Invisible College : Literature Review

Allen, B. L.1996. Information tasks. Toward a user-centered approach to information systems. San

Diego, CA: Academic Press.

Armstrong, J. Scott. 1982. Research on Scientific Journals: Implications for Editors and Authors. Journal

of Forecasting 1: 83-104.

Brunn, S. D. and S. R. O'Lear. 1999. Research and communication in the "invisible college" of the

Human Dimensions of Global Change. Global Environmental Change 9: 285-301.

Carley, K., and K. Wendt. 1991. Electronic mail and scientific communication: A study of the SOAR

extended research group. Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization12: 406-440.

Chubin, D. 1976. The conceptualization of scientific specialties. The Sociological Quarterly17: 448-476.

Constant, D., L. Sproull, and S. Kiesler. 1996. The kindness of strangers: The usefulness of electronic

weak ties for technical advice. Organization Science 7(2): 119-135.

Crane, D. 1972. Invisible Colleges. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Crane, D. 1971. Information needs and uses. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology6: 3-

39.

Crane, D. 1980. Social structure in a group of scientists: a test of the "invisible college" hypothesis. In B.

C. Griffith (Ed.), Key Papers in Information Science , 10-27. White Plains, NY: Knowledge Industry

Publications, Inc.

Crane, D. 1969. Social structure in a group of scientists: a test of the invisible college hypothesis.

American Sociological Review 34: 335-352.

Crane, D. 1972. Invisible colleges: diffusion of knowledge in scientific communities. Chicago: University

of Chicago Press.

Crawford, S. 1971. Informal communication among scientists in sleep research. Journal of the American

Society for Information Science 22: 301-310.

Crawford, S. 1978. Information needs and uses. Annual Review of Information Science and

Technology13: 3-39.

Cronin, B. 1982. Invisible colleges and information transfer: a review and commentary with particular

reference to the social sciences. Journal of Documentation 38: 212-236.

Finholt, Thomas A. 2002. Collaboratories. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology

(ARIST) 36:73-107.

Fisher, C. S. 1966. The death of mathematical theory: a study in the sociology of knowledge. Archives for

the History of Exact Sciences 3: 137-159.Fisher, C. S. 1967. The last invariant theorists. European Journal of Sociology 8: 216-244.

Fulton, c. 1991. Humanities as information users: a review of the literature. Australian Academic and

Research Libraries 22(3): 188-197.

Gaillard, J. 1993. Scientists in the third world. Kentucky: The University Press of Kentucky.

Garvey, W. D. and B. C. Griffith. 1972. Communication and information processing with scientific

disciplines: empirical finding for psychology. Information Storage and Retrieval 8(3): 123-136.

Garvey, W. D., and B. C. Griffith. 1968. Informal channels of information in the behavioral sciences:

their relevance in the structuring of formal or bibliographic communication. In E. B. Montgomery

(Ed.), The Foundations of access to knowledge, 129-146. Syracuse: Syracuse University.

Garvey, William D., and B. C. Griffith. 1966. Studies of social innovations in scientific communication in

psychology. American Psychologist 21: 1019–1036.

Giddens, A. 1984. The constitution of society. Chicago: Polity Press.

Granovetter, M. 1973. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology78: 1360-1380.

Granovetter, M. 1983. The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. Sociological Theory 1: 201-

233.

Gresham Jr., John L. 1994. From invisible college to cyberspace college: computer conferencing and the

transformation of informal scholarly communication networks. Interpersonal Computing and

Technology: An Electronic Journal for the 21st Century 4: 37–52.

Griffith, B. C. 1990. Understanding science: studies of communication and information. In C. L.

Borgman (Ed.), Scholarly communication and bibliometrics,31-45. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Griffith, B. C., and N. C. Mullins.1980. Coherent social groups in scientific change”. In B. C. Griffith

(Ed.), Key papers in information science, Hagstrom, W. O. 1970. Factors related to the use of

different modes of publishing research in four scientific fields. In C. E. Nelson & D. K. Pollock

(Eds.), Communication among scientists and engineers. Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books.

Hiltz, S. R, and M. Turoff. 1993. The network nation: Human communication via computer. Cambridge,

MA: MIT Press.

Hurd, J. M. 2000. The transformation of scientific communication: A model for 2020. Journal of the

American Society for Information Science 51: 1279-1283.

Hurych, J. 1986. After bath: scientists, social scientist, and humanists in the context of online searching.

Journal of Academic Librarianship 12(3): 158-165.

Kadushin, C. 1966. The friends and supporters of psychotherapy: on social circles in urban life. American

Sociological Review31: 786-802..

Kling, R. and G. McKim. 2000. Not just a matter of time: field differences and the shaping of electronic

media in supporting scientific communication. Journal of the American Society for Information

Science54:1306-1320.

Knorr-Cetina, K. D. 1983. The ethnographic study of scientific work: towards a constructivist

interpretation of science. In K. D. Knorr-Cetina & M. Mulkay (Eds.), Science observed: perspectives

on the social study of science, 115-140. London: Sage.

Knorr-Cetina, K. D. 1981. The manufacture of knowledge: an essay on the constructivist and contextual

nature of science. Oxford: Pergamon.

Koku, E., N. Nazer and B. Wellman. 2001. Netting scholars: online and offline. American Behavioral

Scientist 44: 1752-1774.

Latour, B. and S. Woolgar. 1986. Laboratory life: the construction of scientific facts. Princeton: Princeton

University Press.

Laudel, G. 2001. What do we measure by co-authorships? In M. Davis & C. S. Wilson (Eds.)

Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, 369- 384.

Sydney, Australia: Bibliometrics and Informetrics Research Group.

Lievrouw, L. A. 1990 Reconciling structure and process in the study of scholarly communication. In C. L.

Borgman (Ed.), Scholarly communication and bibliometrics, 59-69. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Lievrouw, L. A., and K. Carley. 1990. Changing patterns of communication among scientists in an era of

‘telescience. Technology in Society 12: 457-477.Lievrouw, L. A., E. M. Rogers, C. U. Lowe and E. Nadel. 1987. Triangulation as a research strategy for

identifying invisible colleges among biomedical scientists. Social Networks 9:,217-248.

Luo, Airong, and J. S. Olson. 2006. Informal Communication in Collaboratories. Presented in Conference

on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Montréal, Québec, Canada,: 1043 -1048.

http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1125451.1125650 (accessed Feb. 20, 2008).

Matzat, Uwe. 2004. Academic communication and Internet Discussion Groups: transfer of information or

creation of social contacts? Social Networks26: 221–255.

McSweeney,B. and S. Duncan. 1998. Structure or Agency? Discourse or meta-narrative? Explaining the

emergence of the financial management initiative. Account, Auditing & Accountability Journal 11(3)

Menzel, H. 1964. the information needs of current scientific research. Library quarterly 34: 4-19.

Menzel, Herbert. 1966. Scientific communication: five themes from social science research. American

Psychologist 21:999–1004.

Merton, R. 1957.Priorities in scientific discovery: a chapter in the sociology of science. American

Sociological Review22: 635-659.

Merz, M. 1998. Nobody can force you when you are across the ocean - face to face and e-mail exchanges

between theoretical physicists. In C. Smith and J. Agar (Eds.), Making space for science: territorial

themes in the shaping of knowledge , 313-329. Macmillan, Basingstoke.

Mulkay, M. J., G. N.Gilbert, and S. Woolgar. 1975. Problem areas and research networks in science.

Sociology9: 187-203.

Paisley, W. J. 1968. Information needs and uses. Chicago: American Society for Information Science and

Encyclopedia Britannica.

Paisley, W. J. 1980. Information and work. In B. Dervin and M. J. Voigt (Eds.), Progress in

communication2, 113-165. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corp.

Pelz, D. C., and F. M. Andrews. Scientists in organizations: productive climates for research and

development. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.

Perry, C. A., and R. E. Rice. 1999. Network influences on involvement in the hybrid problem area of

developmental dyslexia. Science Communication 21(1): 38-74.

Perry, C. A., and R. E. Rice. 1998. Scholarly communication in developmental dyslexia: influence of

network structure on change in a hybrid problem area. Journal of the American Society for

Information Science49: 151-168.

Price, D. J. de Solla. 1971. Some remarks on elitism in information and the invisible college phenomenon

in science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science22: 74-75.

Price, D. J. de Solla. 1963. Little science, big science. New York: Columbia University Press.

Price, D.J. de S. 1986. Little science, big science…and beyond. New York: Columbia University Press.

Price, Derek J. de S., and D. Beaver. 1966.Collaboration in an invisible college. American Psychologist

21: 1011– 1018.

Rice, Ron P. 1997. An analysis of stylistic variables in electronic mail. Journal of Management and

Technical Communication 1: 5–23.

Rosenbaum, H. 1993. Information use environments and structuration: towards an integration of Taylor

and Giddens. In S. Bonzi, (Ed.), Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the American Society for

Information Science30, 235-245. Medford, NJ: Learned Information.

Rosenbaum, H. 1996. Managers in and information in organizations: towards a structurational concept

of the information use environment of managers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Syracuse

University, Syracuse, New York.

Sandstrom, P. E. 1998. Information foraging among anthropologists in the invisible college of human

behavioral ecology: an author cocitation analysis. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana

University, Bloomington, Indiana.

Taylor, R. S. 1991. Information use environments. In B. Dervin & M. J. Voigt (Eds.), Progress in

communication sciences 10, 217-255. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corp.

Taylor, R. S. 1986. Value-added processes in information systems. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corp.Lomas, Robert. 2002. The Invisible College the Royal Society, Freemasonry and the Birth of Modern

Science. London: Headline Book Publishing

Traweek, S. 1988. Beamtimes and lifetimes. The world of high energy physicists. Cambridge, MA:

Harvard University Press.

Tuire, P. and P. Erno. 2001. Exploring invisible scientific communities: studying networking relations

within an educational research community. A Finnish case. Higher Education 42: 493-513.

Van Rossum, W. 1973. Informal communication and the development of scientific fields. Social Science

Information12: 63-75.

White, H. 1990. Author cocitation analysis: overview and defense. In C. L. Borgman (Ed.), Scholarly

communication and bibliometrics, 84-106. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

White, H. D., and B. C. Griffith. 1982. Authors and markers of intellectual space: co-citation in studies

of science, technology and society. Journal of Documentation38:255-272.

White, H. D., B. Wellman and N. Nazer. 2004. Does citation reflect social structure? Longitudinal

evidence from the Globenet" interdisciplinary research group. Journal of the American Society for

Information Science and Technology55: 111-126.

Zare, R. N. 1997. Knowledge and distributed intelligence. Science 275: 1047.

Zuccala, A. 2004. Revisiting the invisible college: a case study of the intellectual structure and social

process of Singularity Theory research in mathematics. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University

of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. 2004. http://individual.utoronto.ca/azuccala_web/AZuccala-Thesis.pdf

(accessed Feb. 20, 2008).

Zuccala, Alesia. 2005. Modeling the Invisible College. Journal of the American Society for Information

Science and Technology 57(2): 52 - 168