Defining Feminism in a Digital Age

Hileman, Rachel, M. Defining Feminism in a Digital Age., 2014 [Preprint]

[thumbnail of Hileman.FinalPaper.pdf] Text
Hileman.FinalPaper.pdf
Download (265kB)

English abstract

In this paper, I embark on a journey exploring the relationship between Feminism, Technology, and the redefining of Feminism as both an abstract concept and as creative real-world action. With the rising of the current wave of feminists (also known as 3rd-wave feminists) coinciding with the beginning and rise of technology such as the Internet (cyberspace) and computers, Feminism has expanded its reach to more people in different areas. This adds more voices needing to be heard, which allows for a broader and deeper understanding of equity, equal rights, and struggles the “ordinary” woman goes through. I propose to look at the literature on the rise of this 3rd-wave of Feminism and how it coincides with the rise of technology, in order to tease out a current dynamic definition of Feminism. I will also briefly look at other sub-sects of the Feminist movement that also seem to rise and coalesce around the rise of technology showing that Feminism is not a monolithic entity. By adding these voices to the definition of Feminism, we increase the issues that women are most concerned about, especially with regards to equality of both race and gender. Finally, I argue that this latest version of Feminism is buoyed by the popularity of technology, divided at times by the privilege of those who have access to the technology and information, and that through technology women are able to subvert the normative social gender roles.

Item type: Preprint
Keywords: Feminism, LIS, library science, information science, redefinition, feminists, cyberfeminists
Subjects: A. Theoretical and general aspects of libraries and information.
A. Theoretical and general aspects of libraries and information. > AA. Library and information science as a field.
A. Theoretical and general aspects of libraries and information. > AB. Information theory and library theory.
A. Theoretical and general aspects of libraries and information. > AC. Relationship of LIS with other fields .
B. Information use and sociology of information > BC. Information in society.
B. Information use and sociology of information > BE. Information economics.
B. Information use and sociology of information > BG. Information dissemination and diffusion.
C. Users, literacy and reading. > CC. User categories: children, young people, social groups.
Depositing user: Ms. Rachel Hileman
Date deposited: 13 Mar 2015 17:45
Last modified: 13 Mar 2015 17:45
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/24685

References

Bush, C.G. (1983). Women and the assessment of technology: To think, to be; to unthink, to free. In Rothschild, J. (Ed.), Machina ex dea: Feminist perspectives on technology (pp. 151-170). Elmsford, NY: Pergamon Press.

Collins, P.H. (Winter/Spring, 1996). What’s in a name? Womanism, black feminism, and beyond. The Black Scholar, 26(1), 9-17. Retrieved from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/41068619

Cross, K.A. (Fall/Winter 2012). The new laboratory of dreams: role-playing games as resistance. Women’s Studies Quarterly, 40(3/4), 70-88. Retrieved from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/23333474

Daniels, J. (Spring/Summer, 2009). Rethinking cyberfeminism(s): Race, gender, and embodiment. Women’s Studies Quarterly, 37(1/2), 101-124. Retrieved from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/27655141

Davis, J. (2008). Fractured cybertales: Navigating the feminine. Leonardo, 41(1), 26-34. Retrieved from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20206513

Dworkin, A. (1974). Woman hating. New York: E.P. Dutton.

Everett, A. (Autumn, 2004). On cyberfeminism and cyberwomanism: High-tech mediations of feminism’s discontents. Signs, 30(1), 1278-1286. doi: 10.1086/422235

Ginzberg, L.D. (2009). Elizabeth Cady Stanton: An American life. New York: Hill and Wang.

Gorenstein, S. (2010). What we now know about feminist technologies. In Layne, L.L, Vostral, S.L., and Boyer, K. (Eds.), Feminist technology (pp. 203-214). Illinois: University of Illinois Press.

Hosek, J.R. (2008). Access to digitized knowledge: Education, consolidation, maintenance. Women in German Yearbook, 24, 142-164. Retrieved from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20688297

Imbornoni, A.M. (2007). Women’s rights movement in the U.S.: Timeline of key events in the American women’s rights movement 1980-present. In InfoPlease.com Database. Retrieved from: http://www.infoplease.com/spot/womenstimeline3.html

Johnson, D.G. (2010). Sorting out the question of feminist technology. In Layne, L.L., Vostral, S.L., and Boyer, K. (Eds.), Feminist technology (pp. 36-54). Illinois: University of Illinois Press.

Keller, E.F. (1983). Women, science, and popular mythology. In Rothschild, J. (Ed.), Machina ex dea: Feminist perspectives on technology (pp. 130-146). Elmsford, NY: Pergamon Press.

Nakamura, L. (2002). Cybertypes: Race, ethnicity, and identity on the internet. New York: Routledge.

Queen, M. (May 2008). Transnational feminist rhetorics in a digital world. College English, 70(5), 471-489. Retrieved from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25472284

Taylor, U.Y. (Summer, 1998). Making waves: The theory and practice of black feminism. The Black Scholar, 28(2), 18-28. Retrieved from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/41069774


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
Contact us
Send email Sponsors
Sponsor: AIMS Sponsor: D&P Sponsor: UniNa CAB Get connected
Facebook Facebook Twitter Twitter Linkedin LinkedIn RSS RSS