Online Citation and Reference Management Tools

Das, Anup-Kumar . Online Citation and Reference Management Tools., 2015 In: Open Access for Researchers, Module 4: Research Evaluation Metrics. UNESCO, Paris, pp. 92-120. [Book chapter]

[img] Text
R4.4Online Citation and Reference Management Tools.pdf
Download (3MB)

English abstract

This Unit is on online citation and reference management tools. The tools discussed are Mendeley, CiteULike, Zotero, Google Scholar Library, and EndNote Basic. The features of all the management tools have been discussed with figures, tables, and text boxes. This Unit discusses in details aspects of different Online Citation and Reference Management Tools. Published in the Open Access for Researchers > Module 4: Research Evaluation Metrics > Unit 4: Online Citation and Reference Management Tools.

Item type: Book chapter
Keywords: online citation manager, reference management tools, Mendeley, CiteULike, Zotero, Google Scholar Library, EndNote Basic
Subjects: B. Information use and sociology of information
B. Information use and sociology of information > BB. Bibliometric methods
I. Information treatment for information services
I. Information treatment for information services > IJ. Reference work.
Depositing user: Dr Anup Kumar Das
Date deposited: 20 Mar 2015 17:58
Last modified: 20 Mar 2015 17:58
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/24818

References

Adie, E., & Roe, W. (2013). Altmetric: Enriching Scholarly Content with Article-Level Discussion and Metrics. Learned Publishing, 26(1), 11-17.

Bailón-Moreno, R., Jurado-Alameda, E., Ruiz-Baños, R., & Courtial, J. P. (2005). Bibliometric laws: Empirical flaws of fit. Scientometrics, 63(2), 209-229.

Bogers, T., & Van den Bosch, A. (2008). Recommending Scientific Articles Using Citeulike. In Proceedings of the 2008 ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (pp. 287-290).

Campanario, J.M. (2003). Citation Analysis. In: International Encyclopaedia of Information and Library Science, 2nd edition. London: Routledge.

Colledge, Lisa et. al. (2010). SJR and SNIP: two new journal metrics in Elsevier’s Scopus. Serials, 23(3), 215-221.

Das, A.K., Arora, P. & Bhattacharya, S (2012). Webliography of STI Indicator Databases and Related Publications. Journal of Scientometric Research, 1(1), 86-93.

Das, A.K. & Chakraborty, S. (2014). Collaboration in International and Comparative Librarianship. Hershey, PA: IGI Global. doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-4365-9.

Das, A.K. (2008). Open Access to Knowledge and Information: Scholarly Literature and Digital Library Initiatives – the South Asian Scenario. New Delhi: UNESCO. ISBN: 9788189218218.

Das, A.K., & Mishra, S (2014). Genesis of Altmetrics or Article-level Metrics for Measuring Efficacy of Scholarly Communications: Current Perspectives. Journal of Scientometric Research, 3(2): 82-92.

DORA (2012). The San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA). USA: American Society for Cell Biology (ASCB).

Drott, M. C. (1981). Bradford's Law: Theory, Empiricism and the Gaps Between. Library Trends, 30(1), 41-52.

Egghe, L. (2006). Theory and practise of the g-index. Scientometrics, 69(1), 131-152.

Garfield, Eugene (1994). Expected Citation Rates, Half-Life, and Impact Ratios: Comparing Apples to Apples in Evaluation Research. Current Contents.

Garfield, Eugene (1994). The Concept of Citation Indexing: A Unique and Innovative Tool for Navigating the Research Literature. Current Contents.

Garfield, Eugene (2010). The Evolution of the Science Citation Index. International Microbiology, 10(1): 65-69. doi:10.2436/20.1501.01.10.

Gilmour, Ron & Cobus-Kuo, Laura (2011). Reference Management Software: a Comparative Analysis of Four Products. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship.

Giri, R.S. & Das, A.K. (2011). Indian Citation Index: A New Web Platform for Measuring Performance of Indian Research Periodicals. Library Hi Tech News, 28(3), 33-35.

Harzing, Anne-Wil (2010). The Publish or Perish Book: Your Guide to Effective and Responsible Citation Analysis. Melbourne, Australia: Tarma Software Research.

Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(46), 16569.

Katz, J. Sylvan (1999). Bibliometric Indicators and the Social Sciences. UK: ESRC/ SPRU, University of Sussex.

Li, X., Thelwall, M., & Giustini, D. (2012). Validating Online Reference Managers for Scholarly Impact Measurement. Scientometrics, 91(2), 461-471.

LSE Public Policy Group (2011). Maximizing the Impacts of Your Research: A Handbook for Social Scientists. London: London School of Economics.

Moed, Henk F. (2005). Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

Pendlebury, David A. (2008). Using Bibliometrics in Evaluating Research.

Piwowar, Heather (2013). Altmetrics: Value all research products. Nature, 493(7431), 159-159.

Piwowar, Heather (2013). Introduction to altmetrics: What, why and where? Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 39(4), 8-9.

Poiter, W. G. (1981). Lotka’s law revisited. Library Trends, 30(1), 21-39.

Priem, J., Piwowar, H. A., & Hemminger, B. M. (2012). Altmetrics in the wild: Using social media to explore scholarly impact. arXiv preprint, arXiv:1203.4745.

Priem, J., Taraborelli, D., Groth, P., & Neylon, C. (2010). Altmetrics: A Manifesto.

Prytherch, R.J. (2005). Harrod’s Librarians’ Glossary and Reference Book. 10th ed. Hampshire, England: Ashgate Publishing.

Reitz, Joan M. (2013). Online Dictionary for Library and Information Science.

Smith, L.C. (1981). Citation Analysis. Library Trends, 30(1), 83-106.

Tananbaum, Greg (2013). Article Level Metrics: A SPARC Primer.

Testa, James (2011). The Globalization of Web of ScienceSM: 2005-2010.

Thelwall, Mike (2013). Webometrics and Social Web Research Methods. UK: University of Wolverhampton.

Thomson Reuters (2013). Glossary of Thomson Scientific Terminology.

Wouters, P., & Costas, R. (2012). Users, Narcissism and Control: Tracking the Impact of Scholarly Publications in the 21st Century. Utrecht, Netherlands: SURF Foundation.

Wyllys, R.E. (1981). Empirical and Theoretical Bases of Zipf’s Law. Library Trends, 30(1), 53-64.


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
Contact us
Send email Sponsors
Sponsor: AIMS Sponsor: D&P Sponsor: UniNa CAB Get connected
Facebook Facebook Twitter Twitter Linkedin LinkedIn RSS RSS