Opening the Black Box of Scholarly Communication Funding: A Public Data Infrastructure for Financial Flows in Academic Publishing

Lawson, Stuart and Gray, Jonathan and Mauri, Michele Opening the Black Box of Scholarly Communication Funding: A Public Data Infrastructure for Financial Flows in Academic Publishing. Open Library of Humanities, 2016, vol. 2, n. 1. [Journal article (Unpaginated)]

[img] Text
Lawson-2016-OLH.pdf - Published version
Available under License Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication.
Download (9MB)
Alternative locations: http://doi.org/10.16995/olh.72

English abstract

‘Public access to publicly funded research’ has been one of the rallying calls of the global open access movement. Governments and public institutions around the world have mandated that publications supported by public funding sources should be publicly accessible. Publishers are experimenting with new models to widen access. Yet financial flows underpinning scholarly publishing remain complex and opaque. In this article we present work to trace and reassemble a picture of financial flows around the publication of journals in the UK in the midst of a national shift towards open access. We contend that the current lack of financial transparency around scholarly communication is an obstacle to evidence-based policy-making – leaving researchers, decision-makers and institutions in the dark about the ­systemic implications of new financial models. We conclude that ­obtaining a more joined up picture of financial flows is vital as a means for researchers, ­institutions and others to understand and shape changes to the ­sociotechnical systems that underpin scholarly communication.

Item type: Journal article (Unpaginated)
Keywords: Scholarly Communication; Academic Publishing Finance; Open Access; Article Processing Charges; Higher Education Finance; Financial Transparency
Subjects: E. Publishing and legal issues. > EB. Printing, electronic publishing, broadcasting.
E. Publishing and legal issues. > ED. Intellectual property: author's rights, ownership, copyright, copyleft, open access.
H. Information sources, supports, channels. > HN. e-journals.
Depositing user: Stuart Lawson
Date deposited: 25 May 2016 12:19
Last modified: 25 May 2016 12:19
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/29213

References

Apel, J, Becker, H-G, Bertelmann, R, Beucke, D, Blume, P, Blumtritt, U, Busjahn, D, Deinzer, G, Dorner, A, Engelhardt, C, Hell, D, Herb, U, Feldsien-Sudhaus, I, Franke, F, Frick, C, Geißelmann, A, Geschuhn, K K, Kuehle, G, Jaeger, D, Kroiss, S, Lucht-Roussel, K, Lützenkirchen, F, Oberländer, A, Peil, V, Pieper, D, Pohlmann, T, Schlachter, M, Ruckelshausen, F, Schlegel, B, Sikora, A, Tullney, M, Vieler, A, Witt, S and Jahn, N (2015). Datasets on Fee-based Open Access Publishing Across German Institutions. Bielefeld University, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4119/UNIBI/UB.2014.18

Archambault, E, Amyot, D, Deschamps, P, Nicol, A, Rebout, L and Roberge, G (2013). Proportion of Open Access Peer-Reviewed Papers at the European and World Levels—2004–2011. Brussels: Science-metrix; European Commission. Available at: http://www.science-metrix.com/pdf/SM_EC_OA_Availability_2004–2011.pdf [Last accessed 28 October 2015].

Arnold, D N and Cohn, H (2012). Mathematicians Take a Stand. Notices of the American Mathematical Society 59(6): 828–833, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1090/noti857

Bauer, B, Blechl, G, Bock, C, Danowski, P, Ferus, A, Graschopf, A, König, T, Mayer, K, Nentwich, M, Reckling, F, Rieck, K, Seitz, P, Stöger, H and Welzig, E (2015). Recommendations for the Transition to Open Access in Austria. Zenodo, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.34079

Björk, B-C and Solomon, D J (2014). Developing an Effective Market for Open Access Article Processing Charges. London: Wellcome Trust. Available at: https://www.fwf.ac.at/fileadmin/files/Dokumente/Downloads/Dev_Effective_Market_OA_Article_Processing_Charges.pdf [Last accessed 28 October 2015].

Borgman, C (2007). Scholarship in the Digital Age. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Cockerill, M (2006). The Economics of Open Access Publishing. Information Services and Use 26(2): 151–157. Available at: http://content.iospress.com/articles/information-services-and-use/isu499 [Last accessed 28 October 2015].

Davies, W (2014). The Limits of Neoliberalism: Authority, Sovereignty and the Logic of Competition. London: Sage, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781473906075

Department for Business, Innovation Skills (2015). Fulfilling Our Potential: Teaching Excellence, Social Mobility and Student Choice, Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/474266/BIS-15–623-fulfilling-our-potential-teaching-excellence-social-mobility-and-student-choice-accessible.pdf [Last accessed 6 November 2015].

Department for Education (1992). Further and Higher Education Act, Available at: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1992/13/contents [Last accessed 28 October 2015].

Directory of Open Access Journals (2015). Historical APC Data From Before the April Upgrade, Available at: https://doajournals.wordpress.com/2015/05/11/historical-apc-data-from-before-the-april-upgrade/ [Last accessed 7 November 2015].

Directory of Open Access Journals (2016). About DOAJ, Available at: https://doaj.org/about [Last accessed 31 January 2016].

Eve, M P (2014). Open Access and the Humanities: Contexts, Controversies and the Future. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316161012

Finch Group (2012). Accessibility, Sustainability, Excellence: How to Expand Access to Research Publications. Report of the Working Group on Expanding Access to Published Research Findings, Available at: http://www.researchinfonet.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Finch-Group-report-FINAL-VERSION.pdf [Last accessed 2 November 2015].

Gardner, C C and Gardner, G J (2015). Bypassing Interlibrary Loan Via Twitter: An Exploration of #icanhazpdf Requests In: Proceedings of ACRL 2015, Portland, Oregon: Available at: http://eprints.rclis.org/24847/ [Last accessed 9 November 2015].

Gillies, S (2014). Negotiating Author Fees for Hybrid OA Journals: Library Consortial Leadership. Collection Management 39(4): 231–252, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01462679.2014.935903

Gowers, T (2012). Elsevier — my part in its downfall. Available at: https://gowers.wordpress.com/2012/01/21/elsevier-my-part-in-its-downfall/ [Last accessed 9 November 2015].

Gowers, T (2014). Elsevier journals – some facts. Available at: https://gowers.wordpress.com/2014/04/24/elsevier-journals-some-facts/ [Last accessed 31 January 2016].

Gray, A (2015). Considering Non-Open Access Publication Charges in the “Total Cost of Publication”. Publications 3(4): 248–262, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/publications3040248

Gray, J (2014). Towards a Genealogy of Open Data. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2605828

Gray, J and Davies, T (2015). Fighting Phantom Firms in the UK: From Opening Up Datasets to Reshaping Data Infrastructures?. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2610937

Gutknecht, C (2014). Intransparenz bei den Bibliotheksausgaben von Schweizer Hochschulen, wisspub.net. Available at: http://wisspub.net/2014/10/13/intransparenz-bei-den-bibliotheksausgaben-von-schweizer-hochschulen/ [Last accessed 7 November 2015].

Heald, D (2012). Why is Transparency About Public Expenditure So Elusive?. International Review of Administrative Sciences 78(1): 30–49, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0020852311429931

HEFCE (2012). Recurrent Grants and Student Number Controls for 2012–13, Available at: http://www.hefce.ac.uk/media/hefce/content/pubs/2012/201208/12_08_1123.pdf [Last accessed 2 November 2015].

HEFCE (2014). Memorandum of Assurance and Accountability Between HEFCE and Institutions, Available at: http://www.hefce.ac.uk/media/hefce/content/pubs/2014/201412/HEFCE2014_12.pdf [Last accessed 28 October 2015].

HEFCE (2015). Recurrent Grants for 2015–16, Available at: http://www.hefce.ac.uk/media/HEFCE,2014/Content/Pubs/2015/201505/HEFCE2015_05.pdf [Last accessed 28 October 2015].

HESA (2015). Income of UK HE Providers, Available at: https://hesa.ac.uk/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1900&Itemid=634 [Last accessed 28 October 2015].

HM Treasury (2015). Spending Review and Autumn Statement 2015, Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/479745/HM_Blue_Book_Complete.pdf [Last accessed 25 November 2015].

Jisc (2014). Jisc Evidence to the Independent Review of the Implementation of RCUK Policy on Open Access, Available at: http://scholarlycommunications.jiscinvolve.org/wp/files/2014/09/Jisc-evidence-to-RC-OA-policy-review-20140910.docx [Last accessed 10 November 2015].

Jisc (n.d.). Monitoring Open Access Activity (Jisc Monitor), Available at: https://www.jisc.ac.uk/rd/projects/monitoring-open-access-activity [Last accessed 2 March 2016].

Jisc Collections (2015). APC Data Collection, Available at: https://www.jisc-collections.ac.uk/Jisc-Monitor/APC-data-collection/ [Last accessed 4 November 2015].

Kernohan, D (2015). So, how big a deal is unfunded research in UK HE?. Followers of the Apocalypse, Available at: http://followersoftheapocalyp.se/so-how-big-a-deal-is-unfunded-research-in-uk-he/ [Last accessed 31 January 2016].

Kiley, R and Terry, R (2006). Open Access to the Research Literature: A funders Perspective In: Jacobs, N ed. Open Access: Key Strategic, Technical and Economic Aspects. Oxford: Chandos Publishing, pp. 111–120. Available at: http://eprints.rclis.org/7531/ [Last accessed 31 January 2016].

Kingsley, D and Harnad, S (2015). Dutch universities plan Elsevier boycott — will this be a game changer or will publisher profits remain unaffected?. LSE Impact blog, Available at: http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2015/07/08/dutch-universities-boycott-elsevier/ [Last accessed 28 October 2015].

Larivière, V, Haustein, S and Mongeon, P (2015). The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era. PLOS ONE 10(6): e0127502.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127502

Lawson, S (2015). ‘Total Cost of Ownership’ of Scholarly Communication: Managing Subscription and APC Payments Together. Learned Publishing 28(1)DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1087/20150103

Lawson, S (2015a). Article Processing Charges Paid by 25 UK Universities in 2014. Journal of Open Humanities Data 1DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/johd.2

Lawson, S (2015b). APC Data for 25 UK Higher Education Institutions – 2014. figshare, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1305596

Lawson, S (2015c). APC Data for 27 UK Higher Education Institutions – 2015. figshare, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1507481

Lawson, S (2015d). Aggregated APC data 2014. figshare, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1311672

Lawson, S (2015e). 2015 (Jan–June) UK APC Data Combined. figshare, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1509860

Lawson, S (2015f). Average APC Price 2015. figshare, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1509861.v1

Lawson, S and Evans, A (2015). University of Oxford APCs 2015 (Jan-June). figshare, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1506829

Lawson, S and Meghreblian, B (2014). Journal Subscription Expenditure of UK Higher Education Institutions. F1000Research 3: 274.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.5706.2

Lawson, S, Meghreblian, B and Brook, M (2015). Journal Subscription Costs – FOIs to UK Universities. figshare, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1186832

London Economics (2015). Mind the Gap: Comparing Public Funding in Higher and Further Education. Resource Benchmarking Across Education Sectors in the United Kingdom, Available at: https://www.ucu.org.uk/media/736/London-Economics---final-report-Mind-the-gap-Comparing-public-funding-in-higher-and-further-education-19-Nov-15/pdf/londoneconomics_mindthegap-publicfundinginheandfe_fullreport_nov151.pdf [Last accessed 31 January 2016].

Marshall, J P, Goodman, J, Zowghi, D and da Rimini, F (2015). Disorder and the Disinformation Society: The Social Dynamics of Information, Networks and Software. London: Routledge.

McGettigan, A (2013). The Great University Gamble: Money, Markets, and the Future of Higher Education. London: Pluto Press.

McGettigan, A (2015). The Accounting and Budgeting of Student Loans, HEPI report 75. Available at: http://www.hepi.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/Accounting-and-Budgeting-FINAL.pdf [Last accessed 7 November 2015].

McGuigan, G S (2004). Publishing Perils in Academe. Journal of Business & Finance Librarianship 10(1): 13–26, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J109v10n01_03

Morgan, J (2016). Student loan write-off estimate lowered to 20–25%. Times Higher Education, February 10 2016 Available at: https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/student-loan-write-estimate-lowered-20–25 [Last accessed 12 February 2016].

Morris, S, Barnas, E, LaFrenier, D and Reich, M (2013). The Handbook of Journal Publishing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139107860

Nature Publishing Group (n.d.). Open Access, Available at: http://www.nature.com/ncomms/open_access/index.html [Last accessed 18 January 2016].

Neylon, T (2012). The Cost of Knowledge. Available at: http://thecostofknowledge.com/ [Last accessed 9 November 2015].

Panitch, J M and Michalak, S (2005). The Serials Crisis. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina.

Pinfield, S and Middleton, C (2016). Researchers’ Adoption of an Institutional Central Fund for Open-Access Article-Processing Charges: A Case Study Using Innovation Diffusion Theory. SAGE Open, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2158244015625447

Pinfield, S, Salter, J and Bath, P A (2015). The “Total Cost of Publication” in a Hybrid Open-Access Environment: Institutional Approaches to Funding Journal Article-Processing Charges in Combination with Subscriptions. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.23446 early view.

Power, M (1999). The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification. Oxford: Oxford University Press, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198296034.001.0001

RCUK (2013). RCUK Policy on Open Access and Supporting Guidance, Available at: http://www.rcuk.ac.uk/RCUK-prod/assets/documents/documents/RCUKOpenAccessPolicy.pdf [Last accessed 2 November 2015].

RCUK (2013a). RCUK Announces Block Grants for Universities to Aid Drives to Open Access to Research Outputs, Available at: http://www.rcuk.ac.uk/media/news/121108/ [Last accessed 2 November 2015].

RCUK (2014). RCUK APC Fund Distribution, Available at: http://www.rcuk.ac.uk/RCUK-prod/assets/documents/documents/RCUK_APCfundDistribution.pdf [Last accessed 3 November 2015].

RCUK (2015). Government Funding, Available at: http://www.rcuk.ac.uk/about/aboutrcs/governmentfunding/ [Last accessed 2 November 2015].

Reckling, F and Rieck, K (2015). Austrian Science Fund (FWF) Publication Cost Data 2014. Figshare, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1378610

Research Information Network (2010). Challenges for Academic Libraries in Difficult Economic Times. London: Research Information Network. Available at: http://www.rin.ac.uk/system/files/attachments/Challenges-for-libraries-FINAL-March10.pdf [Last accessed 8 November 2015].

Research Information Network (2015). Monitoring the Transition to Open Access: A Report for the Universities UK Open Access Co-ordination Group, Available at: http://www.researchinfonet.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/Full-report-FINAL-AS-PUBLISHED.pdf [Last accessed 31 January 2016].

Shieber, S M (2009). Equity for Open-Access Journal Publishing. PLOS Biology 7(8): e1000165.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000165

Sikora, A and Geschuhn, K (2015). Management of Article Processing Charges – Challenges for Libraries. Insights 29(2)DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1629/uksg.229

Suber, P (2012). Open Access. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Available at: https://mitpress.mit.edu/sites/default/files/9780262517638_Open_Access_PDF_Version.pdf [Last accessed 28 October 2015].

The Economist (2012). The Price of Information. The Economist, February 4 2012 Available at: http://www.economist.com/node/21545974 [Last accessed 9 November 2015].

Universities Superannuation Scheme (2015). USS Top 100 Investments, Available at: http://www.uss.co.uk/UssInvestments/InvestmentsTypes/Equities/Pages/USStop100investments.aspx [Last accessed 18 January 2016].

Ware, M and Mabe, M (2015). The STM Report: An Overview of Scientific and Scholarly Journal Publishing. 4th ed. The Hague: International Association of Scientific, Technical and Medical Publishers. Available at: http://www.stm-assoc.org/2015_02_20_STM_Report_2015.pdf [Last accessed 28 October 2015].

Wellcome Trust (2015). Annual Review 2014. London: Wellcome Trust. Available at: http://www.wellcome.ac.uk/stellent/groups/corporatesite/.sf_cross_cutting_activities/documents/web_document/wtp058192.pdf [Last accessed 13 November 2015].

Wellcome Trust (2015a). The Reckoning: An Analysis of Wellcome Trust Open Access Spend 2013–14. Available at: http://blog.wellcome.ac.uk/2015/03/03/the-reckoning-an-analysis-of-wellcome-trust-open-access-spend-2013–14/ [Last accessed 28 October 2015].

Wexler, E (2015). What Open-Access Publishing Actually Costs. Chronicle of Higher Education, November 9 2015 Available at: http://chronicle.com/article/What-Open-Access-Publishing/234108 [Last accessed 9 November 2015].

Wijkhuijs, J (2015). Dutch Universities Start their Elsevier Boycott Plan. Univers, Available at: https://universonline.nl/2015/07/02/dutch-universities-start-their-elsevier-boycott-plan [Last accessed 9 November 2015].

Wilson, M C (2014). Market Failure in the Research World. Public Address, Available at: http://publicaddress.net/9549 [Last accessed 7 November 2015].

Worthy, B (2013). David Cameron’s Transparency Revolution? The Impact of Open Data in the UK, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2361428

Young, P (2009). The Serials Crisis and Open Access: A White Paper for the Virginia Tech Commission on Research. Virginia Tech. Available at: https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/handle/10919/11317 [Last accessed 9 November 2015].


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
Contact us
Send email Sponsors
Sponsor: AIMS Sponsor: D&P Sponsor: UniNa CAB Get connected
Facebook Facebook Twitter Twitter Linkedin LinkedIn RSS RSS