A Multi-Level Analysis of World Scientific Output in Pharmacology

Olmeda-Gómez, Carlos and Ovalle-Perandones, María-Antonia and Perianes-Rodríguez, Antonio . A Multi-Level Analysis of World Scientific Output in Pharmacology., 2012 In: Pharmacology. InTech, pp. 339-354. [Book chapter]

[img]
Preview
 PDF
InTech-A_multi_level_analysis_of_world_scientific_output_in_pharmacology.pdf
Download (268kB) | Preview

English abstract

The purpose of this chapter is to analyse international research in “pharmacology, toxicology and pharmaceutics” (hereafter pharmacology) on the basis of the scientific papers listed in the Scopus multidisciplinary database. This primary objective is reached by answering the following questions (in the section on results). What weight does the subject area “pharmacology, toxicology and pharmaceutics” carry in world-wide science? What is the percentage contribution made by the various regions of the world to the subject area “pharmacology, toxicology and pharmaceutics”? Can certain regions be identified as leaders on that basis, as in other scientific contexts? Are emerging countries present in the field? Do the most productive countries also publish the largest number of journals? What features characterise the scientific output of companies that publish pharmacological papers?

Spanish abstract

El propósito de este capítulo es analizar a nivel internacional la investigación en “farmacología, toxicología y farmacéutica” (de aquí en adelante farmacología) a partir de los artículos que aparecen en la base de datos multidisciplinar Scopus. Se llega al principal objetivo respondiendo a las siguientes preguntas (en la sección resultados). ¿Qué peso tienen en la ciencia y a nivel mundial el área temática de “farmacología, toxicología y farmacéutica”? Partiendo de ésta base, ¿pueden algunas regiones identificarse como líderes, así como en otros contextos científicos? ¿Están presentes los países emergentes en este campo? ¿Son los países más productivos los que mayor número de revistas publican? ¿Qué rasgos caracterizan la producción científica en el ámbito de la empresa privada que publica artículos de farmacología?

Item type: Book chapter
Keywords: Global science, World-wide science, Analysis of scientific results, Pharmacological scientific output, Pharmacological publishing, Scientometrics, Ciencia global, Producción científica en farmacología, Publicación en farmacología, Indicadores
Subjects: B. Information use and sociology of information > BB. Bibliometric methods
Depositing user: Carlos Olmeda-Gómez
Date deposited: 07 May 2012
Last modified: 02 Oct 2014 12:22
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/16927

References

Biglu, M.H. and Omidi, Y. (2010). Scientific profile of Pharmacology, Toxicology and

Pharmaceutics fields in Middle East Countries: Impacts of Iranian Scientists.

Gambardella, A. (1995). Science and innovation: the US pharmaceutical industry during the 1980s. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 0521451183

Braun, T.; Glänzel, W. and Schubert, A. Scientometric indicators: a 32-country comparative evaluation of publishing performance and citation impact. Singapore, Philadelphia: World Scientific, 1985, 425 p.

International Journal of Advances in Pharmaceutical Sciences, Vol. 1, pp. 122-127, ISSN0976-1055

Congressional Budget Office. (2006). A CBO Study: Research and Development in hte

Pharmaceutical Industry. Congress of the United States. 20/08/2011. Available from

http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/76xx/doc7615/10-02-DrugR-D.pdf

Fingerman, S. (2006). Web of Science and Scopus: current features and capabilities. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, Fall, ISSN 1092-1206, 20/08/2011, Available from http://www.istl.org/06-fall/electronic2.html

González-Pereira, B.; Guerrero-Bote, V. and Moya-Anegón, F. (2009). The SJR indicator: A

new indicator of journals' scientific prestige. Arxiv Preprint arXiv:0912.4141,

02/08/2011, Available from http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0912/0912.4141.pdf

Gorraiz, J. and Schloegl, C. (2008). A bibliometric analysis of pharmacology and pharmacy journals: Scopus versus Web of Science. Journal of Information Science, Vol. 34, No. 5,pp. 715-725, ISSN 0165-5515

Gupta, B.M. and Kaur, H. (2009). Status of India in science and technology as reflected in its publication output in the Scopus international database, 1996-2006. Scientometrics,Vol. 80, No. 2, pp. 473-490, ISSN 0138-9130

Kaur, H. and Gupta, B.M. (2009). Indian Contribution in Pharmacology, Toxicology and

Pharmaceutics during 1998-2007: A Scientometric Analysis. Collnet Journal of

Scientometrics and Information Management, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 1-9, ISSN 0973-7766

Koening, M. (1983). Bibliometric analysis of pharmaceutical research. Research Policy, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 15-36, ISSN 0048-7333

LaGuardia, C. (2005). E-views and reviews: Scopus vs Web of Science. Library Journal,

(January 2005), eISSN 0000-0027, 20.08.2011, Available from http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA491154.html

McMillan, G.S. and Hamilton, R.D. (2000). Using Bibliometrics to Measure Firm Knowledge: An Analysis of the US Pharmaceutical Industry. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management. Vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 465-475. ISSN 0953-7325

Noisi, J. (1999). The internationalization of industrial R&D from technology transfer to the learing organization. Research Policy, Vol. 28, pp. 107-117, ISSN 0048-7333

Narin, F. and Rozek, R.P. (1988). Bibliometric analysis of United States pharmaceutical industry research performance. Research Policy, Vol. 17, No. 3, pp. 139-154, ISSN 0048-7333

Patel, P. and Pavitt, K. (2000). National systems of innovation under strain: The

internationalization of coporate R&D. In: Barrel, R.; Mason, G.; Mahony, M. (eds).

Productivity, Innovation and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 217-235. ISBN 0521780314

Perianes-Rodríguez, A.; Rafols, I.; O'Hare, A.; Hopkins, M.M. and Nightingale, P. (2011).

Benchmarking and visualizing the knowledge base of pharmaceutical firms (1995-2009). Proceedings of the 13th ISSI Conference. Durban: International Society for

Scientometrics and Informetrics, Vol. 2, pp. 656-661, ISBN 9789081752701

Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America. Pharmaceutical Industry Profile 2011.Washington, DC: PhRMA, April 2011

Rafols, I.; O'Hare, A.; Perianes-Rodríguez, A.; Hopkins, M.M. and Nightingale, P. (2010).

Collaborative practices and technological trajectories in large pharmaceutical firms.

Tentative Governance in Emerging Science and Technology. Enschede: University of Twente, pp. 93-95.

Rehn, C. (2007). Bibliometric indicators: definitions and usage at Karolinska Institutet. 20/08/2011, Available from

http://ki.se/content/1/c6/01/79/31/Bibliometric%20indicators%20-%20definitions_1.0.pdf

Sciverse Scopus (2011). What dos it Cover?. 2.08.2011. Available from http://www.info.sciverse.com/scopus/scopus-in-detail/facts

SJR. SCImago Research Group. SCImago Journal and Country Rank. 2007. 20/08/2011.

Available from: http://www.scimagojr.com


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
Contact us
Send email Sponsors
Sponsor: AIMS Sponsor: D&P Sponsor: UniNa CAB Get connected
Facebook Facebook Twitter Twitter Linkedin LinkedIn RSS RSS