An analytical model to interpret continuous expansion of universe of subjects

References

1) http://en.wikipedia.org

2) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientist

3) Raman, C.V. and Krishnan, K.S./ (A) New type of secondary radiation/ Nature, 121(3048) (1928) 501.

4) Ranganathan, S. R. Prolegomena to Library Classification, (Asia Publishing House; London), 1967.

5) Gopinath, M. A. Colon Classification, (I: Classification in the 1970's. A second look. Revised edition. Ed. by Arthur Maltby. Clive Bingley; London), 1976

6) Chakrabarti, B. Library Classification Theory, (World Press; Calcutta), 1994.

7) Cutter, C.A. Rules for a Dictionary Catalog, (Government Printing Office; Washington, DC), 1904.

8) Drake, C. L.. What is a subject? Australian Library Journal, 9 (1960) 34-41.

9) Wilson, P. Two Kinds of Power. An Essay on Bibliographical Control, (University of California Press; Berkeley), 1968.

10) Hutchins, W. J. Languages of Indexing and Classification: A Linguistic Study of Structures and Functions, (Peter Peregrinus; London ), 1975.

11) Hutchins, W.J. On the problem of “aboutness” in document analysis. Journal of Informatics 1 (1977) 17-35.

12) Hutchins, W.J. The concept of “aboutness” in subject indexing. Aslib Proceedings 30 (1978) 172-181.

13) Maron, M. E. On indexing, retrieval and the meaning of about. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 28 (1977) 38-43.

14) Miksa, F. The Subject in the Dictionary Catalog from Cutter to the Present. Chicago, IL: American Library Association, 1983.

15) Soergel, D. Organizing Information: Principles of Data Base and Retrieval Systems, (Academic Press; Orlando, FL), 1985.

16) Hjørland, B. The concept of "subject" in Information Science. Journal of Documentation 48 (2) (1992) 172-200.

17) Hjørland, B. Information Seeking and Subject Representation. An Activity-theoretical approach to Information Science. Westport, CT & London, UK: Greenwood Press, 1997.

18) Hjørland, B. Towards a theory of aboutness, subject, topicality, theme, domain, field, content . . . and relevance. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 52 (9) (2001) 774–778.

19) Hjørland, B. Epistemology and the socio-cognitive perspective in Information Science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 53 (4) (2002) 257-270.

20) Hjørland, B. & Nicolaisen, J. Bradford’s Law of Scattering: Ambiguities in the Concept of "Subject". IN: Crestani, F. & Ruthven, I. (Eds.): CoLIS 2005, LNCS 3507, (96 – 106). Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2005. (http://www.db.dk/bh/Bradford_Colis5.pdf)

21) Molina, M. P. Interdisciplinary Approaches to the Concept and Practice of Written Text Documentary Content Analysis. Journal of Documentation 50 (2) (1994) 111-133.

22) Sen, B.K. Universe of knowledge from a new angle. Annals of Library and Information Studies, 56(1) (2009) 7-12.

23) Dutta, Bidyarthi. An analytical investigation into the characteristics of a subject; a case study. PhD thesis submitted to Jadavpur University, Kolkata, 2008