Does the Medium Matter?: A Comparison of a Web-based Tutorial with Face-to-Face Library Instruction on Education Students' Self-Efficacy Levels and Learning Outcomes

Beile, Penny and Boote, David Does the Medium Matter?: A Comparison of a Web-based Tutorial with Face-to-Face Library Instruction on Education Students' Self-Efficacy Levels and Learning Outcomes. Research Strategies, 2004, vol. 20, n. 1/2, pp. 57-68. [Journal article (Paginated)]

[thumbnail of Does_the_Medium_Matter.pdf]
Preview
 PDF
Does_the_Medium_Matter.pdf
Download (75kB) | Preview

English abstract

The purpose of this study was to explore if students’ library skills self-efficacy levels and learning outcomes varied based on instructional delivery mode. Groups consisted of an on-campus class with face-to-face instruction, an on-campus class with a Web-based library tutorial, and a Web-based class with a Web-based tutorial. Data were collected immediately prior to instruction and again six weeks after. Analysis indicated self-efficacy levels and learning outcomes significantly increased across all groups after instruction. Groups varied significantly on final self-efficacy levels, but not on final library skills scores. Results are discussed as they relate to the viability of Web-based tutorials for library instruction.

Item type: Journal article (Paginated)
Keywords: library instruction, library tutorials, assessment, teaching methods, teaching efficacy
Subjects: B. Information use and sociology of information > BA. Use and impact of information.
C. Users, literacy and reading. > CB. User studies.
C. Users, literacy and reading. > CE. Literacy.
D. Libraries as physical collections. > DD. Academic libraries.
Depositing user: Penny Beile
Date deposited: 15 May 2012
Last modified: 02 Oct 2014 12:22
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/16967

References

Association of College and Research Libraries, Task Force on Information Literacy Competency Standards. (2000). Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education. Retrieved July 11, 2003, from http://www.ala.org/Content/NavigationMenu/ACRL/Standards_and_Guidelines/Information_Literacy_Competency_Standards_for_Higher_Education.htm

Bandura, A. J. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change.

Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215.

Bandura, A. J. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.

Beile, P. M. (2001). [Factor analysis of library skills self-efficacy survey]. Unpublished raw data.

Dugard, P. & Todman, J. (1995). Analysis of pre-test-post-test control group designs in

educational research. Educational Psychology, 15(2), 181-199.

Eadie, T. (1990). Immodest proposals. Library Journal, 115(7), 42-45.

Fox, L. M. & Weston, L. (1993). Course-integrated instruction for nursing students: How effective?. Research Strategies, 11(2), 89-99.

Greer, A., Weston, L., & Alm, M. L. (1991). Assessment of learning outcomes: A

measure of progress in library literacy. College & Research Libraries, 52, 549-557.

Martin, B. L. (1989). A checklist for designing instruction in the affective domain. Educational Technology, 29(8), 7-15.

Maughan, P. D., (2001). Assessing information literacy among undergraduates: A

discussion of the literature and the University of California-Berkeley experience. College & Research Libraries, 62(1), 71-85.

Nahl-Jakobovits, D. & Jakobovits, L. A. (1993). Bibliographic instructional design for information literacy: Integrating affective and cognitive objectives. Research Strategies, 11, 73-88.

Ren, W. H. (2000). Library instruction and college student self-efficacy in electronic

information searching. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 26(5), 323-328.


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
Contact us
Send email Sponsors
Sponsor: AIMS Sponsor: D&P Sponsor: UniNa CAB Get connected
Facebook Facebook Twitter Twitter Linkedin LinkedIn RSS RSS