Within- and between-department variability in individual productivity. The case of Economics

Perianes-Rodríguez, Antonio and Ruiz-Castillo, Javier Within- and between-department variability in individual productivity. The case of Economics., 2014 . In STI 2014 : Science and Technology Indicators Conference, Leiden (the Netherlands), 3 - 5 September 2014. [Conference paper]

[img] Text
Perianes_STI_2014_.pdf - Published version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.
Download (1MB)

English abstract

There are two types of research units whose performance is usually investigated in one or several scientific fields: individuals (or publications), or larger units such as universities or entire countries. In contrast, the information about the university departments (or research institutes) is not easy to come by. This is important because, in the social sciences, university departments are the governance units where the demand for and the supply of researchers determine an equilibrium allocation of scholars to institutions. This paper uses a unique dataset consisting of all individuals working in 2007 in the top 81 Economics departments in the world according to the Econphd university ranking.

Item type: Conference paper
Keywords: Citation, Economics
Subjects: B. Information use and sociology of information > BA. Use and impact of information.
B. Information use and sociology of information > BB. Bibliometric methods
Depositing user: Antonio Perianes-Rodríguez
Date deposited: 25 Nov 2014 13:30
Last modified: 25 Nov 2014 13:30
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/24180

References

Albarrán, P., J. Crespo, I. Ortuño, and J. Ruiz-Castillo (2011), “The Skewness of Science In 219 Sub-fields and A Number of Aggregates”, Scientometrics, 88: 385-397.

Albarrán, P., Carrasco, R., and Ruiz-Castillo, J. (2014), “The Elite in Economics”, mimeo, Universidad Carlos III.

Crespo, J. A., Li, Yunrong, and Ruiz-Castillo, J. (2013a), “The Measurement of the Effect On Citation Inequality of Differences In Citation Practices Across Scientific Fields”, PLoS ONE 8(3): e58727.

Crespo, J. A., Herranz, N., Li, Yunrong, and Ruiz-Castillo, J. (2013b). The Effect on Citation Inequality of Differences in Citation Practices at the Web of Science Subject category Level, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 65: 1244-1256

Diamond, A.M. (1984), “An Economic Model of the Life-Cycle Research Productivity of Scientists”, Scientometrics, 6: 189-196.

Econphd.net rankings (2004), http://econphd.econwiki.com/rank/rallec.htm.

Li, Y., Castellano, C., Radicchi, F., and Ruiz-Castillo, J. (2013), “Quantitative Evaluation of Alternative Field Normalization Procedures”. Journal of Informetrics, 7: 746– 755.

Lotka, A. (1926), “The Frequency Distribution of Scientific productivity”, Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, 16: 317-323.

Perianes-Rodriguez, A. & Ruiz-Castillo, J. (2014), “Within and across department variability in individual productivity. The case of Economics”, Working Paper 14-04, Departamento de Economía, Universidad Carlos III (http://hdl.handle.net/10016/18470).

Ruiz-Castillo, J., and Costas, R. (2014), “The Skewness of Scientific productivity”, Working Paper 14-02, Departamento de Economía, Universidad Carlos III (http://hdl.handle.net/10016/18286).

Seglen, P. (1992), “The Skewness of Science”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 43: 628-638.

Seglen, P. (1997), “Why the Impact Factor of Journals Should Not Be Used for Evaluating Research”, British Medical Journal, 314: 498-502.

Van Raan, A.F.J. (2005), “Fatal Attraction: Ranking of Universities by Bibliometric Methods”, Scientometrics, 62: 133-143.

Waltman, L., & Van Eck, N.J. (2013), “A systematic empirical comparison of different approaches for normalizing citation impact indicators”, Journal of Informetrics, 7: 833–849.


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
Contact us
Send email Sponsors
Sponsor: AIMS Sponsor: D&P Sponsor: UniNa CAB Get connected
Facebook Facebook Twitter Twitter Linkedin LinkedIn RSS RSS