Auditorías de conocimiento. Análisis de dominio en las bases de datos Scopus y WoK

González Guitián, María Virginia and de Zayas Pérez, María Rosa Auditorías de conocimiento. Análisis de dominio en las bases de datos Scopus y WoK. Revista Interamericana de Bibliotecología, 2012, vol. 35, n. 1, pp. 17-25. [Journal article (Paginated)]

This is the latest version of this item.

[thumbnail of GONZÁLEZ GUITIÁN, María Virginia y DE ZAYAS PÉREZ, María Rosa. Auditorías de conocimiento. Análisis de dominio en las bases de datos Scopus y WoK. Revista Interamericana de Bibliotecología, 2012, vol. 35, n°1, pp. 17–25]
Preview
 Text (GONZÁLEZ GUITIÁN, María Virginia y DE ZAYAS PÉREZ, María Rosa. Auditorías de conocimiento. Análisis de dominio en las bases de datos Scopus y WoK. Revista Interamericana de Bibliotecología, 2012, vol. 35, n°1, pp. 17–25)
v35n1a2.pdf - Published version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial.
Download (1MB) | Preview

English abstract

This an approach to the visualization of the domain knowledge audits, based on an analysis of the scientific production of the database Scopus and Wok between the years 1994–2010. Productivity was studied for years, most productive authors, publications, levels of collaboration between authors of this domain were used and most cited themes. Computer tools such as the Excel, ToolInf and Ucinet. In the studied period were published: 63 articles and 30 procedings. 93 works under the signature of 232 authors, proceeding were published. The most productive magazine was Lecture Notes in Computer Science, and authors with a major contribution to this topic were Wing–Bun Lee, Chi Fai Cheung, Elissaveta Gourova and Baimin M. Suo. Finally the results are depicted in different graphs and maps for viewing.

Spanish abstract

A partir del análisis de la producción científica de las base de datos Scopus y WoK entre los años 1994 y hasta 2010, se hace un acercamiento a la visualización del dominio 'Auditorías de Conocimiento'. Se estudia la productividad por años, los autores más productivos, las publicaciones, los niveles de colaboración entre autores de este dominio y las temáticas más citadas. Para el procesamiento de los datos se emplean herramientas informáticas como Excel, ToolInf y Ucinet. En el período estudiado se publicaron 93 trabajos bajo la firma de 232 autores: 63 artículos y 30 proceeding. La revista más productiva fue 'Lecture Notes in Computer Science' y los autores con un mayor aporte a esta temática, Wing–Bun Lee, Chi Fai Cheung, Elissaveta Gourova y Baimin M. Suo. Finalmente se representan los resultados en diferentes gráficos y mapas para su visualización.

Item type: Journal article (Paginated)
Keywords: análisis de dominio, difusión de la información; auditorías de conocimiento / domain analysis, information visualization, knowledge audit
Subjects: A. Theoretical and general aspects of libraries and information.
H. Information sources, supports, channels. > HL. Databases and database Networking.
Depositing user: Unnamed user with email cdavidm01467@gmail.com
Date deposited: 25 Aug 2013 19:46
Last modified: 02 Oct 2014 12:27
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/20005

Available Versions of this Item

References

BURNETT, Simon, IllINGWORTH, lorraine & WEBSTER, Linda. Knowledge auditing and mapping: a pragmatic approach. Knowledge and Process Management, 11 (1): 25–37, 2004.

CHEUNG, Chi Fai [et al.]. Systematic knowledge auditing with applications. Journal of Knowledge Management Practice [Online]. August 2005, vol. 6. [Fecha de consulta: 28 may 2009]. Disponible en: http://www.tlainc.com/articl97.htm

CHOY, Soon–Yong, LEE, W. B. & Cheung, C. F. A systematic approach for knowledge audit analysis: integration of knowledge inventory, mapping and knowledge flow analysis. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 10 (6): 674682, 2004.

DATTERO, Ronald, GALUP, Stuart D. & QUAN, Jing Jim. The knowledge audit: meta–matrix analysis. Knowledge Management Research & Practice [Online]. August 2007, vol. 5, no. 3. [Fecha de consulta: 15 may 2009]. Disponible en: http://www.palgrave–journals.com/kmrp/journal/v5/n3/full/8500142a.html

DEBENHAM, John & CLARK, Jeff. The knowledge audit. Robotics and Computer Integrated Manufacturing Journal, 11 (3): 201–211, 1994.

GARFIELD, Eugene. Citation indexes in sociological and historical research. American Documentation, 14 (4): 289291, 1963.

GRIFFITH, Belver C. [et al.]. The structure of scientific literatures, II: toward a macro and microestructure for science. Science Studies, 4: 339–365, 1974.

HANDZIC, Meliha, LAGUMDZIJA, Amila, & CELJO, Amer. Auditing knowledge management practices: model and application. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 6 (1): 90–99, 2008.

HJORlAND, Birger. Domain analysis in information science eleven approaches traditional as well as innovative. Journal of Documentation, 58 (4): 422–462, 2002.

HJORlAND, Birger & AlBRECHTSEN, Hanne. Toward a new horizon in information science: domain analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 46 (6): 400–425, 1995.

HYLTON, Anne. A KM initiative is unlikely to succeed without a knowledge audit [Online]. Bruselas: Knowledge Board, 2002. [Fecha de consulta: 15 February 2009] Disponible en: http://www.providersedge.com/docs/km_articles/KM_Initiative_Unlikely_to_Succeed_Without_a_K_Audit.pdf

IAZZOLINO, Gianpaolo & PIETRANTONIO, Rinaldo. An innovative knowledge audit methodology: some first results from an ongoing research in Southern Italy. In: Accettato alla KMAP international Conference on knowledge management [Online]. University of New Zealand, 2005. [Fecha de consulta: 28 may 2009]. Disponible en: http://www.knowledgeboard.com/download/2639/–iazz–pietr–Innovative–KA–Meth.pdf

JURINJAK, Ivan & KLICEK, Bozidar. Designing a method for knowledge audit in small and medium information technology firms [Online]. In: Central European Conference on Information and Intelligent Systems: CECII, september 24–26, 2008. Varazdin: Croatia, 2008. [Fecha de consulta: 28 may 2009]. Disponible en: http://www.ceciis.foi.hr/app/index.php/ceciis/2008/paper/view/104/47

LAUER, Thomas W. & TANNIRU, Mohan. Knowledge management audit – a methodology and case study. Australian Journal of Information Systems [Online]. December 2001, vol. 9, no. 1. [Fecha de consulta: 28 may 2009]. Disponible en: http://dl.acs.org.au/index.php/ajis/article/view/212/184

LIEBOWITZ, Jay [et al.]. The knowledge audit. Knowledge and Process Management, 7 (1): 3–10, 2000.

MARSHAKOVA, Irina. System of document connection based on references. Nauchno–Teknichescaya Informatisya, 2 (6): 3–8, 1973.

MCCAIN, Katherine W. [et al.]. Combining bibliometric and knowledge elicitation techniques to map a knowledge domain, 2006. In: Arthur M. Sackler Colloquium on Mapping knowledge domains [Online]. The Beckman Center of the National Academy of Sciences (Irvine, May 9–11, 2003). [Fecha de consulta: 15 march 2008]. Disponible en: http://vw.indiana.edu/sackler03/ppts/McCain.ppt#258,1

MEARNS, M. A. & DU ToIT, A.S.A. Knowledge audit: Tools of the trade transmitted to tools for tradition. International Journal of Information Management, 28 (1): 161–167, 2008.

MOHD DRUS, Sulfeeza & SAlBIAH SHARIFF, Siti. Analysis of Knowledge Audit Models via life Cycle Approach. In: International Conference on Information Communication and Management. IPCSIT vol. 16. Singapore: IACSIT Press, 2011.

MOYA–ANEGÓN, Félix de [et al.]. Visualización y análisis de la estructura científica española: ISI Web of Science 1990–2005. El profesional de la información, 15 (4): 258–269, 2006.

PRICE, Derek J. Networks of Scientific Papers. Science, 149: 510–515, 1965.

SHARMA, Ram Sharma [et al.]. Using a taxonomy for knowledge audits: some field experiences. Journal of Knowledge Management Practice, 11 (1): 1–17, 2010.

SMALL, Henry. Co–citation in the scientific literature: a new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24: 265–269, 1973.

WHITE, Howard D. & MCCAIN, Katherine W. Visualization of literatures. Annual Review of Information Systems and Technology, 32: 99–168, 1997.


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
Contact us
Send email Sponsors
Sponsor: AIMS Sponsor: D&P Sponsor: UniNa CAB Get connected
Facebook Facebook Twitter Twitter Linkedin LinkedIn RSS RSS