Flexibility in Higher Education: Revisiting Expectations

Collis, Betty and Moonen, Jef Flexibility in Higher Education: Revisiting Expectations. Revista Comunicar, 2011, vol. XIX, n. 37, pp. 15-25. [Journal article (Paginated)]

[img]
Preview
PDF
en15-25.pdf

Download (213kB) | Preview

English abstract

We have studied the construct of flexibility in higher education for many years, as researchers and practitioners. In this context we define flexibility as the way of offering the student various choices in how, what, where, when and with whom he or she participates in learning-related activities while enrolled in a higher education institution. In a textbook we wrote on the topic in 2001 we identified options that could be available to students in higher education to increase the flexibility of their participation. We studied these options from the perspective, not only of the student, but also in terms of the consequences for instructors and for higher-education institutions, and examined the key roles that pedagogical change and technology play in increasing flexibility. Now is it nearly a decade later. We will revisit key issues related to flexibility in higher education, identify in broad terms the extent to which increased flexibility has become established, is it still developing, or has been developed in ways we did not anticipate directly a decade earlier. We will also review our scenarios for change in higher education related to flexibility and contrast these with a more-recent set from the UK. Our major conclusion is that flexibility is still as pertinent an issue for higher education in 2011 as it was in 2001.

Spanish abstract

Llevamos bastantes años estudiando la construcción de la flexibilidad en la educación superior, tanto desde la óptica de la investigación como de la práctica. Entendemos por flexibilidad la opción de ofrecer a los estudiantes la posibilidad de elegir cómo, qué, dónde, cuándo y con quién participan en las actividades de aprendizaje mientras están en una institución de educación superior. En el libro que escribimos sobre esta temática en 2001 identificamos opciones posibles para los estudiantes de educación superior con la finalidad de incrementar la flexibilidad de su participación. Lo estudiamos no sólo desde la perspectiva del estudiante sino también esde las implicaciones para los profesores y para las instituciones de educación superior, y examinamos el papel fundamental que desempeñan el cambio pedagógico y la tecnología en el aumento de la flexibilidad. Ahora, diez años después, revisamos los temas clave relacionados con la flexibilidad en la educación superior e identificamos, en términos generales, hasta qué punto se ha ido estableciendo el incremento de la flexibilidad, si todavía está evolucionando o si ha evolucionado de una forma que no pudimos prever hace diez años. Revisamos también nuestros escenarios para el cambio en la educación superior relacionados con la flexibilidad y los contrastamos con un estudio más reciente llevado a cabo en el Reino Unido. Nuestra conclusión principal es que la cuestión de la flexibilidad en la educación superior sigue siendo tan pertinente en 2010 como lo era en 2001.

Item type: Journal article (Paginated)
Keywords: Flexibility higher education technology change pedagogy implementation scenarios
Subjects: H. Information sources, supports, channels. > HN. e-journals.
Depositing user: Alex Ruiz
Date deposited: 28 Feb 2012
Last modified: 02 Oct 2014 12:21
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/16648

References

ALLEN, I.E. & SEAMAN, J. (2007). Online Nation: Five Years of Growth in Online Learning. Needham (MA, USA): Sloan-Consortium. (http://sloanconsortium.org/publications/sur vey/pdf/online_nation.pdf) (01-08-2010).

ANDERSON, T. (2009). Social Networking in Education. Draft chapter STRIDE Handbook, Indira Gandhi National Open University. (http://terrya.edublogs.org/2009/04/28/social-networkingchapter) (01-08-2010).

ANZAI, Y. (2009). Digital Trends among Japanese University Students: Podcasting and Wikis as Tools for Learning. International Journal on E-Learning, 8, 4; 453-468.

ATTWELL, G. (2007). The Personal Learning Environments. The Future of eLearning? eLearning Papers 2, 1. (www.elearningeuropa.info/files/media/media11561.pdf). (01-08-2010).

BENFIELD, G.; RAMANAU, R. & SHARPE, R. (2009). «Student learning Technology Use: Preferences for Study and Contact». Brookes eJournal of Learning and Teaching, 2, 4. (http://bejlt.brookes.ac.uk/article/student_learning_technology_use_preferences_for_study_and_contact) (01-08-2010).

BERNSTEIN, R. (2000). America’s 100 most wired collages. Yahoo!Internet Life; 114-119.

BOLOGNA WORKING GROUP ON QUALIFICATIONS FRAMEWORKS (2004). A Framework for Qualifications of the European Higher Education Area. Bruselas: Comisión Europea. Sócrates. Dirección General de Educación y Cultura. (http://info.uu.se/uadm/dokument.nsf/en het/8bfc63d6148defc4c1256ee0003d63c1/$file/QF%20of%20EHEA2.pdf) (01-08-2010).

BROWN, M.B. & LIPPINCOTT, J.K. (2003). Learning Spaces: Morethan Meets the Eye. EDUCAUSE Quarterly, 1; 14-16.

BROWN, N.; BEKHRADNIA, B.; BOORMAN, S.; BRICKWOOD, A.; CLARK, T. & RAMSDEN, B. (2008). The Future Size and Shape of the Higher Education Sector in the UK: Threats and Opportunities. London: Report prepared for Universities UK. (www.universitiesuk.ac.uk/ Publications/Documents/Size_and_shape2.pdf) (01-08-2010).

COLLIS, B. (2010). Studying Learning Spaces in the Iborrow Context. Project Report. iBorrow, Canterbury Christ Church University. Canterbury (UK): University of Christ Church. (www.canterbury.ac.uk/projects/iborrow/documents/iBorrow-Pedagogic-Research-Reflections.pdf) (01-08-2010).

COLLIS, B. & MESSING, J. (2001). Usage, attitudes and Workload Implications for a Web-Based Learning Environment. Journal of Advanced Learning Technologies, 9, 1; 17-25.

COLLIS, B. & MOONEN, J. (2001). Flexible Learning in a Digital World: Experiences and Expectations. London: Routledge.

COLLIS, B. & MOONEN, J. (2005). An On-going journey: Technology as a Learning Workbench. University of Twente: Enschede; 96.(www.BettyCollisJefMoonen.nl/rb.htm) (01-08-2010).

COLLIS, B. & MOONEN, J. (2008). Web 2.0 Tools and Processes in Higher Education: Quality Perspectives. Educational Media International, 45, 2; 93-106.

COMRIE, A.; SMYTH, K. & MAYES, T. (2009). Learners in Control: The TESEP Approach. In: MAYES, T.; MORRISON, D.; MELLAR, H.; BULLAN, P. & OLIVER, M. (Eds.). Transforming higher education through technology-enhanced learning. York (UK): The Higher Education Academy; 208-219.

CONOLE, G.; DYKE, M.; OLIVER, M. & SEALE, J. (2004). Mapping Pedagogy and Tools for Effective Learning Design. Computers & Education, 43; 17-33.

DE BOER, W.F. (2004). Flexibility Support for a Changing University. Phd dissertation, Faculty of Behavioural Sciences. University of Twente: Enschede; 208-219. (http://doc.utwente.nl/41410/1/DissertatieWdeBoerITBE.pdf) (01-08-2010).

Financial Times (Ed.) (2000) Business education». Financial Times; 13; 03-04-2000.

GAINES, B.R.; NORRIE, D.H. & SHAW, M.L. (1996). Foundations for the Learning Web. (http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.33.4846) (01-08-2010).

GERVEDINK NIJHUIS, G. (2005). Academics in Control: Supporting Personal Performance for Teaching-Related Managerial Activities. Phd dissertation, Faculty of Behavioural Sciences. University of Twente: Enschede.

HALL, R. & CONBOY, H. (2009). Scoping the Connections between Emergent Technologies and Pedagogies for Learner Empowerment. In: MAYES, T.; MORRISON, D.; MELLAR, H.; BULLAN, H. & OLIVER, H. (Eds.). Transforming Higher Education through Technology-enhanced Learning. York (UK): The Higher Education Academy; 220-234.

HEFCE (2006). Designing Spaces for Effective Learning. Bristol (UK): Higher Education Funding Council for England. (www.jisc.ac.uk/whatwedo/programmes/elearninginnovation/learningspaces.aspx) (01-08-2010).

HEO, M. (2009). Design considerations for today’s online learners: A study of personalized, relationship-based social awareness information. International Journal of E-Learning, 8, 3; 293-311.

HERMANS, H. & VERJANS, S. (2008). Van WWW naar een persoonlijk kennisweb [De la WWW a una web personal del conocimiento]. Onderwijsinnovatie, 10, 2; 37-39.

JAMESON, D.G. (2002). Impact of Educational Technology on Higher Education. Internal Report. London: Multimedia Support and Communications Centre, University College London.

MARTIN, P. (2008). Learning and Learning Spaces for the 21st Century. Educational Developments, 9, 4. London: SEDA (Staffand Educational Development Association). (www.seda.ac.uk/?p= 5_4_1&pID=9.4) (01-08-2010).

NEW MEDIA CONSORTIUM (2008). The Horizon Report: 2008 edition.Report by The New Media Consortium and the Educause Learning Initiative. Boulder (USA): Educause. (http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/CSD5320.pdf) (01-08-2010).

SCHREURS, B. (Ed.). (2009). Reviewing the Virtual Campus Phenomenon. The Rise of Large-scale E-learning Initiatives World wide. Re.ViCa Project, Reviewing (traces) of European Virtual Campuses. EuroPACE. Heverlee (Belgium). (http://revica.europace.org/Re.ViCa%20Online%20Handbook.pdf) (01-08-2010).

SHARPE, R. (2009). The Impact Of Learner Experience Research On Transforming Educational Practices. In: MAYES, T.; MORRISON, D.; MELLAR, H.; BULLAN, P. & OLIVER, M. (Eds.). Transforming Higher Education Through Technology-Enhanced Learning. York (UK): The Higher Education Academy; 178-190.

SIMONS, P.R. (2002). Digitale Didactiek: Hoe (Kunnen) Academici Leren ICT Te Gebruiken in Hun Onderwijs [Didáctica digital: cómo pueden aprender los académicos a usar las TIC en su labor]. University of Utrecht (home.tiscali.nl/robertjansi mons/.../Digitale%20 didactiek%20thema.doc) (01-08-2010).

STEADMAN, S. (2010). iBorrow laptop borrowing scheme. Easier than borrowing a book: External evaluation-final report. Report submitted to JISC at the completion of the iBorrow Project. Canterbury (UK): Universidad de Christ Church. (www.canterbury.ac.uk/ projects/iborrow/documents/iBorrow-External-Evaluation-Report.pdf) (01-08-2010).

TAN, D.T.; LEE, C.S.; CHAN, L. K. & LU, A.D. (2009). University 2.0: A View from Singapore. International Journal on E-Learning, 8, 4; 511-526.

TWIGG, C.A. (2004). Improving Learning and Reducing Costs: Lessons Learned from Round II of the Pew Grant Program in Course Redesign. Troy (USA): Center for Academic Transformation, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute. (www.thencat.org/ PCR/RdII Lessons.pdf) (01-08-2010).

WESTERMAN, S. & BARRY, W. (2009). Mind the Gap: Staff Empowerment through Digital Literacy. In: MAYES, T.; MORRISON, D.; MELLAR, H.; BULLAN, P. & OLIVER, M. (Ed.). Transforming Higher Education through Technology-Enhanced Learning. York (UK): The Higher Education Academy; 122-133.


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item