Knowledge management, codification and tacit knowledge

Kimble, Chris Knowledge management, codification and tacit knowledge. Information Research, 2013, vol. 18, n. 2. [Journal article (Unpaginated)]

[img]
Preview
 Text
Kimble_2013c.pdf - Published version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.
Download (694kB) | Preview
[img] Text
paper577.html - Published version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.
Download (85kB)

English abstract

Introduction. This article returns to a theme addressed in Vol. 8(1) October 2002 of the journal: knowledge management and the problem of managing tacit knowledge. Method. The article is primarily a review and analysis of the literature associated with the management of knowledge. In particular, it focuses on the works of a group of economists who have studied the transformation of knowledge into information through the process of codification and the knowledge transaction topography they have developed to describe this process. Analysis. The article explores the theoretical and philosophical antecedents of the economists' views. It uses this as a basis for examining the dominant views of knowledge that appear in much of the literature on knowledge management and for performing a critical evaluation of their work. Results. The results of the analysis centre upon the question of when is it appropriate to codify knowledge. They present a basic summary of the costs and benefits of codification before looking in more detail at its desirability. Conclusions. The conclusions concern the implications of the above for knowledge management and the management of tacit knowledge. They deal with the nature of knowledge management, some of the reasons why knowledge management projects fail to achieve their expectations and the potential problems of codification as a strategy for knowledge management.

Item type: Journal article (Unpaginated)
Keywords: codification, information management, knowledge management, tacit knowledge
Subjects: B. Information use and sociology of information > BA. Use and impact of information.
B. Information use and sociology of information > BH. Information needs and information requirements analysis.
I. Information treatment for information services > IA. Cataloging, bibliographic control.
I. Information treatment for information services > ID. Knowledge representation.
I. Information treatment for information services > IE. Data and metadata structures.
Depositing user: Chris Kimble
Date deposited: 27 Mar 2014 07:46
Last modified: 02 Oct 2014 12:30
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/22692

References

Ackoff, R.L. (1989). From data to wisdom. Journal of Applied Systems Analysis, 16(1), 3-9.

Ali, N.A., Whiddett, D., Tretiakov, A. & Hunter, I. (2012). The use of information technologies for knowledge sharing by secondary healthcare organisations in New Zealand. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 81(7), 500-506.

Alvesson, M. & Karreman, D. (2001). Odd couple: making sense of the curious concept of knowledge management. Journal of Management Studies, 38(7), 995-1018.

Ancori, B., Bureth, A. & Cohendet, P. (2000). The economics of knowledge: the debate about codification and tacit knowledge. Industrial and Corporate Change, 9(2), 255-287.

Balconi, M., Pozzali, A. & Viale, R. (2007). The 'codification debate' revisited: a conceptual framework to analyze the role of tacit knowledge in economics. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(5), 823-849.

Barley, S.R. (1986). Technology as an occasion for structuring: evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments.Administrative Science Quarterly, 31(1), 78-108.

Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.

Berger, P.L. & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: a treatise in the sociology of knowledge. New York, NY: Doubleday.

Brown, J.S. & Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational learning and communities of practice: toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organization Science, 2(1), 40-57.

Carlile, P.R. (2002). A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: boundary objects in new product development. Organization Science, 13(4), 442-455.

Chalmers, D. (2009). Ontological anti-realism. In D. Chalmers, D. Manley & R. Wasserman (Eds.), Metametaphysics: new essays on the foundations of ontology (pp. 77-129). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Cohendet, P. & Steinmueller, E.W. (2000). The codification of knowledge: a conceptual and empirical exploration. Industrial and Corporate Change, 9(2), 195-209.

Conner, K.R. & Prahalad, C.K. (1996). A resource-based theory of the firm: knowledge versus opportunism. Organization Science, 7(5), 477-501.

Cook, S.D.N. & Brown, J.S. (1999). Bridging epistemologies: the generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing. Organization Science,10(4), 381-400.

Cowan, R., David, P.A. & Foray, D. (2000). The explicit economics of knowledge codification and tacitness. Industrial and Corporate Change, 9(2), 211-253.

Creplet, F., Dupouet, O., Kern, F., Mehmanpazir, B. & Munier, F. (2001). Consultants and experts in management consulting firms. Research Policy, 30(9), 1517-1535.

Daft, R.L. & Lengel, R.H. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32(5), 554-571.

Davenport, T.H., DeLong, D.W. & Beers, M.C. (1998). Successful knowledge management projects. Sloan Management Review, 39(2), 43-57.

DeLong, D.W. (2004). Lost knowledge: confronting the threat of an aging workforce. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Duguid, P. (2005). The art of knowing: social and tacit dimensions of knowledge and the limits of the community of practice. The Information Society, 21(2), 109-118.

Easterby-Smith, M. & Prieto, I.M. (2008). Dynamic capabilities and knowledge management: an integrative role for learning? British Journal of Management, 19(3), 235-249.

Feghali, T. & El-Den, J. (2008). Knowledge transformation among virtually-cooperating group members. Journal of Knowledge Management, 12(1), 92-105.

Gettier, E.L. (1963). Is justified true belief knowledge? Analysis, 23(6), 121-123.

Gourlay, S. (2006a). Conceptualizing knowledge creation: a critique of Nonaka's theory.Journal of Management Studies, 43(7), 1415-1436.

Gourlay, S. (2006b). Towards conceptual clarity for tacit knowledge: a review of empirical studies. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 4(1), 60-69.

Grant, R.M. (1996a). Prospering in dynamically-competitive environments: organizational capability as knowledge integration. Organization Science, 7(4), 375-387.

Grant, R.M. (1996b). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(Special Issue), 109-122.

Håkanson, L. (2010). The firm as an epistemic community: the knowledge-based view revisited. Industrial and Corporate Change, 19(6), 1801-1828.

Hildreth, P.M. & Kimble, C. (2002). The duality of knowledge. Information Research,8(1). Retrieved 12 October, 2012 from http://informationr.net/ir/8-1/paper142.html. (Archived by Webcite at http://www.webcitation.org/6FeZnf9Pu)

Ipe, M. (2003). Knowledge sharing in organizations: a conceptual framework. Human Resource Development Review, 2(4), 337-359.

Iverson, J.O. & Mcphee, R. D. (2002). Knowledge management in communities of practice. Management Communication Quarterly, 16(2), 259-266.

Kay, A.S. (2003). The curious success of knowledge management. In C. W. Holsapple (Ed.), Handbook on knowledge management (Vol. 2, pp. 679-681). Berlin : Springer.

Kimble, C. (2013). What cost knowledge management? The example of Infosys. Global Business and Organizational Excellence, 32(3), 6-14.

Kimble, C., Grenier, C. & Goglio-Primard, K. (2010). Innovation and knowledge sharing across professional boundaries: political interplay between boundary objects and brokers. International Journal of Information Management, 30(5), 437-444.

Kogut, B. & Zander, U. (1992). Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science, 3(3), 383-397.

Kogut, B. & Zander, U. (1996). What firms do? Coordination, identity, and learning.Organization Science, 7(5), 502-518.

Kuhn, T.S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.

Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Leonard, D. & Sensiper, S. (1998). The role of tacit knowledge in group innovation.California Management Review, 40(3), 112-131.

Lesser, E.L. & Storck, J. (2001). Communities of practice and organizational performance. IBM Systems Journal, 40(4), 831-841.

McKinlay, A. (2002). The limits of knowledge management. New Technology, Work and Employment, 17(2), 76-88.

Marshall, N. & Brady, T. (2001). Knowledge management and the politics of knowledge: illustrations from complex products and systems. European Journal of Information Systems, 10, 99-112.

Miller, F.J. (2002). I = 0 (information has no intrinsic meaning). Information Research,8(1). Retrieved 12 October, 2012 from http://informationr.net/ir/8-1/paper140.html (Archived by Webcite at http://www.webcitation.org/6FeZtDqhD).

Murillo, E. (2008). Searching Usenet for virtual communities of practice: using mixed methods to identify the constructs of Wenger's theory. Information Research, 13(4). Retrieved 31 January, 2013 from http://informationr.net/ir/13-4/paper386.html (Archived by Webcite at http://www.webcitation.org/6FeZdSXtM).

Nelson, R.R. & Winter, S. G. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Nonaka, I. (1991). The knowledge-creating company. Harvard Business Review, 69(6), 96-104.

Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14-37.

Nonaka, I. & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: how Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Nonaka, I. & von Krogh, G. (2009). Perspective - tacit knowledge and knowledge conversion: controversy and advancement in organizational knowledge creation theory.Organization Science, 20(3), 635-652.

O'Dell, C. & Grayson, C. J. (1998). If only we knew what we know: identification and transfer of internal best practices. California Management Review, 40(3), 154-174.

Offsey, S. (1997). Knowledge management: linking people to knowledge for bottom line results. Journal of Knowledge Management, 1(2), 113-122.

Polanyi, M. (1966). The tacit dimension. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Polanyi, M. (1969). Knowing and being. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Popper, K.R. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. London: Hutchinson.

Schultze, U. & Stabell, C. (2004). Knowing what you don't know? Discourses and contradictions in knowledge management research. Journal of Management Studies,41(4), 549-573.

Shannon, C.E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. (No. B-1598). New York, NY: The American Telephone and Telegraph Company.

Shannon, C.E. (1956). The bandwagon (editorial). IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 2(1), 3.

Shannon, C.E. & Weaver, W. (1949). The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana, IL: The University of Illinois Press.

Skidelsky, R. (2000). Ideas and the world. The Economist. Retrieved 13 October, 2012 from http://www.economist.com/node/431717 (Archived by Webcite at http://www.webcitation.org/6FeZj2A62)

Spender, J.C. (1996). Making knowledge the basis of a dynamic theory of the firm.Strategic Management Journal, 17, 45-62.

Stein, E.W. & Zwass, V. (1995). Actualizing organizational memory with information systems. Information Systems Research, 6(2), 85-117.

Swart, J. & Harvey, P. (2011). Identifying knowledge boundaries: the case of networked projects. Journal of Knowledge Management, 15(5), 703-721.

Talbott, S.L. (1999). The great knowledge implosion. NetFuture(84). Retrieved 15 October, 2012 from http://www.netfuture.org/1999/Feb0999_84.html#4 (Archived by Webcite at http://www.webcitation.org/6FeZzyzH9).

Teigland, R. & Wasko, M.M. (2003). Integrating knowledge through information trading: examining the relationship between boundary spanning communication and individual performance. Decision Sciences, 34(2), 261-286.

Thompson, M. (2005). Structural and epistemic parameters in communities of practice.Organization Science, 16(2), 151-164.

Vaast, E. (2007). What goes online comes offline: knowledge management system use in a soft bureaucracy. Organization Studies, 28(3), 283-306.

Walsh, J.P. (1995). Managerial and organizational cognition: notes from a trip down memory lane. Organization Science, 6(3), 280-321.

Walsh, J.P. & Ungson, G. R. (1991). Organizational memory. Academy of management review, 16(1), 57-91.

Walsham, G. (2001). Knowledge management: the benefits and limitations of computer systems. European Management Journal, 19(6), 599-608.

Wenger, E. (1996). Communities of practice: the social fabric of a learning organization.Healthcare Forum Journal, 39(4), 20-24.

Wilson, T.D. (2002). The nonsense of 'knowledge management'. Information Research,8(1). Retrieved 16 October, 2012 from http://informationr.net/ir/8-1/paper144.html (Archived by Webcite at http://www.webcitation.org/6Fea4TacK).

Winograd, T. & Flores, F. (1986). Understanding computer and cognition: a new foundation for design. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
Contact us
Send email Sponsors
Sponsor: AIMS Sponsor: D&P Sponsor: UniNa CAB Get connected
Facebook Facebook Twitter Twitter Linkedin LinkedIn RSS RSS