Bibliometría y Academia

Martínez-Rodríguez, Luis-Javier Bibliometría y Academia. Anuario ThinkEPI 2009, 2009, vol. 3, pp. 23-26. [Journal article (Paginated)]

[thumbnail of PDF]
Preview
 Text (PDF)
Bibliometria_Academia.pdf - Published version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (249kB) | Preview

English abstract

Recent criticisms and controversies on abuse or misuse of bibliometric research evaluation are placed in the context of general conflicts of values that knowledge industrialization is bringing about, as bibliometric seems to be a tool of post-academic or industrial science, a form of scientific work that breaks away from traditional academic principles.

Spanish abstract

Las críticas y polémicas recientes sobre los excesos de la evaluación métrica de la investigación se enmarcan dentro de los conflictos generales de valores que la industrialización del conocimiento trae consigo, al aparecer la bibliometría como un instrumento de la ciencia post-académica o de la tecnociencia, las cuales rompen con los principios académicos tradicionales.

Item type: Journal article (Paginated)
Keywords: Bibliometrics; Research perfomance evaluation; Post-academic science; Bibliometría; Evaluación de la investigación; Ciencia post-académica; Tecnociencia.
Subjects: B. Information use and sociology of information > BB. Bibliometric methods
Depositing user: Mr. Luis Javier Martínez Rodríguez
Date deposited: 06 Aug 2013 12:55
Last modified: 02 Oct 2014 12:26
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/19741

References

Adler, R.; Ewing, J.; Taylor, P. (2008). Citation statistics: A report from the International Mathematical Union (IMU) in cooperation with the International Council of Industrial and Applied Mathematics (ICIAM) and the Institute of Mathematical Statistics (IMS). Consultado en: 16-11-08: http://www.mathunion.org/fileadmin/IMU/Report/CitationStatistics.pdf

Brown, H. (2007). “How impact factors changed medical publishing-and science”. En: BMJ, v. 334, pp. 561-564.

Cronin, B. (2005). The Hand of Science: academic Writings and its Rewards. Lanham, Md: Scarecrow Press.

Delgado López-Cózar, E.; Ruiz-Pérez, R.; Jiménez, E. (2007). Impact of the impact factor in Spain. Rapid responses to: Brown, H. 2007. “How impact factors changed medical publishing-and science”. En: BMJ, v. 334, pp. 561-564.

Echeverría, J. (2003). La revolución tecnocientífica. Madrid: Fondo de Cultura Económica.

Grupo Scimago. (2006). El índice h de Hirsch: aportaciones a un debate. En: El profesional de la información, v. 15, n. 4, pp. 304-306.

Harnad, S. (2008). Validating research performance metrics against peer rankings. En: Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics, v. 8, n. 1, pp. 103-107.

Merton, R. K. (1985). La sociología de la ciencia: investigaciones teóricas y empíricas. 2ª ed. Madrid: Alianza.

Simmons, K. (2008). The Misused Impact Factor [Editorial]. En: Science, v. 322, n. 5899, p. 165.

Tse, H. (2008). A possible way out of the impact factor game [Correspondence]. En: Nature, v. 454, n. 7207, pp. 938-939.

The use and misuse of bibliometric indices in evaluating research perfomance: ESEP Theme Section. 2008. En: Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics, v. 8, n. 1.

Ziman, J. M. (2003). ¿Qué es la ciencia? Madrid: Cambridge University Press.


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
Contact us
Send email Sponsors
Sponsor: AIMS Sponsor: D&P Sponsor: UniNa CAB Get connected
Facebook Facebook Twitter Twitter Linkedin LinkedIn RSS RSS