Of hopes, villains and Trojan horses – Open Access academic publishing and its battlefields

Šimukovič, Elena Of hopes, villains and Trojan horses – Open Access academic publishing and its battlefields., 2016 Doctoral research proposal / PhD thesis, University of Vienna. [Thesis]

[img] Text
Simukovic_2016_OA-Doctoral-research-proposal.pdf - Updated version
Download (344kB)

English abstract

In this doctoral research proposal the author deals with "Open Access", a vision of a free online availability of scholarly journal literature that has been put forward in the early 2000s. More than a decade later, Open Access has gathered momentum and became a widespread phenomenon with several (inter-)national strategies currently being pursued towards a radical transformation of the academic publishing world. Should the extreme scenario as proposed by some actors succeed, budgets of academic libraries would be fully shifted from conventional journal subscriptions model ("pay-to-read") towards publishing all research articles in Open Access journals ("pay-to-say"). However, the effects and dynamics that such a transition would unleash in the global knowledge regime remain largely unexplored. In order to answer the research questions, ongoing negotiations on Open Access publishing between the Association of Universities in the Netherlands (VSNU) and the academic publisher Elsevier as well as Dutch researchers' perceptions on the implications of these negotiations for their own publication practices will serve as empirical basis. Situational analysis developed by Adele E. Clarke (2005) will be used as an overall frame for data collection and analysis.

Item type: Thesis (UNSPECIFIED)
Keywords: Open Access, academic publishing, science policy, the Netherlands
Subjects: A. Theoretical and general aspects of libraries and information. > AC. Relationship of LIS with other fields .
B. Information use and sociology of information
E. Publishing and legal issues.
E. Publishing and legal issues. > ED. Intellectual property: author's rights, ownership, copyright, copyleft, open access.
Depositing user: Elena Šimukovič
Date deposited: 03 May 2016 15:48
Last modified: 03 May 2016 15:48
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/29265

References

Adema, J. (2014). Open Access. Critical Keywords for the Digital Humanities. Retrieved from http://cdckeywords.leuphana.com/open_access/ [accessed on 14/06/15]

Adema, J. (2015). Knowledge Production Beyond The Book? Performing the Scholarly Monograph in Contemporary Digital Culture (PhD Thesis). Coventry University, Coventry. Retrieved from http://curve.coventry.ac.uk/open/items/8222ccb2-f6b0-4e5f-90de-f4c62c77ac86/1/

Akrich, M. (1992). The de-scription of technical objects. In W. E. Bijker & J. Law (Eds.), Inside technology. Shaping technology/building society. Studies in sociotechnical change (pp. 205–224). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Anderson, K. (2012). The “Academic Spring” — Shallow Rhetoric Aimed at the Wrong Target. The Scholarly Kitchen blog. Retrieved from http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2012/04/12/the-academic-spring-shallo-rhetoric-aimed-at-the-wrong-target/

Antelman, K. (2006). Self-archiving practice and the influence of publisher policies in the social sciences. Learned Publishing, 19(2), 85–95. doi:10.1087/095315106776387011

Association of Universities in the Netherlands (VSNU). (2015). Dutch Universities and Elsevier reach agreement in principle on Open Access and subscription. The Hague/Amsterdam. Retrieved from http://vsnu.nl/en_GB/news-items/nieuwsbericht/241-dutch-universities-and-elsevier-reach-agreement-in-principle-on-open-access-and-subscription.html

Bauer, B., Blechl, G., Bock, C., Danowski, P., Ferus, A., Graschopf, A., . . . Welzig, E. (2015). Recommendations for the Transition to Open Access in Austria. doi:10.5281/zenodo.34079

Bazerman, C. (1988). Shaping written knowledge: The genre and activity of the experimental article in science. Rhetoric of the human sciences. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

Bensaude Vincent, B. (2014). The politics of buzzwords at the interface of technoscience, market and society: the case of 'public engagement in science'. Public understanding of science, 23(3), 238–253. doi:10.1177/0963662513515371

Berghmans, S. (2015). Changes in Scientific Communication – a culture of openness [video recording]. Zürich: Open-Access-Tage 2015. Retrieved from https://cast.switch.ch/vod/clips/1kn6m93rdb/

Björk, B.-C. (2013). Open Access - Are the Barriers to Change Receding? Publications, 1(1), 5–15. doi:10.3390/publications1010005

Björk, B.-C. & Solomon, D. (2014). Developing an Effective Market for Open Access Article Processing Charges. Final Report to a consortium of research funders comprising Jisc, Research Libraries UK, Research Councils UK, the Wellcome Trust, the Austrian Science Fund, the Luxembourg National Research Fund and the Max Planck Institute for Gravitational Physics. Retrieved from http://www.wellcome.ac.uk/About-us/Policy/Spotlight-issues/Open-access/Guides/WTP054773.htm

Bohannon, J. (2015). In unique deal, Elsevier agrees to make some papers by Dutch authors free. Science News. doi:10.1126/science.aad7565

Bonaccorso, E., Bozhankova, R., Cadena, C. D., Čapská, V., Czerniewicz, L., Emmett, A., . . . Tykarski, P. (2014). Bottlenecks in the Open-Access System: Voices from Around the Globe. Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication, 2(2). doi:10.7710/2162-3309.1126

Brienza, C. (2012). Opening the Wrong Gate? The Academic Spring and Scholarly Publishing in the Humanities and Social Sciences. Publishing Research Quarterly, 28(3), 159–171. doi:10.1007/s12109-012-9272-5

Brintzinger, K.-R. (2010). Piraterie oder Allmende der Wissenschaften? Leviathan, 38(3), 331–346. doi:10.1007/s11578-010-0095-5

Bruch, C., Geschuhn, K., Hanig, K., Hillenkötter, C., Pampel, H., Schäffler, H., . . . Tullney, M. (2016). Empfehlungen zur Open-Access-Transformation: Strategische und praktische Verankerung von Open Access in der Informationsversorgung wissenschaftlicher Einrichtungen. Empfehlungen der Ad-hoc-AG Open-Access-Gold im Rahmen der Schwerpunktinitiative „Digitale Information“ der Allianz der deutschen Wissenschaftsorganisationen. Retrieved from http://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/12962

Budapest Open Access Initiative. (2002). Budapest Open Access Initiative. BOAI declaration. Retrieved from http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/

Butler, D. (2016). Dutch lead European push to flip journals to open access. Nature, 529(7584), 13. doi:10.1038/529013a

Canagarajah, A. S. (2002). A geopolitics of academic writing. Pittsburgh series in composition, literacy, and culture. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.

Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London, Thousand Oaks, Calif.: SAGE Publications.

Clarke, A. E. (2005). Situational analysis: Grounded theory after the postmodern turn. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: SAGE Publications.

Clarke, A. E., Friese, C., & Washburn, R. (Eds.). (2015). Situational analysis in practice: Mapping research with grounded theory. Walnut Creek, Calif.: Left Coast Press.

Corrall, S., & Pinfield, S. (2014). Coherence of "Open" Initiatives in Higher Education and Research: Framing a Policy Agenda. In Maxi Kindling & Elke Greifeneder (Eds.), iConference 2014 Proceedings: Breaking Down Walls. Culture - Context - Computing (pp. 293–313). Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/2142/47316

Crawford, W. (2011). Open access: What you need to know now. ALA Editons: special reports. Chicago Ill.: American Library Association. Retrieved from http://lib.myilibrary.com/?id=309349

Czerniewicz, L., & Goodier, S. (2014). Open access in South Africa: A case study and reflections. South African Journal of Science, 110(9/10), 1–9. doi:10.1590/sajs.2014/20140111

European Commission. (2015). Commissioner Moedas and Secretary of State Dekker call on scientific publishers to adapt their business models to new realities. Brussels. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/commission/2014-2019/moedas/announcements/commissioner-moedas-and-secretary-state-dekker-call-scientific-publishers-adapt-their-business_en

Felt, U., Igelsböck, J., Schikowitz, A., & Völker, T. (2016). Transdisciplinary Sustainability Research in Practice: Between Imaginaries of Collective Experimentation and Entrenched Academic Value Orders. Science, Technology & Human Values. doi:10.1177/0162243915626989

Felt, U., & Wynne, B. (2007). Taking European knowledge society seriously: Report of the Expert Group on Science and Governance to the Science, Economy and Society Directorate, Directorate-General for Research, European Commission ([1st ed.]). EUR (Series): Vol. 22700. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.

Fuchs, C., & Sandoval, M. (2013). The Diamond Model of Open Access Publishing: Why Policy Makers, Scholars, Universities, Libraries, Labour Unions and the Publishing World Need to Take Non-Commercial, Non-Profit Open Access Serious. tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique, 11(2), 428–443. Retrieved from http://triplec.at/index.php/tripleC/article/view/502

Gradmann, S. (2008). Ist elektronisches Publizieren eine Aufgabe von Bibliotheken? Abweichlerische Gedanken zu einer scheinbaren Selbstverständlichkeit. In E. Hutzler, A. Schröder, & G. Schweikl (Eds.), Bibliotheken gestalten Zukunft. Kooperative Wege zur Digitalen Bibliothek (pp. 149–156). Universitätsverlag Göttingen.

Guédon, J.-C. (2001). In Oldenburg's long shadow: Librarians, research scientists, publishers, and the control of scientific publishing. Washington, D.C.: Association of Research Libraries. Retrieved from http://www.arl.org/storage/documents/publications/in-oldenburgs-long-shadow.pdf

Hagner, M. (2015). Zur Sache des Buches. Göttingen: Wallstein.

Haider, J. (2008). Open Access and Closed Discourses. Constructing Open Access as a ‘Development’ Issue (Dissertation). City University London, London. Retrieved from http://lup.lub.lu.se/record/1544653

Haider, J. (2012). Open Access hinter verschlossenen Türen oder wie sich Open Access im und mit dem Entwicklungsdiskurs arrangiert. In U. Herb (Ed.), Saarbrücker Schriften zur Informationswissenschaft. Open initiatives. Offenheit in der digitalen Welt und Wissenschaft (pp. 65–84). Saarbrücken: Universaar. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10760/17229

Hajer, M. (1993). Discourse Coalitions and the Institutionalisation of Practice: The Case of Acid Rain in Great Britain. In F. Fischer & J. Forester (Eds.), The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning (pp. 43–67). London: UCL.

Hajer, M. (2006). Doing discourse analysis: coalitions, practices, meaning. In Brink, Margo van den & T. Metze (Eds.), Netherlands geographical studies: Vol. 344. Words matter in policy and planning. Discourse theory and method in the social sciences (pp. 65–74). Utrecht: Koninklijk Nederlands Aardrijkskundig Genootschap; Netherlands Graduate School of Urban and Regional Research.

Harnad, S. (2012). Finch Report, a Trojan Horse, Serves Publishing Industry Interests Instead of UK Research Interests. Retrieved from http://openaccess.eprints.org/index.php?/archives/904-Finch-Report,-a-Trojan-Horse,-Serves-Publishing-Industry-Interests-Instead-of-UK-Research-Interests.html

Hecht, G. (2001). Technology, Politics, and National Identity in France. In M. T. Allen & G. Hecht (Eds.), Technologies of power. Essays in honor of Thomas Parke Hughes and Agatha Chipley Hughes (pp. 253–294). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Herb, U. (2010). Sociological implications of scientific publishing: Open access, science, society, democracy and the digital divide. First Monday, 15(2). doi:10.5210/fm.v15i2.2599

Hofmann, J. (2014). Open Access: Ein Lackmustest (Preprint version). In T. Dreier, V. Fischer, A. van Raay, & Spiecker gen. Döhmann, Indra (Eds.) (2016), Studien zur Informationsfreiheit. Informationen der öffentlichen Hand. Zugang und Nutzung (1st ed.). Baden-Baden: Nomos. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=2515844

Kingsley, D. (2007). The journal is dead, long live the journal. On the Horizon, 15(4), 211–221. doi:10.1108/10748120710836237

Kuipers, T. & van der Hoeven, J. (2009). Insight into digital preservation of research output in Europe: Survey report D3.4. Retrieved from http://www.parse-insight.eu/downloads/PARSE-Insight_D3-4_SurveyReport_final_hq.pdf

Laakso, M. (2014). Green open access policies of scholarly journal publishers: a study of what, when, and where self-archiving is allowed. Scientometrics, 99(2), 475–494. doi:10.1007/s11192-013-1205-3

Laakso, M., Welling, P., Bukvova, H., Nyman, L., Björk, B.-C., & Hedlund, T. (2011). The development of open access journal publishing from 1993 to 2009. PLoS ONE, 6(6), e20961. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0020961

Larivière, V., Haustein, S., & Mongeon, P. (2015). The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era. PLoS ONE, 10(6), e0127502. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0127502

League of European Research Universities (LERU). (2015). Christmas is over. Research funding should go to research, not to publishers!: Moving Forwards on Open Access. LERU Statement for the 2016 Dutch EU Presidency. Leuven. Retrieved from http://www.leru.org/index.php/public/extra/signtheLERUstatement/

League of European Research Universities (LERU). (2016). The academic world urges publishers to enter a brave new world. Retrieved from http://www.leru.org/index.php/public/news/the-academic-world-urges-publishers-to-enter-a-brave-new-world/

Meier zu Verl, C., & Horstmann, W. (Eds.). (2011). Studies on Subject-Specific Requirements for Open Access Infrastructure. Bielefeld. doi:10.2390/PUB-2011-3

Merton, R. K. (1968). The Matthew Effect in Science: The reward and communication systems of science are considered. Science (New York, N.Y.), 159(3810), 56–63. doi:10.1126/science.159.3810.56

Ministry of Education, Culture and Science. (2014). Open Access to publications. Parliamentary document. Retrieved from https://www.government.nl/documents/parliamentary-documents/2014/01/21/open-access-to-publications

Ministry of Education, Culture and Science. (2015). Non-paper on open science: open access to publications and data. Retrieved from https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/documenten/publicaties/2015/03/23/non-paper-open-acces-to-publications-and-data

Pinfield, S. (2013). Is scholarly publishing going from crisis to crisis? Learned Publishing, 26(2), 85–88. doi:10.1087/20130204

Rieck, K., Haslinger, D., Meischke-Ilic, S., Kirindi-Hentschel, Ü., & Reckling, F. (2016). Austrian Science Fund (FWF) Publication Cost Data 2015. Report. Retrieved from https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.3180166.v1

Schimmer, R., Geschuhn, K. K., & Vogler, A. (2015). Disrupting the subscription journals’ business model for the necessary large-scale transformation to open access. doi:10.17617/1.3. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0026-C274-7

Somers, M. R. (1994). The narrative constitution of identity: A relational and network approach. Theory and Society, 23(5), 605–649. doi:10.1007/BF00992905

SPARC & PLoS. (2014). HowOpenIsIt? Open Access Spectrum. Version 2.0. Licensed under CC BY. Retrieved from https://www.plos.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/hoii-guide_V2_FINAL.pdf

Star, S. L. (Ed.). (1995). Ecologies of knowledge: Work and politics in science and technology. SUNY series in science, technology, and society. Albany: State University of New York Press.

Suber, P. (2012). Open access. MIT Press essential knowledge. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.

Taubert, N. (2014). Green Open Access in Mathematik und Astronomie. In H. Parthey & W. Umstätter (Eds.), Wissenschaftsforschung: Jahrbuch 2013. Forschung und Publikation in der Wissenschaft (pp. 41–77). Berlin: wvb.

The Cost of Knowledge. (2012). Statement of Purpose. Retrieved from https://gowers.files.wordpress.com/2012/02/elsevierstatementfinal.pdf

The price of information: Academics are starting to boycott a big publisher of journals (2012, February 4). The Economist. Retrieved from http://www.economist.com/node/21545974

Tüür-Fröhlich, T. (2012). The European sciences: How "open" are they for women? A review of the literature. In U. Herb (Ed.), Saarbrücker Schriften zur Informationswissenschaft. Open initiatives. Offenheit in der digitalen Welt und Wissenschaft (pp. 85–106). Saarbrücken: Universaar. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10760/16938

Viehöver, W. (2001). Diskurse als Narrationen. In R. Keller, A. Hirseland, W. Schneider, & W. Viehöver (Eds.), Handbuch Sozialwissenschaftliche Diskursanalyse. Band I: Theorien und Methoden (pp. 177–206). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

Ware, M., & Mabe, M. (2015). The STM Report: An overview of scientific and scholarly journal publishing. Fourth Edition. Retrieved from http://www.stm-assoc.org/2015_02_20_STM_Report_2015.pdf


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
Contact us
Send email Sponsors
Sponsor: AIMS Sponsor: D&P Sponsor: UniNa CAB Get connected
Facebook Facebook Twitter Twitter Linkedin LinkedIn RSS RSS