Subject gateways: herramientas para el filtrado de contenidos en la world wide web. Propuesta metodológica para su evaluación

Fernández-Ramos, Andrés Subject gateways: herramientas para el filtrado de contenidos en la world wide web. Propuesta metodológica para su evaluación., 2013 PhD thesis, Universidad de Granada (Spain). [Thesis]

[thumbnail of tesisdoctoral.pdf] Text
tesisdoctoral.pdf - Published version
Download (4MB)

English abstract

Internet has dramatically changed the ways of communication and access to information. The large amount of information available on the web and the lack of filters for publication imply that people face great difficulties in accessing to high quality information. Deficiencies of Internet search engines and the lack of information literacy bring more restrictions to achieve an efficient access to valuable web resources. To address these problems and provide their users with high quality web resources, libraries have designed and implemented different solutions. Subject gateways are probably the more effective of them because they use all the library background to identify, select, catalog, classify and disseminate internet resources. The objective of this research is to carry out an assessment of the quality of subject gateways in the last years in order to detect their strengths and weaknesses, observe their evolution, and identify best practices. For this purpose, we design a specific tool for assessing the quality of subject gateways, which includes 30 items divided in three main categories: access to information, management and value-added elements. The tool was applied to a sample of 30 subject gateways in 2007 and 2012. We find substantial differences across the subjects gateways under analysis and that their average quality is quite good in the two first categories but not in the last one. Regarding the temporal evolution, we only observe improvements on valued added services, but they are no significant.

Spanish abstract

La aparición de internet ha supuesto en cambio radical en las formas de acceder a la información. La comodidad con la que se accede a ella a través de internet ha supuesto una trasformación de los hábitos informacionales de la gente, que a través de motores de búsqueda dispone de millones de documentos web para su consulta. Sin embargo, la carencia de filtros y la facilidad con la que cualquiera puede publicar en internet, ha significado una sobreabundancia de información, tanto valiosa como irrelevante, que repercute negativamente en las posibilidades de encontrar recursos fiables y de calidad. Las carencias de los motores a la hora de identificar información de calidad, hace necesario el desarrollo de otros tipos de sistemas de información, que apliquen los conocimientos bibliotecarios relacionados con la selección y descripción de documentos. Los subject gateways nacen precisamente con esa finalidad, la de aportar una aproximación a la búsqueda y recuperación de información basada en la calidad en vez de en la cantidad mediante la aplicación de técnicas bibliotecarias. A pesar de su utilidad y vigencia, su uso es menor de lo que podría esperarse, lo que hace necesario un diagnóstico de su situación y un análisis del papel que juegan hoy en día en la recuperación de información en internet. Por estos motivos, en este trabajo se pretende llevar a cabo un diagnóstico de la calidad de los subject gateways en los últimos años para poder detectar sus puntos fuertes, sus debilidades y su evolución, así como para identificar las mejores prácticas, que puedan servir de referente y modelo a seguir. Debido a las carencias en cuanto a herramientas específicas para tal labor, el otro gran objetivo que se persigue es crear un modelo de evaluación que permita, a partir de la utilización de herramientas concretas, valorar de forma rigurosa su calidad. Para alcanzar los objetivos propuestos, primeramente se diseñó un modelo general de evaluación, compuesto por dos herramientas específicas, una para evaluar a calidad del servicio y otra su proceso de selección de recursos, que permitían valorar numéricamente los aspectos relacionados con la calidad de los subject gateways. A continuación, se llevó a cabo la evaluación de una muestra de 30 subject gateway entre los años 2007 y 2012 utilizando una adaptación de la primera de esas herramientas. Se observó que su calidad era aceptable, pero que había grandes diferencias entre unos casos y otros, identificándose además sus principales puntos débiles y fortalezas, siendo los servicios de valor añadido el aspecto que presentaba mayores carencias. En el periodo de tiempo estudiado no ha habido variaciones significativas, obteniéndose unas valoraciones similares en las dos recogidas de datos. Se concluye que la herramienta de evaluación utilizada es adecuada para los fines para los que fue diseñada y se resalta la importancia de evaluar para mejorar la calidad de los subject gateways. En base a un diagnóstico adecuado pueden tomarse decisiones fundadas que ayuden a su mejora.

Item type: Thesis (UNSPECIFIED)
Keywords: subject gateways, portals, quality, assessment, evaluation, digital libraries. portales temáticos , portales, calidad , evaluación , bibliotecas digitales
Subjects: B. Information use and sociology of information > BG. Information dissemination and diffusion.
H. Information sources, supports, channels. > HP. e-resources.
H. Information sources, supports, channels. > HR. Portals.
I. Information treatment for information services > II. Filtering.
L. Information technology and library technology > LZ. None of these, but in this section.
Depositing user: Dr. Andrés Fernández-Ramos
Date deposited: 02 Dec 2014 15:09
Last modified: 02 Dec 2014 15:09
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/24011

References

Abad García, M. F. (1997). Investigación evaluativa en Documentación. Aplicación a la Documentación Médica. Valencia: Universidad de Valencia.

Abad García, M. F., González Teruel, A., Calduch, P. B., De Ramón Frías, R., & Blasco, L. C. (2005). A comparative study of six European databases of medically oriented Web resources. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 93(4), 467-479.

Abad García, M. F., González Teruel, A., & Martínez Catalán, C. (2004). La base de datos de recursos web de la biblioteca médica virtual del COMV. Hipertext.net, 2. Recuperado de http://www.upf.edu/hipertextnet/numero-2/qreme.html

Abadal Falgueras, E., & Codina Bonilla, L. (2008). Función de los portales temáticos en la era de la búsqueda posmoderna. Anuario ThinkEPI, (1), 89-95.

Abadal Falgueras, E., & Rius Alcaraz, L. (2006). Revistas científicas digitales: características e indicadores. Revista de Universidad y Sociedad del Conocimiento, 3(1), 6-20. Recuperado de http://www.uoc.edu/rusc/3/1/dt/esp/abadal_rius.pdf

Abbott, R. (2010). Delivering quality-evaluated healthcare information in the era of Web 2.0: design implications for Intute: Health and Life Sciences. Health Informatics Journal, 16, 5-14. doi: 10.1177/1460458209353555

Abels, E. G. (2011). Transforming the Internet Public Library into the ipl2 Virtual Learning Laboratory. The Reference Librarian, 52, 284-290. doi:10.1080/02763877.2011.586922

ACRL-ALA (2000). Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education. Recuperado de http://www.ala.org/acrl/sites/ala.org.acrl/files/content/standards/standards.pdf

Adam, D., & Bjurström, A. (2002). Quality issues of Swedish gateway services: A study based on eleven gateway services of the National Resource Libraries in Sweden. http://lup.lub.lu.se/luur/download?func=downloadFile&recordOId=1334076&fileOId=1334077

Adams, S. A., & De Bont, A. A. (2007). More than just a mouse click: research into work practices behind the assignment of medical trust marks on the World Wide Web. International Journal of Medical Information, 76, 14-20. doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2006.05.024

Aguillo Caño, I. (2001). Los contenidos son la clave. Boletín de la Sedic, 35, 1-3.

Aharony, N. (2012). An Analysis of American Academic Libraries Websites: 2000-2010. The Electronic Library, 30(6), 764-776.

AIMC (2012). Navegantes en la red: 14ª encuesta AIMC a usuarios de internet. Recuperado de http://download.aimc.es/aimc/f5g9/macro2011.pdf

Al-Bahrani, A., & Plusa, S. (2004). The quality of patient-orientated internet information on colorectal cancer. Colorectal Disease, 6(5), 323-326.

Alemu, G., Stevens, B., & Ross, P. (2012). Towards a conceptual framework for user-driven semantic metadata interoperability in digital libraries: A social constructivist approach. New Library World, 113(1/2), 38-54.

Alexander, J. E., & Tate, M. A. (1999). Web Wisdom: How to Evaluate and Create Information Quality on the Web, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbanm.

Alipour-Hafezi, M., Horri, A., Shiri, A., & Ghaebi, A. (2010). Interoperability Models in Digital Libraries: An Overview. The Electronic Library, 28(3), 438-452.

Allen, L. (2005). Hybrid Librarians in the 21st Century Library: A Collaborative Service-Staffing Model. In Currents and Convergence: Navigating the Rivers of Change: Conference Proceedings ACRL 12th National Conference, April 7-10 2005 (pp. 291-301). Minneapolis: Association of College and Research Libraries.

Alonso Arévalo, J., Cordón García, J. A., & Gómez Díaz, R. (2011). El libro electrónico en la biblioteca universitaria y de investigación. Biblios: Revista de bibliotecología y ciencias de la información, (42), 15-35.

Alvite Díez, M. L., & Rodríguez Bravo, B. (2009). E-books in Spanish academic libraries. The Electronic Library, 27(1), 86-95.

Alvite Díez, M. L. (2002). Colecciones patrimoniales en la red: acceso y normalización en el entorno Web. In M. A. Morán Suárez & M. C. Rodríguez López (Eds.), La Documentación para la investigación: Homenaje a José Antonio Martín Fuertes (pp. 17-39). León: Universidad de León.

Alvite Díez, M. L. (2009). Interfaces y funcionalidades de bibliotecas digitales. Anales de Documentación, 12, 7-23.

Anderson, R. P., Wilson, S. P., Livingston, M. B., & LoCicero, A. D. (2008). Characteristics and content of medical library tutorials: a review. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 96, 61-63. doi:10.3163/1536-5050.96.1.61

Ansani, N. T., Vogt, M., Henderson, B. A., McKaveney, T. P., Weber, R. J., Smith, R. B., … Starz, T. (2005). Quality of arthritis information on the Internet. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, 62(11), 1184-1189.

ANZIIL & CAUL (2004). Australian and New Zealand Information Literacy Framework: principles, standards and practice. Recuperado el 10/11/2012 de http://www.library.unisa.edu.au/learn/infolit/Infolit-2nd-edition.pdf

Arms, W. Y. (2000). Digital Libraries. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Arms, W. Y. (2012). The 1990s: The Formative Years of Digital Libraries. Library Hi Tech, 30(4), 579-591.

Arms, W. Y., Blanchi, C., & Overly, E. A. (1997). An architecture for information in digital libraries. D-Lib Magazine, 3(2). Recuperado de http://mirror.dlib.org/dlib/february97/cnri/02arms1.html

Arms, W. Y., Hillmann, D., Lagoze, C., Krafft, D., Marisa, R., Saylor, J., … Van de Solpem, H. (2002). A spectrum of interoperability: the site for science prototype for the NSDL. D-Lib Magazine, 8(1). Recuperado de http://www.dlib.org/dlib/january02/arms/01arms.html

Association for Library Collections and Technical Services (2007). Definitions of Digital Preservation. Recuperado de http://www.ala.org/alcts/resources/preserv/defdigpres0408

Association of Research Libraries (1995). Definition and purposes of a digital library. Recuperado de http://www.arl.org/resources/pubs/mmproceedings/126mmappen2

Ayuso García, M. D., & Martínez Navarro, V. (2006). Evaluación de calidad de fuentes y recursos digitales: guía de buenas prácticas. Anales de Documentación, 9, 17-42.

Bailey, M. A., Coughlin, P. A., Sohrabi, S., Griffin, K. J., Rashid, S. T., Troxler, M. A., & Scott, D. J. (2012). Quality and readability of online patient information for abdominal aortic aneurysms. Journal of Vascular Surgery, 56(1), 21-26.

Baker, T. (2012). Libraries, languages of description, and linked data: a Dublin Core perspective. Library Hi Tech, 30(1), 116-133.

Barateiro, J., Antunes, G., Freitas, F., & Borbinha, J. (2010). Designing digital preservation solutions: A risk management-based approach. International Journal of Digital Curation, 5(1), 4-17.

Bargheer, M. (2003). Quality control and evaluation of scientific web resources. Bibliothek, 27(3), 153-169.

Barnes, S., & Vidgen, R. (2002). An integrative approach to the assessment of e-commerce quality. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 3(3): 114-127.

Barr, R. B., & Tagg, J. (1995). From Teaching to Learning - a new paradigm for undergraduate education. Change, 27(6), 12-25.

Barry, C. A. (1999). Las habilidades de información en un mundo electrónico: la formación investigadora de los estudiantes de doctorado. Anales de Documentación, 2, 237-258.

Barry, C. L., & Schamber, L. (1998). Users' criteria for relevance evaluation: a cross-situational comparison. Information Processing and Management, 34(2/3), 219-236.

Batalla Martínez, C. (2009). Sellos de calidad en las páginas web, una ayuda para el usuario. Atención primaria, 41(10), 543-544.

Bates, M. J. (2002). The cascade of interactions in the digital library interface. Information Processing and Management, 38(3), 381-400.

Bauer, C., & Scharl, A. (2000). Quantitive evaluation of Web site content and structure. Internet Research, 10(1), 31-44.

Bawden, D. & Robinson, L. (2002). Internet subject gateways revisited. International Journal of Information Management, 22(2), 157-162.

Beagrie, N. (2008). Digital curation for science, digital libraries, and individuals. International Journal of Digital Curation, 1(1), 3-16.

Beard, J., & Vekey, J. (2004). The quality assurance of Healthinfo4u: a Web-based Internet resource for the lay public. Performance Measurement and Metrics, 5(1), 28-34.

Bearman, D. (2007). Digital libraries. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 41(1), 223-272.

Becker, C., Kulovits, H., Guttenbrunner, M., Strodl, S., Rauber, A., & Hofman, H. (2009a). Systematic planning for digital preservation: Evaluating potential strategies and building preservation plans. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 10(4), 133-157.

Becker, C., Kulovits, H., Kraxner, M., Gottardi, R., Rauber, A., & Welte, R. (2009b). Adding quality-awareness to evaluate migration web-services and remote emulation for digital preservation. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 5714, 39-50.

Becker, C., & Rauber, A. (2011). Decision criteria in digital preservation: What to measure and how. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(6), 1009-1028.

Beirekdar, A., Keita, M., Noirhomme, M., Randolet, F., Vanderdonckt, J., & Mariage, C. (2005). Flexible reporting for automated usability and accessibility evaluation of web sites. In Human-Computer Interaction-INTERACT 2005 (pp. 281-294). Berlin: Springer.

Belcher, M., Place, E., & Conole, G. (2000). Quality assurance in subject gateways: creating high quality portals on the Internet. Quality Assurance in Education, 8(1), 38-48.

Bell, S. (2010, March). The IPL: still alive and well from the bell tower. Library Journal. Recuperado de http://lj.libraryjournal.com/2010/03/academic-libraries/the-ipl-still-alive-and-well-from-the-bell-tower

Berners-Lee, T. (2006). Linked data. Recuperado el 10/11/2012 de http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData.html

Bevan, S., Dalton, P., & Conyers, A. (2005). How usage statistics can inform national negotiations and strategies. Serials: The Journal for the Serials Community, 18(2), 116-123.

Blandford, A., Keith, S., Connell, I., & Edwards, H. (2004). Analytical usability evaluation for digital libraries: a case study. In H. Chen, H. D. Wactlar, C. Chen, E. Lim & M. G. Christel (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2004 Joint ACM/IEEE Conference on Digital Libraries (pp. 27-36). doi:10.1109/JCDL.2004.1336093

Blue Ribbon Task Force on Sustainable Digital Preservation and Access (2008). Sustaining the digital investment: Issues and challenges of economically sustainable digital preservation. Recuperado el 10/11/2012 de http://brtf.sdsc.edu/biblio/BRTF_Interim_Report.pdf

Bollen, J., & Luce, R. (2002). Evaluation of digital library impact and user communities by analysis of usage patterns. D-Lib Magazine, 8(6). Recuperado de http://dlib.org/dlib/june02/bollen/06bollen.html

Bomeke, M. (2004). The Engineering Subject Gateway (ViFaTec) and Biotech: virtual developments in biotechnology. IFLA Journal-International Federation of Library Associations, 30(1), 47-54.

Borgman, C. L. (1999). What are digital libraries? Competing visions. Information Processing and Management, 35(3), 227-243.

Borgman, C. L. (2000). From Gutenberg to the Global Information Infraestructure: Access to information in the networked World. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Borgman, C. L. (2003). Digital Libraries: past, present and future. Presentación realizada en el curso "Bibliotecas digitales y su impacto en la sociedad de la información", Valencia: Universidad Internacional Menéndez Pelayo.

Borgman, C. L., Gilliland-Swetland, A. J., Leazer, G. H., Mayer, R., Gwynn, D., & Gazan, R. (2000). Evaluating digital libraries for teaching and learning in undergraduate education: a case study of the Alexandria Digital Earth Prototype (ADEPT). Library Trends, 49(2), 228-250.

Boydston, J. M. K. & Leysen, J. M. (2002). Internet Resources Cataloging in ARL Libraries. The Serials Librarian, 41(3-4), 127-145.

Brandt, D. S. (1996). Evaluating information on the Internet. Computers in Libraries, 16(5), 44-46.

Breivik, P. S. (1998). Student learning in the information age. Phoenix, AZ: The Oryx Press.

Brophy, P. (2000). Towards a generic model of information and library services in the information age. Journal of Documentation, 56(2), 161-184.

Candela, L., Castelli, D., & Pagano, P. (2011). History, Evolution, and Impact of Digital Libraries. In I. Iglezakis, T. E. Synodinou, & S. Kapidakis (Eds.), E-Publishing and Digital Libraries: Legal and Organizational Issues (pp. 1-30). Hersey: IGI Global.

Candela, L., Castelli, D., & Pagano, P. (2007). A Reference Architecture for Digital Library Systems: Principles and Applications. In C. Thanos, F. Borri, & L. Candela (Eds.), Digital Libraries: Research and Development (pp. 22-35). Berlin: Springer.

Cañedo Andalia, R. (2011). Los buscadores en la recuperación de información en salud. ACIMED, 22(3), 219-236. Recuperado de http://scielo.sld.cu/pdf/aci/v22n3/aci04311.pdf

Capstick, J., Diagne, A. K., Erbach, G., Uszkoreit, H., Leisenberg, A., & Leisenberg, M. (2000). A system for supporting cross-lingual information retrieval. Information Processing & Management, 36(2), 275-289.

Carmines, E. & Zeller, R. (1979). Reliability and Validity Assessment. SAGE Publications.

Carr, R. (1998). Integrate, co-operate, innovate: an introduction. New Review of Information and Library Research, 4, 17-26.

Carrión Gútiez, A. (2001). Las tecnologías de la información y las comunicaciones en las bibliotecas públicas españolas: nuevos usuarios y nuevos servicios. In H. Hernández (Ed.), Las bibliotecas públicas en España: una realidad abierta (pp. 243-279). Madrid: Fundación Germán Sánchez Ruipérez.

Carrión, M. (1993). Manual de bibliotecas. Salamanca: Fundación Germán Sánchez Ruipérez,1993.

Cencerrado Malmierca, L. M. (1997). La formación de usuarios como difusora de los servicios de la biblioteca. Boletín de AABADOM, 8(2), 31-35.

Chan, D. S., Willicombe, A., Reid, T. D., Beaton, C., Arnold, D., Ward, J., ... & Lewis, W.G. (2012). Relative Quality of Internet-Derived Gastrointestinal Cancer Information. Journal of Cancer Education, 27, 676-679. doi:10.1007/s13187-012-0408-2.

Chao, H. (2002). Assessing the quality of academic libraries on the web: the development and testing of criteria. Library and Information Science Research, 24(2), 169-194.

Charnock, D., Shepperd, S., Needham, G., & Gann, R. (1999). DISCERN: an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 53,105-111.

Chen, H. (2000a). Digital Libraries: Part I. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(3).

Chen, H. (2000b). Digital Libraries: Part II. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(4).

Chen, H. (2004). Digital library research in the US: an overview with a knowledge management perspective. Program: Electronic Library and Information Systems, 38(3), 157-167.

Chesney, T. (2006). An empirical examination of Wikipedia’s credibility. First Monday, 11(11). Recuperado de http://firstmonday.org

Choi, Y., & Rasmussen, E. (2009). What Qualifications and Skills are Important for Digital Librarian Positions in Academic Libraries? A Job Advertisement Analysis. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 35(5), 457-467.

Chowdhury, G. (2002). Digital Divide: How Can Digital Libraries Bridge the Gap? In E. P. Lim, S. Foo, C. Khoo, H. Chen, E. Fox, S. Urs, & T. Costantino (Eds.), Digital Libraries: People, Knowledge, and Technology (pp. 379-391). Berlin: Springer.

Chowdhury, G. (2010). From digital libraries to digital preservation research: the importance of users and context. Journal of Documentation, 66(2), 207-223.

Chowdhury, G., & Chowdhury, S. (1999). Digital library research: major issues and trends. Journal of Documentation, 55(4), 409-448.

Chowdhury, G., & Chowdhury, S. (2003). Introduction to digital libraries. London: Facet Publishing.

Chowdhury, S., Landoni, M., & Gibb, F. (2006). Usability and impact of digital libraries: a review. Online Information Review, 30(6), 656-680.

Chua, A. Y. K., & Goh, D. H. (2010). A study of Web 2.0 applications in library websites. Library & Information Science Research, 32(3), 203-211.

CIBER (2009). Scholarly e-books usage and information seeking behaviour: a deep log analysis of MyiLibrary: CIBER final report. Recuperado de http://observatory.jiscebooks.org/reports/scholarly-e-books-usage-and-information-seeking-behaviour-a-deep-log-analysis-of-myilibrary/

Clark, N., & Frost, D. (2002). User-centred evaluation and design: A subject gateway perspective. Recuperado de www.vala.org.au/vala2002/2002pdf/38ClaFro.pdf

Clausen, H. (1999a). Evaluation of library Web sites: the Danish case. The Electronic Library, 17(2), 83-87.

Clausen, H. (1999b). User-oriented evaluation of library and information centre Web sites. New Library World, 100(1146), 5-10.

Cleveland, G. (1998). Digital Libraries: Definitions, Issues and Challenges. Recuperado de http://archive.ifla.org/VI/5/op/udtop8/udtop8.htm

Codina, L. (2000). Evaluación de recursos digitales en línea: conceptos, indicadores y métodos. Revista Española de Documentación Científica, 23(1), 7-43.

Codina, L. (2007a). Motores de búsqueda de información científica y académica. Hipertext.net, 5. Recuperado de http://www.hipertext.net/web/pag273.htm

Codina, L. (2007b). Motores de búsqueda para usos académicos: ¿Cambio de Paradigma? Anuario ThinkEPI, 1, 98-100. Recuperado el 10/11/2012 de http://www.thinkepi.net/motores-de-busqueda-para-usos-academicos-%C2%BFcambio-de-paradigma

Codina, L., & Abadal Falgueras, E. (2012). Crítica del mundo digital: propuesta de categorización. Notas ThinkEPI 2013. Recuperado el 10/11/2012 de http://www.thinkepi.net/critica-del-mundo-digital-propuesta-de-categorizacion

Codina, L., & Pedraza-Jiménez, R. (2011). Búsqueda y recuperación de información en la web: qué ha pasado y qué podemos esperar en el futuro. BiD: Textos Universitaris de Biblioteconomia i Documentació, (27). Recuperado de http://www.ub.edu/bid/27/pedraza2.htm

Collier, M. (1997, Noviembre). Towards a general theory of the Digital library. Comunicación presentada a International Symposium on Research, Development and Practice in Digital Libraries: ISDL'97, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japón. Recuperado de http://www.dl.slis.tsukuba.ac.jp/ISDL97/proceedings/collier.html

Colvin, J. (2010). For Your Consideration: Models for Digital Music Distribution in Libraries. Music Reference Services Quarterly, 13(1-2), 35-38.

Corcoran, T. B., Ward, M., Jarosz, K., & Schug, S. A. (2009). The evaluation of anaesthesia-related information on the Internet. Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, 37(1), 79-84.

Cordón García, J. A., Alonso Arévalo, J., & Martín Rodero, H. (2010). Los libros electrónicos: la tercera ola de la revolución digital. Anales de Documentación, 13, 53-80.

Courtois, M. P., Higgins, M. E., & Kapur, A. (2003). Was this guide helpful? Users’ perceptions of subject guides. Reference Services Review, 33(2), 188-196.

Crawford, W., & Gorman, M. (1995). Future libraries: dreams, madness & reality. Chicago: ALA.

Crow, R. (2006). Publishing cooperatives: An alternative for non-profit publishers. First Monday, 11(9). Recuperado de http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/1396/1314

Dahl, C. (2001). Electronic pathfinders in academic libraries: An analysis of their content and form. College & Research Libraries, 62(3), 227-237.

Danskin, A. (2009). RDA - Resource Description and Access: A Prospectus. Report to the Joint Steering Committee for Development of RDA. Recuperado de http://www.rda-jsc.org/docs/5rda-prospectusrev7.pdf

Darmoni, S. J., Leroy, J. P., Baudic, F., Douyère, M., Piot, J., & Thirion, B. (1999). CISMeF: cataloque and index of French speaking health resources. Studies in health technology and informatics, 68, 493-496.

Davis, P. M. (2002). Patterns in electronic journal usage: Challenging the composition of geographic consortia. College & Research Libraries, 63(6), 484-497.

Davis, P. M. (2003). Information-seeking behavior of chemists: A transaction log analysis of referral URLs. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(4), 326-332.

Dawson, A. (1997). BUBL bursts out of Bath. The Serials Librarian, 31(4), 15-22.

Dawson, A., & Simpson, J. (1997). BUBL : How BUBL Benefits Academic Librarians. Ariadne, 10. Recuperado de http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue10/bubl/

Day, M., Koch, T., & Neuroth, H. (2004). Searching and browsing multiple subject gateways in the Renardus service. In: C. van Dijkum, J. Blasius, & C. Durand (Eds.), Recent developments and applications in social research methodology: Proceedings of the RC33 Sixth International Conference on Social Science Methodology, Amsterdam. Opladen: Budrich Verlag. Recuperado de http://opus.bath.ac.uk/14366/

De-Juanas, A., Pardo, R., Diestro, A., Ferro, A., & Sampedro, J. (2012). Construcción de un instrumento de verificación de la calidad de portales y redes de investigación de carácter científico en Internet. Revista Española de Documentación Científica, 35(4), 555-572.

Deegan, M., & Tanner, S. (2002). Digital Futures: Strategies for the Information Age. London: Library Association.

Dempsey, L. (1996). ROADS to desire: Some UK and other European metadata and resource discovery projects. D-Lib Magazine, 2(7-8). Recuperado de http://www.dlib.org/dlib/july96/07dempsey.html

Dempsey, L. (2000). The subject gateway: Experiences and issues based on the emergence of the Resource Discovery Network. Online Information Review, 24(1), 8-23.

Dempsey, L., Russell, R., & Murray, R. (1999). A utopian place of criticism? Brokering access to network information. Journal of Documentation, 55(1), 33-70.

Díaz de Rada, V., Flavián, C., & Guinalíu, M. (2004). Encuestas en Internet: Algo más que una simple versión mejorada de la tradicional encuesta autoadministrada. Investigación y markeing, (82), 45-56.

Domínguez Aroca, M. I., & Pérez Carrillo, S. (2009). Elaboración y gestión de guías temáticas mediante un sistema mixto, web institucional y wiki. La experiencia de la Biblioteca de la Universidad de Alcalá. Comunicación presentada a XV Jornadas Bibliotecarias de Andalucía. Recuperado de http://www.aab.es/pdfs/jba15/15-Elaboracion_y_gestion_de_guias_tematicas.pdf

Dorner, D. G. (2004). The impact of digital information resources on the roles of collection managers in research libraries. Library Collections, Acquisitions and Technical Services, 28(3), 249-274.

Dragulanescu, N. G. (2002). Website quality evaluations: criteria and tools. International Information and Library Review, 34(3), 247-254.

ECIA. (2004). Euroreferencial en Información y Documentación. Vol. 1. Competencias y actitudes de los profesionales europeos de información y documentación. Madrid: SEDIC. Recuperado de http://www.certidoc.net/es1/euref1-espanol.pdf

Eíto Brun, R. (2002). El camino hacia el libro electrónico. El Profesional de la Información, 11(1), 52-63.

Equipo Portal Tecnociencia. (2003). Metodología para la creación de un sistema de información científico-técnica en Internet: el caso de PortalTecnoCiencia. En Los sistemas de información en las organizaciones, eficacia y transparencia. Actas Fesabid 2003, VIII Jornadas Españolas de Documentación. Barcelona, 6, 7 y 8 de febrero de 2003 (pp. 343-355). Recuperado de http://digital.csic.es/bitstream/10261/38002/1/x10%20Tecnociencia.pdf

Estermann, Y., & Jacquesson, A. (2000). Quelle formation pour les bibliothèques numériques? Bulletin des Bibliothèques de France, 45(5), 4-17.

Estivill, A., & Abadal, E. (2000). Acceso a los recursos web gratuitos desde las bibliotecas. El Profesional de la Información, 9(11), 4-20.

Evans, G. E., & Saponaro, M. Z. (2012). Collection Management Basics (6th ed.). Santa Barbara: Libraries Unlimited.

Evans, G. E., & Saponaro, M. Z. (2005). Developing Library and Information Center Collections (5th ed.). Santa Barbara: Libraries Unlimited.

Exon, A. (1978). Getting to know the user better. Aslib Proceedings, 30(10), 352-364.

Faba Pérez, C., & Moya Anegón, F. (1999). Bibliotecas digitales: concepto y principales proyectos. Investigación Bibliotecológica, 13(26), 64-78.

Feng, L., Jeusfeld, M. A., & Hoppenbrouwers, J. (2005). Beyond information searching and browsing: acquiring knowledge from digital libraries. Information Processing & Management, 41(1), 97-120.

Feng, Z. X. Y. L. & Xuejun, H. Y. H. (2001). Web-based Personalized Library and Information Service Mechanism. New Technology of Library and Information Service, 1, 6.

Fernández, E. (2002). Portal Tecnociencia: sistema de información científica en ciencia y tecnología. El profesional de la información, 11(5), 376-381.

Fernández Felero, M. R., Hurtado Guapo, M. A., & Peral Pacheco, D. (2008). Evaluación, características y calidad de las páginas web comerciales extremeñas: 2003-2006. SCIRE: Representacion y Organizacion Del Conocimiento, 14(1), 87-104.

Ferran, N., Mor, E., & Minguillón, J. (2005). Towards personalization in digital libraries through ontologies. Library Management, 26(4/5), 206-217.

Fink-Shamit, N., & Bar-Ilan, J. (2008). Information quality assessment on the web: An expression of behaviour. Information Research, 13(4). Recuperado de http://informationr.net/ir/13-4/paper357.html

Fischer, T. & Neuroth, H. (2000). SSG-FI - Special subject gateways to high quality Internet resources for scientific users. Online Information Review, 24(1), 64-68.

Fox, E., & Logan, E. (2004). An Asian Digital Libraries Perspective. Information Processing & Management, 41(1).

Fox, E. A. (1999). Digital Libraries Initiative (DLI) Projects 1994-1999. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 26(1), 7-11.

Franco, A. (2003). Gateways to the Internet: Finding Quality Information on the Internet. Library Trends, 52(2), 228-246.

Freshwater, M. (2002). Subject Gateways: an investigation into their role in the information environment (whit particular reference to Aerade, the subject gateway for aerospace and defense). Birmingham: Central England University. Recuperado de http://aerade.cranfield.ac.uk/fullevaluationreport.pdf

Frias-Martinez, E., & Chen, S. Y. (2005). Evaluation of user satisfaction with digital library interfaces. In Proceedings of the 5th WSEAS International Conference on Simulation, Modeling And Optimization, Corfu, Greece, August 17-19, 2005 (pp. 172-177).

Frias-Martinez, E., Magoulas, G., Chen, S., & Macredie, R. (2006). Automated user modeling for personalized digital libraries. International Journal of Information Management, 26(3), 234-248.

Frias-Martinez, E., Chen, S. Y., & Liu, X. (2009). Evaluation of a personalized digital library based on cognitive styles: Adaptivity vs. adaptability. International Journal of Information Management, 29(1), 48-56.

Fritch, J. W. (2003). Heuristics, tools, and systems for evaluating Internet information: helping users assess a tangled Web. Online Information Review, 27(5), 321-327.

Fuentes Romero, J. J. (1985). El expurgo como labor bibliotecaria. Boletín de la ANABAD, 35(1), 93-98.

Gagliardi, A., & Jadad, A. R. (2002). Examination of instruments used to rate quality of health information on the internet: chronicle of a voyage with an unclear destination. British Medical Journal, 324(7337), 569-573.

Galvin, J. (2005). Alternative strategies for promoting information literacy. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 31(4), 352-357.

García Marco, F. J. (2010). La revolución de internet y los paradigmas bibliotecarios emergentes: las bibliotecas digitales comerciales. Notas ThinkEPI. Recuperado de http://www.thinkepi.net/revolucion-internet-paradigmas-bibliotecarios-emergentes-bibliotecas-digitales-comerciales

García Marco, F. J. (2009). Teaching Digital Libraries in Spain: Context and Experiences. Education for Information, 27(2-3), 127-155.

García Mateu, M. J., & Sánchez Sanz, T. (2001). Internet subject gateways knowledge organisation systems evaluation. Paper presented to EAHIL Workshop – 2001 Cyberspace Odyssey. Recuperado de http://www.eahil.eu/conferences/2001Alghero/056.htm

Gardner, T., & Iannella, R. (2000). Architecture and software solutions. Online Information Review, 24(1), 35-40.

Gargiulo, P. (2003). Electronic journals and users: the CIBER experience in Italy. Serials: The Journal for the Serials Community, 16(3), 293-298.

Garrido Picazo, P., & Tramullas Saz, J. (2005). Potnia: una herramienta para directorios temáticos: basada en Dublin Core y topic maps. In J. Gascón, F.

Garrod, P. (1998). Skills for new information professionals (SKIP): An evaluation of the key findings. Program: Electronic Library and Information Systems, 32(3), 241-263.

Gastinger, A. (2006). A Report on the 8th International Bielefeld Conference 2006: Academic Library and Information Services - New Paradigms for the Digital Age. Library Hi Tech News, 23(4), 4-7.

Giglia, E. (2009). Orthogate and Orthopaedia: orthopedic information on the web. European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, 45(3), 443-446.

Gold, J. (1996). The BUBL information service. The Serials Librarian, 29(3-4), 165-174.

Gold, N. (2011). Less is more: essential web resources that eliminate clutter and enhance service. Reference Reviews, 25(4), 4-11.

Gómez Hernández, J. A., (2000). La alfabetizacion informacional y la biblioteca universitaria. Organizacion de programas para enseñar el uso de la informacion. En J. A Gómez Hernández (Ed.), Estrategias y modelos para enseñar a usar la información : guía para docentes, bibliotecarios y archiveros (169-255). Murcia: KR.

Gómez Hernández, J. A. (2007). Alfabetización informacional: cuestiones básicas. Anuario ThinkEPI, 1, 43-50.

Gómez Hernández, J. A. (2009). Aprender a enseñar competencias informacionales a los usuarios: avances en la formación profesional en España. Anuario ThinkEPI, (1), 106-113.

Gómez Hernández, J. A., & Benito Morales, F. (2001). De la formación de usuarios a la alfabetización internacional: propuestas para enseñar las habilidades de información. Scire: Representación y organización del conocimiento, 7(2), 53-83.

Gómez-Hernández, J. A., & Pasadas-Ureña, C. (2007). La alfabetización informacional en bibliotecas públicas: situación actual y propuestas para una agenda de desarrollo. Information Research, 12(3). Recuperado de http://informationr.net/ir/12-3/paper316.html

González-Lucio, J. A., Faba Pérez, C., Moya Anegón, F., & Moscoso Castro, P. (2009). Evolution of the formal quality indicators of the Web spaces of University Libraries in Spain. Cybermetrics: International Journal of Scientometrics, Informetrics and Bibliometrics, (13), 1. Recuperado de http://cybermetrics.cindoc.csic.es/articles/v13i1p1.html

Goodwin, S., Shurtz, S., Gonzalez, A., & Clark, D. (2012). Assessing an e-reader lending program: from pilot to mainstream service. Library Review, 61(1), 8-17.

Gorman, M. (1999). Metadata or cataloguing? A false choice. Journal of Internet cataloging, 2(1), 5-22.

Graham, E. (1999). eLib: the UK Electronic Libraries Programme. Exploit Interactive, 3. Recuperado de http://www.exploit-lib.org/issue3/elib/

Gray, L. (1999). BIOME: Incorporating the OMNI Service. Ariadne, 22. Recuperado de http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue22/biome/

Greenberg, J. (2004). Metadata extraction and harvesting: A Comparison of Two Automatic Metadata Generation Applications. Journal of Internet Cataloging, 6(4), 59-82.

Greenberg, J., Spurgin, K., & Crystal, A. (2006). Functionalities for automatic metadata generation applications: a survey of metadata experts' opinions. International Journal of Metadata, Semantics and Ontologies, 1(1), 3-20.

Greenstein, D. (2000). Digital libraries and their challenges. Library Trends, 49(2), 290-303.

Greenstein, D., & Thorin, S. E. (2002). The digital library: A biography. Washington: Digital Library Federation, Council on Library and Information Resources.

Grewal, P., Williams, B., Alagaratnam, S., Neffendorf, J., & Soobrah, R. (2012). Quality of vascular surgery Web sites on the Internet. Journal of Vascular Surgery, 56(5), 1461-1467.

Guardiola-Wanden-Berghe, R., Gil-Perez, J. D., Sanz-Valero, J., & Wanden-Berghe, C. (2011). Evaluating the quality of websites relating to diet and eating disorders. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 28(4), 294-301.

Hane, P. (2011). Internet Public Library Milestones. Information Today, 28(4), 8.

Hanif, F., Read, J. C., Goodacre, J. A., Chaudhry, A., & Gibbs, P. (2009). The role of quality tools in assessing reliability of the internet for health information. Informatics for Health and Social Care, 34(4), 231-243.

Hanif, F., Sivaprakasam, R., Butler, A., Huguet, E., Pettigrew, G. J., Michael, E. D., … Gibbs, P. (2006). Information about liver transplantation on the World Wide Web. Informatics for Health and Social Care, 31(3), 153-160.

Hargrave, D. R., Hargrave, U. A., & Bouffet, E. (2006). Quality of health information on the Internet in pediatric neuro-oncology. Neuro-Oncololy, 8(2), 175-182.

Hariri, N., & Norouzi, Y. (2011). Determining evaluation criteria for digital libraries' user interface: a review. The Electronic Library, 29(5), 698-722.

Harland, J., & Bath, P. (2007). Assessing the quality of websites providing information on multiple sclerosis: evaluating tools and comparing sites. Health Informatics Journal, 13(3), 207-221.

Harrington, J., Meaden, K., & Turner, E. (1999). Aerade. Ariadne, 22. Recuperado de http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue22/aerade/

Hasan, L., & Abuelrub, E. (2011). Assessing the quality of web sites. Applied Computing and Informatics, 9(1), 11-29.

Haynes, D., Streatfield, D., Cookman, N., & Wood, H. (1998). Comparative Evaluation of the Subject Based Gateways Approach to Providing Access to Network Resources. Recuperado de http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/services/elib/papers/tavistock/subject-gateway-access/

Hedlund, T. (2002). Compounds in dictionary-based cross-language information retrieval. Information Research, 7(2). Recuperado el 10/11/2012 de http://informationr.net/ir/7-2/paper128.html

Heery, R. (2000). Information gateways: Collaboration on content. Online Information Review, 24(1), 40-45.

Hegenbart, B. (1998). The Economics of the Internet Public Library. Library Hi Tech, 16(2), 69–83.

Hernández Peréz, T., Rodríguez Mateos, D., & Bueno De la Fuente, G. (2008). Open Access: el papel de las bibliotecas en los repositorios institucionales de acceso abierto. Anales de Documentación, 10, 185-204.

Hernández Sampieri, R., Fernández Collado, C., & Baptista Lucio, P. (2006). Metodología de la investigación (4ª ed.). México DF: McGraw-Hill Interamericana.

Hernon, P., & Calvert, P. (2005). E-service quality in libraries: Exploring its features and dimensions. Library & Information Science Research, 27(3), 377-404.

Herring, J. E. (2011). Web Site Evaluation: A Key Role for the School Librarian. School Library Monthly, 27(8), 22-23.

Hickey, T. B. (2000). CORC: a system for gateway creation. Online Information Review, 24(1), 49-56.

Hill, H., & Bossaller, J. (2013). Public library use of free e-resources. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 45(2), 103-112.

Hiom, D. (1998). The Social Science Information Gateway: putting theory into practice. Information Research, 4(1). Recuperado de http://informationr.net/ir/4-1/paper48.html

Hiom, D. (2000). SOSIG: an internet hub for the social sciences, business and law. Online Information Review, 24(1), 54-58.

Hípola, P., Vargas-Quesada, B., & Senso, J. A. (2000). Bibliotecas digitales: situación actual y problemas. El Profesional de la Información, 9(4), 4-13.

Hjørland, B. (2002). Domain analysis in information science: eleven approaches - traditional as well as innovative. Journal of Documentation, 58(4), 422-462.

Hjørland, B. (2012). Methods for evaluating information sources: An annotated catalogue. Journal of Information Science, 38(3), 258-268.

Hofman. P., Worsfold, E., Hiom, D., Day, M., & Oehler, A. (1999). Selection criteria for quality controlled information gateways, Work Package 3 of Telematics for Research project DESIRE (RE 1004). Recuperado de http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/metadata/desire/quality/

Hoivik, J. (2013). Global village: mobile access to library resources. Library Hi Tech, 31(3), 467-477.

Holmberg, K., Huvila, I., Kronqvist-Berg, M., & Widén-Wulff, G. (2009). What is Library 2.0? Journal of Documentation, 65(4), 668-681.

Honaker, J., King, G., & Blackwell, M. (2013). Amelia II: A program for missing data. Recuperado de http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/Amelia/vignettes/amelia.pdf

Howarth, L. C. (2003, Agosto). Modelos de metadatos para pasarelas temáticas. Comunicación presentada en 69th IFLA Council and General Conference, Berlín. Recuperado de http://webdoc.sub.gwdg.de/ebook/aw/2003/ifla/vortraege/iv/ifla69/papers/053s_trans-Howarth.pdf

Hsiung, L. Y. (2007). Expanding the role of the electronic resources (ER) librarian in the hybrid library. Collection Management, 32(1-2), 31-47.

Huang, R., & Liu, C. (2007). An Investigation and Analysis of e-Services in Major Subject Based Information Gateways in the World. In W. Wang, Y. Li, Z. Duan, L. Yan, H. Li, & X. Yang (Eds.), Integration and Innovation Orient to E-Society (pp. 209-217). Boston: Springer.

Hunter, B. (2012). The Effect of Digital Publishing on Technical Services in University Libraries. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 39(1), 84-93.

Huxley, L., Carpenter, L., & Peereboom, M. (2003). The Renardus broker service: Collaborative frameworks and tools. The Electronic Library, 21(1), 39-48.

Huxley, L., & Joyce, A. (2004). A social science gateway in a shifting digital world: Shaping SOSIG for users' needs of the future. Online Information Review, 28(5), 328-337.

IFLA & UNESCO (2011). IFLA/UNESCO Manifesto for Digital Libraries. Recuperado el 10/11/2012 de http://www.ifla.org/files/digital-libraries/documents/ifla-unesco-digital-libraries-manifesto.pdf

Innocenti, P., Ross, S., Maceviciute, E., Wilson, T., Ludwig, J., & Pempe, W. (2009). Assessing digital preservation frameworks: the approach of the SHAMAN project. In ACM. Recuperado de http://eprints.gla.ac.uk/45793/

Innocenti, P., Smith, M. K., Ashley, K., Ross, S., De Robbio, A., Pfeiffenberger, H., & Faundeen, J. (2011). Towards a holistic approach to policy interoperability in digital libraries and digital repositories. International Journal of Digital Curation, 6(1), 111-124.

INSPIRAL (2001). INSPIRAL definition of a digital library. Recuperado de http://inspiral.cdlr.strath.ac.uk/about/digilibs.html

Irwin, J. Y., Thyvalikakath, T., Spallek, H., Wali, T., Kerr, A.R., & Schleyer, T. (2011). English and Spanish oral cancer information on the Internet: a pilot surface quality and content evaluation of oral cancer Web sites. Journal of public health dentistry, 71(2), 106-116.

ISO (2003). ISO 15836:2003: Information and documentation -- The Dublin Core metadata element set. Recuperado de http://www.niso.org/international/SC4/n515.pdf

ISO (2006). ISO 2789:2006: Information and documentation -- International library statistics. Recuperado de http://www.iso.org/iso/home/store/catalogue_ics/catalogue_detail_ics.htm?csnumber=39181

ISO (1994). ISO 8402:1994: Quality management and quality assurance – Vocabulary. Recuperado de http://www.iso.org/iso/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=20115

Jackson, R., & Pellack, L. J. (2004). Internet subject guides in academic libraries: An analysis of contents, practices, and opinions. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 43(4), 319-327.

Jadad, A. R., & Gagliardi, A. (1998). Rating health information on the Internet: navigating to knowledge or to Babel? Journal of the American Medical Association, 279, 611-614.

Janes, J. (1998). The Internet public library: an intellectual history, Library Hi Tech, 16(2), 55-68.

Jansen, B. J., & Spink, A. (2006). How are we searching the World Wide Web? A comparison of nine search engine transaction logs. Information Processing & Management, 42(1), 248-263.

Jaques, C., & Losada, M. (2005). Elaboración de guías temáticas en el web en la biblioteca de la Universitat Pompeu Fabra. El profesional de la información, 14(1), 67-69.

Jayawardana, C., Hewagamage, K. P., & Hirakawa, M. (2001). A personalized information environment for digital libraries. Information Technology & Libraries, 20(4), 185-196.

Jeng, J. (2005). Usability assessment of academic digital libraries: Effectiveness, efficiency, satisfaction, and learnability. Libri, 55(2-3), 96-121.

Jiménez Piano, M., & Ortiz Repiso, V. (2007). Evaluación y calidad de sedes web. Gijón: Trea.

Jiménez Planet, V., & Jaén Casquero, B. (2003). Presentación del nuevo Localizador de Información en Salud: LIS-España. Comunicación presentada a INFORSALUD’02: VI Congreso Nacional de Informática de la Salud, Madrid. Recuperado de http://www.seis.es/seis/inforsalud03/INFORSALUD2003_jimenezv.pdf

Johnston, B., & Webber, S. (2003). Information literacy in higher education: a review and case study. Studies in Higher Education, 28(3), 335-352.

Joint Funding Council's Libraries Review Group (1993). Joint Funding Council's Libraries Review Group: Report (The Follet Report). Recuperado de http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/services/papers/follett/report/

Joint Steering Committee for Development of RDA (2012). RDA: Resource Descrption and Access. Recuperado de http://www.rda-jsc.org/rda.html

Joint, N. (2003). Staff development and training in the digital library environment. Library Review, 52(9), 417-421.

Jones, S., Cunningham, S. J., McNab, R., & Boddie, S. (2000). A transaction log analysis of a digital library. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 3(2), 152-169.

Joo, S., & Lee, J. Y. (2011). Measuring the usability of academic digital libraries: Instrument development and validation. The Electronic Library, 29(4), 523-537.

Joo, S., Lin, S., & Lu, K. (2011). A usability evaluation model for academic library websites: Efficiency, effectiveness and learnability. Journal of Library and Information Studies, 9(2), 11-26.

Joyce, A., Kerr, L., Machin, T., & Williams, C. (2010). Intute reflections at the end of an era. Ariadne, 64. Recuperado de http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue64/joyce-et-al/

Joyce, A., Wickham, J., Cross, P., & Stephens, C. (2008). Intute Integration. Ariadne, 55. Recuperado de http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue55/joyce-et-al/

Kahn, B. K., Strong, D. M., & Wang, R. Y. (2002). Information Quality Benchmarks: Product and Service Performance. Communications of the ACM 45(4), 184-192.

Kani-Zabihi, E., Ghinea, G., & Chen, S. Y. (2006). Digital libraries: what do users want? Online Information Review, 30(4), 395-412.

Karim, N. S. A., Darus, S. H., & Hussin, R. (2006). Mobile phone applications in academic library services: a students' feedback survey. Campus-Wide Information Systems, 23(1), 35-51.

Kehinde, A. A., & Tella, A. (2012). Assessment of Nigerian University Library Web Sites/Web Pages. New Review of Information Networking, 17, 69-92. doi:10.1080/13614576.2012.724282

Kelly, B., Closier, A., & Hiom, D. (2005). Gateway Standardization: A Quality Assurance Framework for Metadata. Library Trends, 53(4), 637-650.

Kerr, L., & MacLeod, R. (1997). EEVL: an Internet gateway for engineers. Library Hi Tech, 15(3-4), 110-18.

Kim, K. S., & Sin, S. C. J. (2011). Selecting quality sources: Bridging the gap between the perception and use of information sources. Journal of Information Science, 37(2), 178-188.

Kim, P., Eng, T. R., Deering, M. J., & Maxfield, A. (1999). Published criteria for evaluating health-related web sites: review. British Medical Jurnal, 318, 647-649.

Kim, Y. M., & Abbas, J. (2010). Adoption of Library 2.0 functionalities by academic libraries and users: a knowledge management perspective. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 36(3), 211-218.

Kipp, M. E. I., & Campbell, D. G. (2010). Searching with Tags: Do Tags Help Users Find Things? Knowledge Organization, 37(4), 239-255.

Kiran, K., & Diljit, S. (2012). Modeling Web-based library service quality. Library & Information Science Research, 34(3), 184-196.

Kirriemuir, J. (2002). A brief survey of Quality Resource Discovery Systems: Database Summary. Recuperado el 20 de Mayo de 2005 de: http://www.rdn.ac.uk/publications/studies/survey/data-summary.html

Kirriemuir, J., Brickley, D., Wels, S., Knight, J., & Hamilton, M. (1998). Cross-searching Subject Gateways: The Query routing and forward knowledge approach. D-Lib Magazine. Recuperado de http://www.dlib.org/dlib/january98/01kirriemuir.html

Klas, C. P., Fuhr, N., Kriewel, S., Albrechtsen, H., Tsakonas, G., Kapidakis, S., … Jacob, E. (2006). An experimental framework for comparative digital library evaluation: the logging scheme. Recuperado de http://www.is.inf.uni-due.de/bib/pdf/ir/Klas_etal_06.pdf

Koch, T. (2000). Quality-controlled subject gateways: Definitions, typologies, empirical overview. Online Information Review, 24(1), 24-34.

Kohl, D. F. (2009). Knowledge Life Cycles: Renewal and Obsolescence. El Profesional de la Informacion, 18(4), 374-381.

Kovacevic, A., Ivanovic, D., Milosavljevic, B., Konjovic, Z., & Surla, D. (2011). Automatic extraction of metadata from scientific publications for CRIS systems. Program: Electronic Library and Information Systems, 45(4), 376-396.

Kroski, E. (2008). What is the mobile web? Library Technology Reports, 44(5), 5-9.

Kukulsa-Hume, A. & Shield, L. (2004). Usability and pedagogical design: are language learning websites special? Recuperado de http://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/docs/00/19/03/40/PDF/KukulskaHulme-Agnes-2004.pdf

Kyrillidou, M., & Giersch, S. (2005). Developing the DigiQUAL protocol for digital library evaluation. In (pp. 172-173). IEEE.

Kyrillidou, M., & Young, M. (2001). ARL Statistics 1999-2000. Washington: Association of Research Libraries.

Lalhmachhuana (2006). Subject Information Gateways as the Scholars' Pathways for Avoiding the Internet Chaos: New Prospects and Challenges for LIS Professionals. Comunicación presentada a 4th Convention PLANNER, Aizawl. Recuperado de http://ir.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/handle/1944/1324/418-429.pdf?sequence=1

Lam, V.T. (2000). Cataloging Internet resources: why, what, how. Cataloging & classification quarterly, 29(3), 49-61.

Lam, W., Chan, K., Radev, D., Saggion, H., & Teufel, S. (2005). Context-based generic cross-lingual retrieval of documents and automated summaries. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56(2), 129-139.

Larouk, O., Dalhoumi, S., & Hassoun, M. (2006). Indexing and information retrieval in the SBIG: Evaluation of Websites Gateway. In Proceedings of ICTTA’06 (pp. 1751-1756). Bangalore: IEEE. doi 10.1109/ICTTA.2006.1684650

Law, D. (2009). Academic Digital Libraries of the Future: An Environment Scan. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 15(1), 53-67.

Lee, K. H., & Teh, K. H. (2000). Evaluation of academic library web sites in malaysia. Malaysian Journal of Library and Information Science, 5(2), 95-108.

Lee, S., & Jacob, E. K. (2011). An Integrated Approach to Metadata Interoperability. Library Resources & Technical Services, 55(1), 17-32.

Lee, Y. W., Strong, D. M., Kahn, B. K., & Wang, R. Y. (2002). AIMQ: a methodology for information quality assessment. Information & Management, 40(2), 133-146.

Lesk, M. E. (1997). Practical digital libraries: books, bytes and bucks. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufman.

Lesk, M. E. (2005). Understanding digital libraries (2nd ed.) San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.

Lesk, M. E. (2012). A Personal History of Digital Libraries. Library Hi Tech, 30(4), 592-603.

Lew, M. S. (2012). Multimedia information retrieval in the twenty-first century. International Journal of Multimedia Information Retrieval, 1(1), 1-2.

Library of Congress (2012). RDA Training Plan for 2012 - March 30, 2013. Recuperado de http://www.loc.gov/aba/rda/pdf/RDA_Long-Range_Training_Plan.pdf

Licklider, J. C. R. (1965). Libraries of the Future. Cambridge, MA: MIT.

Liew, C. L. (2009). Digital Library Research 1997-2007: Organisational and People Issues. Journal of Documentation, 65(2), 245-266.

Lim, E. (1999). Pasarelas temáticas del Sudeste Asiático: análisis de sus métodos de clasificación. Comunicación presentada en 65th IFLA Council and General Conference, Bangkok. Recuperado de http://archive.ifla.org/IV/ifla65/papers/011-117s.htm

Liu, S., Liao, S., & Guo, J. (2009). Surviving in the Digital Age by Utilizing Libraries' Distinctive Advantages. The Electronic Library, 27(2), 298-307.

Liu, Z. (2006). Print vs. electronic resources: A study of user perceptions, preferences, and use. Information Processing & Management, 42(2), 583-592.

Liu, Z. (2004). Perceptions of credibility of scholarly information on the web. Information Processing & Management, 40(6), 1027-1038.

Logoze, C., & Fielding, D. (1998). Defining collections in distributed digital libraries. D-Lib Magazine, 4(11). Recuperado de http://www.dlib.org/dlib/november98/lagoze/11lagoze.html

Lougee, W. P. (2002). Diffuse libraries: emergent roles for the research library in the digital age. Washington: Council on Library and Information Resources.

Lowe, C. (2000). GEM: Design and implementation of a metadata project for education. Journal of internet cataloging, 3(2-3), 109-126. doi 10.1300/J141v03n02_01

Lu, K., & Kipp, M. E. I. (2010). Can collaborative tagging improve retrieval effectiveness? An experimental study. Recuperado de http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1920331.1920509

Lubans, J. (1999). When students hit the surf: What kids really do on the Internet. And What They Want from Librarians. School Library Journal, 45(9), 144-47.

Lucassen, T., & Schraagen, J. M. (2011). Factual accuracy and trust in information: The role of expertise. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(7), 1232-1242.

Lupiáñez-Villanueva, F. (2012). El control de la calidad de la información de webs de salud va más allá en internet. Respuesta. Revista Española de Cardiología, 65, 199-200.

Lynch, C. A. (2003). Institutional Repositories: Essential Infrastructure for Scholarship in the Digital Age. ARL: A Bimonthly Report, no. 226. Recuperado de http://www.arl.org/resources/pubs/br/br226/br226ir.shtml

Lynch, C. A. (2005). Where Do We Go From Here? The Next Decade for Digital Libraries. D-Lib Magazine, 11(7/8). Recuperado el 10/11/2012 de http://www.dlib.org/dlib/july05/lynch/07lynch.html

Lynch, C. A., & Lippincott, J. K. (2005). Institutional Repository Deployment in the United States as of Early 2005. D-Lib Magazine, 11(9). Recuperado de http://www.dlib.org/dlib/september05/lynch/09lynch.html

Maceli, M., Wiedenbeck, S., & Abels, E. (2011). The internet public library (IPL): an exploratory case study on user perceptions. Information Technology and Libraries, 30(1), 16-23.

Macgregor, G. (2008). Digital Libraries and the semantic web: context, applications and research. Library Review, 57(3).

Mackie, M., & Burton, P. F. (1999). The use and effectiveness of the eLib subject gateways: a preliminary investigation. Program, 33(4), 327-337.

MacLeod, R. (1999). Internet hub for engineering, maths & computing. Software for Engineering Education, 15, 18-19.

MacLeod, R. (2000). Promoting a subject gateway: A case study from EEVL (Edinburgh Engineering Virtual Library). Online Information Review, 24(1), 59-63.

Madalli, D. P., Barve, S., & Amin, S. (2012). Digital Preservation in Open-Source Digital Library Software. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 38(3), 161-164.

Mai, J. E. (2013). The Quality and Qualities of Information. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(4), 675-688.

Maldonado Martínez, A., & Rodríguez Yunta, L. (2007). Directorios temáticos en Internet como herramienta de difusión de la ciencia. Análisis comparativo. Comunicación presentada a IV Congreso Comunicación Social de la Ciencia: Cultura Científica y Cultura Democrática, Madrid. Recuperado de http://digital.csic.es/bitstream/10261/4584/1/directorios.pdf

Mandalios, J. (2013). RADAR: An approach for helping students evaluate Internet sources. Journal of Information Science, 39(4), 470-478. doi:10.1177/0165551513478889

Marchionini, G., & Fox, E. A. (1999). Progress toward digital libraries: augmentation through integration. Information Processing and Management, 35(3), 219-225.

Marinai, S. (2009). Metadata extraction from PDF papers for digital library ingest. Comunicación presenada a 10th International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition. Recuperado de http://www.cvc.uab.es/icdar2009/papers/3725a251.pdf

Markey, K., Rieh, S. Y., St Jean, B., Kim, J., & Yakel, E. (2007). Census of Institutional Repositories in the United States: MIRACLE Project Research Findings. Washington, D.C.: Council on Library and Information Resources.

Markland, M. (2005). Does the student’s love of the search engine mean that high quality online academic resources are being missed? Performance measurement and metrics, 6(1), 19-31.

Markscheffel, B., Fischer, D., & Stelzer, D. (2008). Classification of Digital Libraries-An e-Business Model-Based Approach. Journal of Digital Information Management, 6(1), 71-80.

Martell, C. (2008). The absent user: Physical use of academic library collections and services continues to decline 1995-2006. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 34(5), 400-407.

Martínez Méndez, F. J., & Rodríguez Muñoz, J. V. (2003). Síntesis y crítica de las evaluaciones de la efectividad de los motores de búsqueda en la Web. Information Research, 8(2). Recuperado de http://informationr.net/ir/8-2/paper148.html

Martínez Santiago, M. D. (2010). Estudio de caso basado en los criterios de calidad de las pasarelas temáticas europeas en 2010. (Tesina de Master). Univeritat Politecnica de Valencia, Valencia. Recuperado de http://riunet.upv.es/bitstream/handle/10251/13852/TESINA%20DE%20MASTER.pdf?sequence=1

Marzal, M. A., Calzada-Prado, J., & Vianello, M. (2008). Criterios para la evaluación de la usabilidad de los recursos educativos virtuales: un análisis desde la alfabetización en información. Information Research, 13(4), 1-15. Recuperado de http://informationr.net/ir/13-4/paper387.html

Mason, J., Mitchell, S., Mooney, M., Reasoner, L., & Rodriguez, C. (2000). INFOMIME: Promising directions in virtual library development. First Monday, 5(6). doi http://dx.doi.org/10.5210%2Ffm.v5i6.763

Maurer, H., & Mueller, H. (2013). Can the Web turn into a digital library? International Journal on Digital Libraries, 13(2), 65-75.

Mayer, M. A., & Leis, A. (2009). Los motores de búsqueda personalizada utilizados como herramientas de filtrado de webs con información de salud. In (pp. 107-111). Madrid: SEIS. Recuperado de http://wma.comb.es/Upload/Documents/Mayer_INFORSALUD2009_49.pdf

Mayer, M. A., Leis, A., & Sanz, F. (2009). Información sobre salud en internet y sellos de confianza como indicadores de calidad: el caso de las vacunas. Atención Primaria, 41(10), 534-542.

McMurdo, G. (1998). Evaluating Web information and design. Journal of Information Science, 24(3), 192-204.

Meghini, C., Spyratos, N., & Yang, J. (2010). A data model for digital libraries. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 11(1), 41-56.

Meichsner, J., & Ohly, H. P. (2009). Quality control in web catalogues – considerations with respect to the subject gateway Socioguide. IX ISKO-Spain Congress, Valencia, 11-13 March, 2009. Recuperado de dialnet.unirioja.es/descarga/articulo/2924576.pdf

Méndez Rodríguez, E. (2002). Metadatos y recuperación de la información: estándares, problemas y aplicabilidad en bibliotecas digitales. Gijón: Trea.

Méndez, E., & Greenberg, J. (2012). Datos enlazados para vocabularios abiertos y marco general de HIVE. El Profesional de la Información, 21(3), 236-244.

Meola, M. (2004). Chucking the Checklist: A Contextual Approach to Teaching Undergraduates Web-Site Evaluation. portal: Libraries & the Academy, 4(3), 331-344.

Merlo Vega, J. A. (1999). 50 aplicaciones bibliotecarias de Internet. Educación y Biblioteca, 11(106), 38-47.

Merlo Vega, J. A. (2003). La evaluación de la calidad de la información web: aportaciones teóricas y experiencias prácticas. En F. Zapico Alonso (Ed.), Recursos informativos: creación, descripción y evaluación (pp. 101-110). Mérida: Junta de Extremadura.

Merlo Vega, J. A. (2004). Servicios digitales en ámbitos bibliotecarios: tendencias y reflexiones. Boletín de la ANABAD, 54(1/2), 377-385.

Merlo Vega, J. A. (2009). Información y referencia en entornos digitales: desarrollo de servicios bibliotecarios de consulta. Murcia: Universidad de Murcia.

Merlo Vega, J. A., Gracia Armendáriz, J., Zapico Alonso, F., & Rodríguez Gairín, J. M. (1999). DARWIN: una propuesta de organización y evaluación del conocimiento accesible en línea. In M. J. López Huertas, & J. C. Fernández Molina (Eds.), La representación y la organización del conocimiento en sus distintas perspectivas: su influencia en la recuperación de la información: actas del IV Congreso ISKO-España EOCONSID'99, 22-24 de abril de 1999, Granada (pp. 87-94). Granada: Universidad de Granada.

Merwe, R., & Bekker, J. (2003). A framework and methodology for evaluating e-commerce web sites. Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications, 13(5), 330-341.

Miller, H. (1996). The multiple dimensions of information quality. Information Systems Management, 13(2), 79-82.

Miranda González, F. J. & Bañegil Palacios, T. M. (2004). Quantitative evaluation of commercial web sites: an empirical study of Spanish firms. International Journal of Information Management, 24, 313-328. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2004.04.009

Mitchell, S. (1999). Interface Design Considerations in Libraries. Science & Technology Libraries, 17(3-4), 131-181.

Mitchell, S., & Mooney, M. (1996). INFOMINE: A model Web-based academic virtual library. Information technology and libraries, 15(1), 20-25.

MLA (2013). A users’ guide to finding and evaluating health information on the web. Recuperado de http://www.mlanet.org/resources/userguide.html

Monopoli, M., & Nicholas, D. (2000). A user-centred approach to the evaluation of Subject Based Information Gateways: Case study SOSIG. Aslib Proceedings, 52(6), 218-231.

Monopoli, M., & Nicholas, D. (2001). A user evaluation of Subject Based Information Gateways: Case study ADAM. Aslib Proceedings, 53(1), 39-52.

Moore, R. (2008). Towards a theory of digital preservation. International Journal of Digital Curation, 3(1), 63-75.

Moreira, B. L., Gonçalves, M. A., Laender, A. H. F., & Fox, E. A. (2009). Automatic evaluation of digital libraries with 5SQual. Journal of Informetrics, 3(2), 102-123.

Pinto, M., & Fernández-Ramos, A. (2010). Spanish Faculty Preferences and Usage of Library Services in the Field of Science and Technology. portal: Libraries and the Academy, 10(2), 215-239.

Pinto, M., Fernández-Ramos, A., Sánchez, G., & Meneses, G. (2012). Information Competence of Doctoral Students in Information Science in Spain and Latin America: A Self-assessment. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 39(2), 144-154.

Pinto, M., Gomez-Camarero, C., & Fernandez-Ramos, A. (2012). Los recursos educativos electrónicos: perspectivas y herramientas de evaluación. Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação, 17(3), 82-99.

Pinto, M., Gómez, C., Fernández-Ramos, A., & Doucet, V. (2010). Evaluación y mejora de la calidad de los recursos educativos electrónicos en el ámbito universitario español desde un enfoque documental. Recuperado de http://www.evaluareed.edu.es/archivos/evaluareed.pdf

Pinto, M., Guerrero, D., Fernández-Ramos, A., & Doucet, A. V. (2009). Information provided by Spanish university websites on their assessment and quality processes. Scientometrics, 81(1), 265-289.

Pinto, M., & Manso, R. A. (2012a). El uso de mapas conceptuales para la evaluación de los servicios de referencia virtual de las bibliotecas universitarias: una experiencia práctica. Investigación Bibliotecológica, 26(57), 249-269.

Pinto, M., & Manso, R. A. (2012b). Virtual references services: defining the criteria and indicators to evaluate them. The Electronic Library, 30(1), 51-69.

Pinto, M., Sales, D., Doucet, A. V., Fernández-Ramos, A., & Guerrero, D. (2007). Metric analysis of the information visibility and diffusion about the European Higher Education Area on Spanish University websites. Scientometrics, 72(2), 345-370.


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
Contact us
Send email Sponsors
Sponsor: AIMS Sponsor: D&P Sponsor: UniNa CAB Get connected
Facebook Facebook Twitter Twitter Linkedin LinkedIn RSS RSS