Evaluation and comparison of features of OPACs in university libraries of Chandigarh and Punjab (India)

Kumar, Shiv and Bansal, Jivesh Evaluation and comparison of features of OPACs in university libraries of Chandigarh and Punjab (India). IASLIC Bulletin, 2012, vol. 57, n. 3, 157-169.. [Journal article (Paginated)]

[img] Text
Evaluation and Comparison of OPAC.pdf
Download (271kB)
[img] Text (ImageMagick conversion from text to application/pdf)
Evaluation and Comparison of OPAC.pdf
Download (1MB)

English abstract

The paper evaluates and compares the features and functionalities of OPACs in university libraries of Chandigarh and Punjab, to identify whether these OPACs are offering searching capabilities and facilities in accordance with present days, rapid paced, digital age and IT-based society. The findings reveal that although all these OPACs under study provide basic search options and facilities, but an evaluation of the checklist features indicates shortcomings that continue to persist among them. System designers have as yet not exploited the latest technology inputs for better utilization of OPACs. Therefore, libraries have to rethink the application of advanced web technologies to make the OPACs efficiently functional, usable and attractive for users of the fast changing technology era to access information on OPAC in a modern technological environment.

Item type: Journal article (Paginated)
Keywords: OPAC, Web-OPAC, Characteristics of OPAC, Comparison of OPACs, Historical development of OPAC
Subjects: L. Information technology and library technology
L. Information technology and library technology > LQ. Library automation systems.
L. Information technology and library technology > LR. OPAC systems.
L. Information technology and library technology > LS. Search engines.
Depositing user: shiv sk kumar
Date deposited: 05 Apr 2015 15:59
Last modified: 05 Apr 2015 15:59
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/24880

References

References

1. Ansari M A and Amita, Awareness and use of OPACs in five Delhi libraries, The Electronic Library, 26 (1) (2008) 111-129.

2. Mercun T and Zumer M, Library catalogue - the ultimate reference tool? In Education and training in digital libraries and Reference in digital environments: LIDA 2008 - Libraries in the digital age (2008a) 79-85.

3. Mercun T and Zumer M, New generation of catalogues for the new generation of users: A comparison of six library catalogues, Program: electronic library and information systems, 42(3) (2008b) 243-261.

4. Mi J and Weng C, Revitalizing the library OPAC: Interface, searching and display challenges, Information technology and Libraries, 27 (1) (2008) 5-22.

5. Kumar, S (2011), Effect of web searching on the OPAC: A comparison of selected university libraries, Library Hi Tech News, 28 (6) (2011)14-21.

6. Tennant R, Digital libraries: Lipstick on a pig, Library Journal, 130 (7) (2005) 34.

7. Borgman C L, Why are online catalogue still hard to use?, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 47 (7) (1996) 493-503.

8. Cherry J M, Yuan W, and Clinton M, Evaluating the effectiveness of a concept-based computer tutorial for OPAC users, College & Research Libraries, 55(4) (1994), 355-364.

9. Babu B R and O’Brien A, Web OPAC interfaces: An overview, The Electronic Library, 18 (5) (2000) 316-328.

10. Ibrahim A E, Displays of Arabic script on web-based OPACs in GCC Institutions, The Electronic Library, 23 (4) (2005) 419-432.

11. Mahmood K, Library Web OPACs in Pakistan: An overview, Program: electronic library and information systems, 42 (2) (2008) 137-149.

12. Sauperl A and Saye J D, Have we made any progress? Catalogues of the future revisited, Journal of Documentation, 65 (3) (2009) 500-514.

13. Luong T D and Liew, C L, The evaluation of New Zealand academic library OPACs: A checklist approach, The Electronic Library, 27 (23) (2009) 376-393.

14. Babu R R and Tamizhchelvan M, An investigation into the features of OPACs in Tamil Nadu (India), Library Review, 52 (6) (2003) 257-267.

15. Kapoor K and Goyal O P, Web-based OPACs in Indian academic libraries: a functional comparison, Program: electronic library and information systems, 41 (3) (2007) 291-309.

16. Madhusudhan M and Aggarwal S, Web-based online public access catalogues of IIT libraries in India: an evaluative study, Program: electronic library and information systems, 45 (4) (2011) 415-418.

17. Babu and O’Brien, Op. Cit.

18. Babu and Tamizhchelvan , Op. Cit.

19. Kapoor and Goyal, Op. Cit.

20. Mahmood, Op. Cit.

21. Luong and Liew, Op. Cit.

22. Madhusudan and Aggarwal, Op. Cit.

23. Kumar, S and Vohra R, Online Public Access Catalogue Usage at Panjab University Library, Chandigarh, DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, 31 (4) (2011) 302-310.


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
Contact us
Send email Sponsors
Sponsor: AIMS Sponsor: D&P Sponsor: UniNa CAB Get connected
Facebook Facebook Twitter Twitter Linkedin LinkedIn RSS RSS