Reorienting open repositories to the challenges of the Semantic Web: Experiences from FAO’s contribution to the resource processing and discovery cycle in repositories in the agricultural domain

Subirats-Coll, Imma and Malapela, Thembani and Dister, Sarah and Zeng, Marcia and Goovaerts, Marc and Pesce, Valeria and Jaques, Yves and Anibaldi, Stefano and Keizer, Johannes Reorienting open repositories to the challenges of the Semantic Web: Experiences from FAO’s contribution to the resource processing and discovery cycle in repositories in the agricultural domain., 2012 . In 6th Metadata and Semantics Research Conference (MTSR 2012), Cádiz, Spain, 28-30 November 2012. (Unpublished) [Conference paper]

[img]
Preview
 PDF
Subirats_ReorientingRepositoriesfinal[1].pdf
Download (484kB) | Preview

English abstract

The use of widely-used metadata standards is essential to guarantee the visibility and retrieval of documents stored in open repositories. Attention should be paid to the creation and exchange of meaningful metadata to enhance interoperability amongst repositories and provide value added services. Since 2005 the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) provides the agricultural information management com-munity with standards, services and tools to assist open reposito-ries in benefiting from the advantages offered by Semantic Web publishing. This paper presents the work that FAO carries out in recommending standards for the encoding and exchange of metadata while also reviewing techniques to help navigate within open repositories and services. It talks about how to improve the visibility of repository content and explains the benefits of inte-grating subject vocabulary tools expressed in SKOS. It concludes with a presentation of use cases integrating these recommenda-tions into DSpace and Drupal customizations.

Item type: Conference paper
Keywords: Open Access ;Open Repositories; Metadata; Repository In-teroperability, AGROVOC; AgriOcean DSpace; AgriDrupal; WebAGRIS; LODE-BD; Linked Data; AIMS; Semantic Web; AgMES; AGRIS AP
Subjects: I. Information treatment for information services
Depositing user: Sarah Dister
Date deposited: 03 Oct 2012
Last modified: 02 Oct 2014 12:23
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/17733

References

1. OpenDoar http://www.opendoar.org/index.html Last accessed: July 2012.

2. Tim Berners-Lee (2009) Linked Data. http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData. Last accessed: July 2012

3. Swan, A., and Carr,L (2008) Institutions, their repositories and the web. Serials Re-view. Vol. 34 (1), 31-35.

4. Drewry, J (2007). Google Scholar, windows live academic search, and beyond : a study of new tools and changing habits in ARL libraries. A Master’s Thesis. http://ils.unc.edu/MSpapers/3310.pdf Last accessed September 2012.

5. Aguillo, l., Ortega,J., Ferriandez, M., and Utrilla, A (2010) Indicators for a webometric ranking of open access repositories. Scientometrics. Vol.82 (3), 447-486.

6. Ranking Web of Repositories website. http://repositories.webometrics.info/en. Last accessed: September 2012

7. Abrizah, A., Noorhidawati, A and Kiran, K (2010) Global visibility of Asian Universitie’s Open Access institutional repositories. Malaysian Journal of Library and Information Science. Vol.15 (3) 53-73.

8. Banier,J and Perciali, I (2008) The institutional repository rediscovered; what can a university do for Open Access publishing? Serials Review. 34 (1), 21-26.

9. Mercer, H., Koeing,J., McGeachin,R., and Tucker,S. (2011) Structure, features, and fac-ulty content in ARL member repositories. The Journal of Academic Librarianship. Vol. 37 (40), 333-342.

10. Arlitsch, K., and O’Brien, P. S. (2012). Invisible institutional repositories: addressing the low indexing ratios of IRs in Google Scholar. Library Hi Tech, 30(1), 60–81.

11. Ochoa, X., and Duval, E (2009) Automatic evaluation of metadata quality in digital re-positories. International Journal on Digital Libraries. 10(2-3), 67-91.

12. Haslhofer, B., and Klas, W. (2010). A survey of techniques for achieving metadata in-teroperability. ACM Computing Surveys, 42(2), 1–37.

13. Park, J., and Lu, C (2008). An analysis of seven metadata creation guidelines; issues and implications. A paper presented at 2008 Annual Electronic Resources and Librar-ies Conference, Atlanta, Georgia. March 18-21, 2008.

14. Michael, G (2004) Authority control in the context of bibliographic control in the elec-tronic environment. Cataloguing and Classification Quartely.38 (3-40), 11-22.

15. Weller, K (2010) Knowledge representation in the social semantic web. New York: Walter de Gruyer.

16. Gray,A., Gray,N., Hall,C and Ounis, A (2010) Finding the right term: retrieving and ex-ploring semantic concepts in astronomical vocabularies. Information processing and Management. Vol.46 (4) 470-478.

17. Subirats,I and Zeng,M (2012)Linked Open Data Enabled Bibliographic Metadata (LODE-BD) version 2.0 http://aims.fao.org/standards/lode-bd Last accessed: Sep-tember 2012.

18. Lukose,D (2012) World-wide semantic web of agriculture knowledge. Journal of Inte-grative Agriculture. Vol. 11(5) 769-774.

19. Knowledge and information sharing through the AGRIS Network http://agris.fao.org/knowledge-and-information-sharing-through-agris-network Last accessed: July 2012

20. FAO(2005)The AGRIS Application Profile for the international information system on agricultural sciences and technology guidelines on best practices for Information Ob-ject Description http://www.fao.org/docrep/008/ae909e/ae909e00.htm Last ac-cessed: July 2012

21. Onyancha, I ., Weinheimer, J ., Salokhe, G., Katz, S., and Keizer, J. (2004). Metadata ex-change without pain: the AGRIS-AP to harvest and exchange quality metadata http://dcpapers.dublincore.org/index.php/pubs/article/download/774/770 Last accessed: July 2012

22. Subirats, l,. Onyancha, I., Salokhe, G., Keizer, J.(2008) Towards an architecture for open archive networks in Agricultural Sciences and Technology ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/009/ah766e/ah766e00.pdf Last accessed: July 2012.

23. AGROVOC Homepage http://aims.fao.org/standards/agrovoc/about Last accessed: July 2012

24. MIMOS Behard Homepage http://www.mimos.my/ Last accessed: July 2012

25. UNESCO. WWW/ISIS – Technical Reference Manual, v. 5.1.1 / 05-05-02, War-saw/Rome, May 2005.

26. Rybinski,H , Kaloyanova, Sand Katz,S. (2006) WWW-ISIS: a result of a close coopera-tion between FAO-GIL and ICIE ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/010/ai162e/ai162e00.pdf Last accessed: July 2012

27. Metadata Object Description Schema (MODS) http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/ Last accessed: July 2012

28. OceanDocs http://www.oceandocs.org/ Last accessed July 2012

29. IBSS Institutional Repository http://repository.ibss.org.ua/dspace/ Last accessed Ju-ly 2012

30. Central and Eastern European Marine Repository http://repository.ibss.org.ua/dspace/ Last accessed July 2012

31. Ministry of Agriculture (Peru) http://www.minag.gob.pe/portal/ Last accessed Feb-ruary 2012

32. Pesce, V., Subirats, I., Picarella, A., Keizer, K.(2011) AgriDrupal : repository manage-ment integrated into a content management system,. A paper presented at Open Re-positories Conference 2011,Austin (US),8-10 June 2011.

33. AgriDrupal Homepage http://aims.fao.org/tools/agridrupal Last accessed: July 2012

34. Drupal Open Source Content Management System http://drupal.org/ Last accessed: July 2012

35. NFPCSP Homepage http://www.nfpcsp.org/agridrupal/ Last accessed: July 2012

36. AgriDrupal at NFPCSP http://aims.fao.org/advice-and-capacity-development/open-access/fpmu Last accessed: July 2012.

37. ZAR4DIN Homepage http://zar4din.org/ Last accessed: July 2012


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
Contact us
Send email Sponsors
Sponsor: AIMS Sponsor: D&P Sponsor: UniNa CAB Get connected
Facebook Facebook Twitter Twitter Linkedin LinkedIn RSS RSS