Much Obliged: Analyzing the Importance and Impact of Acknowledgements in Scholarly Communication

Finnell, Joshua Much Obliged: Analyzing the Importance and Impact of Acknowledgements in Scholarly Communication. Library Philosophy and Practice, 2014. [Journal article (Unpaginated)]

[img] Text
Finnell_Much Obliged.pdf

Download (167kB)

English abstract

Author rights, peer review, open access, and the role of institutional repositories have all come under scrutiny by scholars, librarians, and legal experts in the last decade. Much of the conversation is centered on liberating information from the confinements of legal, financial, and hierarchical restraints. The relevancy of traditional citation analysis too, understood within the framework of an h-Index and Eigen factor, is under scrutiny with the rise of altmetrics. Collectively, these issues form the core of the scholarly communication process, from creation to dissemination to impact. However, an overlooked facet of the scholarly communication process is the acknowledgement. As an expression of scholarly debt, the acknowledgment is an important facet of intellectual networks. Not only does the acknowledgement demonstrate the intellectual contributions of colleagues, advisors, funding agencies, and mentors but also the significance of librarians in the scholarly communication process.

Item type: Journal article (Unpaginated)
Keywords: acknowledgements, scholarly communication, citation analysis, open access
Subjects: B. Information use and sociology of information > BA. Use and impact of information.
B. Information use and sociology of information > BB. Bibliometric methods
B. Information use and sociology of information > BG. Information dissemination and diffusion.
Depositing user: Mr. Joshua Finnell
Date deposited: 02 Jul 2015 22:29
Last modified: 09 Jul 2015 02:11


ACRL. (2010). A Guideline for the Appointment, Promotion and Tenure of Academic

Librarians. Retrieved May 7, 2014, from

Allen, L., Scott, J., Brand, A., Hlava, M., & Altman, M. (2014). Publishing: Credit

Where Credit is Due. Nature, 508(7496), 312–313. doi:10.1038/508312a

Andrés, A. (2009). Measuring Academic Research: How to Undertake a Bibliometric

Study. Oxford: Chandos Publishing.

Bailin, A., & Grafstein, A. (2009). The Critical Assessment of Research: Traditional and

New Methods of Evaluation. Neal Schuman Pub.

Coker, C., Van Duinkerken, W., & Bales, S. (2010). Seeking Full Citizenship: A Defense

of Tenure Faculty Status for Librarians. College & Research Libraries, 71(5),


Collins, R. (1998). The Sociology of Philosophies: A Global Theory of Intellectual

Change. Cambridge, Mass: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

Councill, I. G., Giles, C. L., Han, H., & Manavoglu, E. (2005). Automatic

Acknowledgement Indexing: Expanding the Semantics of Contribution in the

CiteSeer Digital Library. International Conference on Knowledge Capture, 19–


Cronin, B. (1991). Let the Credits Roll: A Preliminary Examination of the Role Played

by Mentors and Trusted Assessors in Disciplinary Formation. Journal of

Documentation, 47(3), 227–239. doi:10.1108/eb026878

Cronin, B. (1995). The Scholar’s Courtesy : The Role of Acknowledgement in the

Primary Communication Process. London: Taylor Graham.

Cronin, B., & Shaw, D. (2007). Peers and Spheres of Influence: Situating Rob Kling.

Information Society, 23(4), 221–233.

De Bellis, N. (2009). Bibliometrics and Citation Analysis: From the Science Citation

Index to Cybermetrics. Lanham, Md: Scarecrow Press.

Descartes, R. (2003). Discourse on Method and Meditations. Mineola, N.Y: Dover


Garfield, E. (1979). Citation Indexing - Its Theory and Application in

Science,technology, and Humanities. New York: Wiley.

Garner, J., Davidson, K., & Schwartzkopf, B. (2009). Images of Academic Librarians:

How Tenure-Track Librarians Portray Themselves in the Promotion and

Tenure Process. Serials Librarian, 56(1-4), 203–208.

Giles, C. L., Councill, I. G., & Gray, J. N. (2004). Who Gets Acknowledged: Measuring

Scientific Contributions through Automatic Acknowledgment Indexing.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of

America, 101(51), 17599–17604.

Grafton, A. (1997). The Footnote: A Curious History (Rev. ed.). Cambridge, Mass:

Harvard University Press.

Hauptman, R. (2008). Documentation: A History and Critique of Attribution,

Commentary, Glosses, Marginalia, Notes, Bibliographies, Works-Cited Lists, and

Citation Indexing and Analysis. Jefferson, N.C: McFarland.

Jackson, H. J. (2001). Marginalia Readers Writing in Books. New Haven: Yale

University Press.

Johnson, S. (2010). Where Good Ideas Come from: The Natural History of Innovation.

New York: Riverhead Books.

Massman, V. F. (1972). Faculty status for librarians,. Metuchen, N.J.: Scarecrow Press.

Peek, R. & Newby, G. (1996). Scholarly Publishing: The Electronic Frontier.

Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.

Potter, W. G. (1988). “Of making many books there is no end”: Bibliometrics and

Libraries. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 14(4), 1.

The Pennsylvania State University, T. C. of I. S. and T. (2004). CiteSeerX. CiteSeer.

Retrieved August 30, 2011, from

Walters, W. H., & Linvill, A. (2010). Characteristics of Open Access Journals in Six

Subject Areas. College & Research Libraries. Retrieved from

Ebest, S.B, Fox, T., & Bleich, D. (1994). Writing with: New Directions in Collaborative

Teaching, Learning, and Research. Albany, N.Y: State University of New York


Zerby, C. (2002). The Devil’s Details: A History of Footnotes (1st ed.). Montpelier, Vt:

Invisible Cities Press.


Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item