The exploitation of social tagging in libraries

Kakali, Constantia and Papatheodorou, Christos The exploitation of social tagging in libraries., 2011 . In First Workshop on Digital Information Management, Corfu, Greece, 30-31 March, 2011. [Conference paper]


Download (303kB) | Preview

English abstract

Nowadays, many libraries have developed social tagging services, after the considerable use of social tagging and deployment as key components of Web 2.0. Another set of libraries have enriched the search and indexing services of their OPACs with the folksonomy of Library Thing. The evaluation of these metadata (folksonomies) and further their exploitation is one of our challenges. At the same time, we explore ways to define a methodology for the exploitation of user’s vocabulary by the traditional indexing systems maintained by information organizations. Firstly, our research focused on the user acceptance for the OPACIAL an OPAC 2.0 with social tagging functionalities. The users’ behavior was studied by qualitative evaluation using questionnaires and structured interviews. Social tags are then analyzed and categorized to identify the users’ needs. After finding that a large number of tags consist new terms for the authority file of a Library, these tags were searched in other authority files. The research was completed by developing a methodology for social tagging evaluation and a proposal for developing policies to integrate social tags in their indexing processes. Moving to a new study, librarians - cataloguers assessed the value of the semantics of inserted tags and also investigated the possibility of using them for the subject indexing. Before the new experiment a new set of tags from LibraryThing’s folksonomy had been added to the library. The experiment aimed to compare the two vocabularies and the participants recommended to develop the cooperation with users’ communities in matters of terminology and apodosis of scientific terms.

Item type: Conference paper
Keywords: Web 2.0, folksomonies, tags, subject indexing, cataloguing, OPACs, OPACIAL
Subjects: C. Users, literacy and reading. > CB. User studies.
D. Libraries as physical collections. > DD. Academic libraries.
H. Information sources, supports, channels. > HM. OPACs.
I. Information treatment for information services > IC. Index languages, processes and schemes.
Depositing user: Giannis Tsakonas
Date deposited: 01 Jul 2011
Last modified: 02 Oct 2014 12:19


- Stock, W.G. (2010). Concepts and Semantic Relations in Information Science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 61(10),1951-1969

- Quintarelli, E. (2005) Folksonomies: power to the people. In ISKO Italy-UniMIB meeting. Milan, Italy.

- Mathes, A. (2004). Folksonomies - cooperative classification and communication through shared metadata. Report. Graduate School of Library and Information Science, Illinois Urbana-Champaign. communication/folksonomies.html

- Spiteri, L. F. (2006). The use of folksonomies in Public Library catalogues. Serials Librarian 51, 75-89.

- Lin, X., Beaudoin, J. E., Bui, Y., & Desai, K. (2006). Exploring characteristics of social classification. In Proceedings of the 17th ASIS&T Classification Research Workshop, Austin, Texas, USA.

- Kipp, M.E.I. (2006). Complementary or discrete contexts in online indexing: a comparison of user, creator, and intermediary keywords. Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science 30(3).

- Al-Khalifa, H.S., & Davis, H.C. (2007). Exploring the value of folksonomies for creating semantic metadata. International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems, 3(1), 13-39.

- Voss, J. (2006). Collaborative thesaurus tagging the Wikipedia way.

- Yi, K., Chan, L. M. (2009). Linking folksonomy to Library of Congress subject headings: an exploratory study. Journal of Documentation 65(6), 872-900.

- Yi, K. (2010). A Semantic Similarity Approach to Predicting Library of Congress Subject Headings for Social Tags. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 61(8),1658-1672.

- Thomas, M., Caudle D., Schmitz C. (2009). To tag or not to tag? Library Hi Tech 27(3), 411-334.

- Golder, S., & Huberman, B. (2006). Usage patterns of collaborative tagging systems. Journal of Information Science, 32(2), 198-208.

- Mendes, L.H. Quinonez-Skinner J., Skaggs D. (2008). Subjecting the catalog to tagging. Library Hi Tech 27(1), 30-41.

- Smith, T. (2007). Cataloguing and you: Measuring the efficacy of a folksonomy for subject analysis. In 18th Workshop of the American Society for Information Science and Technology Special Interest Group in Classification Research, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.

- Bartley P. (2009). Book Tagging on LibraryThing: How, why, and what are in the tags? Available at: 16. Pera, M.S., Lund, W., Ng, Y-K., (2009). A sophisticated library search strategy using folksonomies and similarity matching. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(7), 1392-1406.

- Lawson, K. (2009). Mining social tagging data for enhanced subject access for readers and researchers. The Journal of Academic Librarianship 35(6), 574-82.

- Heymann P, Garcia-Molina H. (2009). Contrasting Controlled Vocabulary and Tagging Do Experts Choose the Right Names to Label the Wrong Things? In Proceedings of the Second ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining - WSDM ’09.

- Rolla, BPJ. (2009). User Tags versus Subject Headings Can User-Supplied Data Improve Subject Access to Library Collections? Library, 53(3):174-185.

- Lu, C. Park J-r., Xu, (2010). User tags versus expert-assigned subject terms: A comparison of LibraryThing tags and Library of Congress Subject Headings. Journal of Information Science, 36(6):763-779.

- Stvilia B, Jörgensen C. (2010). Member Activities and Quality of Tags in a Collection of Historical Photographs in Flickr. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 61(12), 2477-2489.

- Gavrilis, D., Kakali, C., & Papatheodorou, C. (2008). Enhancing library services with Web 2.0 functionalities. In Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries (Aarhus, Denmark, September 14 - 19, 2008). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 5173. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 148- 159.


Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item