Competency-based lifelong learning of librarians in Croatia: an integrative approach

Machala, Dijana and Horvat, Aleksandra Competency-based lifelong learning of librarians in Croatia: an integrative approach., 2010 . In IFLA Satellit Meeting : Cooperation and Collaboration in Teaching and Research : Trends in Library and Information Studies Education Cooperation and Collaboration in Teaching and Research: Trends in Library and Information Studies Education, Borås (Sweden), 8-9 August 2010. (Unpublished) [Conference paper]

[thumbnail of 6-12-1-PB.pdf]
Preview
Text
6-12-1-PB.pdf - Accepted version
Available under License Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication.

Download (373kB) | Preview

English abstract

Purpose – The purpose of the paper is to present the main findings of a nation-wide online survey of Croatian LIS stakeholders - library practitioners, mainly graduate librarians and library managers – regarding subject-related competencies and further CPD activities in perspective of lifelong learning of librarians. The findings were used to create a model of LIS competency framework strongly valued by labour market. Design/methodology/approach – A sample of 216 Croatian libraries was pre-selected to participate in an online survey in order to obtain an optimal stratification of study cohort according to library type, library size and territorial coverage. Two distinctive online questionnaires were prepared, one for library managers, the other for library practitioners. 113 library managers (52% of pre-selected sample) and 260 librarians (cca. 10% of estimated size of overall professional body in Croatia) responded. A Tuning methodology was applied for purpose of identifying subject-related and key generic competencies in LIS. Findings – The results of the online survey indicate that for LIS professionals there is a unified „core‟ of subject-specific competencies valid for every type of library. The same is true for subject-specific competencies on „periphery‟. Generic competencies have been strongly valued by both groups of respondents. Participation in formal and informal learning opportunities has proved to be intrinsically motivated, self-directed and driven by pragmatic reasons – a wish to improve working skills and increase self-confidence. Practical implications – It is hoped that the competency-based approach applied to the CPD programme may bridge the gap between initially acquired competencies, labour market expectations and personal goals fostered by an integrative process of lifelong learning. Originality/value – The research is the first nation-wide investigation into the LIS competency framework in Croatia.

Item type: Conference paper
Keywords: competency framework in LIS, lifelong learning, librarians, Croatia
Subjects: G. Industry, profession and education. > GE. Staff.
G. Industry, profession and education. > GG. Curricula aspects.
G. Industry, profession and education. > GH. Education.
G. Industry, profession and education. > GI. Training.
Depositing user: dr. sc. Dijana Machala
Date deposited: 16 Jan 2013 14:59
Last modified: 02 Oct 2014 12:24
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/18148

References

Brine, A. and Feather, J. (2002), “Supporting the development of skills for information professionals”, Education for Information, Vol. 20, pp. 253-262

Buttlard, L. and Du Mont, R. (1996), “Library and information science competencies revisited”, Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, Vol. 37 No. 1, pp. 44-62.

Calzonetti, J. A. and Crook, L. (2009), “The 2007 STS continuing education survey:continuing education needs of science/technology librarians. Issues in science and technology librarianship, Spring 2009”, available at: http://www.istl.org/09-spring/sts.html (accessed 30May 2010).

CEDEFOP (2009), The dynamics of qualifications: defining and renewing of occupational and educational standards. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities,Luxembourg.

Cronin, B. (2002), “Holding the center while prospecting at the periphery: domain identity and coherence in North American information studies education”, Education for Information,No. 20, pp. 3-10.

Cronin, B. (2007), “Education pluralism for a diversifying profession”, Education for Information, Vol. 25, pp. 51-56.

Durance, J. C. (2009), “A Changing Profession and Its Education”, available at:https://open.umich.edu/education/si/si643-winter2009/lectures-1/SI643-W09-Week2.pdf(accessed 30 May 2010).

Farmer, J. and Campbell, F. (1997), “Information professionals, CPD and transferable skills”,Library Management, Vol. 18 No. 3, pp. 436-445.

Goramn, G. E and Corbitt, B. J. (2002), “Core competencies in information management education”, New Library World, Vol. 103, pp. 436-445.

Hallam, G. (2006), “Trends in LIS education in Australia”, in C. Khoo, D. Singh & A. S.Chaudhry (Eds.), Proceedings of the Asia-Pacific Conference on Library & Information Education & Practice 2006 (A-LIEP 2006), Singapore, 3-6 April 2006, School of Communication & Information, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, pp. 41-51.

Harvey, R. and Higgins, S. (2003), “Defining fundamentals and meeting expectations: Trendsin LIS education in Australia”, Education for Information, Vol. 21, pp. 149-157.

Horvat, A. (2004), “Continuing education of librarians in Croatia: problems and prospects”,New Library World, Vol. 105 No. 9/10, pp. 370-375.

Horvat, A. (2009), “Cjelozivotno ucenje knjiznicara: stanje i mogucnosti”, in Horvat A. and Machala, D. (Eds.), Cjelozivotno ucenje knjiznicara: ishodi ucenja i fleksibilnost, Nacionalnai sveucilisna knjiznica u Zagrebu, Zagreb, pp. 21-36.

Houle, C. O. (1980), “Continuing Learning in the Professions”, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco,cited in Varlejs, J. (2002), “Quality Control and Assurance for Continuing Professional Education”, in Layzell Ward, P. (Ed.), Continuing Professional Education for the Information Society, Saur, München, pp. 232-242.

Lederman, D. (2010), “The Faculty Role in Assessment”, Inside Higher Ed, 28 May 2010,available at: http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2010/05/28/assess (accessed 30 May 2010).

Line, M. B. (2007), “Requirements for library and information work and the role of library education”, Education for Information, Vol. 25, pp. 27-39.

Marouf, L. and Rehman, S. (2007), “New directions for information education: Perspectives of the stakeholders”, Education for Information, Vol. 25, pp. 195-209.

Mastrovic, T. (2009), “Projekt Cjelozivotno ucenje knjiznicara: ishodi ucenja i fleksibilnost”,in Horvat, A. and Machala, D. (Eds.), Cjelozivotno ucenje knjiznicara ishodi ucenja ifleksibilnost, Nacionalna i sveucilisna knjiznica u Zagrebu, Zagreb, pp. 13-19.

Ojala, M. (1993), “Core competencies for special library managers of the future”, Special libraries, fall 1993, pp. 230-233.

Raju, J. (2003), “The „Core‟ in library and/or information science education and training”,Education for Inforamtion, Vol. 21, pp. 229-242.

Saracevic, T. (1983), “The complex process of a total curriculum revision in information and library science: a case study”, Education for information,Vol. 1, pp. 309-375.

Shera, Jesse H. (1972), The foundations of education for librarianship, Wiley, New York.

Spackman, E. et al. (2006), “The 2005 continuing education survey : what science librarians want to know”, available at: http://www.istl.org/06-fall/sts.html (accessed 30 May 2010).

Tammaro, A. M. (2002), “Recognition and quality assurance in LIS: New approaches for lifelong learning in Europe”, Performance Measurement and Metrics, Vol. 6 No.2, pp. 67-79.

Van House, N. A. and Sutton, S. A. (1996), “The Panda Syndrome: An Ecology of LIS education”, Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, Vol. 37 No. 2, pp.131-147.

White, H. (1986), “The future of Library and Information Science Education”, Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, Vol. 26, pp. 174-181.


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item