Formulating answerable questions: question negotiation in evidence-based practice

Kloda, Lorie A. and Bartlett, Joan C. Formulating answerable questions: question negotiation in evidence-based practice. Journal of the Canadian Health Libraries Association, 2013, vol. 34, n. 2, pp. 55-60. [Journal article (Paginated)]

[img]
Preview
Text
c13-019.pdf - Published version

Download (133kB) | Preview

English abstract

Objective: This review explores the different question formulation structures proposed in the literature that may be helpful to librarians for conducting the reference interview and for teaching students and clinicians. Method: We present and compare several known question formulation structures identified in the health and social sciences literature. Discussion: Health and social care professionals should be made aware of the plurality of question formulation structures and their applicability to different fields of practice, as well as their utility for different types of questions within a field of practice.

Item type: Journal article (Paginated)
Keywords: evidence-based practice, question negotiation, clinical questions, reference interview, evidence-based healthcare
Subjects: A. Theoretical and general aspects of libraries and information. > AB. Information theory and library theory.
B. Information use and sociology of information > BH. Information needs and information requirements analysis.
Depositing user: Lorie A. Kloda
Date deposited: 11 Feb 2014 20:35
Last modified: 02 Oct 2014 12:30
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/22563

References

"SEEK" links will first look for possible matches inside E-LIS and query Google Scholar if no results are found.

1. Wilson TD. 1999. Models in information behaviour research. J Doc 55(3): 249-70 CrossRef.

2. Taylor RS. 1968. Question-negotiation and information seeking in libraries. Coll Res Libr 29(5): 178-94 .

3. Edwards PM. Taylor's question negotiation. In: Fisher KE, Erdelez S, McKechnie L, editors. Theories of Information Behavior. Medford, N.J.: American Society for Information Science and Technology by Information Today; 2005. p. 358–62.

4. Dawes M, Summerskill W, Glasziou P, Cartabellotta A, Martin J, Hopayian K, . 2005. Sicily statement on evidence-based practice. BMC Med Educ 5 CrossRef.

5. Horsley T, O'Neill J, McGowan J, Perrier L, Kane G, Campbell C. 2010. Interventions to improve question formulation in professional practice and self-directed learning. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 5: CD007335 CrossRef.

6. Richardson SW, Wilson M, Nishikawa J, Hayward R. 1995. The well-built clinical question: a key to evidence-based decisions. ACP J Club 123(3): A12-A13 .

7. Dawes M, Pluye P, Shea L, Grad RM, Greenberg A, Nie J-Y. 2007. The identification of clinically important elements within medical journal abstracts: Patient – Population – Problem, Exposure – Intervention, Comparison, Outcome, Duration and Results (PECODR) Inform Prim Care 15(1): 9-16 .

8. Schlosser RW, O'Neil-Pirozzi T. 2006. Problem formulation in evidence-based practice and systematic reviews. Contemp Issues Commun Sci Disord 33: 5-10 .

9. Schlosser RW, Koul R, Costello J. 2007. Asking well-built questions for evidence-based practice in augmentative and alternative communication. J Commun Disord 40(3): 225-38 CrossRef.

10. Bennett S, Bennett JW. 2000. The process of evidence-based practice in occupational therapy: informing clinical decisions. Aust Occup Ther J 47(4): 171-80 CrossRef.

11. Gibbs LE. Evidence-based practice for the helping professions. Toronto: Thomson Brooks Cole; 2003.

12. Wildridge V, Bell L. 2002. How CLIP became ECLIPSE: a mnemonic to assist in searching for health policy/management information. Health Info Libr J 19(2): 113-5 CrossRef.

13. ADAPTE Collaboration. The ADAPTE process: resource toolkit for guideline adaptation. Version 2.0. 2009. http://www.g-i-n.net/document-store/adapte-resource-toolkit-guideline-adaptation-version-2/view

14. Davies KS. 2011. Formulating the evidence based practice question: a review of the frameworks. Evid Based Libr Inform Practice 6(2): 75-80 .

15. Huang X, Lin J, Demner-Fushman D. Evaluation of PICO as a knowledge representation for clinical questions. In: AMIA Symp Proc. 2006. pp. 359–63.

16. Booth A, O'Rourke AJ, Ford NJ. 2000. Structuring the pre-search reference interview: a useful technique for handling clinical questions. Bull Med Libr Assoc 88(3): 239-47 .

17. Fourie I. 2009. Learning from research on the information behaviour of healthcare professionals: a review of the literature 2004–2008 with a focus on emotion. Health Info Libr J 26(3): 171-86 CrossRef.

18. Schardt C, Adams MB, Owens T, Keitz SA, Fontelo P. 2007. Utilization of the PICO framework to improve searching PubMed for clinical questions. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 7: 16 CrossRef.

19. Hoogendam A, Robbe PFDV, Overbeke AJPM. 2012. Comparing patient characteristics, type of intervention, control, and outcome (PICO) queries with unguided searching: a randomized controlled crossover trial. J Med Libr Assoc 100: 121-6 CrossRef.


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item