Active audiencies and journalism: Involved citizens or motivated consumers?

Masip, Pere and Guallar, Javier and Peralta, Miquel and Ruiz, Carles and Suau, Jaume Active audiencies and journalism: Involved citizens or motivated consumers? Brazilian Journalism Research, 2015, vol. 11, n. 1, pp. 234-255. [Journal article (Paginated)]

[img] Text
BJR2015_masip-guallar-peralta-ruiz-suau_active audiences and journalism.pdf - Published version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (583kB)

English abstract

Audience participation, in any of its forms and names (public journalism, citizen journalism, participatory journalism, UGC), appears to revitalise democracy, thanks to the opportunities for public debate opened up by information and communications technology. On the other hand, however, there are many authors who question whether interactive technologies really encourage democracy or the market, empower the citizen or strengthen the consumer. In this context, we still have little information on the motivations that drive citizens to actively participate through the mechanisms that the media make available to them on their own websites or through social networks. There is a similar lack of information on the role that users attribute to their involvement in the functioning of the media and whether it contributes to improving their democratic function. This article aims to shed some light on this subject.

Portuguese abstract

A participação da audiência, em qualquer de suas formas e nomes (jornalismo público, jornalismo cidadão, jornalismo participativo, UGC), parece revitalizar a democracia, graças às oportunidades de debate público abertas pela tecnologia de informação e comunicações. Por outro lado, no entanto, há muitos autores que questionam se as tecnologias interativas realmente incentivam a democracia ou o mercado, empoderam o cidadão ou fortalecem o consumidor. Neste contexto, ainda temos pouca informação sobre as motivações que impulsionam os cidadãos a participarem ativamente por meio dos mecanismos que os meios de comunicação tornam disponíveis para eles em seus próprios sites ou redes sociais. Há uma falta semelhante de informações sobre o papel que os usuários atribuem ao seu envolvimento no funcionamento dos meios de comunicação e se contribui para melhorar a sua função democrática. Este artigo pretende lançar alguma luz sobre este assunto.

Spanish abstract

La participación de la audiencia, en cualquiera de sus formas y denominaciones (public journalism, periodismo ciudadano, periodismo participativo, UGC), revitaliza, aparentemente, la democracia, gracias a las posibilidades que las tecnologías de la información y la comunicación ofrecen para el debate público. Frente a estas posiciones, sin embargo, no faltan las voces que se cuestionan si las tecnologías interactivas realmente fomentan la democracia o el mercado, potencian al ciudadano o fortalecen al consumidor. En este contexto, disponemos todavía de poca información sobre las motivaciones que impulsan a los ciudadanos a participar activamente a través de los mecanismos de participación que los medios de comunicación ponen a su disposición en sus propias webs o a través de las redes sociales. Así como del rol que los usuarios atribuyen a su implicación en el funcionamiento de los medios y si contribuye a mejorar la función democrática de los medios de comunicación. Este artículo pretende aportar algo de luz en este aspecto.

Item type: Journal article (Paginated)
Keywords: Participation, Journalists, Active audiences, Participatory journalism, Democracy, Participação, Jornalista, Públicos ativos, Jornalismo participativo, Democracia. Participación, Periodismo, Audiencias activas, Periodismo participativo, Democracia.
Subjects: C. Users, literacy and reading. > CB. User studies.
H. Information sources, supports, channels. > HA. Periodicals, Newspapers.
H. Information sources, supports, channels. > HI. Electronic Media.
Depositing user: Javier Guallar
Date deposited: 13 Jan 2016 20:41
Last modified: 13 Jan 2016 22:40
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/28779

References

ALLAN, S. Witnessing in crisis: Photo-reportage of terror attacks in Boston and London. Media, War & Conflict, v. 7, n.2, 2014.

BAKKER, P.; PANTTI, M. Beyond news: User-generated content on Dutch media websites. In: Proceedings of the Future of Journalism Congress. Cardiff, 2009.

BARBER, Benjamin R. How Democratic are the New Telecommunication Technologies. IDP. Revista de Internet, Derecho y Política, v. 3, 2006.

http://www.uoc.edu/idp/3/dt/eng/barber.pdf

BLACK J. (ed.). Mixed news: the public/civic/communitarian journlism debate. Hillsdade: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1997

BOCZKOWSKI, P. J.; MITCHELSTEIN, E. The News gap: when the information preferences of the media and the public diverge. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2013.

BOWMAN, S.; WILLIS, C. We media: how audiences are shaping the future of news and information. The media center at the American Press Institute, 2013.

http://www.hypergene.net/wemedia/download/we_media.pdf

BRUNS, Axel. Gatewatching: Collaborative Online News Production. New York: Peter Lang, 2005

CIS Barómetro de marzo, 2013.

http://www.cis.es/cis/export/sites/default/-Archivos/Marginales/2980_2999/2981/Es2981.pdf

CHUNG, D. S. Profits and Perils: Online News Producers’ Perceptions of Interactivity and Uses of Interactive Features. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, v. 13, n. 1, 43-61, 2007.

DEUZE, M. Understanding the impact of the internet on new media professionalism mindsets and buzzwords. Ejournalist. v. 1, n. 1, 2001.

http://www.ejournalism.au.com/djournalist/deuze.pdf

DIAKOPOULOS, N.; NAAMAN, M. Towards Quality Discourse in Online News Comments. In: Proceedings of the ACM 2011 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, p.133–142. CSCW ‘11. New York: ACM, 2011.

DOMINGO, D. 2008. Interactivity in the daily routines of online newsrooms: Dealing with an uncomfortable myth. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, v. 13, n. 3, pp. 680-704, 2008.

_______________; HEINONEN, A. Weblogs and journalism: a typology to explore the blurring boundaries. Nordicom Review, v. 29, n. 1, 2008.

_______________: QUANDT, T.; HEINONEN, A.; PAULUSSEN, S.: SINGER, J.; VUJNOVIC, M. Participatory Journalism practices in the media and beyond. An international comparative study of initiatives in online newspapers. Journalism Practice, v. 2, n. 3, 326-342, 2008.

GILLMOR, Dan. We the Media. Grassroots Journalism by the People, for the People. Sebastopol, USA: O’Reilly, 2004.

http://www.authorama.com/we-the-media-1.html

GUALLAR, J. Prensa digital en 2007. Anuario ThinkEPI, v. 2, pp. 102-108, 2008.

http://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/ThinkEPI/article/view/32051

HANITZSCH, T. Populist Disseminators, Detached Watchdogs, Critical Change Agents and Opportunist Facilitators: Professional Milieus, the Journalistic Field and Autonomy in 18 Countries. International Communication Gazette, v. 73, n. 6, p.477-494, 2011.

HERMIDA, A.; THURMAN, N. A Clash of Cultures: The Integration of User-Generated Content within Professional Journalistic Frameworks at British Newspaper Websites. Journalism Practice, v. 2, n. 3, pp. 343–356, 2008.

JENSEN, J. F. “Interactivity”. Tracking a New Concept in Media and Communication Studies. Nordicom Review, v. 1, 1998.

http://www.nordicom.gu.se/en/tidskrifter/nordicom-review-11998/interactivity-tracking-new-concept-media-and-communicationstudies

KOVACH, B.; ROSENTIEL, T. The Elements of journalism: what newspeople should know and the public should expect. New York, N.Y.: Three Rivers Press, cop. 2007.

LEE, A. M. ; CHYI, H. I. When Newsworthy is Not Noteworthy. Examining the value of news from the audience’s perspective. Journalism Studies, v. 15, n. 6, pp. 807–820, 2013.

LIU, S.B. et al. In Search of the Bigger Picture: The Emergent Role of On-Line Photo Sharing in Times of Disaster. In: FRIEDRICH, F. (ed.); FRIEDRICH, B. V. de W. (ed.). Proceedings ot the 5th International 252 ISCRAm Conference. Washington: ISCRAm, 2008.

LOWREY, W. Mapping the Journalism–blogging Relationship. Journalism, v. 7, n. 4, pp. 477-500, 2006.

LOWREY, W.; LATTA, J. The Routines of Blogging. In: PATERSON, C. (ed.); DOMINGO, D. (ed.). Making Online News: the Ethnography of New Media Production. New York: Peter Lang, 2008.

MANOSEVITCH, E; WALKER, D. Reader Comments to Online Opinion Journalism: A Space of Public Deliberation. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Online Journalism. Austin (Texas), 2009.

MASSEY, B. L.; LEVY, M. R. `Interactive’ Online Journalism at EnglishLanguage Web Newspapers in Asia: A Dependency Theory Analysis. International Communication Gazette, v. 61, n. 6, pp. 523–538, 1999.

MASIP, P.; MICÓ, J. Ll. La Convergència comunicativa a la premsa local i comarcal: noves perspectives per a la informació. Barcelona: Generalitat de Catalunya, 2010.

___________; _______________. Ciberperiodismo en Cataluña: estado actual y tendencias. IV Encontro de la SBPJOR, São Bernardo do Campo, Universidade Metodista de São Paulo, 2008.

MASIP, P.; JAUME, S. Active audiences and participation models in Spanish media. Hipertext.net, n. 12, 2014.

http://raco.cat/index.php/Hipertext/article/view/274308/364480

MATHESON, D. Negotiating Claims to Journalism: Webloggers’ Orientation to News Genres. Convergence, v. 10, n. 4, pp. 33-54, 2004.

NEUBERGER, C.; NUERNBERGK, C. Competition, complementarity or integration? The relationship between professional and participatory media. Journalism Practice, v. 4, n. 3, pp. 319-332, 2010.

NIP, J. Exploring the second phase of public journalism. Journalism Studies, v. 7, n. 2, pp. 212-236, 2006.

PAULUSSEN, S.; HEINONEN, A.; DOMINGO, D.; QUANDT, T. Doing it together: Citizen Participation in the professional news making process. Observatorio (OBS) Journal, v. 1, n. 3, pp. 131-154, 2007.

http://obs.obercom.pt/index.php/obs/article/viewArticle/148

PURCELL, K; RAINIE, L.; MITCHELL, A.; ROSENTIEL, T.; OLMSTEAD, K. Understanding the Participatory News Consumer. Washington: Pew Research Center, 2010.

REICH, Z. User comments and the transformation of participatory space. In: SINGER, J.B., et al. Participatory Journalism: Guarding Open Gates in Online Newspapers. New York: Wiley-Blackwell, 2011.

RICHARDSON, J. E.; STANYER, J. Reader opinion in the digital age: Tabloid and broadsheet newspaper websites and the exercise of political voice. Journalism, v. 12, n. 8, pp. 983-1003, 2011.

______________________.; FRANKLIN, B. Letters of Intent: Election Campaigning and Orchestrated Public Debate in Local Newspapers’ Letters to the Editor. Political Communication, v. 21, n. 4, pp. 459–478, 2004.

ROBINSON, S. The mission of the j-blog: Recapturing journalistic authority online. Journalism, v. 7, n. 1, p.65-83, 2006.

ROSEN, J. What are journalists for? New Haven: Yale University Press, 1999.

ROSENZWEIG, R. Can History Be Open Source? Wikipedia and the Future of the Past. The Journal of American History, v. 93, n. 1, pp. 117-146, 2006.

ROST, A. La interactividad en el periódico digital. Tesis doctoral dirigida por el doctor Miquel Rodrigo Alsina. Facultad de Ciencias de la Comunicación. Bellaterra: Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 2006.

RUIZ, C.; DOMINGO, D.; MICÓ, J. L.; DÍAZ-NOCI, J.; MASIP, P.; MESO, K. Public Sphere 2.0? The Democratic Qualities of Citizen Debates in Online Newspapers. The International Journal of Press/Politics, v. 16, n. 4, 2011.

_________; MASIP, P.; MICÓ, J.L.; DÍAZ-NOCI, J.; DOMINGO, D. Conversación 2.0. y democracia. Análisis de los comentarios de los lectores en la prensa digital catalana. Comunicación y Sociedad, v. 23, n. 2, pp. 7-39, 2010.

SHACHAF, P.; HARA, N. Beyond vandalism: Wikipedia trolls. Journal of Information Science, v. 36, n. 3, pp. 357-370, 2010.

SCHULTZ, T. Interactive Options in Online Journalism: A Content Analysis of 100 U.S. Newspapers. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, v. 5, n. 1., 1999.

SILVA, M. T. da. Newsroom Practices and Letters-to-the editor. Journalism Practice, v. 6, n. 2, pp. 250–263, 2012.

SINGER, J. B. User-generated visibility: Secondary gatekeeping in a shared media space. New Media & Society, v. 16, n. 1, pp. 55-73, 2013.

______________. Quality control. Journalism Practice, v. 4, n. 2, p.127-142, 2010.

______________. The Political j-blogger. ‘Normalizing’ a New Media Form to Fit Old Norms and Practices’. Journalism, v. 6, n. 2, pp. 173-198, 2005.

SUAU, J.; MASIP, P., Exploring Participatory Journalism in Mediterranean Countries. Journalism Practice, v. 8, n. 6, pp. 670–687, 2014a.

___________; _____________. Models of online media participation and active audiences – a comparison of what the media are offering and what citizens are looking for. In: MESO, K. Active Audiences and Online Journalism. Bilbao: Universidad del País Vasco, 2014b.

TAMAIUOLO, N. U-Content. Searcher, v. 17, n. 9, pp. 12-54, 2009.

THOMPSON, J.B., 1988. Los Media y la modernidad: una teoría de los medios de comunicación. Barcelona: Paidos.

VUJNOVIC, M.; SINGER, J.; HERMIDA, A.; DOMINGO, D.; REICH, Z.; QUANDT, T.; HEINONEN, A., PAULUSSEN, S. Exploring the politicaleconomic factors of participatory journalism. Journalism Practice, v. 4, n. 3, pp. 285-296, 2010.

WAHL-Jorgensen, K. The construction of the public in letters to the editor: Deliberative democracy and the idiom of insanity. Journalism, v. 3, n. 2, pp. 183–204, 2002a.

________________________. Understanding the Conditions for Public Discourse: four rules for selecting letters to the editor. Journalism Studies, v. 3, n. 1, pp. 69–81, 2002b.

WARDLE, C.; WILLIAMS, A. Beyond user-generated content: a production study examining the ways in which UGC is used at the BBC. Media, Culture & Society, v. 32, pp. 781-799, 2010.

WILLIAMS, A.; WARDLE, C.; WAHL-JORGENSENS, K. (Have They Got News for Us? Audience Revolution or Business as Usual at the BBC?. Journalism Practice, v.5, n. 1, pp. 85-99, 2011.

WUNSH-VINCENT, S; VICKERY, G. (2007). Participative Web: UserCreated Content. Paris: OECD, 2007.

http://www.oecd.org/sti/38393115.pdf


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item