Análisis de la cobertura de la base de datos Scopus

SCImago Research Group, De-Moya-Anegón, Félix, Vargas-Quesada, Benjamín, Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Zaida, Herrero-Solana, Victor and Corera-Álvarez, Elena Análisis de la cobertura de la base de datos Scopus. El Profesional de la Información, 2006, vol. 15, n. 2, pp. 144-145. [Journal article (Paginated)]

[thumbnail of analisis_cobertura_base_datos_scopus.pdf]
Preview
 PDF
analisis_cobertura_base_datos_scopus.pdf
Download (90kB) | Preview

English abstract

In late 2004, Elsevier launched a product that no doubt has drawn attention in the world of scientific information: Scopus. This is a large multidisciplinary database, the largest at present and many are the highlights.

Spanish abstract

A finales de 2004, Elsevier lanzó al mercado un producto que sin lugar a dudas ha llamado la atención en el mundo de la información científica: Scopus. Se trata de una gran base de datos multidisciplinar, la mayor en la actualidad y muchos son sus puntos destacables.

Item type: Journal article (Paginated)
Keywords: Scopus, cobertura, bases de datos, SCImago Research Group, Ulrich's Directory; Bibliometrics
Subjects: A. Theoretical and general aspects of libraries and information. > AA. Library and information science as a field.
Depositing user: Zaida Chinchilla-Rodríguez
Date deposited: 07 Mar 2012
Last modified: 02 Oct 2014 12:21
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/16691

References

1. http://www.scopus.com

2. Codina, Lluís. “Scopus: el mayor navegador

científico de la web”. En: El profesional de la

información, 2005, enero–febrero, v. 14, n. 1,

pp. 44–49.

3. http://www.isiknowledge.com

4. “Scopus to challenge Web of science?”. En:

Access: Asia’s newspaper on electronic information

products & services, 2004, March, n. 48.

http://www.aardvarknet.info/access/number48/m

onthnews.cfm?monthnews=08

5. Hane, Paula. “Elsevier announces Scopus

service”. En: Information today, 2004, March.

http://www.infotoday.com/newsbreaks/nb040315

–1.shtml

6. Pickering, Bobby. “Elsevier prepares Scopus

to rival ISI Web of science”. En: Information

world review, 8 March 2004.

7. Deis, Louise F.; Goodman, David. “Web of

science (2004 version) and Scopus”. En: The

Charleston advisor, 2005, January, v. 6, n. 3.

8. La Guardia, Cheryl. “E–views and reviews:

Scopus vs. Web of science”. En: Library journal.

http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA49115

4.html

9. Goodman, David; Deis, Louise F. “Scopus

vs WoS: additional review in LJ. En: The Charleston

advisor, 2005.

http://www.charlestonco.com/feedback/view_lett

er.cfm?id=35

10. Sweeney, Richard T.; Singh,

Haymwantee. Letter to Editor re: Web of science

(2004 version) and Scopus. En: The Charleston

advisor, 2005.

http://www.charlestonco.com/feedback/view_lett

er.cfm?id=34

11. Braun, Tibor; Glänzel, Wolfgang; Schubert,

Andras. “How balanced is the Science Citation

Index’s journal coverage? A preliminary

overview of macrolevel statistical data”. En:

Cronin, Blaise; Barsky Atkins, Helen (eds.).

The Web of knowledge, a festschrift in honor of

Eugene Garfield. Canada: American Society of

Information Science, 2000, pp. 251–277.

12. http://www.ulrichsweb.com/


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
Contact us
Send email Sponsors
Sponsor: AIMS Sponsor: D&P Sponsor: UniNa CAB Get connected
Facebook Facebook Twitter Twitter Linkedin LinkedIn RSS RSS