Cómo comunicar y diseminar información científica en Internet para obtener mayor visibilidad e impacto

Robinson-García, Nicolás, Delgado-López-Cózar, Emilio and Torres-Salinas, Daniel Cómo comunicar y diseminar información científica en Internet para obtener mayor visibilidad e impacto. Aula Abierta, 2011, vol. 39, n. 3, pp. 41-50. [Journal article (Paginated)]

[thumbnail of Dialnet-ComoComunicarYDiseminarInformacionCientificaEnInte-3691479.pdf] Text
Dialnet-ComoComunicarYDiseminarInformacionCientificaEnInte-3691479.pdf - Published version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.
Download (1MB)

English abstract

Scientific communication has experienced great changes, over the last decades. The final establishment of the Open Access initiative and the emergence of tools from the Web 2.0 are just some examples of such changes. Although, there is still great ignorance among the researchers of its existence and necessity, and of the benefits they can bring to the scientific community. On this paper, a general vision of the Open Access initiative and of Science 2.0 is presented, along with some considerations on how to make the most of these new tools in order to obtain more visibility and impact of scientific publications.

Spanish abstract

La comunicación científica está experimentando en las últimas décadas grandes cambios. La consolidación del movimiento de Acceso Abierto y la aparición de herramientas derivadas de la Web 2.0 son buena muestra de ello. A pesar de su irrupción en el mundo científico, existe un desconocimiento generalizado del uso de estas herramientas, las causas que explican su aparición y necesidad, y los beneficios que se derivan de ellos. En este trabajo se da una visión general del movimiento del Acceso Abierto, la Ciencia 2.0 y se sugieren posibles formas de utilizarse para obtener una mayor visibilidad e impacto de las publicaciones científicas.

Item type: Journal article (Paginated)
Keywords: Acceso abierto; impacto científico; comunicación de la ciencia; ciencia 2.0; publicación científica; Open access; research impact; scientific communication; science 2.0; research paper
Subjects: B. Information use and sociology of information > BA. Use and impact of information.
B. Information use and sociology of information > BG. Information dissemination and diffusion.
H. Information sources, supports, channels. > HQ. Web pages.
H. Information sources, supports, channels. > HS. Repositories.
Depositing user: María J. Manzano-Mulet
Date deposited: 30 Sep 2015 07:57
Last modified: 03 Oct 2015 18:07
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/28043

References

Anglada, L. y Abadal, E. (2010).Open Access in Southern European Countries. Madrid: FECYT.

Antelman, K. (2004). Do open-access articles have a greater research impact? College & Research Libraries, 65, 372-382.

Björk, B., Welling, P., Laakso, M., Majlender, P., Hedlund, T., y Guðnason, G. (2010). Open Access to the Scientific Journal Literature: Situation 2009. PLoS One, 5, e11273.

Butler, D. (2006). Open-access journal hits rocky times. Nature, 441, 914.

Cabezas-Clavijo, A., Torres-Salinas, D., y Delgado-López-Cózar, E. (2009). Ciencia 2.0: catálogo de herramientas e implicaciones para la actividad investigadora. El profesional de la información, 18, 72-79.

Crawford, B. (2003). Open-access publishing: where is the value? Lancet, 362, 1578-1580.

Davis, P. M. (2011). Open access, readership, citations: a randomized controlled trial of scientific journal publishing. The FASEB Journal, 25, 1-6.

Eysenbach, G. (2006). Citation advantage of open access articles. PLoS Biology, 4, e157.

Fink, J.L. y Bourne, P.E. (2007). Reinventing Scholarly Communication for the Electronic Age. CTWatchQuaterly, 3, 1-4. Recuperado el 3 de febrero de 2011.

http://www. ctwatch.org/quarterly/articles/2007/08/reinve nting-scholarly-communication-for-the-electronic-age/

Gargouri, Y., Hajjem, C., Larivière, V., Gingras, Y., Carr, L., Brody, T., y Harnad, S. (2010). Self-selected or mandated, open access increases citation impact for higher quality research. PLoS One, 5, e13636.

Matzat, U. (2004). Academic communication and Internet Discussion Groups: transfer of information or creation of contacts? Social Networks, 26, 221-255.

Nicholas, D., Huntington, P., y Rowlands, I. (2005). Open access journals publishing: the views of some of the world’s senior authors. Journal of Documentation, 61, 497-519.

Nicholas, D., Williams, P., y Rowlands, I. (2010). Researchers’ e-journal use and information seeking behaviour. Journal of Information Science, 36, 494-516.

Oppenheim, C. (2008). Electronic scholarly publishing and open access. Journal of Information Science, 34, 577-590.

Procter, R., Williams, R., Stewart, J., Poschen, M., Snee, H., Voss, A., y Asgari-Targhi, M. (2010). Philosophical Transactions. Series A, Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 368, 4039-4056.

Research Information Network (2009a). Communicating Knowledge: How and why researchers publish and disseminate their findings. Recuperado el 18 de enero de 2011.

http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/publ ications/communicatingknowledgereport.pdf

Research Information Network (2009b). E-journals: their use and impact. Recuperado el 18 de enero de 2011.

http://www.rin. ac.uk/our-work/communicating-and-disseminating-research/e-journals-their-use-valueand-impact

Rodríguez-Armentia, N. y Amat, C. (2010). Is it worth establishing institutional repositories? The strategies for open access to Spanish peer-reviewed articles. Learned Publishing, 23, 193-203.

Swan, A. y Brown, S. (2004). Authors and open access publishing. Learned Publishing, 17, 219-224.

Torres-Salinas, D. y Delgado-López-Cózar, E. (2009). Estrategias para mejorar la difusión de los resultados de investigación con la Web 2.0. El profesional de la información, 18, 534-539.


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
Contact us
Send email Sponsors
Sponsor: AIMS Sponsor: D&P Sponsor: UniNa CAB Get connected
Facebook Facebook Twitter Twitter Linkedin LinkedIn RSS RSS