Content Analysis of Open Access LIS Journal “ALIS” (2002 - 2011)

Lokhande , Rahul S Content Analysis of Open Access LIS Journal “ALIS” (2002 - 2011). International Journal of Information Dissemination and Technalogy, 2013. (Submitted) [Journal article (Unpaginated)]

[thumbnail of Content Analysis of Open Access LIS Journal 'ALIS' 2002-2011.pdf]
Preview
Archive
Content Analysis of Open Access LIS Journal 'ALIS' 2002-2011.pdf - Submitted version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (537kB) | Preview

English abstract

The present study investigated the trends of LIS open access Journal “ALIS”by analysing articles, authors and LIS subjects covered in the articles. Quantitative content analysis was carried out for which the data were analysed in order to project literature growth, authorship pattern and related bibliometric phenomena. The analysis indicates that there were 283 articles published during 2002 to 2011. The authorship pattern indicates that the majority of articles published with multi-authorship. Authors from teaching faculty were paid more interest in “ALIS”. The subject coverage of this journal is mostly towards bibliometric and scientometric study, covering other LIS subjects in the articles. The analysis of data clearly indicates that OA ejournal “ALIS”rapidly establishing themselves as a most viable media for scholarly communication.

Item type: Journal article (Unpaginated)
Keywords: Content analysis, Bibliometric study, Scientometrics and Informetrics.
Subjects: I. Information treatment for information services > IB. Content analysis (A and I, class.)
Depositing user: Rahul Lokhande
Date deposited: 19 Jan 2013 15:19
Last modified: 02 Oct 2014 12:24
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/18283

References

1. Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

2. Neuendorf, K. A. (2002). The content analysis guidebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

3. White, M.D., & Marsh, E.E. (2006). Content analysis: A flexible methodology. Library Trends 55(1), 22-45 doi: 10.1353/lib.2006.0053

4. Atinmo,M.I., Jimba, S. W. (2002). Gender and authorship pattern in an African librarianship journal(1991–1997). Library Review, 51(9), 458–463.

5. Bates, M. (1999). A tour of information science through the pages of JASIS. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50, 975–993.

6. Cano, V. (1999). Bibliometric overview of library and information science research in Spain. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50, 675–680.

7. Cline, G. S. (1982). College and research libraries: Its first forty years. College and Research Libraries, 43, 209–232.

8. Harsanyi, M. A. (1993). Multiple authors, multiple problems – bibliometrics and the study of scholarly collaboration: A literature review. Library and Information Science Research, 15 (Fall), 325–154.

9. Hawkins, D. T. (1978). Bibliometrics of the online information retrieval literature. Online Review, 2, 345–351.

10. Hawkins, D. T. (2001). Bibliometrics of electronic journals in information science. Information Research, 7(1), Available at http://InformationR.net/ir/7-1/paper120.html. [Access on 04th January 2012].

11. Hawkins, D. T. (2001).Information Science Abstracts: tracking the literature of information science. part 1: definition and map. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(1), 44-53.

12. Hussain, Akhtar., Fatima, Nishat. (2011). A bibliometric analysis of the ‘Chinese Librarianship: an International electronic journal,(2006-2010)’. Chinese Librarianship: an International electronic journal,31, Available at http://www.iclc.us/cliej/cl31HF.pdf. [Access on 14th January 2012].

13. He, S. Y., Spink, A. (2002). A comparison of foreign authorship distribution in JASIST and the Journal of Documentation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(11), 953–959.

14. Jarvelin, K., Vakkari, P. (1990). Content-analysis of research articles in library and information-science. Library and Information Science Research, 12, 395–421.

15. Jarvelin, K., Vakkari, P. (1993). The evolution of library and information science 1965–1985: A contentanalysis of journal articles. Information Processing and Management, 29, 129–144.

16. Korytnyk, C. A.(1988). Comparison of the publishing patterns between men and women Ph.D.s in Librarianship. Library Quarterly, 58 (1), 52–65.

17. Mahapatra, G. (1994). Indian library and information science journals: A bibliometric analysis of the rate of citations and their characteristics. Library Review, 43 (3), 41–46.

18. Mukherjee, Bhaskar. (2009). Scholarly research in LIS open access electronic journals : A bibliometric study. Scientometrics, 80(1), 167-194.

19. Nisonger, T. E. (1999). JASIS and library and information science journal ranking: A review and analysis of the last half century. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 50, 1004–1019.

20. Schloegl, C., Stock, W. G. (2004). Impact and relevance of LIS journals: A scientometric analysis of international and German-language LIS journals-citation analysis versus reader survey. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55 (13), 1155–1168.

21. Terry, J. L. (1996). Authorship in college & research libraries revisited: Gender, institutional affiliation, collaboration. College and Research Libraries, 58, 377–383.

22. Voorbij, H. (1999). Searching scientific information on the Internet: A Dutch academic user survey. Journal of the American Society of Information Science, 50 (7), 598–615.

23. Zhang, Y. (1998). The impact of Internet based electronic resources on formal scholarly communication in the area of library and information science: A citation analysis. Journal of Information Science, 24, 241–254.

24. Jena, Lochan Kamal; Swain, Dillip K. and Sahoo, K. C.(2012). Annals of Library and Information Studies, 2002–2010: A Bibliometric Study. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal), 716.

25. Verma, Niraj; Tamrakar, Rajnish and Sharma, Priyanka (2007). Analysis of contributions in 'Annals of Library and Information Studies’. Annals of Library and Information Studies, 54,106-111.

26. Mittal, Rekha (2011). Library and information science research trends in India. Annals of Library and Information Studies, 58,319-325.

27. Naseer, Mirza Muhammad and Mahmood, Khalid (2009). LIS Research in Pakistan: An Analysis of Pakistan Library and Information Science Journal 1998-2007. Library Philosophy and Practice, 1-10.


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item