Building Creative Competence in Globally Distributed Courses through Design Thinking

Steinbeck, Reinhold Building Creative Competence in Globally Distributed Courses through Design Thinking. Revista Comunicar, 2011, vol. XIX, n. 37, pp. 27-34. [Journal article (Paginated)]

[img]
Preview
PDF
en27-35.pdf

Download (233kB) | Preview

English abstract

Helping students think creatively is consistently cited as one of the key goals of education. Yet, across universities around the world, alarms have been sounding off suggesting that students are not prepared for a world where they are expected to solve messy, unstructured problems that don't have easy answers. This paper introduces design thinking, a human-centered innovation methodology that has been implemented in a design innovation program at Stanford University as well as at one of the most successful design consultancies. After a brief overview of design thinking, the author illustrates the key elements of this innovation pedagogy through its implementation at a university in Colombia. Realizing the potential of this methodology for building creative competence and confidence among students from all disciplines, and recognizing the power of the next generation of information and collaboration technologies and social media, the author proposes new research and development projects that will bring more creativity to traditional distance and blended learning programs through an infusion of design thinking.

Spanish abstract

Ayudar a los estudiantes a pensar de forma creativa suele considerarse uno de los objetivos clave de la educación. Sin embargo, muchas universidades de todo el mundo muestran cierta preocupación al respecto que sugiere que los estudiantes no están preparados para un mundo en el que necesitarán resolver problemas desordenados y desestructurados que no tienen fácil solución. Este artículo presenta el «design thinking» como una metodología para la innovación centrada en las personas, que se ha implementado en un programa para la innovación en el diseño de la Universidad de Stanford, así como en una de las consultoras de diseño más exitosas. Después de un breve resumen del concepto de design thinking, se ilustran los elementos clave de esta pedagogía para la innovación a través de su aplicación en una universidad en Colombia. Rendida cuenta del elevado potencial de esta metodología para la construcción de confianza y capacidad creativa en los estudiantes de todas las disciplinas, y del evidente poder de la próxima generación de tecnologías de la información y la colaboración, así como de los medios sociales, el autor propone nuevos proyectos de investigación y desarrollo que aportarán más creatividad a los programas de educación a distancia y semipresenciales gracias a la aplicación del «design thinking».

Item type: Journal article (Paginated)
Keywords: Design thinking, distance education, international education, project based, learning creativity
Subjects: B. Information use and sociology of information > BC. Information in society.
C. Users, literacy and reading. > CD. User training, promotion, activities, education.
Depositing user: Alex Ruiz
Date deposited: 18 Mar 2012
Last modified: 02 Oct 2014 12:21
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/16746

References

"SEEK" links will first look for possible matches inside E-LIS and query Google Scholar if no results are found.

BARRON, B. (2000). Achieving Coordination in Collaborative Problem-Solving Groups. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9, 4; 403-436.

BROWN, T. (2010). IDEO «design thinking» Approach. (www.ideo.com/thinking/approach) (27-12-2010).

CARLETON, T. & LEIFER, L. (2009). Stanford’s ME310 Course as an Evolution of Engineering Design. Proceedings of the 19th CIRP Design Conference-Competitive Design, Cranfield University.

CARRILLO, A. (2003). Engineering Design Team Performance: Quantitative Evidence that Membership Diversity Effects are Time Dependent. Stanford: Escuela de Ingeniería, Universidad de Stanford.

COHEN, E. (1994). Restructuring the Classroom: Conditions for Productive Small Groups. Review of Educational Research, 6, 1; 1-35.

DRISCOLL, S. (2010). Designing Liberation Technologies. (http://stanfordlawyer.law.stanford.edu/2010/11/designing-liberationtechnologies)

(21-012011).

H.P.I. (2009). Design thinking Process. University of Potsdam (Germany). (www.hpi.uni-potsdam.de/d_school/home.html) (08-01-2011).

JOHNSON, D. & JOHNSON, R. (1993). What we Know about Cooperative Learning at the College Level. Cooperative Learning, 13, 3.

LAND, G. & JARMAN, B. (1993). Breakpoint and Beyond. New York: Harper Business.

LEIFER, L. (1998). Design Team Performance: Metrics and the Impact of Technology. Evaluating Corporate Training: Models and Issues. In BROWN, S.M. & SEIDNER, C.J. (Ed.). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

ME310 (2010). Design Innovation at Stanford University. (www.stanford.edu/group/me310) (27-10-2010).

ROBINSON, K. (2006). Do Schools Kill Creativity? (www.ted.com/talks/ken_robinson_says_schools_kill_creativity.html) (27-09-2010).

SLAVIN, R.E. (1996). Research on Cooperative Learning and Achievement: What we Know, What we Need to Know. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21; 43-69.

SPRINGER, L.; DONOVAN, S. & AL. (1999). Effects of Small-Group Learning on Undergraduates in Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology: A Meta-Analysis. Review of Educational Research, 69, 1; 21-51.

TISCHLER, L. (2009). Ideo's David Kelley on Design Thinking. Fast Company.


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item