Open Access Research Impacts

Das, Anup-Kumar . Open Access Research Impacts., 2015 In: Introduction to Open Access [Open Access for Library Schools, 1]. UNESCO, Paris, ISBN 9789231000744, pp. 55-81. [Book chapter]

[img] Text
LS1.5 Open Access Research Impacts.pdf
Download (2MB)

English abstract

In an open access (OA) world, much importance has been given to using open source tools, open access resources and open solutions to engage authors and researchers in collaborative research, peer-to-peer sharing of scholarly information and collaborative evaluation of scholars’ works. On the other hand, exponential growth of scientific literature also has led to rapid disappearance of nascent literature before it actually gets noticed by the scientific communities. No single database can capture this over-growing scientific literature. Several data mining tools are probably required to keep abreast with quantum of emerging literature. In this Unit, various tools and techniques have been discussed in details to help the library and information professionals in strengthening their efforts in enhancing scientific productivity, visibility, reputation, and impact of research works of their affiliated scientific researchers. This Unit briefly discusses various conventional citation-based indicators available for assessing scientific productivity of authors, journals and institutions. This Unit also identifies emerging indicators such as h-index, i10-index, Eigenfactor score, article influence score and source normalized impact per paper. The social webs, available to the researchers’ communities in addition to any other groups of citizens, help the researchers in disseminating their produced or contributed knowledge to global communities. Much you are active in social media, more you have chances to get noticed by fellow researchers and possible research collaborators. Many personalized web-based services are now increasingly made available targeting global researchers' communities, helping them to enhance their social media presence and visibility. These factors influence the development of new metrics called article level metrics or altmetrics. Finally, this Unit also briefly discusses the emergence of the open citation databases for text mining and data mining of open access literature.

Item type: Book chapter
Keywords: h-index, i10-index, Eigenfactor score, article influence score, Altmetrics, Webometrics, Article Level Metrics, Author Level Metrics, Citation Metrics
Subjects: B. Information use and sociology of information > BB. Bibliometric methods
B. Information use and sociology of information > BG. Information dissemination and diffusion.
E. Publishing and legal issues. > EB. Printing, electronic publishing, broadcasting.
H. Information sources, supports, channels. > HN. e-journals.
H. Information sources, supports, channels. > HS. Repositories.
Depositing user: Dr Anup Kumar Das
Date deposited: 10 Apr 2015 15:40
Last modified: 10 Apr 2015 15:40
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/24906

References

Bailón-Moreno, R., Jurado-Alameda, E., Ruiz-Baños, R., & Courtial, J. P. (2005). Bibliometric laws: Empirical flaws of fit. Scientometrics, 63(2), 209-229.

Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities (2003). Retrieved from http://openaccess.mpg.de/286432/Berlin-Declaration

Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing (2003). Retrieved from http://legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/bethesda.htm

Budapest Open Access Initiative (2002). Retrieved from http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read

Correia, A.M.R. and Teixeira, J.C. (2005). Reforming scholarly publishing and knowledge communication: From the advent of the scholarly journal to the challenges of open access. Information Services & Use, 29(4), 349-364.

Das, A.K., Arora, P. & Bhattacharya, S (2012). Webliography of STI Indicator Databases and Related Publications. Journal of Scientometric Research, 1(1), 86-93.

Das, A.K. & Chakraborty, S. (2014). Collaboration in International and Comparative Librarianship. Hershey, PA: IGI Global. doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-4365-9.

Das, A.K. (2008). Open Access to Knowledge and Information: Scholarly Literature and Digital Library Initiatives – the South Asian Scenario. New Delhi: UNESCO. ISBN: 9788189218218.

Das, A.K. (2011). Emergence of Open Educational Resources (OER) in India and its Impact on Lifelong Learning. Library Hi Tech News, 28(5), 10-15.

Das, A.K., & Mishra, S (2014). Genesis of Altmetrics or Article-level Metrics for Measuring Efficacy of Scholarly Communications: Current Perspectives. Journal of Scientometric Research, 3(2): 82-92.

DORA (2012). The San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA). USA: American Society for Cell Biology (ASCB).

Drott, M. C. (1981). Bradford's Law: Theory, Empiricism and the Gaps Between. Library Trends, 30(1), 41-52.

Garfield, Eugene (1994). Expected Citation Rates, Half-Life, and Impact Ratios: Comparing Apples to Apples in Evaluation Research. Current Contents.

Garfield, Eugene (1994). The Concept of Citation Indexing: A Unique and Innovative Tool for Navigating the Research Literature. Current Contents.

Garfield, Eugene (2010). The Evolution of the Science Citation Index. International Microbiology, 10(1): 65-69. doi:10.2436/20.1501.01.10.

Giri, R.S. & Das, A.K. (2011). Indian Citation Index: A New Web Platform for Measuring Performance of Indian Research Periodicals. Library Hi Tech News, 28(3), 33-35.

Gu, Feng & Widén-Wulff, Gunilla (2011). Scholarly communication and possible changes in the context of social media: A Finnish case study. The Electronic Library, 29(6), 762-776.

Hahn, K. L. (2008). Research library publishing services: New options for university publishing. Washington, D.C.: Association of Research Libraries

Houghton, J.W., Rasmussen, B., Sheehan, P.J., Oppenheim, C., Morris, A., Creaser, C., Greenwood, H., Summers, M. and Gourlay, A. (2009). Economic Implications of Alternative Scholarly Publishing Models: Exploring the Costs and Benefits, Report to The Joint Information Systems Committee (JISC) by Victoria University & Loughborough University.

Hubbard, Bill (2008). Green, Blue, Yellow, White & Gold: A Brief Guide to the Open Access Rainbow.

I2S2 Partners (2011). Idealised Scientific Research Activity Lifecycle Model.

Iribarren-Maestro, I.; Lascurain-Sánchez, M.L. & Sanz-Casado, E. (2009). The Use of Bibliometric Techniques in Evaluating Social Sciences and Humanities. In: Celebrating Scholarly Communication Studies: A Festschrift for Olle Persson at his 60th Birthday.

Joseph, Heather (2013). The Open Access Movement Grows Up: Taking Stock of a Revolution. PLoS Biololgy, 11(10): e1001686. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001686

Katz, J. Sylvan (1999). Bibliometric Indicators and the Social Sciences. UK: ESRC/ SPRU, University of Sussex.

LSE Public Policy Group (2011). Maximizing the Impacts of Your Research: A Handbook for Social Scientists. London: London School of Economics.

Lyon, Liz (2012). The Informatics Transform: Re-engineering Libraries for the Data Decade.

Malenfant, Kara (2012). Integrating Scholarly Communication into Your Library.

McIntyre, G., Chan, J. and Gross, J. (2013). Library as Scholarly Publishing Partner: Keys to Success. Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication 2(1):eP1091.

Moed, Henk F. (2005). Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.

Mullins, J. L., [et al] (2012). Library Publishing Services: Strategies for Success: Final Research Report. Washington, DC: SPARC.

Neylon, C.; Willmers, M. & King, T. (2014). Impact beyond Citation: An Introduction to Altmetrics.

Park, E.G. & Oh, S. (2012). Examining Attributes of Open Standard File Formats for Long-term Preservation and Open Access. Information Technology and Libraries, 31(4).

Pendlebury, David A. (2008). Using Bibliometrics in Evaluating Research.

Poiter, W. G. (1981). Lotka’s Law Revisited. Library Trends, 30(1), 21-39.

Smith, K.L. & Hansen, D.R. (2008). Copyright and Authors' Rights: A Briefing Paper.

Smith, L.C. (1981). Citation Analysis. Library Trends, 30(1), 83-106.

SPARC (2006). Addendum to Publication Agreement.

SPARC (2006). Author Rights: Using the SPARC Author Addendum to Secure Your Rights as the Author of a Journal Article.

SPARC, PLOS & OASPA (2014). HowOpenIsIt? Open Access Spectrum.

Starr, Joan (2012). What is the research life cycle?

Suber, Peter (2009). Timeline of the Open Access Movement.

Suber, Peter (2012). Open Access. Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA: MIT Press.

Swan, Alma (2012). Policy Guidelines for the Development and Promotion of Open Access. Paris: UNESCO.

Tananbaum, Greg (2013). Article Level Metrics: A SPARC Primer.

Thelwall, Mike (2013). Webometrics and Social Web Research Methods. UK: University of Wolverhampton.

University of Minnesota Libraries (2010). Approaches to Open Access.

Van den Eynden, V., Corti, L., Woollard, M. & Bishop, L. (2009). Managing and Sharing Data: A Best Practice Guide for Researchers.

Weimer, Katherine H. and Andrew, Paige G. (2013) How We Participate in the Scholarly Communication Life Cycle. Journal of Map and Geography Libraries, 9:217–219.

Wellcome Trust, U.K. (2012). Open Access: CC-BY licence required for all articles which incur an open access publication fee – FAQ.

WIPO (2008). WIPO Intellectual Property Handbook: Policy, Law and Use. Geneva: World Intellectual Property Organization.

Withey, lynne [et al] (2011). Sustaining Scholarly Publishing: New Business Models for University Presses a report of the AAUP task force on economic models for scholarly publishing. Journal of Scholarly Publishing.

Wouters, P., & Costas, R. (2012). Users, Narcissism and Control: Tracking the Impact of Scholarly Publications in the 21st Century. Utrecht, the Netherlands: SURF Foundation.

Wyllys, R.E. (1981). Empirical and Theoretical Bases of Zipf’s Law. Library Trends, 30(1), 53-64.


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
Contact us
Send email Sponsors
Sponsor: AIMS Sponsor: D&P Sponsor: UniNa CAB Get connected
Facebook Facebook Twitter Twitter Linkedin LinkedIn RSS RSS