Five Scholarly Open Access Publishers

Beall, Jeffrey Five Scholarly Open Access Publishers. The Charleston Advisor., 2012, vol. 13, n. 4, pp. 5-10. [Journal article (Print/Paginated)]

[img]
Preview
PDF
TCA review April 2012 five.pdf

Download (173Kb) | Preview

English abstract

This review critically examines five international scholarly publishers that publish academic journals using the gold (author pays) Open Access model. The author-pays model is changing scholarly publishing because authors, rather than libraries or other subscribers, become the publishers' customers, an arrangement that creates a built in conflict of interest. The more articles a publisher accepts, the more revenue it earns. New gold Open Access publishers are appearing almost weekly, and many are engaged in unethical practices. The review covers four predatory publishers, Academy Publish, BioInfo, ScienceDomain International, and Scientific Research Publishing, and one legitimate publisher, AOSIS Open Journals.

Item type: Journal article (Print/Paginated)
Keywords: predatory open access scholarly publishers reviews
Subjects: E. Publishing and legal issues. > EZ. None of these, but in this section.
Depositing user: Jeffrey Beall
Date deposited: 04 Jun 2012
Last modified: 02 Oct 2014 12:22
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/17051

References

"SEEK" links will first look for possible matches inside E-LIS and query Google Scholar if no results are found.

Sanderson, Katharine. “Two new journals copy the old.” Nature 463 (14 January 2010): 148.

Shao, Jufang, and Huiyun Shen. “The outflow of academic papers from China: Why is it happening and can it be stemmed?” Learned Publishing 24 (2011): 95–97.


Actions (login required)

View Item View Item