The Digital Library Professionals’ Learning Culture: A Study on Digital Libraries’ Community of Practice in Europe

Batiancila, Marcial The Digital Library Professionals’ Learning Culture: A Study on Digital Libraries’ Community of Practice in Europe., 2011 Master dissertation thesis, Tallinn University (Estonia). [Thesis]

[img]
Preview
PDF
Batiancila_Marcial (1).pdf

Download (1MB) | Preview

English abstract

In the context of knowledge management (KM) in the field of digital libraries (DL), communities of practice (CoPs) is one of the unexplored areas of interests for research, as compared with those in the fields of business and management, education, engineering and medical sciences. Greater importance is being placed on those communities on their ability to share knowledge, facilitate knowledge transfer and most importantly in providing the proper context for learning to take place. Thus, this research sought to: (1) find out the defining characteristics of CoPs in the field of DL, (2) examine on how CoPs‘ contribute to the development of a learning culture and (3) determine the success and hindering factors in the development of such learning culture. This study was grounded on an interpretivist philosophical view. Hence, the methodological approach of this study was qualitative in nature in which experiential or context-based data were collected through semi-structured interviews. Research sampling was limited to professionals who are actively involved in DL communities. These include DL designers, system developers, system administrators, librarians, academicians in DL educational programmes, graduate students and scholars having common interests in DL and its enabling technologies. The gathered data were analyzed based on Peterson et al.‘s five steps thematic analysis. The findings of the study revealed that DL CoPs take a variety of forms, has no definite structure and their creation is always dependent on the purposes for which they are established. Furthermore, results indicated that there is a strong culture of learning among DL professionals which is characterized by the four distinct cultures of practices – knowledge sharing culture, culture of collaboration, knowledge transfer culture and the culture of innovation. However, there are also critical success factors in creating a culture of learning as follows: human behaviour, organizational and technological factors. In contrast, the hindering factors or barriers include: attitude towards knowledge sharing, culture-related barriers or challenges, language limitation, and time.

Item type: Thesis (UNSPECIFIED)
Keywords: communities of practice, CoPs, learning culture, knowledge management, digital libraries, digital library professionals, Europe, digital librarianship
Subjects: A. Theoretical and general aspects of libraries and information. > AA. Library and information science as a field.
A. Theoretical and general aspects of libraries and information. > AC. Relationship of LIS with other fields .
Depositing user: Marcial Batiancila
Date deposited: 03 Dec 2011
Last modified: 02 Oct 2014 12:20
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/16337

References

Allee, V. (2000). Knowledge networks and communities of practice. OD Practitioner, 32 (4).

Andrew, N., Tolson, B., & Ferguson, D. (2008). Building on Wenger: Communities of practice in nursing. Nurse Education Today, 28, 246–252.

Archer, N. (2006). A classification of communities of practice. In E. Coakes, & S. Clarke (Eds.), Encyclopedia of communities of practice in information and knowledge management (p. 29). Hershey, PA: Idea Group.

Ardichvili, A., Page, V., & Wentling, T. (2003). Motivation and barriers to participation in virtual knowledge-sharing communities of practice. Journal of Knowledge Management, 7 (1), 64 – 77.

Awad, E. M., & Ghaziri, H. M. (1996). Knowledge management. New Delhi, India : Dorling Kindersley.

Barab, S. A., & Roth, W. (2006). Curriculum-based ecosystems: Supporting knowing from an ecological perspective. Educational Researcher, 35 (5), 3-13.

Barab, S. A., MaKinster, J. G., & Scheckler, R. (2004). Designing system dualities: Characterizing an online professional development community. In S. A. Barab, R. Kling, & J. Gray (Eds.), Designing for virtual communities in the service of learning. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

Bellarby, L., & Orange, G. Knowledge sharing through communities of practice in the voluntary sector. In E. Coakes, & S. Clarke (Eds.), Encyclopedia of communities of practice in information and knowledge management (p. 306). Hershey, PA: Idea Group.

Bergeron, B. P. (2003). Essentials of knowledge management. New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons.

Bishop, A. P., Lynch, C., Borgman, C., Marshall, C. C., Star, S. L., & Bowker, G. C. (2000). Digital library use (panel session): Social practice in design and evaluation. Proceedings of the Fifth ACM Conference on Digital Libraries, 276-277. San Antonio, Texas.117

Bishop, A., Van House, N. A., & Buttenfield, B. P. (Eds.). (2003). Digital library use : social practice in design and evaluation. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.

Botcheva, L., White, C. R., & Huffman, L. C. (2002). Learning culture and outcomes measurement practices in community agencies. American Journal of Evaluation, 23.

Bozarth, J. (2008). The usefulness of Wenger‘s framework in understanding a community of practice. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina.

Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18 (1), 32-41.

Bryman, A. (2001). Social research methods. . Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Cambridge, D., Kaplan, S., & Suter, V. (2005). Community of practice design guide: A step-by-step guide for designing & cultivating communities of practice in higher education. Retrieved February 7, 2011, from http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/NLI0531.pdf.

Candela, L. (2010). The digital library reference model. [Pisa, Italy]: DL.org.

CDC Public Health Information Network. (2008). InfoLinks community of practice : Community charter. Retrieved January 8, 2011, from http://www.cdc.gov/phin/communities/current-cops/infolinks/docs/InfoLinksCoPCharter.pdf.

Clovis, J. B. (2010). Dalhousie University‘s communities of practice: Part 2 -Research collaborations. Journal of Canadian Dental Association, 76 (a34).

Coakes, E., & Clarke, S. (2006). Encyclopedia of communities of practice in information and knowledge management. Hershey, PA: Idea Group.

Coburn, C. C., & Stein, M. K. (2006). Communities of practice theory and role of teacher professional community in policy implementation. In M. I. Honig (Ed.), New directions in education policy implementation: Confronting complexity.Albany: State University of New York Press.

Conner, M. L., & Clawson, J. G. (2002). Creating a learning culture. Retrieved January 8, 2011, from Ageless Learner: http://agelesslearner.com/articles/lc_connerclawson_tc600.html.

Conner, M. L., & Clawson, J. G. (2004). Creating a learning culture: Strategy, technology, and practice. Cambridge, UK : Cambridge University Press.

Cox, A. (2005). What are communities of practice? A comparative review of four seminal works. Journal Information Science, 31, 527-540.

Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Daele, A., Deschryver, N., Gorga, D., & Künzel, M. (2007). Managing knowledge within communities of practice: Analysing needs and developing services. eLearning Papers, 5.

Daele, A., Deschryver, N., Gorga, D., & Künzel, M. (2007). Managing knowledge within communities of practice: Analysing needs and developing services. eLearning Papers, 5.

Dawson, C. (2002). Practical research methods: A user-friendly guide to mastering research techniques and projects. UK: How To Books.

Dempsey, L., & Lavoie, B. (2005). DLF service framework for digital libraries. Retrieved from Digital Library Federation: http://old.diglib.org/architectures/serviceframe/dlfserviceframe1.htm#_Toc104101319.

Denzin, N.K. and Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2000). Handbook of Qualitative Research (2nd ed.), London: Sage Publications.

DL.org. (2010b). DL.org mission : A common journey to new frontiers. Retrieved Febraury 19, 2011, from http://www.dlorg.eu/.

DL.org. (2010a). Seminar on research & education in digital libraries. Parma, Italy.

DL.org. (2011). Workshop on digital libraries & open access: Interoperability strategies. London, UK.

Dubé, L., Bourhis, A., & Jacob, R. (2005). The impact of structuring characteristics on the launching of virtual communities of practice. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 18 (2), 145-166.

Easterby-Smith, M., & Thorpe, R. a. (1991). Management research: An introduction.London: Sage.

Fielding, N. (1993). Ethnography. In N. Fielding (Ed.), Researching Social Life.London: Sage.

Fontaine, M. A., & Millen, D. R. (2004). Understanding the benefits and impact of communities of practice. In P. M. Hildreth, & C. Kimble (Eds.), Knowledge networks : innovation through communities of practice. London: Idea Group Publishing.

Frost, A. (2010). Organizational learning and communities of practice. Retrieved February 7, 2011, from A KM Resource Site: http://www.knowledgemanagement-tools.net/communities-of-practice.html.

Fuller, A., Hodkinson, H., & Hodkinson, P. (2005). Learning as peripheral participation in communities of practice: a Reassessment of key concepts in workplace learning. British Educational Research Journal, 31 (1).

Galagan, P. A. (1993). The search for the poetry of work. Training & Development, 47 (10), 33-37.

Golafshani, N. (2003). Understanding reliability and validity in qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 8 (4), 597-607.

Gray, B. (2004). Informal learning in an online community of practice. Journal of Distance Education, 19 (1), 20-35.

Hanks, W. F. (1991). Foreword. In J. Lave, & E. Wenger, Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Hara, N. (2007). Information technology support for communities of practice: How public defenders learn about winning and losing in court. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58 (1), 76–87.

Hara, N., & Hew, K. F. (2006). A case study of a longstanding online community of practice involving critical care and advanced practice nurses. 39th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

Hara, N., Shachaf, P., & Stoerger, S. (2009). Online communities of practice typology revisited. Journal of Information Science, 35, 740-75.

Harris, C. L. (2006). Learning and innovation in communities of practice. Retrieved December 8, 2010, from www.pyramidodi.com/papers/CoPs.pdf

Henschel, P. (2001, Fall). Understanding and winning the bnever-ending search for talent. Retrieved February 2, 2011, from LineZine : http://www.linezine.com/6.2/articles/phuwnes.htm.

Hildreth, P., & Kimble, C. (Eds.). (2004). Knowledge networks : innovation through communities of practice. Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publsihing.

Houser, J. (2008). Nursing research: Reading, using, and creating evidence. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett.

Hubert, C., Newhouse, B., & Vestal, W. (2001). Building and sustaining communities of practice. Houston: American Productivity Centre.

International Federation of Library Association and Institutions. (2010). IFLA strategic plan 2010-2015. Hague, Netherlands: IFLA.

Jackson, P. (Ed.). (1999). Virtual working: Social and organisational dynamics.London: Routledge.

Johnson, M. (2001). A survey of current research on online communities of practice. Internet and Higher Education, 4, 51.

Knowledge management. (2011). Retrieved March 27, 2011, from Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Knowledge_management&oldid=431163123.

Kvale, S. (1996). Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing.California: Sage.

Kwok, W. L., Pratt, K., Anderson, M., & Stigter, S. (2006). Literature review and synthesis: Online communities of practice. New Zealand: Ministry of Education.

La Pelle, N. (2004). Simplifying qualitative data analysis using general purpose tools. Field Methods, 16 (1).

Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning : Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Learning theory (education). (2011, May 11). Retrieved June 6, 2011, from Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Learning_theory_(education)&oldid=428607258.

Lesser, E. L., & Fontaine, M. A. (2004). Communities of practice: Lessons learned through practical experience. In P. Hildreth, & C. Kimble (Eds.), Knowledge networks : innovation through communities of practice. Hershey, PA: Idea Group.

Lesser, E. L., & J. Storck, J. (2001). Community of practice and organizational development. IBM Systems Journal, 40 (4).

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. . Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Liu, X., Bollen, J., Nelson, M. L., & Van de Sompel, H. (2005). Co-authorship networks in the digital library research community. Information Processing & Management, 41, 1462-1480.

Ludden, J. B. (2009). Learning in a heterogeneous community of practice (Unpublished dissertation). Northern Illinois University, De Kalb, Illinois.Maccoby, M. (2003). The seventh rule: Creating a learning culture. Research Technology Management, 43 (3), 59-60.

Maier, R. (2007). Knowledge management systems : Information and communications technologies for knowledge management (3rd ed.). New York: Springer.

Mallon, D. (2010). High-impact learning culture 2010 : Executive summary. Bersin & Associate Research Report, 1.0.

McDermott, R. (2000). Knowing in community: 10 critical cuccess factors in building communities of practice. Retrieved January 23, 2011, from http://www.a-ia.com/KM-GC-MONTREAL/dossiers/KnowingInCommunity.pdf

Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation.San Francisco, CA: John Wiley.

Minerva Project. (2008). About Minerva eC. Retrieved March 12, 2011, from Minerva eEurope: http://www.minervaeurope.org/about/minervaec.htm.

Minerva Project. (2007). Good practices in digitization. Retrieved March 12, 2011, from Minerva eEurope: http://www.minervaeurope.org/bestpractices/listgoodpract.htm.

Munhall, P. L. (2007). Nursing research: a qualitative perspective. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett.

Murillo, E. (2008). Searching Usenet for virtual communities of practice: using mixed methods to identify the constructs of Wenger's theory. Information Research, 13(4).

Oguz, F. (2007). An exploration of the diffusion of a new technology from communities of practice perspective: Web services technologies in digital libraries (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of North Texas, Denton, Texas.

Oguz, F., Marsh, C., & Landis, C. (2010). Collaboration through communities of practice in the digital age. Technological Convergence and Social Networks in Information Management Communications in Computer and Information Science, 96 (1).

Parboosingh, J. T. (2002). Physician communities of practice: Where learning and practice are inseparable. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 22, 230–236.

Parker, S., & Biro, T. (2010). Digital Library learning through the eyes of a master student. Retrieved December 29, 2010, from DL.org: http://www.dlorg.eu/index.php/on-line-media-room/interviews/interview-withmarcial-reyes-batiancilaon-line-media-room/interviews/interview-with-marcialreyes-batiancila.

Patton, M. (2001). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Patton, M. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Peters, C. (2000, April). ERCIM launches the DELOS Network of Excellence for Digital Libraries. Retrieved from ERCIM News: http://www.ercim.eu/publication/Ercim_News/enw41/delos.html.

Peterson, T. R., White, K., Enkerlin-hoeflich, E., Espericueta, L., Flora, J. T., Florey, N., et al. (1994). Using informant directed interviews to discover risk orientation: How formative evaluations based in interpretive analysis can improve persuasive safety campaigns. Journal of Applied Communication, 22, 199–215.

Petter, C., Reich, K., & Helling, K. (2007). Social software and the establishment of virtual communities of practice in the tourism sector. eLearning Papers, 5.

Pickard, A. J. (2007). Research methods in information. London: Facet Publishing.

Pope, C., Ziebland, S., & Mays, N. (2000). Qualitative research in health care : Analysing qualitative data. British Medical Journal, 320.

Raitt, D. (2000). Digital library initiatives across Europe. Computers in Libraries, 20(10).

Retna, K. S., & Ng, P. T. (2011). Communities of practice: dynamics and success factors. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 32 (1), 41 - 59.

Robey, D., Khoo, H., & Powers, C. (2000). Situated learning in cross-functional virtual teams. Journal of the Society for Technical Communication, 47 (1), 51-66.

Rogers, J. (2000). Communities of practice: A framework for fostering coherence in virtual learning communities. Educational Technology & Society, 3 (3).

Rumizen, C. M. (2002). The complete idiot's guide to knowledge management.Madison, WI: CWL Publishing Enterprises.

Ryan, G., & Bernard, H. R. (2000). Data management and analysis methods Sage, 769-802. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Seidman, I. (2006). Interviewing as qualitative research : A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art & practice of the learning organization. New York: Doubleday.

Serrat, O. (2008, October). Building communities of practice. Knowledge Solutions. Manila: Asian Development Bank.

Siegle, D. (2002a). Qualitative research. Retrieved February 20, 2011, from Principles and Methods in Educational Research : A Web-based Course from the University of Connecticut: http://www.gifted.uconn.edu/siegle/research/Qualitative/qualitativeInstructorNotes.html.

Siegle, D. (2002b). Trustworthiness. Retrieved February 20, 2011, from Principles and Methods of Educational Research : A Web-based Course from the University of Connecticut: http://www.gifted.uconn.edu/siegle/research/Qualitative/trust.htm.

Stake, R. E. (2010). Qualitative research : studying how things work. New York, NY : The Guilford Press.

Stakehoder. (2011). Retrieved February 10, 2011, from BusinessDictionary.com:http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/stakeholder.html.

Star, S. L., Bowker, G. C., & Neumann, L. J. (2003). Transparency beyond the individual level of scale: Convergence between information artifacts and communities of practice. In A. P. Bishop, N. A. Van House, & B. P. Buttenfield (Eds.), Digital library use : social practice in design and evaluation.Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Taylor, C., & Gibbs, G. R. (2010). What is Qualitative Data Analysis (QDA)?Retrieved April 22, 2011, from Online QDA Web Site: http://onlineqda.hud.ac.uk/Intro_QDA/what_is_qda.php.

Van House, N. A. (2003). Digital libraries and collaborative knowledge construction. In A. P. Bishop, N. A. Van House, & B. P. Buttenfield (Eds.), Digital library use : social practice in design and evaluation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Wallace, D. P. (2007). Knowledge management: historical and cross-disciplinary themes. Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited.

Walsham, G. (1993). Interpreting information systems in organizations. Chichester: Wiley.

Wasko, M., & Faraj, S. (2000). It is what one does: why people participate and help others in electronic communities of practice. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 9 (2-3), 155–173.

Wenger, E. (2000). Communities of practice and social learning systems. Organization, 7 (2).

Wenger, E. (1998a). Communities of practice. Learning as a social system. The Systems Thinker, 9 (5).

Wenger, E. (2006, June). Communities of practice: A brief introduction. Retrieved December 7, 2010, from http://www.ewenger.com/theory/index.htm

Wenger, E. (1998b). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Wenger, E., & Snyder, W. (2000). Learning in communities. Retrieved December 21, 2010, from Line Zine: http://www.linezine.com/1/features/ewwslc.htm.

Wenger, E., McDermott, R., & Snyder, W. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge. Boston, Mass.: Harvard Business School Press.

Wenger, E., White, N., & Smith, J. D. (2009). Digital habitats : Stewarding technology for communities. Portland, OR: CPsquare.

What is learning culture?. (2011). Retrieved April 6, 2011, from training.com.au: http://www.training.com.au/pages/menuitemfa8c35992f940190f9fa5a1017a62dbc.aspx.

World Bank. (n.d.). Communities of practice questions and answers. Retrieved January 3, 2011, from http://siteresources.worldbank.org/WBI/Resources/CoP_QA.pdf.

Worrall, A. (2010). Supporting community-building in digital libraries: A pilot study of LibraryThing. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 47, 1-3.


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item