Scholars before Researchers: On the Centrality of the Dissertation Literature Review in Research Preparation

Beile, Penny and Boote, David Scholars before Researchers: On the Centrality of the Dissertation Literature Review in Research Preparation. Educational Researcher, 2005, vol. 34, n. 6, pp. 3-15. [Journal article (Paginated)]


Download (2MB) | Preview

English abstract

A thorough, sophisticated literature review is the foundation and inspiration for substantial, useful research. The complex nature of education research demands such thorough, sophisticated reviews. Although doctoral education is a key means for improving education research, the literature has given short shrift to the dissertation literature review. This article suggests criteria to evaluate the quality of dissertation literature reviews and reports a study that examined dissertation at three universities. Acquiring the skills and knowledge required to be education scholars, able to analyze and synthesize the research in a field of specialization, should be the focal, integrative activity of predissertation doctoral education. Such scholarship is a prerequisite for increased methodological sophistication and for improving the usefulness of education research.

Item type: Journal article (Paginated)
Keywords: academic libraries, library instruction
Subjects: B. Information use and sociology of information > BA. Use and impact of information.
B. Information use and sociology of information > BB. Bibliometric methods
D. Libraries as physical collections. > DD. Academic libraries.
G. Industry, profession and education. > GG. Curricula aspects.
G. Industry, profession and education. > GH. Education.
Depositing user: Penny Beile
Date deposited: 07 May 2012
Last modified: 02 Oct 2014 12:22


"SEEK" links will first look for possible matches inside E-LIS and query Google Scholar if no results are found.

Alton-Lee A (1998) A troubleshooter’s checklist for prospective authors derived from reviewers’ critical feedback. Teaching and Teacher Education 14(8):887–890.

America’s Best Colleges (2004) US News & World Report, Retrieved January 4, 2005, from

Babbie E (1998) The practice of social research (Wadsworth, Belmont, CA), 8th ed.

Bailey B (1995) Thesis practicum and the librarian’s role. Journal of Academic Librarianship 11:79–81.

Barger RR, Duncan JK (1986) Creativity in doctoral research: A reasonable expectation? The Educational Forum 51(1):33–43.

Barry CA (1997) Information skills for an electronic world: Training doctoral research candidates. Journal of Information Science 23(3):225–238.

Berelson B (1960) Graduate education in the United States (McGraw-Hill, New York).

Berliner DC (2002) Educational research: The hardest science of all. Educational Researcher 31(8):18–20.

Boote DN, Gaudelli W (2002) The use and abuse of historical educational theorists: Comments on recent Dewey scholarship. Insights: A publication of the John Dewey Society for the Study of Education and Culture 35(2):9–13.

Boote DN, Beile P (April, 2004) Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association (San Diego, CA), The quality of dissertation literature reviews: A missing link in research preparation.

Britzman D (1991) Practice makes practice: A critical study of learning to teach (State University of New York Press, Albany).

Bruce CS (1994) Research students’ early experiences of the dissertation literature review. Studies in Higher Education 19(2):217–229.

Bruce CS (2001a) Interpreting the scope of their literature reviews: Significant differences in research students concerns. New Library World 102(4):158–166.

Bruce CS (2001b) Faculty–librarian partnerships in Australian higher education: Critical dimensions. Reference Service Review 29:106–115.

Carnegie Foundation (2003) Carnegie initiative on the doctorate, Retrieved January 4, 2005, from

Caspers J, Lenn K (2000) in The collaborative imperative: Librarians and faculty working together in the information universe, The future of collaboration between librarians and teaching faculty, eds RaspaD, WardD (American Library Association, Chicago), pp 148–154.

Cooper HM (1985) Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association (Chicago), A taxonomy of literature reviews. ERIC Document Reproduction Services No. ED254541.

Creswell JW (1994) Research design: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (SAGE, Thousand Oaks, CA).

Creswell JW (2002) Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (Merrill Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ).

Delamont S, Atkinson P, Parry O (2000) The doctoral experience: Success and failure in graduate school (Falmer, New York).

Dong YR (1998) Nonnative graduate students’ thesis dissertation writing in science: Self-reports by students and their advisors from two US institutions. English for Specific Purposes 17(4):369–390.

Duke NK, Beck SW (1999) Education should consider alternative forms for the dissertation. Educational Researcher 28(3):31–36.

Fraenkel JR, Wallen NE (2003) How to design and evaluate research in education (McGraw-Hill Higher Education, Boston), 5th ed.

Galvan JL (2004) Writing literature reviews: A guide for students of the social and behavioral sciences (Pyrczak, Los Angeles), 2nd ed.

Gay LR, Airasian PW (2000) Educational research: Competencies for analysis and application (Merrill, Upper Saddle River, NJ).

Granello DH (2001) Promoting cognitive complexity in graduate written work: Using Bloom’s taxonomy as a pedagogical tool to improve literature reviews. Counselor Education and Supervision 40(4):292–307.

Grant CA, Graue E (1999) (Re)Viewing a review: A case history of the “Review of Educational Research. Review of Educational Research 69(4):384–396.

Hart C (1999) Doing a literature review: Releasing the social science research imagination (SAGE, London).

Hjorland B (1988) Information retrieval in psychology: Implications of a case study. Behavioral and Social Sciences Librarian 6(3–4):39–64.

Isbell D, Broaddus D (1995) Teaching writing and research as inseparable: A faculty–librarian teaching team. Reference Services Librarian 48:5–25.

Johnston S (1997) Examining the examiners: An analysis of examiners’ reports on doctoral theses. Studies in Higher Education 22(3):333–347.

Klein P (1999) Reopening inquiry into cognitive processes of learning-to-write. Educational Psychology Review 11:203–270.

Kuhn D (1992) Thinking as argument. Harvard Educational Review 62(2):155–178.

Kuhn TS (1970) The structure of scientific revolutions (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 2nd ed.

Labaree DF (2003) The peculiar problems of preparing educational researchers. Educational Researcher 32(1):13–22.

Lagemann EC, Shulman LS (1999) Issues in education research: Problems and possibilities (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco).

Lather P (1999) To be of use: The work of reviewing. Review of Educational Research 69(1):2–7.

LeCompte MD, Klingner JK, Campbell SA, Menk DW (2003) Editors’ introduction. Review of Educational Research 73(2):123–124.

Lester JD (2002) The essential guide: Research writing across the disciplines (Longman, New York).

Libutti P, Kopala M (1995) The doctoral student, the dissertation, and the library: A review of the literature. Reference Librarian 48:5–25.

Mauch JE (1998) Guide to the successful thesis and dissertation: A handbook for students and faculty (M. Dekker, New York).

McMillan JH, Schumacher SA (2001) Research in education: A conceptual introduction (Longman, New York), 5th ed.

Metz MH (2001) Intellectual border crossing in graduate education: A report from the field. Educational Researcher 30(5):12–18.

Mullins G, Kiley M (2002) “It’s a PhD, not a Nobel Prize”: How experienced examiners assess research theses”. Studies in Higher Education 27(4):369–386.

National Center for Education Statistics (2002) Digest of education statistics, 2001 (U.S. Department of Education, Washington, DC).

National Research Council (1999) Improving student learning: A strategic plan for education research and its utilization (National Academy Press, Washington, DC).

Nickerson ET (1993) The dissertation handbook: A guide to successful dissertations (Kendall/Hunt, Dubuque, IA).

Nightingale P (1984) Examination of research theses. Higher Education Research and Development 3:137–150.

Ogden EH (1993) Completing your doctoral dissertation or master’s thesis in two semesters or less (Technomic, Lancaster, PA).

Page RN (2001) Reshaping graduate preparation in educational research methods: One school’s experience. Educational Researcher 30(5):19–25.

Pallas AM (2001) Preparing education doctoral students for epistemological diversity. Educational Researcher 30(5):6–11.

Paltridge B (2002) Thesis and dissertation writing: An examination of published advice and actual practice. English for Specific Purposes 21:125–143.

Pan ML (2003) Preparing literature reviews: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (Pyrczak, Los Angeles).

Passmore J (1980) in The philosophy and future of graduate education, The philosophy of graduate education, ed FrankenaWK (University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor), pp 40–59.

Pew Charitable Trust (2001) Re-envisioning the Ph.D, Retrieved January 4, 2005, from

Pitkethly A, Prosser M (1995) in Research into higher education: Dilemmas, directions and diversions, Examiners’ comments on the international context of PhD theses, eds McNaughtC, BeattieK (Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australasia Victoria, Melbourne), pp 129–136.

Richardson V (2003) The Ph.D. in education, Retrieved January 4, 2005, from

Rivard LP (1994) A review of writing to learn in science: Implications for practice and research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 31:969–983.

Schoenfeld AH (1999) in Issues in education research: Problems and possibilities, The core, the canon, and the development of research skills, eds LagemannEC, ShulmanLS (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco), pp 166–223.

Schools of Education (April 10, 2000) US News & World Report, p I14.

Shulman LS (1999) in Issues in education research: Problems and possibilities, Professing educational scholarship, eds LagemannEC, ShulmanLS (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco), pp 159–165.

Siddle Walker V (1999) in Issues in education research: Problems and possibilities, Culture and commitment: Challenges for the future training of education researchers, eds LagemannEC, ShulmanLS (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco), pp 224–244.

Storr RJ (1969) The beginning of graduate education in America (Arno Press and New York Press, New York).

Strike K, Posner G (1983) in Knowledge structure and use: Implications for synthesis and interpretation, Types of synthesis and their criteria, eds WardS, ReedL (Temple University Press, Philadelphia), pp 343–362.

Veysey LR (1965) The emergence of the American university (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).

Wideen MF, Mayer-Smith J, Moon B (1999) A critical analysis of the research on learning to teach: Making the case for an ecological perspective on inquiry. Review of Educational Research 68(2):130–178.

Winter R, Griffiths M, Green K (2000) The “academic” qualities of practice: What are the criteria for a practice-based PhD? Studies in Higher Education 25(1):25–37.

Woodrow Wilson National Fellowship Foundation (2001) The responsive PhD, Retrieved January 4, 2005, from

Young LJ (2001) Border crossings and other journeys: Re-envisioning the doctoral preparation of education researchers. Educational Researcher 30(5):3–5.

Zaporozhetz LE (1987) The dissertation literature review: How faculty advisors prepare their doctoral candidates (University of Oregon Eugene) Unpublished doctoral dissertation.


Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item