Social reference: Toward a unifying theory

Shachaf, Pnina Social reference: Toward a unifying theory. Library and Information Science Research, 2010, vol. 32, pp. 66-76. [Journal article (Paginated)]

[img]
Preview
 Text (Social Reference: Toward a Unifying Theory)
Social Reference- Toward A Unifying Theory.pdf - Submitted version
Download (254kB) | Preview

English abstract

This article addresses the need for a theoretical approach to reference research and specifically concentrates on a lacuna in conceptual research on social reference. Social reference refers to online question answering services that are provided by communities of volunteers on question and answer (Q&A) sites. Social reference is similar to library reference, but at the same time, it differs significantly from the traditional (and digital) dyadic reference encounter; it involves a collaborative group effort and uses wikis and other Web 2.0 infrastructure. This article proposes a sociotechnical framework to analyze, evaluate, and understand social reference that relies on a systems approach to the reference encounter, combined with an input-process-output (IPO) approach to virtual group work. The framework also accounts for the collaborative process of question answering and the interplay between technology and users, in their contexts.

Item type: Journal article (Paginated)
Keywords: social reference, virtual reference, digital reference, social question answering, collaborative question answering, virtual teams
Subjects: A. Theoretical and general aspects of libraries and information. > AA. Library and information science as a field.
A. Theoretical and general aspects of libraries and information. > AB. Information theory and library theory.
B. Information use and sociology of information > BA. Use and impact of information.
B. Information use and sociology of information > BC. Information in society.
B. Information use and sociology of information > BG. Information dissemination and diffusion.
Depositing user: Amanda Ferrara
Date deposited: 21 Oct 2013 01:55
Last modified: 02 Oct 2014 12:28
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/20320

References

Abels, E.G. (1996). The e-mail reference interview. Reference Quarterly, 35, 345-358.

Adamic, L.A., Zhang, J., Bakshy, E., & Ackerman, M.S. (2008). Knowledge sharing and Yahoo! Answers: Everyone knows something. Proceedings of the International World Wide Web Conference. Beijing, ACM.

Agichtein, E., Castillo, C., Donato, D., Gionides, A., & Mishne, G. (2008). Finding high-quality content in social media. Proceedings of Web Search and Web Data Mining. Palo Alto, CA, ACM.

Answerbag (2009). About us. Retrieved July 5, 2009, from http://www.answerbag.com/about/

Bertalanffy, L. (1968). General system theory: Foundations, developments, applications. New York:

Braziller.

Bettenhausen, K.L. (1991). Five years of group research: What we have learned and what need to be addressed. Journal of Management, 17, 345-381.

Bian, J., Liu, Y., Agichtein, E., & Zha, H. (2008). Finding the right facts in the crowd: factoid question answering over social media. Proceedings of the International World Wide Web Conference. Beijing, ACM. (pp. 467-476).

Burnett, G., Besant, M., & Chatman, E. A. (2001). Small worlds: Normative behavior in virtual communities and feminist bookselling. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52, 536−547.

Burnett, G., & Bonnici, L. (2003). Beyond the FAQ: Explicit and implicit norms in Usenet newsgroups. Library & Information Science Research, 25, 333-351.

Burnett, G., & Buerkle, H. (2004). Information exchange in virtual communities: A comparative study. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 9(2). Retrieved July 5, 2009, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol9/issue2/burnett.html.

Burnett, G., Jaeger, P.T., & Thompson K.M. (2008). Normative behavior and information: The social aspects of information access. Library & Information Science Research, 30, 56-66.

Chatman, E. A. (1999). A theory of life in the round. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50, 207−217.

Cohen, S.G., & Bailey, D.E. (1997). What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. Journal of Management, 23(3), 239-291.

Cohen, S.G., Ledford, G.E. Jr., & Spreitzer, G.M. (1996). A predictive model of self- managing work teams effectiveness. Human Relations, 49, 643-676.

Crews, K.D. (1988). The accuracy of reference services: Variables for research and implementation. Library & Information Science Research, 10, 331-355.

Curry, E.L. (2005). The reference interview revisited: Librarian-patron interaction in the virtual environment. SIMILE: Studies in Media and Information Literacy Education, 5(1), 1-16.

DeSanctis G., & Poole, M.S. (1994). Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: Adaptive structuration theory. Organization Science, 5(2), 121-147.

DeSanctis, G., & Poole, M.S. (1997). Transition in teamwork in new organizational forms. Advances in Group Processes, 14, 157-176.

Dewdey, P., & Ross, C.S. (1994). Flying a light aircraft: Reference service evaluation from a user’s viewpoint. Reference Quarterly, 34, 217-230.

Dom, B., & Paranjpe, D. (2008). A Bayesian technique for estimating the credibility of question answerers. Proceedings of the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM). pp. 399-409. Retrieved August 20, 2008, from http://www.siam.org/proceedings/datamining/2008/dm08_36_Dom.pdf

Durrance, J.C. (1995). Factors that influence reference success: What makes questioners willing to return? Reference Librarian, 49/50, 243-65.

Furst, S., Blackburn, R., & Rosen, B. (1999). Virtual team effectiveness: A proposed research agenda. Information Systems Journal, 9(4), 249-269.

Gazan, R. (2006, November). Specialists and synthesists in a question answering community. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science & Technology Annual Meeting, 43(1), 1-10.

Gazan, R. (2007). Seekers, sloths and social reference: Homework questions submitted to a question-answering community. New Review of Hypermedia & Multimedia, 13(2), 239-248.

Gibson, C.B., & Cohen, S.G. (Eds.). (2003). Virtual teams that work: Creating conditions for virtual team effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Gilbert, L.M., Liu, M., Matoush, T., & Whitlatch, J.B. (2006). Digital reference and online instructional services in an integrated public/university library. The Reference Librarian, 46(95-96), 149-172.

Gross, M., & Saxton, M. L. (2002). Integrating the imposed query into the evaluation of reference service: A dichotomous analysis of user ratings. Library & Information Science Research, 24, 251-263.

Guzzo, R.A., & Dickson, M.W. (1996). Teams in organizations: Recent research on performance and effectiveness. Annual Review of Psychology, 47(1), 307-338.

Hackman, J.R. (1983). A normative model of work team effectiveness (Technical Report No. 2). New Haven, CT: Yale School of Organization and Management.

Hackman, J.R. (1987). The design of work teams. In J. Lorsch (Ed.), Handbook of organizational behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Hackman, J.R., & Oldham, G.R. (1980). Work redesign. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Hansen, D. L., Ackerman, M. S., Resnick, P. J., & Munson, S. (2007). Virtual community maintenance with a collaborative repository. Proceedings of the 70th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 44 (1), 1-20.

Harper, F.M., Raban, D., Rafaeli, S., & Konstan, J.A. (2008). Predictors of answer quality in online Q&A sites. Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Florence, ACM.

Hernon, P., & Calvert, P. (2005). E-service quality in libraries: Exploring its features and dimensions. Library & Information Science Research, 27, 377-404.

Hernon, P., & McClure, C.R. (1986). Unobtrusive reference testing: The 55 percent rule. Library Journal, 111(7), 37-41.

Hitwise (2008, March 19). U.S. visits to question and answer websites increased 118 percent year-over-year. Retrieved November 22, 2008, from http://www.hitwise.com/press-center/hitwiseHS2004/question-and-answer-websites.php

Jarvenpaa, S.L. , & Leidner, D.E. (1999). Communication and trust in global virtual teams. Organization Science, 10(6), 791–815.

Kayworth, T.R., & Leidner, D.E. (2001). Leadership effectiveness in global virtual teams. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(3), 7–40.

Kling, R., McKim, J., & King, A. (2003). A bit more to IT: Scholarly communication forums as socio-technical interaction networks. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(2), 127-148.

Kulthlu, C.C. (1988). Developing a model of the library search process: Cognitive and affective aspects. Reference Quarterly, 28, 231-242.

Kwon, N. (2006). User satisfaction with referrals at a collaborative virtual reference service. Information Research, 11(2). Retrieved January 15, 2009, from http://informationr.net/ir/11-2/paper246.html

Lankes, R.D. (2004). The digital reference research agenda. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(4), 301-311.

Lankes, R.D. (2005). Digital reference research: Fusing research and practice. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 44(4), 320-326.

Lurey, J.M., & Raisinghani, M.S. (2001). An empirical study of best practices in virtual teams. Information & Management, 38, 523-544.

Mathieu, J., Maynard, M.T., Rapp, T., & Gilson, L. (2008). Team effectiveness 1997-2007: A review of recent advancements and a glimpse into the future. Journal of Management, 34(3), 410-476.

McClennen, M., & Memmott, P. (2001). Roles in digital reference. Information Technology and Libraries, 20(3), 143-148.

McClure, C.R., Lankes, R.D., Gross, M., & Choltco-Devlin, B. (2002). Statistics, measures and quality standards for assessing digital reference library services: Guidelines and procedures. Syracuse, NY: Information Institute of Syracuse. Retrieved December 27, 2008, from: http://quartz.syr.edu/quality/Quality.pdf

McGrath, J.E. (1984). Groups: Interaction and performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

McGrath, J.E. (1964). Social psychology: A brief introduction. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.

Montoya-Weiss, M.M., Massey, A.P., & Song, M. (2001). Getting it together: Temporal coordination and conflict management in global virtual teams. Academy of Management Journal, 44(6),1251–1262.

Nicholson, S., & Lankes, R.D. (2007). The Digital Reference Electronic Warehouse (DREW) Project: Creating the infrastructure for digital reference research through a multi-disciplinary knowledge base. Reference and User Services Quarterly, 46 (3), 45-59.

Oh, S., Oh, J.S., & Shah, C. (2008). The use of information sources by Internet users in answering questions. Proceedings of the Annual meeting of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 45(1), 1-13.

O’Neill, N. (2007). Chacha, Yahoo!, and Amazon. Searcher, 15(4), 7-11.

O’Reilly, T. (2005). What is Web 2.0. Retrieved January 9, 2009, from http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html

Orlikowski, W.J. (1992). The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organization Science, 3, 398-427.

Pearce, J.A.I., & Ravlin, E.C. (1987). The design and activation of self-regulating work groups. Human Relations, 40, 751-760.

Pettigrew, KE. (1999). Waiting for chiropody: Contextual results from an ethnographic study of the information behaviour among attendees at community clinics. Information Processing & Management, 35(6), 801-817.

Pomerantz, J. (2005). A conceptual framework and open research questions for chat-based reference service. Journal of the American Society of Information Science and Technology, 56(12), 1288-1302.

Pomerantz, J. (2006). Collaboration as the norm in reference work. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 46(1), 45-55.

Pomerantz, J., Nicholson, S., Belanger, Y., & Lankes, R.D. (2004). The current state of digital reference: Validation of a general digital reference model through a survey of digital reference services. Information Processing & Management, 40(2), 347-363.

Raban, D. & Harper, M. (2008). Motivations for answering questions online. In D. Caspi, D., & T. Azran (Eds.), New media and innovative technologies. Beer Sheva, Israel: Ben-Gurion University Press, Tzivonim Publications. pp.73-97. Retrieved July 5, 2009 from http://cmsprod.bgu.ac.il/NR/rdonlyres/34396BDB-6C0E-4931-A077-697451885123/38249/MicrosoftWordraban.pdf

Radford, M.L. (1999). The reference encounter: Interpersonal communication in the academic library. Chicago: Association of College and Research Libraries.

Radford, M.L. (2006). Encountering virtual users: A qualitative investigation of interpersonal communication in chat reference. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(8), 1046-1059.

Rafaeli, S., & Ariel, Y. (2008). Online motivational factors: Incentives for participation and contribution in Wikipedia. In A. Barak (Ed.), Psychological aspects of cyberspace: Theory, research, applications (pp. 243-267). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Ranganathan, S.R. (1931). The five laws of library science. London: Edward Goldston.

Reference and User Services Association (2004). Guidelines for behavioral performance of reference and information service providers. Retrieved December 5, 2008 from http://www.ala.org/ala/rusa/rusaprotools/referenceguide/guidelinesbehavioral.htm

Rheingold, H. (2000). The virtual community: Homesteading on the electronic frontier. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Richardson, J.V. (1995). Knowledge-based systems for general reference work: Applications, problems, and progress. San Diego: Academic Press.

Richardson, J.V. (1999). Understanding the reference transaction: A systems analysis perspective. College & Research Libraries, 60(3), 211-222.

Ross, C.D., Nilsen, K., & Dewdney, P. (2002). Conducting the reference interview. New York: Neal-Schuman Publishers, Inc.

Rothstein, S. (1964). The measurement and evaluation of reference service. Library Trends, 12(3), 456-472

Rousseau, V., Aube, C., & Savoie, A. (2006). Teamwork behaviors: A review and an integration of frameworks. Small Group Research, 37, 540-570.

Savolainen, R. (2009). Small world and information grounds as contexts of information seeking and sharing. Library & Information Science Research, 31, 38-45.

Saxton, M.L., & Richardson, J.V. (2002). Understanding reference transactions: Transforming an art into a science. San Diego: Academic Press.

Shachaf, P. (2008). Cultural diversity and information and communication technology impacts on global virtual teams: An exploratory study. Information and Management, 45(2), 131-142.

Shachaf, P. (in press). The paradox of expertise: Is the Wikipedia Reference Desk as good as your library? Journal of Documentation, 54. Retrieved December 6, 2008, from http://ella.slis.indiana.edu/~shachaf/paradox.pdf

Shachaf, P., & Hara, N. (2002). Ecological approach to virtual team effectiveness. Proceedings of Americas Conference on Information Systems, 8, 1814-1819. AIS.

Shachaf, P., & Horowitz, S. (2006). Are virtual reference services color blind? Library & Information Science Research, 28, 501-520.

Shachaf, P. & Horowitz, S. (2008). Virtual reference service evaluation: Adherence to RUSA behavioral guidelines and IFLA digital reference guidelines. Library & Information Science Research, 30, 122-137.

Shah, C., Oh, J.S., & Oh, S. (2008). Exploring characteristics and effects of user participation in online social Q&A sites. First Monday, 13(9), retrieved September 29, 2008, from http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/viewArticle/2182/2028

Shea, G.P., & Guzzo R.A. (1987). Groups as human resources. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 5, 323-356.

Shirky, C. (2008). Here comes everybody: The power of organizing without organizations. New York: Penguin Books.

Sundstrom, E., DeMuese, K.P., & Futrell D. (1990). Work teams: Applications and effectiveness. The American Psychologist, 45(2), 120-133.

Surowiecki, J. (2004). The wisdom of crowds. New York: Anchor Books.

Taylor, R.S. (1968). Question negotiation and information seeking in libraries. College and Research Libraries, 29(6), 178-194.

Walter, V.A., & Mediavilla, C. (2005). Teens are from Neptune, librarians are from Pluto: An analysis of online reference transactions. Library Trends, 54(2), 209-227.

Ward, D. (2004). Measuring the completeness of reference transactions in online chats; Results of an unobtrusive study. Reference and User Services Quarterly, 44(1), 46- 58.

Ward, D. (2005). Why users choose chat? A survey of behavior and motivations. Internet Reference Services Quarterly, 10(1), 29-46.

Weinberger, D. (2007). Everything is miscellaneous: The power of the new digital disorder. New York: Henry Holt & Co.

Whittaker, K. (1977). Towards a theory for reference and information service. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 9(1), 49-63.

White, M.D. (1981). Dimensions of the reference interview. Reference Quarterly, 20(4), 373-381.

White, M.D. (1985). Evaluation of the reference interview. Reference Quarterly, 25(1), 76-84.

White, M.D. (1989). Different approaches to the reference interview. The Reference Librarian, 25, 631-646.

White, M.D. (2001). Digital reference services: Framework for analysis and evaluation. Library & Information Science Research, 23, 211-231.

Zhang, J., Ackerman, M.S., Adamic, L., & Nam, K.K. (2007). QuME: A mechanism to support expertise finding in online help-seeking communities. Proceedings of the 20th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. Newport, RI, ACM.

Zhuo F., Love, M., Norwood, S., & Massia, K. (2006). Applying RUSA guidelines in the analysis of chat reference transcripts. College & Undergraduate Libraries, 13(1), 75-88.


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
Contact us
Send email Sponsors
Sponsor: AIMS Sponsor: D&P Sponsor: UniNa CAB Get connected
Facebook Facebook Twitter Twitter Linkedin LinkedIn RSS RSS