Login
Create Account

The Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations

Leydesdorff, Loet The Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations., 2012 [Preprint]

Preview

PDF
The Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations.Jan12.pdf
Download (313kB) | Preview

English abstract

Etzkowitz & Leydesdorff (2000) further elaborated the Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations (cf. Etzkowitz & Leydesdorff, 1995; Lowe, 1982) into a model for studying knowledge-based economies. A series of workshops, conferences, and special issues of journals have developed under this title since 1996. In various countries, the Triple Helix concept has also been used as an operational strategy for regional development and to further the knowledge-based economy. This short review (4000 words) provides an update (in January 2012) of the further elaborations of various Triple Helix models (such as a neo-institutional versus neo-evolutionary version). The surplus of using different models is specified in terms of research strategies. Using Triple Helix indicators, one can evaluate to what extent an innovation system is nationally, regionally, or technologically integrated.

Item type:	Preprint
Keywords:	Triple Helix, Mode-2, innovation, translation, communication of meaning
Subjects:	B. Information use and sociology of information > BE. Information economics.
Depositing user:	Loet Leydesdorff
Date deposited:	04 Feb 2012
Last modified:	02 Oct 2014 12:21
URI:	http://hdl.handle.net/10760/16559

Check full metadata for this record

References

Almeida, M. (2005). The evolution of the incubator movement in Brazil. International Journal of Technology and Globalisation, 1(2), 258-277.

Aoki, M. (2001). Towards a Comparative Institutional Analysis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Beccatini, G. (2003). The Development of Tuscany: Industrial Districts. In G. Beccatini, M. Bellandi, G. dei Ottati & F. Sforzi (Eds.), From Industrial Districts to Local Development: An Itinerary of Research (pp. 11-28). Cheltenham, UK; Northhampton, MA: Edward Elgar.

Braczyk, H.-J., Cooke, P., & Heidenreich, M. (Eds.). (1998). Regional Innovation Systems. London/ Bristol PA: University College London Press.

Bunders, J. F. G., Broerse, J. E. W., & Zweekhorst, M. B. M. (1999). The triple helix enriched with the user perspective: A view from Bangladesh. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 24(2), 235-246.

Carlsson, B. (2006). Internationalization of Innovation Systems: A Survey of the Literature. Research Policy, 35(1), 56-67.

Clark, B. R. (1998). Creating Entrepreneurial Universities: Organization Pathways of Transformation. Guildford, UK: Pergamon.

Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1989). Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R & D. The Economic Journal, 99(397), 569-596.

Cooke, P., & Leydesdorff, L. (2006). Regional Development in the Knowledge-Based Economy: The Construction of Advantages. Journal of Technology Transfer, 31(1), 5-15.

dei Ottati, G. (2003). Local Governance and Industrial Districts’ Competitive Advantage. In G. Beccatini, M. Bellandi, G. dei Ottati & F. Sforzi (Eds.), From Industrial Districts to Local Development: An Itinerary of Research (pp. 184-209). Cheltenham, UK/ Northhampton, MA: Edward Elgar.

Dolfsma, W., & Leydesdorff, L. (2009). Lock-in & Break-out from Technological Trajectories: Modeling and policy implications. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76(7), 932-941.

Dosi, G. (1982). Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories: A Suggested Interpretation of the Determinants and Directions of Technical Change. Research Policy, 11(3), 147-162.

Etzkowitz, H. (1994). Academic-Industry Relations: A Sociological Paradigm for Economic Development. In L. Leydesdorff & P. van den Besselaar (Eds.), Evolutionary Economics and Chaos Theory: New Directions in Technology Studies (pp. 139-151). London, etc.: Pinter.

Etzkowitz, H. (2002). MIT and the Rise of Entrepreneurial Science. London: Routledge.

Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (1995). The Triple Helix---University-Industry-Government Relations: A Laboratory for Knowledge-Based Economic Development. EASST Review 14, 14-19.

Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (1997). Universities and the Global Knowledge Economy: A Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations. London: Pinter.

Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (1998). The Endless Transition: A "Triple Helix" of University-Industry-Government Relations, Introduction to a Theme Issue. Minerva, 36, 203-208.

Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The Dynamics of Innovation: From National Systems and 'Mode 2' to a Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109-123.

Etzkowitz, H., Webster, A., Gebhardt, C., & Terra, B. R. C. (2000). The future of the university and the university of the future: evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm. Research Policy, 29(2), 313-330.

Fire, A., Xu, S. Q., Montgomery, M. K., Kostas, S. A., Driver, S. E., & Mello, C. C. (1998). Potent and specific genetic interference by double-stranded RNA in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature, 391(6669), 806-811.

Foray, D. (2004). The Economics of Knowledge. Cambridge, MA/London: MIT Press.

Freeman, C. (1987). Technology, policy, and economic performance: lessons from Japan. London: Pinter Publishers.

Freeman, C., & Perez, C. (1988). Structural crises of adjustment, business cycles and investment behaviour. In G. Dosi, C. Freeman, R. Nelson, G. Silverberg & L. Soete (Eds.), Technical Change and Economic Theory (pp. 38-66). London: Pinter.

Freeman, C., & Soete, L. (1997). The Economics of Industrial Innovation. London: Pinter.

Gay, B. (2010). Innovative network in transition: From the fittest to the richest. Available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1649967.

Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge: the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage.

Godin, B., & Gingras, Y. (2000). The place of universities in the system of knowledge production. Research Policy, 29(2), 273-278.

Hall, P. A., & Soskice, D. W. (Eds.). (2001). Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford, etc.: Oxford University Press.

Jacob, M. (2006). Utilization of social science knowledge in science policy: Systems of Innovation, Triple Helix and VINNOVA. Social Science Information, 45(3), 431-462.

Krippendorff, K. (2009). Information of Interactions in Complex Systems. International Journal of General Systems, 38(6), 669-680.

Kwon, K. S., Park, H. W., So, M., & Leydesdorff, L. (2012). Has Globalization Strengthened South Korea’s National Research System? National and International Dynamics of the Triple Helix of Scientific Co-authorship Relationships in South Korea. Scientometrics, 90(1), 163-175; doi: 10.1007/s11192-11011-10512-11199

Latour, B. (1987). Science in Action. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

Lengyel, B., & Leydesdorff, L. (2011). Regional innovation systems in Hungary: The failing synergy at the national level. Regional Studies, 45(5), 677-693.

Leydesdorff, L. (1995). The Challenge of Scientometrics: The development, measurement, and self-organization of scientific communications. Leiden: DSWO Press, Leiden University; at http://www.universal-publishers.com/book.php?method=ISBN&book=1581126816.

Leydesdorff, L. (2006). The Knowledge-Based Economy: Modeled, Measured, Simulated. Boca Raton, FL: Universal Publishers.

Leydesdorff, L. (2011). "Meaning" as a sociological concept: A review of the modeling, mapping, and simulation of the communication of knowledge and meaning. Social Science Information, 50(3-4), 1-23.

Leydesdorff, L., & Bornmann, L. (in preparation). Mapping (USPTO) Patent Data using Overlays to Google Maps.

Leydesdorff, L., & Fritsch, M. (2006). Measuring the Knowledge Base of Regional Innovation Systems in Germany in terms of a Triple Helix Dynamics. Research Policy, 35(10), 1538-1553.

Leydesdorff, L., & Meyer, M. (2010). The Decline of University Patenting and the End of the Bayh-Dole Effect. Scientometrics, 83(2), 355-362.

Leydesdorff, L., & Rafols, I. (2011). How Do Emerging Technologies Conquer the World? An Exploration of Patterns of Diffusion and Network Formation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(5), 846-860.

Leydesdorff, L., & Sun, Y. (2009). National and International Dimensions of the Triple Helix in Japan: University-Industry-Government versus International Co-Authorship Relations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 60(4), 778-788.

Lowe, C. U. (1982). The Triple Helix—NIH, industry, and the academic world. The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine, 55(3-4), 239-246.

Luhmann, N. (1995). Social Systems. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Lundin, P. (2011). Is silence still golden? Mapping the RNAi patent landscape. Nature Biotechnology, 29(6), 493-497.

Lundvall, B.-Å. (1988). Innovation as an interactive process: from user-producer interaction to the national system of innovation. In G. Dosi, C. Freeman, R. Nelson, G. Silverberg & L. Soete (Eds.), Technical Change and Economic Theory (pp. 349-369). London: Pinter.

Malerba, F., Nelson, R., Orsenigo, L., & Winter, S. (1999). ‘History-firendly’ Models of Industry Evolution: The Computer Industry. Industrial and Corporate Change, 8(1), 3-35.

Mirowski, P., & Sent, E. M. (2007). The Commercialization of Science, and the Response of STS. In E. J. Hackett, O. Amsterdamska, M. Lynch & J. Wajcman (Eds.), Handbook of Science, Technology and Society Studies (pp. 635-689). Cambridge, MA/London: MIT Press.

MIT Technology Licensing Office (2006). Licensing for RNAi Patents, at http://web.mit.edu/tlo/www/industry/RNAi_patents_tech.html (Retrieved on Oct. 19, 2011).

Nelson, R. R. (Ed.). (1993). National Innovation Systems: A comparative analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.

Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1977). In Search of Useful Theory of Innovation. Research Policy, 6, 35-76.

Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1982). An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

Noble, D. (1977). America by Design. New York: Knopf.

Nowotny, H., Scott, P., & Gibbons, M. (2001). Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty. Cambridge, etc: Polity.

Park, H. W., & Leydesdorff, L. (2010). Longitudinal trends in networks of university-industry-government relations in South Korea: The role of programmatic incentives. Research Policy, 39(5), 640-649.

Rothwell, R., & Zegveld, W. (1981). Industrial Innovation and Public Policy. London: Pinter.

Saad, M., Zawdie, G., & Malairaja, C. (2008). The triple helix strategy for universities in developing countries: the experiences in Malaysia and Algeria. Science and Public Policy, 35(6), 431-443.

Sábato, J. (1975). El pensamiento latinoamericano en la problemática ciencia–technología–desarrollo-dependencia. Buenos Aires: Paidós.

Schumpeter, J. ([1939], 1964). Business Cycles: A Theoretical, Historical and Statistical Analysis of Capitalist Process. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Shinn, T. (2002). The Triple Helix and New Production of Knowledge : Prepackaged Thinking on Science and Technology. Social Studies of Science, 32(4), 599-614.

Soete, L., & ter Weel, B. (1999). Schumpeter and the knowledge-based economy: On technology and competition policy. Research Memoranda 004. MERIT, Maastricht Economic Research Institute on Innovation and Technology.

Strand, O., & Leydesdorff, L. (in preparation). Where is Synergy in the Norwegian Innovation System Indicated? Triple Helix Relations among Technology, Organization, and Geography.

Sung, J. J., & Hopkins, M. M. (2006). Towards a method for evaluating technological expectations: Revealing uncertainty in gene silencing technology discourse. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 18(3), 345-359.

Vernon, R. (1979). The Product Cycle Hypothesis in a New International Environment. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 41(4), 255-267.

Viale, R., & Campodall’Orto, S. (2002). An evolutionary Triple Helix to strengthen academy-industry relations:suggestions from European regions. Science and Public Policy, 29(3), 154-168.

Viale, R., & Pozzali, A. (2010). Complex Adaptive Systems and the Evolutionary Triple Helix. Critical Sociology, 36(4), 575-594.

Whitley, R. D. (1984). The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Windrum, P. (1999). Simulation models of technological innovation: a review. American Behavioral Scientist, 42(10), 1531-1550.