A globalização e o acesso ao conhecimento do ponto de vista da propriedade intelectual

Rosa, António Machuco A globalização e o acesso ao conhecimento do ponto de vista da propriedade intelectual., 2013 . In VI Encontro Ibérico EDICIC, Porto (Portugal), 4-6 November 2013. [Conference paper]

[thumbnail of PORTUGAL_A globalização e o acesso ao conhecimento do ponto de vista da propriedade intelectual.pdf]
Preview
 Text
PORTUGAL_A globalização e o acesso ao conhecimento do ponto de vista da propriedade intelectual.pdf
Download (198kB) | Preview

English abstract

This paper discusses the historical path of globalization in the area of intellectual property. Three phases are distinguished. The first phase is the principle of territorial sovereignty and bilateralism. The second is the stage of internationalization, marked by the Berne Convention. The third is that of globalization, marked by TRIPS. The guiding idea of the communication analyses a possible conflict between the traditional foundations of intellectual property laws, as it is reflected in national laws, and the text of the international agreements. Furthermore, it will be analyzed the divergence of interests between exporting and importing countries of information. It is concluded that a balance between, on the one hand, producers of information and, on the other hand, access by users, should also be a integral part of the international agreements on intellectual property.

Portuguese abstract

Esta comunicação analisa o percurso histórico da globalização na área da propriedade intelectual. Serão distinguidas três fases. A primeira é a fase do princípio da soberania territorial e do bilateralismo. A segunda é a fase da internacionalização, marcada pela Convenção de Berna. A terceira é a da globalização, marcada pelo acordo TRIPS. A ideia condutora da comunicação consiste em ver até que ponto existe um conflito entre a fundamentação tradicional das leis de propriedade intelectual, tal como ela está reflectida nas leis nacionais, e o texto dos acordos internacionais. Além disso, será analisado a divergência de interesses entre países exportadores e importadores de informação. Conclui-se no sentido de o equilíbrio entre, por um lado, produtores de informação e, por outro, o acesso por parte dos utilizadores, também dever constar dos acordos internacionais de propriedade intelectual.

Item type: Conference paper
Keywords: Propriedade intelectual, Globalização, Convenção de Berna, TRIPS, Intelectual Property, Globalization, Berne Convention
Subjects: B. Information use and sociology of information
B. Information use and sociology of information > BZ. None of these, but in this section.
E. Publishing and legal issues. > ED. Intellectual property: author's rights, ownership, copyright, copyleft, open access.
Depositing user: Carla Ferreira
Date deposited: 12 Mar 2014 22:29
Last modified: 02 Oct 2014 12:30
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/22712

References

Arthur, W. B. (1994). Increasing returns and Path dependence in the Economy. Ann Arbour: University of Michigan Press.

Boyle, J. (2004). A Manifesto on WIPO and the Future of Intellectual Property. Disponível em: http://www.law.duke.edu/journals/dltr/articles/PDF/2004DLTR0009.pdf.

Boyle, J. (2006). O segundo movimento de emparcelamento e a construção do espaço público. In Anabela Afonso, António Machuco Rosa, Manuel J. Damásio (Eds). A economia da propriedade intelectual e os novos media - entre a inovação e a protecção (pp. 20-57). Lisboa: Guerra e Paz.

Clift, C. (2010). Why IPR issues were brought to GATT – A historical perspective on the origins of TRIPS. In Carlos M. Correa (Ed). Research Handbook on the Protection of Intellectual Property under WTO Rules (p. 3-21). Cheltenham: Edward Elger.

Correa, C. M. (2002). Unfair Competition Under the TRIPS Agreement: Protection of Data Submitted for the Registration of Pharmaceuticals. Chicago Journal of International Law. 3. 69. Deere, C. (2009).

The Implementation Game: The TRIPS Agreement and the Global Politics of Intellectual Property Reform in Developing Countries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Drahos,P.(1999).TheUniversalityofIntellectualPropertyRights:OriginsandDevelopment.WIPO Publications No. 762 (E). disponível em: http://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/tk/en/wipo_unhchr_ip_pnl_98/wipo_unhchr_ip_pnl_98_ 1.pdf.

Fisher, W. (2006). Teorias da Propriedade Intelectual. In Anabela Afonso, António Machuco Rosa, Manuel J. Damásio (Eds). A economia da propriedade intelectual e os novos media – entre a inovação e a protecção (p. 58-86). Lisboa: Guerra e Paz.

Ginsburg. J. (2001). Toward Supranational Copyright Law? The WTO Panel Decision and the «Three-Step Test» for Copyright Exceptions. Disponível em: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=253867.

Hesse, C. (2002). The rise of intellectual property, 700 b.c.– a.d.2000: an idea in the balance. Dædalus, Spring, 2002.

Jaffe, A. , Lerner, J. (2004). Innovation and its Discontents – How our Broken Patent System is Endanreging Innovation and Progress, and What to Do About It. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Janis, M. (2002). Patent Abolitionism. Berkeley High Tech Law Review. 17, 899.

Ladas, S. (1975). Patents, Trademarks, and Related Rights: National and International Protection. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. 1331 Landes, W. M., Posner, R. A. (2003). The Economic Structure of Intellectual Property Law. Cambridge: Harvard University Press,

Lemley, M. (2005). Property, Intellectual Property, and Free Riding. Texas Law Review. 83, 1031.

Lévêque, F., Menière, Y. (2003). Économie de la propriété intellectuelle. Paris: La Découverte.

Machuco Rosa, A. (2009). Os Direitos de Autor e os Novos Media. Coimbra: Angelus Novus.

Maskus, K. (2000). Intellectual Property Rights and Economic Development. Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law. 32, 471.

May, C. (2007). The World Intellectual Property Organization – Resurgence and the Development Agenda. London: Routledge.

May, C. , Sell, S. (2006). Intellectual Property Rights – A Critical History. Boulder: Lynne Rienner

Okediji, R. (2005). Sustainable Access to Copyrighted Digital Information Works. In Keith Maskus, Jerome Reichman (Eds.). International Public Goods andTransfer of Technology Under a Globalized Intellectual Property Regime (p. 142-187). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Okediji, R. (2006). The International Copyright System: Limitations, Exceptions and Public Interest Considerations for Developing Countries. UNCTAD-ICTSD Project on IPRs and Sustainable Development. Disponível em: http://unctad.org/en/Docs/iteipc200610_en.pdf.

Okediji, R. (2010). Copyright in TRIPS and beyond: the WIPO Internet Treaties. In Carlos M. Correa (Ed). Research Handbook on the Protection of Intellectual Property under WTO Rules (p. 343-378). Cheltenham: Edward Elger.

Ringer, B. (1968). The Role of the United States in International Copyright-Past, Present, and Future. GtownLawJournal. 56, 1050.

Sagot-Duvauraux, D. (2002). La propriété intellectuelle, c’est le vol – Les Majorats Littéraires. Dijon: Les Presses du Réel.


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
Contact us
Send email Sponsors
Sponsor: AIMS Sponsor: D&P Sponsor: UniNa CAB Get connected
Facebook Facebook Twitter Twitter Linkedin LinkedIn RSS RSS