Rights and Licenses

Das, Anup-Kumar . Rights and Licenses., 2015 In: Introduction to Open Access [Open Access for Library Schools, 1]. UNESCO, Paris, ISBN 9789231000744, pp. 31-42. [Book chapter]

[thumbnail of LS1.3 Rights and Licenses.pdf] Text
LS1.3 Rights and Licenses.pdf - Published version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike.
Download (404kB)

English abstract

In the beginning of this millennium, three open access declarations namely Berlin, Budapest and Bethesda (BBB), have transformed the whole scholarly communications environment. The electronic journals had already arrived by then. But scholars still used to browse through print version of journals as a matter of habit. Electronic journals brought out the concept of open access journals, where people will get free access to published journal contents. However, copyright regime existing that time did not have adequate provisions to deal with open access to scholarly communications. Then the Creative Commons (CC) licenses got introduced in 2001 by a non-profit organization with the same name, that facilitate making open access knowledge resources globally accessible without the hassles of copyright restrictions. Open content licenses help researchers to make public funded research findings communicated through open access channels. There are two prominent open access channels available to researcher communities, namely Gold Open Access and Green Open Access. Gold open access channel usually caters to open access journals and open access contents in hybrid electronic journals. Green open access channel caters to institutional and disciplinary knowledge repositories. Scholarly authors are also made aware of author rights and some rights they can retain while signing a copyright transfer agreement or a license to publish agreement. In this Unit, various author rights, licenses and rights assessment tools are discussed in details to help the librarians in strengthening their efforts in enhancing researchers' level of awareness.

Item type: Book chapter
Keywords: Gold open access, Green open access, Creative Commons, Copyleft, Science Commons, Publishing Fee
Subjects: E. Publishing and legal issues. > EB. Printing, electronic publishing, broadcasting.
E. Publishing and legal issues. > ED. Intellectual property: author's rights, ownership, copyright, copyleft, open access.
H. Information sources, supports, channels. > HN. e-journals.
H. Information sources, supports, channels. > HP. e-resources.
H. Information sources, supports, channels. > HS. Repositories.
Depositing user: Dr Anup Kumar Das
Date deposited: 10 Apr 2015 15:38
Last modified: 10 Apr 2015 15:38
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/24904

References

Bailón-Moreno, R., Jurado-Alameda, E., Ruiz-Baños, R., & Courtial, J. P. (2005). Bibliometric laws: Empirical flaws of fit. Scientometrics, 63(2), 209-229.

Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities (2003). Retrieved from http://openaccess.mpg.de/286432/Berlin-Declaration

Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing (2003). Retrieved from http://legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/bethesda.htm

Budapest Open Access Initiative (2002). Retrieved from http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read

Correia, A.M.R. and Teixeira, J.C. (2005). Reforming scholarly publishing and knowledge communication: From the advent of the scholarly journal to the challenges of open access. Information Services & Use, 29(4), 349-364.

Das, A.K., Arora, P. & Bhattacharya, S (2012). Webliography of STI Indicator Databases and Related Publications. Journal of Scientometric Research, 1(1), 86-93.

Das, A.K. & Chakraborty, S. (2014). Collaboration in International and Comparative Librarianship. Hershey, PA: IGI Global. doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-4365-9.

Das, A.K. (2008). Open Access to Knowledge and Information: Scholarly Literature and Digital Library Initiatives – the South Asian Scenario. New Delhi: UNESCO. ISBN: 9788189218218.

Das, A.K. (2011). Emergence of Open Educational Resources (OER) in India and its Impact on Lifelong Learning. Library Hi Tech News, 28(5), 10-15.

Das, A.K., & Mishra, S (2014). Genesis of Altmetrics or Article-level Metrics for Measuring Efficacy of Scholarly Communications: Current Perspectives. Journal of Scientometric Research, 3(2): 82-92.

DORA (2012). The San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA). USA: American Society for Cell Biology (ASCB).

Drott, M. C. (1981). Bradford's Law: Theory, Empiricism and the Gaps Between. Library Trends, 30(1), 41-52.

Garfield, Eugene (1994). Expected Citation Rates, Half-Life, and Impact Ratios: Comparing Apples to Apples in Evaluation Research. Current Contents.

Garfield, Eugene (1994). The Concept of Citation Indexing: A Unique and Innovative Tool for Navigating the Research Literature. Current Contents.

Garfield, Eugene (2010). The Evolution of the Science Citation Index. International Microbiology, 10(1): 65-69. doi:10.2436/20.1501.01.10.

Giri, R.S. & Das, A.K. (2011). Indian Citation Index: A New Web Platform for Measuring Performance of Indian Research Periodicals. Library Hi Tech News, 28(3), 33-35.

Gu, Feng & Widén-Wulff, Gunilla (2011). Scholarly communication and possible changes in the context of social media: A Finnish case study. The Electronic Library, 29(6), 762-776.

Hahn, K. L. (2008). Research library publishing services: New options for university publishing. Washington, D.C.: Association of Research Libraries

Houghton, J.W., Rasmussen, B., Sheehan, P.J., Oppenheim, C., Morris, A., Creaser, C., Greenwood, H., Summers, M. and Gourlay, A. (2009). Economic Implications of Alternative Scholarly Publishing Models: Exploring the Costs and Benefits, Report to The Joint Information Systems Committee (JISC) by Victoria University & Loughborough University.

Hubbard, Bill (2008). Green, Blue, Yellow, White & Gold: A Brief Guide to the Open Access Rainbow.

I2S2 Partners (2011). Idealised Scientific Research Activity Lifecycle Model.

Iribarren-Maestro, I.; Lascurain-Sánchez, M.L. & Sanz-Casado, E. (2009). The Use of Bibliometric Techniques in Evaluating Social Sciences and Humanities. In: Celebrating Scholarly Communication Studies: A Festschrift for Olle Persson at his 60th Birthday.

Joseph, Heather (2013). The Open Access Movement Grows Up: Taking Stock of a Revolution. PLoS Biololgy, 11(10): e1001686. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001686

Katz, J. Sylvan (1999). Bibliometric Indicators and the Social Sciences. UK: ESRC/ SPRU, University of Sussex.

LSE Public Policy Group (2011). Maximizing the Impacts of Your Research: A Handbook for Social Scientists. London: London School of Economics.

Lyon, Liz (2012). The Informatics Transform: Re-engineering Libraries for the Data Decade.

Malenfant, Kara (2012). Integrating Scholarly Communication into Your Library.

McIntyre, G., Chan, J. and Gross, J. (2013). Library as Scholarly Publishing Partner: Keys to Success. Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication 2(1):eP1091.

Moed, Henk F. (2005). Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.

Mullins, J. L., [et al] (2012). Library Publishing Services: Strategies for Success: Final Research Report. Washington, DC: SPARC.

Neylon, C.; Willmers, M. & King, T. (2014). Impact beyond Citation: An Introduction to Altmetrics.

Park, E.G. & Oh, S. (2012). Examining Attributes of Open Standard File Formats for Long-term Preservation and Open Access. Information Technology and Libraries, 31(4).

Pendlebury, David A. (2008). Using Bibliometrics in Evaluating Research.

Poiter, W. G. (1981). Lotka’s Law Revisited. Library Trends, 30(1), 21-39.

Smith, K.L. & Hansen, D.R. (2008). Copyright and Authors' Rights: A Briefing Paper.

Smith, L.C. (1981). Citation Analysis. Library Trends, 30(1), 83-106.

SPARC (2006). Addendum to Publication Agreement.

SPARC (2006). Author Rights: Using the SPARC Author Addendum to Secure Your Rights as the Author of a Journal Article.

SPARC, PLOS & OASPA (2014). HowOpenIsIt? Open Access Spectrum.

Starr, Joan (2012). What is the research life cycle?

Suber, Peter (2009). Timeline of the Open Access Movement.

Suber, Peter (2012). Open Access. Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA: MIT Press.

Swan, Alma (2012). Policy Guidelines for the Development and Promotion of Open Access. Paris: UNESCO.

Tananbaum, Greg (2013). Article Level Metrics: A SPARC Primer.

Thelwall, Mike (2013). Webometrics and Social Web Research Methods. UK: University of Wolverhampton.

University of Minnesota Libraries (2010). Approaches to Open Access.

Van den Eynden, V., Corti, L., Woollard, M. & Bishop, L. (2009). Managing and Sharing Data: A Best Practice Guide for Researchers.

Weimer, Katherine H. and Andrew, Paige G. (2013) How We Participate in the Scholarly Communication Life Cycle. Journal of Map and Geography Libraries, 9:217–219.

Wellcome Trust, U.K. (2012). Open Access: CC-BY licence required for all articles which incur an open access publication fee – FAQ.

WIPO (2008). WIPO Intellectual Property Handbook: Policy, Law and Use. Geneva: World Intellectual Property Organization.

Withey, lynne [et al] (2011). Sustaining Scholarly Publishing: New Business Models for University Presses a report of the AAUP task force on economic models for scholarly publishing. Journal of Scholarly Publishing.

Wouters, P., & Costas, R. (2012). Users, Narcissism and Control: Tracking the Impact of Scholarly Publications in the 21st Century. Utrecht, the Netherlands: SURF Foundation.

Wyllys, R.E. (1981). Empirical and Theoretical Bases of Zipf’s Law. Library Trends, 30(1), 53-64.


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
Contact us
Send email Sponsors
Sponsor: AIMS Sponsor: D&P Sponsor: UniNa CAB Get connected
Facebook Facebook Twitter Twitter Linkedin LinkedIn RSS RSS