Open Metrics: Jenseits des Zitatkartells

Herb, Ulrich Open Metrics: Jenseits des Zitatkartells., 2013 [Newspaper/magazine article]

[img]
Preview
Text
Open_Metrics_scinoptica.pdf - Published version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (166kB) | Preview

English abstract

A short review on alternative impact metrics and the benefits of open and transparent metrics.

German abstract

Ein kurzer Artikel zu offenen Impact Metriken, der deren Unterschiede zu konventionellen Impact Maßen wie dem Journal Impact Factor diskutiert.

Item type: Newspaper/magazine article
Keywords: Open Science, Open Metrics, Journal Impact Factor, AltMetrics
Subjects: B. Information use and sociology of information > BB. Bibliometric methods
Depositing user: Dr. Ulrich Herb
Date deposited: 04 Feb 2013 20:20
Last modified: 02 Oct 2014 12:25
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/18487

References

Begley, S. (2006). Science Journals Artfully Try To Boost Their Rankings. The Wallstreet Journal, (05.06.2006). Online: http://online.wsj.com/public/article/SB114946859930671119-SZLwhPkY7G2ewhQbKToJS6QiT00_20060704.html

Dong, P., Loh, M., & Mondry, A. (2005). The “impact factor” revisited. Biomedical digital libraries, 2(7). doi:10.1186/1742-5581-2-7

Herb, U. (2012). Offenheit und wissenschaftliche Werke: Open Access, Open Review, Open Metrics, Open Science & Open Knowledge. In U. Herb (Ed.), Open Initiatives: Offenheit in der digitalen Welt und Wissenschaft (pp. 11–44). Saarbrücken, Germany: universaar. Online: http://eprints.rclis.org/17183/

Rossner, M., Van Epps, H., & Hill, E. (2007). Show me the data. The Journal of cell biology, 179(6), 1091–2. doi:10.1083/jcb.200711140

The PLoS Medicine Editors. (2006). The impact factor game. It is time to find a better way to assess the scientific literature. PLoS medicine, 3(6), e291. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0030291


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item