Journal of Informetrics: A Bibliometric Profile

Das, Prabir Kumar Journal of Informetrics: A Bibliometric Profile. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology,, 2013, vol. 33, n. 3, pp. 243-252. [Journal article (Paginated)]

[thumbnail of DJLIT Article.pdf]
Preview
Text
DJLIT Article.pdf

Download (900kB) | Preview

English abstract

This paper critically analyses 239 scholarly communications published in the inaugural five volumes of Journal of Informetrics (JOI) to examine growth of literature, types of communications, authorship pattern, collaboration trend, predominant research domains, etc. Subsequent analysis focuses on prolific contributors, degree of collaboration, and time-lag trend. Findings reveal that - publication output doubles over the study period as article publications increase considerably; though single-authored contributions were significant (30 %), majority of contributions were collaborated by two-authors (36 %), while average authorship accounts for 2.28 per communications. Degree of collaboration (DC) was impressive (0.699) but not overwhelming as research collaborations has emanated from 199 higher learning institutions of 32 countries across the globe. Ranking of prolific contributors has shown Prof. Egghe on the top followed by L Bornmann; R Rousseau and L Leydesdoff. Result also shows upward trend of keyword usage with an average of 4.55 per items, of which h-index, citation analysis, bibliometrics, g-index, etc, expectedly predominates. Scholarly nature of source journal has been further ascertained from increasing citations and reference usage trend. Moreover, growing hardness of the field has been attributed to JOI due to the increasing usage of tables and figures. Study also showed that the journal takes an average of about four month time to publish a manuscript

Item type: Journal article (Paginated)
Keywords: Bibliometrics, Bibliometric Analysis, LIS Journals, Informetrics, Journal Evaluation, Journal of Informetrics
Subjects: B. Information use and sociology of information > BB. Bibliometric methods
Depositing user: Mr Prabir Kumar Das
Date deposited: 07 Jul 2013 05:07
Last modified: 02 Oct 2014 12:26
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/19660

References

1. Nacke, O. Informetrie: Ein neuer Name für eine neue Disziplin. Nachrichten für Dokumen, 1979,30(6), 219-26.

2. Tague-Sutcliffe, J. An introduction to informetrics,Inf. Proc. & Manag., 1992, 28(1), 1-3.

3. Egghe, L. Expansion in the field of informetrics: Origin and consequence, Inf. Proc. & Manag.,2005, 41(6), 1311-16.

4. B a r - I l a n , J . I n f o r m e t r i c s a t t h e beginning of the 21st century: A review.Journal of Informetrics, 2008, 2(1), 1-52.

5. Mayr, P. & Umstätter, W. Why a new Journal of informetrics needed? Int. J. Sciento. Inf. & Bib., 2007, 11(1). Journal of Informetrics, 2008, 2(1), 1-52.

6. White, H.D. & Mccain, W. Bibliometrics In Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, edited by M.E. Williams. American Society for Information Science (Elsevier Science,Amsterdam), 1989, 24, 119-86.

7. Tiew, W.S. Single journal bibliometric studies: A review. Mala. J. Lib. & Inf. Sci. 1997, 2(2), 93-114.

8. Y oung, A.P. Library Quarterly 1956-2004: An exploratory bibliometric analysis. Library Quarterly,2006, 76(1) 10-18.

9. Verma, N.; Tamrakar, R. & Sharma, P. Analysis of contributions in Annals of Library and Information Studies. Ann. Lib. Inf. Stu., 2007,54(2) 106-11.

10. Singh, G.; Mittal, R. & Ahmad, M. A bibliometric study of literature on digital libraries. The Electronic Library. 2007, 25(3), 342-48.

11. Bakri, A. & Willett, P. The Malaysian Journal of Library and Information Science 2001-2006:A bibliometric study. Mala. J. Lib. & Inf. Sci.,2008, 13(1), 103–16.

12. Tiew, W.S. Abdullah, A. & Kaur, K. Malaysian Journal of Library and Information Science 1996-2000: A bibliometrics study. Mala. J. Lib. & Inf. Sci., 2002, 6(2), 43-56.

13. Park, T. K. Asian and Pacific region authorship characteristics in leading library and information science journals. Serials Review, 2008, 34(4),243-51.

14. Mukherjee, B. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (2000- 2007): A bibliometric study. IFLA Journal, 2009, 35(4)341-58.

15. Halder, S.N. & Chandra, S.A. Bibliometric study of published literature in Library and Information Science in IASLIC Bulletin: 2003-2007. Pearl: A Journal of Lib. & Inf. Sci., 2009, 3(2), 4-12.

16. Ani, K.W.U.; Zainab, A. N. & Anur, N.B. Bibliometric studies on single ournals: A review. Mala. J. Lib. & Inf. Sci., 2009, 14(1), 17-55.

17. Thanuskodi, S. Bibliometric analysis of the journal Library Philosophy and Practice from 2005-2009. Lib. Phil. & Prac., 2010. (available online)

18. Park, T.K. D-Lib Magazine: Its first 13 years, D-Lib Magazine, 2010, 16(2).

(available online)

19. Tsay, M. & Shu, Z. Journal bibliometric analysis: A case study on the Journal of Documentation. Journal of Documentation, 2011, 67(5), 806-22.

20. Hussain, A., et al. Bibliometric analysis of the 'Electronic Library' journal (2000-2010), Webology,2011, 8(1). (http://www.webology.org/2011/v8n1/

a87.html/).

21. Thanuskodi, S. Library Herald Journal: A bibliometric study. J. Art. Sci. & Comm.,2011, 2(4) 68-76.

22.Singh, K. P., et al. DESIDOC Bulletin of Information Technology: A bibliometric study. SRELS J. Inf.Manag., 2011, 48(1) 57–68.

23. Kumar, M. & Moorthy, A.L. Bibliometric analysis of DESIDOC Journal of Library and Information Technology during 2001-2010. DESIDOC J. Lib.& Inf. Technol., 2011, 31(3) 203–08.

24. E gghe, L. Five years “Journal of Informetrics”. Journal of Informetrics, 2012, 6(3), 422-26.

25. Van-Hooydonk, G. Fractional counting of multiauthored publications: Consequences for the impact of authors. J. Amer. Soc. Inf. Sci & Tech., 1997, 48(10), 944–45.

26. S u b r a m a n y a m , K . B i b l i o m e t r i c s t u d i e s

of research in col laborat ion: A review.J. Inf. Sci., 1983, 6(1) 33-38.

27. C hen Y.; Fang S. & Börner K., Mapping the developments of Scientometrics: 2002-2008.J. Lib. Sci. China. (available online)

28. Egghe L.; Rousseau R. & Van-Hooydonk G. Methods for accrediting publications to authors or countries:Consequences for evaluation studies. J. Amer.Soc. Inf. Sci. & Tech., 2000, 52(2), 145-57.

29. Smith, L.D., et al. Constructing knowledge: The role of graphs and tables in hard and soft psychology. American Psychologist, 2002, 57, 749-61.

30. Moed, H.F. & Leeuwen, T.N.V. Improving the accuracy of Institute of Scientific Information’s journal impact factors. J. Amer. Soc. Inf. Sci.

& Tech., 1995, 46(6), 461-67.


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item