol_wpaper_07-018.pdf

Vinding, A. L. (2002). Interorganizational diffusion and transformation of knowledge in the process of product innovation, Ph. D. Thesis, Aalborg University http://www.business.aau.dk/~alv/Vinding-Dissertation.pdf

Yoshikane, F. (2006). Comparative analysis of co-authorship networks considering authors’ roles in collaboration: Differences between the theoretical and application areas. Scientometrics, 68(3):643-655


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
Contact us
Send email Sponsors
Sponsor: AIMS Sponsor: D&P Sponsor: UniNa CAB Get connected
Facebook Facebook Twitter Twitter Linkedin LinkedIn RSS RSS