FRBR and Tillett’s Taxonomy of Bibliographic Relationships

Noruzi, Alireza FRBR and Tillett’s Taxonomy of Bibliographic Relationships. Knowledge Organization, 2012, vol. 39, n. 6, pp. 409-416. [Journal article (Paginated)]

[img] Text
FRBR and Tillett's Taxonomy of Bibliographic Relationships.pdf
Download (260kB)
Alternative locations: http://www.ergon-verlag.de/isko_ko/

English abstract

Bibliographic relationships are one of the most active research areas in knowledge organization, especially in cataloguing. This study attempts to examine and map the FRBR (Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records) bibliographic relationships with Tillett’s taxonomy of bibliographic relationships, and to assess the congruence between them. The FRBR conceptual model provides a taxonomy of bibliographic relationships in chapter 5, illustrating them in 11 tables. This study shows that there is considerable congruence between these two taxonomies.

Item type: Journal article (Paginated)
Keywords: Bibliographic relationships, Bibliographic records, Bibliographic families, Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR), RDA, Barbara B. Tillett, Taxonomy
Subjects: I. Information treatment for information services > IA. Cataloging, bibliographic control.
Depositing user: Dr. Alireza Noruzi
Date deposited: 16 Aug 2015 00:22
Last modified: 16 Aug 2015 00:22
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/25682

References

Andersen, Jack. 2002. Materiality of works: The bibliographic record as text. Cataloging and Classification Quarterly 33: 39-65.

Arsenault, Clement and Noruzi, Alireza. 2012. Analysis of work-to-work bibliographic relationships through FRBR: A Canadian perspective. Cataloging and Classification Quarterly 50.

Chen, Ya-ning and Chen, Shu-jiun. 2004. A metadata practice of the IFLA FRBR model: A case study for the National Palace Museum in Taipei. Journal of Documentation, 60: 128-143.

Cutter, Charles Ammi. 1876. Rules for a printed dictionary catalogue. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.

Green, Rebecca. 2008. Relationships in knowledge organization. Knowledge Organization, 35: 150-159.

Hadro, Josh. 2008. Library of Congress, National Agricultural Library, and National Library of Medicine issue joint statement. Library Journal, 06/01/2008. Available http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6561378.html

IFLA Study Group on the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records. 2007. Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records, Final Report. International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions UBCIM Publications. Munchen: K.G. Saur. Available http://archive.ifla.org/VII/s13/frbr/frbr_current5.htm

Jepsen, Erik Thorlund. 2005. Structuring the catalogue according to FRBR user task: Utilizing bibliographic relationships through collocation and linking. In: Bibliotheca Universalis: How to organize chaos? 11-12 August 2005. Finnish Library Association, 2005.

Panizzi, Antonio. 1841. Panizzi's 91 Rules for Standardizing the Cataloguing of Books. Catalogue of Printed Books in the British Museum, Volume 1, pp. v-ix.

Riva, Pat. 2004. Mapping MARC 21 linking entry fields to FRBR and Tillett's taxonomy of bibliographic relationships. Library Resources & Technical Services, 48: 130-143.

Smiraglia, Richard P. 1992. Authority control and the extent of derivative bibliographic relationships. Ph.D. dissertation, Graduate Library School, University of Chicago.

Smiraglia, R.P. 1994. Derivative bibliographic relationships: Linkages in the bibliographic universe. In Andersen, D.L., Galvin, T.J., and Giguere, M.D. (Eds.), Navigating the Networks: Proceedings of the ASIS Mid-Year Meeting, Portland, Oregon, May 21-25, 1994. (Medford, NJ: ASIS, 1994), pp. 115-135.

Smiraglia, Richard P. 2002. Musical works as information retrieval entities: Epistemological perspectives. Notes (Quarterly Journal of the Music Library Association), 58: 747-764.

Svenonius, Elaine. 2001. The intellectual foundation of information organization. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.

Tillett, Barbara B. 1987. Bibliographic relationships: toward a conceptual structure of bibliographic information used in cataloging. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.

Tillett, Barbara B. 1991. A taxonomy of bibliographic relationships. Library Resources & Technical Services, 35: 150-58.

Tillett, Barbara B. 2001. Bibliographic relationships. In: Bean, Carol A. and Green, Rebecca (Eds.), Relationships in the Organization of Knowledge. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2001, pp. 19-35.

Tillett, Barbara B. 2005. FRBR and cataloging for the future. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 39: 197-205.

Tillett, Barbara B. 2011. Re: Question "is alternate relationship (simultaneously released edition) in FRBR a derivative or an equivalence"? FRBR 5.3.4 Manifestation-to-Manifestation Relationships. (personal communication, November 10, 2011).

UNIMARC Format. 1980. 2nd ed. London: IFLA International Office for UBC, 1980, p.58-59.

Vellucci, Sherry Lynn. 1995. Bibliographic relationships among musical bibliographic entities: A conceptual analysis of music represented in a library catalog with a taxonomy of the relationships discovered. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Columbia University, New York.

Zagorskaya, Elena I. 2000. Bibliographic relationships in the catalogue, rules and formats. International Cataloguing and Bibliographic Control, 29: 15-18.

Zhang, Ying. 2003. Bibliographic relationships among Chinese publications: a bibliographic study of the Chinese collections of the East Asia Resources at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. A paper submitted to the University of North Carolina for the Master of Library Science degree. Available http://ils.unc.edu/MSpapers/2866.pdf


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
Contact us
Send email Sponsors
Sponsor: AIMS Sponsor: D&P Sponsor: UniNa CAB Get connected
Facebook Facebook Twitter Twitter Linkedin LinkedIn RSS RSS