Model for democratisation of the contents hosted in MOOCs

Atenas, Javiera Model for democratisation of the contents hosted in MOOCs. RUSC, 2014, vol. 21, n. 1. [Journal article (Unpaginated)]

[img] Text
Model for democratisation of the contents hosted in MOOCs.pdf - Published version

Download (444kB)

English abstract

Massive Online Open Courses (MOOCs) have emerged as a new educational tool in higher education, based on gratuity, massiveness and ubiquity. Essentially they suggest an evolution of the Open Learning Movement based on principles of reusing, revising, remixing and redistributing open educational resources (OER). However, in contrast with the content of OERs, content hosed in MOOCs tends to be paywalled and copyrighted, which restricts its reuse. Philosophically, the main problem with MOOCs is the inaccessibility and inadaptability of their resources, challenging democratic open access to knowledge. A number of authors and organisations consider it an ultimate necessity to open up MOOC resources. Therefore in this paper three strategies to open up MOOC contents are proposed: to deposit the materials in repositories of OER (ROER) as individual objects, to archive them in ROER in data packages as learning units or to convert them into OpenCourseWare (OCW) as self-taught courses.

Spanish abstract

Los cursos online masivos y abiertos (MOOC por Massive Online Open Courses) son la materialización de un nuevo escenario formativo en la educación superior fundamentado en la gratuidad, la masividad y la ubicuidad. En su esencia suponen una evolución del movimiento de aprendizaje abierto (Open Learning Movement), cuyos principios son la reutilización, revisión, remezcla y redistribución de los recursos educativos abiertos (REA). Pero a diferencia de estos, en los MOOC los contenidos están cerrados y protegidos bajo copyright, por lo que sus materiales no pueden ser reutilizados. Criticados desde diferentes puntos de vista, desde la perspectiva de la filosofía REA, el principal problema que presentan es que sus recursos no sean accesibles, modificables y traducibles, lo que impide la democratización y el acceso libre del conocimiento. Por ello diferentes autores e instancias consideran necesaria la apertura de los contenidos de los MOOC y en este artículo se proponen tres estrategias para abrir los contenidos: depositar los materiales en repositorios de REA, archivarlos como objetos individuales en repositorios de REA como paquetes de datos y su conversión a Open CourseWare, como cursos de autoaprendizaje.

Item type: Journal article (Unpaginated)
Keywords: MOOCs, OER, democratic knowledge
Subjects: B. Information use and sociology of information > BA. Use and impact of information.
B. Information use and sociology of information > BD. Information society.
H. Information sources, supports, channels. > HI. Electronic Media.
I. Information treatment for information services > IK. Design, development, implementation and maintenance
Depositing user: Dr Javiera Atenas
Date deposited: 25 Nov 2014 12:38
Last modified: 25 Nov 2014 12:38


Aguaded-Gómez, J. I. (2013). La revolución MOOCs, ¿una nueva educación desde el paradigma tecnológico? Comunicar, 41(21), 7-8.

Aguaded, J. I., Vázquez-Cano, E. & Sevillano-García, M. (2013). MOOCs, ¿turbocapitalismo de redes o altruismo educativo? Hacia un modelo más sostenible. SCOPEO INFORME No2. MOOC: Estado de la situación actual, posibilidades, retos y futuro.

Bates, A. W. & Sangrà, A. (2011). Managing Technology in Higher Education: Strategies for Transforming Teaching and Learning (1st ed.). Wiley.

Barnes, C. (2013). MOOCs: The Challenges for Academic Librarians. Australian Academic & Research Libraries, 44(3), 163-175.

Bell, F. (2010). Connectivism: Its place in theory-informed research and innovation in technology-enabled learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning IRROLD, 14(3), 98-118.

Butler, B., Smith, K., Crews, K. & Courtney, K. K. (2013). Copyright, Licensing, Open Access Session. In: U. of Pennsylvania (ed.), MOOCs and Libraries: Massive Opportunity or Overwhelming Challenge? Philadelphia.

Cafolla, R. (2006). Project MERLOT: Bringing Peer Review to Web-Based Educational Resources. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 14(2), 313-323.

Conole, G. (2012). Fostering social inclusion through open educational resources (OER). Distance Education, 37-41.

Cormier, D. & Siemens, G. (2010). The Open Course: Through the Open Door: Open Courses as Research, Learning, and Engagement. Educause Review.

Daniel, J. (2012). Making Sense of MOOCs: Musings in a Maze of Myth, Paradox and Possibility. Journal of Interactive Media in Education.

Downes, S. (2012). Connectivism and Connective Knowledge: Essays on meaning and learning networks. Stephen Downes Web.

Dezuanni, M. & Monroy-Hernandez, A. (2012). «Prosuming» across Cultures: Youth Creating and Discussing Digital Media across Borders. Comunicar, 19(38), 59-66.

Gea, M., Montes-Soldado, R. & Rojas, B. (2013). Cursos masivos mediante la creación de comunidades activas de aprendizaje. (Sintice).

Gourley, B. & Lane, A. (2009). Re-invigorating openness at The Open University: the role of Open Educational Resources. Open Learning, 24(1), 57-65.

Haggard, S. (2013). The Maturing of the MOOC (p. 123).

Hill, P. (2012, November/December). Online Educational Delivery Models: A Descriptive View. Educause Review, 85-97.

Hill, P. (2012). Four Barriers That MOOCs Must Overcome To Build a Sustainable Model. e-Literate, What We Are Learning About Online Learning Online.

Holton, D. (2012). What’s the «problem» with MOOCs? Ed Tech Dev: developing educational technology.

Hylén, J. (2006). Open educational resources: Opportunities and challenges. (OECD, ed.) Proceedings of Open Education. Paris: William and Flora Hewlett Foundation Page.

Inoue, Y. (2010). Cases on Online and Blended Learning Technologies in Higher Education: Concepts and Practices (1st ed., p. 348). Guam: University of Guam.

Kanwar, A, & Uvalic-Trumbic, S. (2011). A basic guide to open educational resources (OER). (N. Butcher, ed.) Unesco (p. 133). Vancouver: Commonwealth of Learning & UNESCO.

Kim, J. (2012). Playing the Role of MOOC Skeptic: 7 Concerns. Inside Higher Ed.

Mcgreal, R., Kinuthia, W. & Marshall, S. (2013). Open Educational Resources : Innovation , Research and Practice. (Rory McGreal, Ed.) (1st ed., p. 268). Athabasca: Commonwealth of Learning and Athabasca University - UNESCO.

Kop, R. (2011). The challenges to connectivist learning on open online networks: Learning experiences during a massive open online course. The International Review Of Research In Open And Distance Learning, 12(3), 19-38.

Laurillard, D. (2007). Pedagogical forms for mobile learning: Framing research questions. En: N. Pachler (ed.), Mobile learning: Towards a research agenda (pp. 153-175). Londres: WLE Centre for Excellence, Institute of Education.

Liyanagunawardena, T., Adams, A. A. & Williams, S. A. (2013). MOOCs: A systematic study of the published literature 2008-2012. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 14(3), 202-227.

Marshall, S. J. (2013). Evaluating the Strategic and Leadership Challenges of MOOCs. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 9(2).

McAndrew, P., Farrow, R. & Law, P. (2012). Learning the Lessons of Openness. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 1-13.

McAuley, A., Stewart, B., Siemens, G. & Cormier, D. (2010). The MOOC model for digital practice.

Milligan, C., Littlejohn, A. & Margaryan, A. (2013). Patterns of engagement in connectivist MOOCs. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 9(2), 149-159.

Ravenscroft, A. (2011). Dialogue and connectivism: A new approach to understanding and promoting dialogue-rich networked learning. The International Review Of Research In Open And Distance Learning, 12(3), 139-160.

Rodriguez, O. (2012). MOOCs and the AI-Stanford like Courses: Two Successful and Distinct Course Formats for Massive Open Online Courses. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning – EURODL.

Sangrà, A. & Wheeler, S. (2013). New Informal Ways of Learning: Or Are We Formalising the Informal? RUSC. Revista de Universidad y Sociedad del Conocimiento, 10(1).

Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 1(2).

Siemens, G. (2013). Massive Open Online Courses: Innovation in Education? (McGreal, R., Kinuthia, W. & Marshall, S., eds.) En: Open Educational Resources: Innovation, Research and Practice. (RoryMcGreal, Ed.) (1st ed., p. 268). Athabasca: UNESCO.

Traxler, J. (2009). The evolution of mobile learning. En: R. Guy (ed.), The evolution of mobile teaching and learning (pp. 1-14). Santa Rosa, CA: Informing Science Press.

UNESCO. (2012, junio). 2012 Paris OER Declaration. World OER Congress, París.

Vázquez-Cano, E. (2013). El videoartículo: nuevo formato de divulgación en revistas científicas y su integración en MOOCs. Comunicar, 1-9.

Waard, I. de, Abajian, S., Gallagher, M., Hogue, R., Keskin, N., Koutropoulos, A. & Rodriguez, O. (2011). Using mLearning and MOOCs to understand chaos, emergence, and complexity in education. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning IRROLD, 12(7), 94-115.

Weller, M. (2007). Virtual Learning Environments: Using, Choosing and Developing your VLE. Oxford: Routledge.

Wiley, D. (2007). On the Sustainability of Open Educational ResourceInitiatives in Higher Education. Artículo encargado por el Centre for Educational Research and Innovation (CERI) de la OECD. OECD’s Centre for Educational Research and Innovation (CERI) (p. 21). OECD Publishing.

Zapata-Ros, M. (2013). MOOCs, una visión crítica y una alternativa complementaria: La individualización del aprendizaje y de la ayuda pedagógica.


Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item