Frameworks for understanding knowledge sharing in open online communities: Boundaries and boundary crossing

Hara, Noriko and Fichman, Pnina . Frameworks for understanding knowledge sharing in open online communities: Boundaries and boundary crossing., 2013 In: Social Informatics: Past, Present and Future. Cambridge Scholars Publishing. (In Press) [Book chapter]

Text (Frameworks for understanding knowledge sharing in open online communities)
Hara-and-Fichman-CM-Final_Draft.pdf - Draft version

Download (192kB) | Preview

English abstract

Earlier studies of Social Informatics strive to understand end-user behaviors of Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) implemented in organizations (Dutton, 2005). In the 1970s through the 1980s, the usage of ICTs is primary found in organizations such as universities, corporations, and governments. As the price of computer devices came down, more computers were adopted in private homes, and studies of personal computers were added to the corpus of the studies in Social Informatics (e.g., Hara & Kling, 2000). Then, in the 1990s, as more and more people gained access to the Internet, Social Informatics became interested in studies on Internet use in various settings (e.g., Kling, 2006). In the early 21st century, there was a surge in social media use, which led to a wave of studies seeking insight into user relationships with social media and the consequences of this activity(e.g, Turkle, 2011). This paper focuses on a specific activity, knowledge sharing, in the social media setting from a Social Informatics perspective.

Item type: Book chapter
Keywords: boundaries, online communities, social informatics
Subjects: A. Theoretical and general aspects of libraries and information. > AB. Information theory and library theory.
B. Information use and sociology of information > BA. Use and impact of information.
B. Information use and sociology of information > BC. Information in society.
B. Information use and sociology of information > BD. Information society.
B. Information use and sociology of information > BG. Information dissemination and diffusion.
C. Users, literacy and reading. > CA. Use studies.
L. Information technology and library technology > LB. Computer networking.
L. Information technology and library technology > LC. Internet, including WWW.
L. Information technology and library technology > LD. Computers.
Depositing user: Amanda Ferrara
Date deposited: 07 Oct 2013 15:39
Last modified: 02 Oct 2014 12:28


"SEEK" links will first look for possible matches inside E-LIS and query Google Scholar if no results are found.

Akkerman, Sanne F., and Arthur Bakker. 2011. “Boundary Crossing and Boundary Objects.” Review of Educational Research 81 (2): 132-169.

Allen, Jonathan P. 2010. “ Knowledge-Sharing Successes in Web 2.0 Communities.” IEEE Technology and Society Magazine 29 (1): 58-64.

Barrett, Michael, and Eivor Oborn, 2010. “Boundary Object Use in Cross-Cultural Software Development Teams.” Human Relations 63 (8):1199-1221.

Bourdieu, Pierre, and Loic J. D. Wacquant. 1992. An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Brown, John Seely, and Paul Duguid, P. 2001. “Knowledge and Organization: A Social-Practice Perspective.” Organization Science 12(2): 198-213.

Carlile, Paul R. 2004. “Transferring, Translating, and Transforming: An Integrative Framework for Managing Knowledge Across Boundaries.” Organization Science 15 (5): 555-568.

Doan, Anhai, Raghu Ramakrishnan, and Alon Y. Halevy. 2011. “Crowdsourcing Systems on the World-Wide Web.” Communications of the ACM 54 (4): 86-96.

Dougherty, Deborah, and Danielle D. Dune. 2012. “Digital Science and Knowledge Boundaries in Complex Innovation.” Organization Science 23 (5): 1467-1484.

Dutton, William H. 2005. Foreword to Understanding and Communicating Social Informatics: A Framework for Studying and Teaching the Human Contexts of Information and Communication Technologies by

Rob Kling, Howard Rosenbaum, and Steve Sawyer. Medford, NJ: Information Today.

Fleischmann, Kenneth R. 2006. “Boundary Objects with Agency: A Method for Studying the Design-Use Interface.” The Information Society 22 (2): 77-87.

Fox, Nick J. 2011. “Boundary Objects, Social Meanings and the Success of New Technologies.” Sociology 45 (1): 70-85.

Hara, Noriko, and Rob Kling. 2000. “Students’ Distress with a Web-Based Distance Education Course.” Information, Communication and Society 3 (4): 557-579.

Hara, Noriko, Pnina Shachaf, and Sharon Stoerger. 2009. “Online Communities of Practice Typology Revisited.” Journal of Information Science 35 (6): 740-757.

Hara, Noriko, Paul Solomon, Seung-Lye Kim, and Diane H. Sonnenwald. 2003. “An Emerging View of Scientific Collaboration: Scientists’ FRAMEWORKS FOR UNDERSTANDING KNOWLEDGE SHARING IN

OPEN ONLINE COMMUNITIES 11 Perspectives on Collaboration and Factors that Impact Collaboration.”

Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology 54 (10): 952-965.

Hernes, Tor. 2004. “Studying Composite Boundaries: A Framework of Analysis.” Human Relations 57 (1): 9-29.

Hew, Khe Foon, and Noriko Hara. 2007. “Knowledge Sharing Among Professionals in Three Online Environments: A Qualitative Case Study.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology 58 (14): 2310-2324.

Hsiao, Ruey-Lin, Dun-Hou Tsai, and Ching-Fang Lee. 2012. “Collaborative Knowing: The Adaptive Nature of Cross-Boundary Spanning.” Journal of Management Studies 49 (3): 463-491.

Joyce, Elisabeth, Brian Butler, and Jacqueline Pike. 2011. “Handling Flammable Materials: Wikipedia Biographies of Living Persons as Contentious Objects.” In Proceedings of iConference 2011, Seattle, Washington, February 8-11, 2011.

Kimble, Chris, Corinne Grenier, and Karine Goglio-Primard. 2010. “Innovation and Knowledge Sharing Across Professional Boundaries: Political Interplay Between Boundary Objects and Brokers.” International Journal of Information Management 30: (5): 437-444.

Kling, Rob, ed. 1996. Computerization and Controversy: Value Conflicts and Social Choices (2nd ed.). San Diego: Academic Press.

Kling, Rob, Howard Rosenbaum, and Steve Sawyer. 2005. Understanding and Communicating Social Informatics: A Framework for Studying and Teaching the Human Contexts of Information and Communication Technologies. Medford, NJ: Information Today.

Lamont, Michèle, and Virág Molnár. 2002. “The Study of Boundaries in the Social Sciences.” Annual Review of Sociology 28: 167-195.

Landry, Steven, Kerry Levin, Dennis Rowe, and Monicarol Nickelson. 2010. “Enabling Collaborative Work Across Different Communities of Practice Through Boundary Objects: Field Studies in Air Traffic Management.” International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 26 (1): 75-93.

Lee, Charlotte P. 2007. “Boundary Negotiating Artifacts: Unbinding the Routine of Boundary Objects and Embracing Chaos in Collaborative Work.” Computer Supported Cooperative Work 16 (3): 307-339.

Lee, Gwendolyn K., and Robert E. Cole. 2003. “From a Firm-Based to a Community-Based Model of Knowledge Creation. The Case of the Linux Kernel Development.” Organization Science 14 (6): 633-649.

Levina, Natalia, and Emmanuelle Vaast. 2005. “The Emergence of Boundary Spanning Competence in Practice: Implications for CHAPTER FIVE 12 Implementation and Use of Information Systems.” MIS Quarterly 29 (2): 335-363.

March, James G., and Herbert A. Simon. 1958. Organizations. New York: Wiley.

Miller, Richard. 2005. “Creating Boundary Objects to Aid Knowledge Transfer.” Knowledge Management Review 8 (2): 12-15.

Qualman, Erik. 2011. Socialnomics: How Social Media Transforms the Way we Live and Do Business. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

Rau, Christiane, Anne-Katrin Neyer, and Kathrin M. Möslein. 2012. “Innovation Practices and Their Boundary-Crossing Mechanisms: A Review and Proposals for the Future.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 24 (2): 181-217.

Shachaf, Pnina, and Noriko Hara. 2005. “Team Effectiveness in Virtual Environments: An Ecological Approach.” In Teaching and Learning with Virtual Teams, edited by Sharmila Pixy Ferris and Susan Godar, 81-106. Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.

Star, Susan Leigh, and James R. Griesemer. 1989. “Institutional Ecology, ‘Translations’ and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology.” Social Studies of Science 19 (3): 387-420.

Star, Susan Leigh, and Karen Ruhleder. 2001. “Steps Toward an Ecology of Infrastructure: Design and Access for Large Information Spaces.” In Information Technology and Organizational Transformation: History, Rhetoric, and Practice, edited by JoAnne Yates and John Van Maanen, 305-345, Organization Science. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

Sturdy, Andrew, Timothy Clark, Robin Fincham, and Karen Handley. 2009. “Between Innovation and Legitimation – Boundaries and Knowledge Flow in Management Consultancy.” Organization 16 (5): 627-653.

Turkle, Sherry. 2011. Alone Together: Why we Expect More from Technology and Less From Each Other. New York: Basic Books.

Vakkayil, Jacob D. 2012. “Boundaries and Organizations: A Few Considerations for Research.” International Journal of Organizational Analysis 20 (2): 203-220.

Vygotsky, Lev S. 1978. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Wang, Sheng, and Raymond A. Noe. 2010. “Knowledge Sharing: A Review and Directions for Future Research.” Human Resource Management Review 20 (2): 115-131. FRAMEWORKS FOR UNDERSTANDING KNOWLEDGE SHARING IN OPEN ONLINE COMMUNITIES 13

Wasko, Molly McLure, and Samer Faraj. 2005. “Why Should I Share? Examining Social Capital and Knowledge Contribution in Electronic Networks of Practice.” MIS Quarterly 29 (1): 35-57.

Watkins, Ceri. 2006. “Boundaries, Boundary Work and the Art of Management and Organisation Conferences: New Lines of Knowing.”Culture & Organization 12 (1): 3-10.

Wenger, Etienne. 1998. Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Werr, Andreas, Jesper Blomberg, and Jan Löwstedt. 2009. “Gaining External Knowledge—Boundaries in Managers’ Knowledge Relations.” Journal of Knowledge Management 13 (6): 448-463.

Wright, Christopher. 2009. “Inside Out? Organizational Membership, Ambiguity and the Ambivalent Identity of the Internal Consultant.” British Journal of Management 20 (3): 309-322.


Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item